Skip to main content

Nazira's brother was hanged because of Singapore's tough drug laws. Are they working?

As Malaysia releases drug offenders from death row, its close neighbour Singapore has re-started executions for drug offences, with the government saying its policy is working. But drug reform advocates have a different view.

Nazira Lajim (pictured, pre-execution photoshoot) remembers her brother looking healthy the night before he was hanged.

"He told me 'never mind; it's my fate'," she recalls. "He was very strong. He kept smiling. He was 64 years old."

Nazeri bin Lajim was executed by the Singaporean government on 22 July 2022, more than a decade after being charged with trafficking of "no less than 35.41 grams of diamorphine (pure heroin)".

The site of his execution, Changi Prison, sits just 25km from the Johor Causeway, a 1km bridge separating Singapore from its close neighbour, Malaysia.

This is one of the world's busiest border crossings, with more than 300,000 people travelling between the two countries every day. For drug dealers and mules, however, the causeway has become the boundary separating life from state-sanctioned death.

On the Malaysian side, at least 30 convicted drug offenders on death row have had their sentences commuted over the past month, after the government officially repealed the mandatory death penalty earlier this year — a move widely celebrated by human rights activists.

Meanwhile, on the Singaporean side, at least 16 drug offenders have been hanged since April 2022, when the government resumed state executions after a two-year hiatus because of the COVID-19 pandemic. At least 50 more are believed to remain on death row, awaiting the same fate.

The contrast is severe.

While Malaysia has joined the majority of jurisdictions that are choosing to do away with the mandatory death penalty, the tiny city-state hugging its southern tip has dug in its heels on what now constitute some of the world’s harshest anti-narcotics policies.

In violation of international law, Singapore is one of six jurisdictions globally—including China, Iran, North Korea, Vietnam and Saudi Arabia—that continues to execute people for drug offences. Anyone caught with at least 30g of morphine, 15g of diamorphine (heroin), 500g of cannabis, 30g of cocaine or 250g of methamphetamine can be sentenced and hanged for drug trafficking.

A growing chorus of voices is calling to change that. Abolitionist groups argue that not only are Singapore’s harsh narcotics laws ineffective at targeting the key players within drug syndicates, they also disproportionately affect people from already marginalised groups, such as ethnic minorities and those experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage.

Many of these are people who have taken up drug crime out of desperation, becoming street-level dealers and mules as a means of survival. Many of them also habitually use drugs, like Nazeri did.

"My brother was a drug addict at the age of 14," Nazira says. "He came from a very poor family, and he's not educated, so he got hooked on drugs."

"That's why they hanged him: because he had drugs in his hand."

Who gets executed in Singapore


The majority of death sentences in Southeast Asia are for nonviolent, drug-related offences. And in several nations, those numbers are trending upwards.

Indonesia, for example, sentenced 122 people to death for drug offences in 2022, a 37 per cent increase from the year before. Like Singapore, most of those incarcerated for drug offences in Indonesia tend to be from socially disadvantaged backgrounds.

Unlike Singapore, however, Indonesia hasn't executed anyone since 2016. During that same period, Singapore hanged at least 41 people. And while Indonesian legislators are considering a probationary death penalty, where prisoners could be given alternative sentences after 10 years if certain conditions are met, Singaporean authorities remain vocally defensive of the need to execute criminals.

"Capital punishment has deterred drug trafficking and kept Singapore's domestic drug situation well under control," said Umej Bhatia, Singapore's permanent representative to the United Nations Office, in a letter to the UN in May 2022.

"Consequently, we have avoided the crimes and suffering that many societies with liberal drug laws have had to live with."

This deterrence factor is the linchpin in the Singapore government's defence of the death penalty. But abolition advocates denounce claims that such a tough approach is achieving its stated aim to throttle supply chains, disrupt syndicates, and catch kingpins.

Kirsten Han is an anti-death penalty activist and member of the Transformative Justice Collective and has worked alongside families of death row inmates since 2010.

"There's this very widespread narrative that's perpetuated by the government that by killing people we are saving lives," she told SBS Dateline.

"I used to have the same assumption that only the most hardened drug lords get executed. Then when I came to this issue I was shocked to discover that they are drug mules, that they are people from impoverished backgrounds, that they are people in desperate circumstances, that they are ethnic minorities — that really the marginalised segments of society are on death row."

