Skip to main content

USA | Why an Emory physician built a second career as a death penalty expert

After it intersected with his job as an anesthesiologist, Dr. Joel Zivot devoted years to studying the death penalty. Now, he's concerned about a new form of execution, nitrogen hypoxia, which was used in Alabama for the first time in January.

Dr. Joel Zivot first began researching the death penalty 12 years ago when it suddenly affected his day job. As an anesthesiologist in the ICU at Emory University Hospital, Zivot frequently used the drug sodium thiopental. But in 2011, the drug disappeared from the market and caused a drastic shortage in ICUs across the country. When Zivot looked into the cause of the shortage, he found the drug was pulled by manufacturer Hospira after they couldn’t promise the European Union—who threatened to ban the export of lethal injection drugs—that sodium thiopental wasn’t used for executions. “I felt outraged that this drug I used to heal could also be involved in [lethal injection],” says Zivot.

He still works in critical care at Emory, but his feelings following that sodium thiopental shortage turned into a second career dedicated to studying lethal injection and its medical effects. For the past decade, Zivot has acted as a medical expert in numerous death penalty cases throughout the South. Legal defense teams seek him out for medical examinations before execution, for expert testimony in court, and, in rare cases, for autopsies to assess a victim’s experience during execution. In his research, Zivot has found that lethal injection victims often die of pulmonary edema, or fluid in the lungs, instead of the drugs stopping the heart, which is the intended, painless cause of death in an execution. Pulmonary edema instead causes a painful experience similar to drowning.

“I’m not an abolitionist of the death penalty, but I’d call myself an agnostic,” Zivot says, “My angle here became that if capital punishment is a technical act, it has to be done technically correct.”

Today, his attention has shifted to a new method of execution, nitrogen hypoxia, that Zivot believes also induces pain for a person on death row. On January 26, Kenneth Smith, an Alabama man convicted in 1988 for a murder-for-hire killing, was the first person to be executed in the United States by nitrogen hypoxia. On a gurney in a prison in Atmore, Alabama, Smith died by breathing nitrogen gas through a face mask, depriving him of oxygen. State officials said prior to the execution that the nitrogen would render Smith unconscious within a few seconds. According to five Alabama journalists who witnessed the execution, that didn’t happen. Smith held his breath until he couldn’t, appeared conscious for several minutes, and then “shook and writhed” on the gurney for two minutes. One of those reporters said that of the five executions he had witnessed, it was the most violent reaction he had seen. From the first flow of gas to the time of death, the execution took 22 minutes.

Zivot credits his passion for death penalty ethics to his background. His family of lawyers taught him to argue with evidence and expertise. Growing up and practicing medicine in Canada before moving to Atlanta also affected his perception of lethal injection as abnormal compared to his American medical peers, he says.

After the sodium thiopental shortage, he spent two years further researching the medical act of lethal injection, using resources from the Death Penalty Information Center in Washington D.C. By 2013, Zivot was ready to bring his medical expertise to the public; he wrote an opinion piece for USA Today highlighting how the controversy of drugs used in lethal injections could lead to hospital shortages like he had experienced. The article gained the attention of a legal defense team of a person on death row in Florida, who consulted Zivot to examine their client for any health issues that could complicate lethal injection. It was unlike any medical examination he performed, Zivot says, with the man “completely shackled head to toe.” Zivot looked at the prisoner’s feet for peripheral circulation, vascular disease, or any other ailment that might impede state officials from accessing a vein. But he didn’t find any health issues, and the man was later executed.

“Around a death penalty case, we’re told maximally evocative stories about a convict’s transformation, or that these horrible murderers are owed nothing in return,” Zivot says. “It occurred to me, acting as a physician in Florida, that those narratives were false. They are owed not to be tortured or punished in a cruel way.”

Zivot went back to school to learn about the ethical and legal nuances of the death penalty. In six years he earned both a master’s degree in bioethics and a law degree from Emory. He continued to medically examine people on death row and write opinion pieces on the cruelty of lethal injection for the Guardian, CNN, Slate, and more. “I wanted to use science and medicine to expose techniques that are cruel,” Zivot says, “But it’s extremely difficult to get the public to see science for such an emotional issue.”

Zivot says that another roadblock in his work is bureaucracy. “I’d be given the protocol of an execution technique [from a state’s corrections department] with the entire document redacted,” Zivot says. “I don’t know who is involved or what the plan is, so they have blanket immunity if something were to go wrong.” In 2018, he obtained 250 autopsies of executions from lethal injection in the U.S. and found that victims died from pulmonary edema 80 percent of the time. Zivot presented his findings to the U.S. Supreme Court as part of his expert testimony in Bucklew v. Precythe, a case on the behalf of Rusty Bucklew, who was on death row in Missouri. Zivot argued that lethal injection violated the cruel and unusual punishment clause of the 8th Amendment, pointing to his research that lethal injection often did not result in a painless stopping of the heart. The court ruled against Bucklew, with the majority opinion defining the death penalty as justifiable as long as “it does not intend pain.”

​​“It’s frustrating for me because death is an abstraction for the people making these decisions, when treating death is part of my job in the ICU,” Zivot says, “They justify killing a person who did something terrible, but everyone still deserves to not be tortured.”

Zivot first worked with Kenneth Smith when, on behalf of Smith’s legal team, he examined him following a failed execution attempt by lethal injection in 2022. When Zivot later learned that nitrogen hypoxia could be used to execute Smith, he decided to take a more public approach for his argument against the process. “I realized that I’ve been losing every time [I argued against lethal injection], and 100 percent of these guys I worked with were killed in a cruel way,” Zivot says, “So I needed a new strategy.”

He stated in a letter to the United Nations in early January that the physical experience of involuntarily breathing pure nitrogen would amount to torture for Smith. A successful death by nitrogen hypoxia requires natural breathing, which is unlikely when a human faces death, Zivot wrote. He pointed to a study of volunteers who breathed in small amounts of pure nitrogen and experienced convulsions and seizures that induced vomiting and choking. The UN made a statement saying they were “alarmed” over the “untested method.” Alabama officials still pushed forward with the execution.

In a news conference after Smith’s execution, Alabama attorney general Steve Marshall called the execution “textbook” and said that nitrogen hypoxia is now “a proven method” that could offer “a blueprint for other states.” Alabama, Mississippi, and Oklahoma are the only states who have legalized executions via nitrogen, but other states could follow.

The reports of the journalists who attended Smith’s execution affirmed for Zivot the concerns he outlined in his UN letter. “The state will say it was a success and give an information underload for the execution,” Zivot says. “Ultimately, the goal is to produce a corpse.”

He plans to continue following cases of both lethal injection and nitrogen hypoxia. Alabama plans to use it for 43 more inmates on death row. “I feel compelled to keep going and expose techniques that are cruel and, to me, impersonations of science,” says Zivot. “This work has made me feel so grateful for my own life and privilege. The responsibility of the privileged is to roll up their sleeves and try to make the world better.”

Source: atlantamagazine.com, Xavier Stevens, February 22, 2024

_____________________________________________________________________










SUPPORT DEATH PENALTY NEWS





Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight.  In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution.  Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order. 

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

Alabama | Judge bars nitrogen gas execution, says method is unconstitutionally cruel

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- A federal judge on Tuesday permanently blocked Alabama from executing an inmate with nitrogen gas after declaring it violates the ban on cruel and unusual punishment. U.S. District Judge Emily Marks issued the ruling hours after an appeals court reversed her initial finding that the method was constitutional. Marks permanently enjoined the state from executing Jeffrey Lee, 49, by nitrogen gas. He was scheduled to be executed Thursday. The decision, for now, blocks the use of the controversial new execution method that the state has championed since 2024, but the issue will likely end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Idaho will soon turn to firing squad executions. Police will pull the triggers

Trained members of Idaho law enforcement with demonstrated firearms proficiency are expected to fill slots for carrying out the death penalty by firing squad as the state prison system transitions to the controversial execution method next month.  Six volunteers certified for no less than three years apiece through Peace Officer Standards and Training, or POST, will be recruited to ensure the Idaho Department of Correction is ready to comply with a state law that prioritizes shooting prisoners to death over lethal injection starting July 1.  No one on the team may have faced disciplinary action over firearms, use of force, or related conduct over the prior year, according to new execution protocols the prison system released this week. 

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.