Nazeri fit the bill. He was no kingpin, but merely a drug user, from an impoverished background and desperate circumstances, who as a member of the Malay ethnic minority was already statistically more likely to face state execution.



A 2021 UN report found that although Malays — a majority Muslim people who have historically endured racial discrimination and Islamophobia in Singapore — account for only about 15 per cent of the nation's population, they make up 84 per cent of executions for drug trafficking.

"I feel that my brother has been discriminated [against]—by the law, by the government, by the judge," Nazira said. "We've been discriminated [against]."

While Nazeri admitted to the court that he intended to sell a portion of the drugs found in his possession, Nazira says he needed the money to make a livable income, since social stigma had made it almost impossible for him to get a job.

Tough approach may be helping drug lords


Not only is Singapore's death row dragnet failing to bring in the big fish, but the government's hard-on-drugs approach may be helping the real kingpins rake in higher profits.

Dobby Chew, executive coordinator of the Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network, said the relatively high price of drugs in the city-state had stimulated the opposite of a deterrent effect.

For drug traffickers, high risk is compensated by high reward.

"Singapore really doubled down on this idea that 'our drug policy is an effective deterrence and it has really helped restrict the flow of drugs'," Chew told SBS Dateline.

"[But] at the same time, what the users indicated was drug prices. We saw that information out there in public, and then we could get the same kind of information from the Malaysian side of the fence."

The cross-border inflation in these prices was sharp, Chew explained.

"Heroin, for example, is almost 21 times the value just by crossing the causeway from Malaysia to Singapore," he said.

"So if you look at it financially and economically, it really incentivizes trafficking syndicates to want to traffic more over—because the same amount of stuff, regardless of purity, goes up that much in value the moment you cross one bridge."

How Malaysia is different


Siti Zabidah Muhammad Rasyid lives on the north side of that bridge, in Malaysia. Her son, Razali, was sentenced to death in 2003 after being caught with 851 grams of cannabis.

"Twenty years I suffered, as a mother, alone," Siti told SBS Dateline.

The 66-year-old explained how she sold all of her possessions and spent the majority of her pension paying for lawyers and legal appeals. Three times she appealed to the courts, and three times she was unsuccessful.

Then, on 16 November this year, after 20 years on death row, Razali was released. Malaysia’s parliament repealed the country’s mandatory death penalty in April, offering more than 1,300 people the chance to seek a sentencing review.

"We cannot arbitrarily ignore the existence of the inherent right to life of every individual," deputy law minister Ramkarpal Singh said during a debate in Malaysia's lower house to pass the reform.

"The death penalty has not brought the results it was intended to bring."

For those who are granted a sentencing review, it is now up to the courts to decide on a possible alternative punishment, which under the new rules includes caning and a jail term of up to 40 years.

After 12 strokes of the cane, Razali was a free man.

"I feel like I've reborn him," Siti said. "What happened for [the past] 20 years, I already forgot. I don't want to think about that. He has a new life and I also have to face a new life for him."


Human rights groups have celebrated Malaysia’s sweeping reforms as an important step in the right direction, stressing the need for other states in the region to follow suit.

"Southeast Asia saw an alarming rise in the resort to executions in 2022," said Katrina Jorene Maliamauv, executive director of Amnesty International Malaysia, in May.

"But Malaysia's decision to abolish the mandatory death penalty and establish a re-sentencing process for those on death row brings hope that a more progressive and humane approach to criminal justice can become a reality in the region."

Since her brother's death, Nazira has become a loud voice condemning the Singaporean government’s seemingly immovable position. She wants justice for Nazeri, to see the death penalty scrapped, and for people who are struggling with habitual drug use to receive medical treatment rather than capital punishment.

"I want people to know that the death sentence, that hanging, doesn't work at all," she says. "I want them to know that the government is cruel. So unfair, and so cruel."

"My world was shattered after they hanged my brother."

Source: sbs.com.au, Gavin Butler, December 10, 2023


_____________________________________________________________________











Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Iran: Flogging still a common practice

Flogging of Sufis in Gonabad: Fourteen Ne’matollahi dervishes received 25 lashes each for allegedly disturbing the public security "The lash ruling against 14 Ne'matollahi dervishes of Gonabad was carried out. They were residents of Baydokht and had been arrested and condemned by the Public Prosecutor of Gonabad after a protest against the illegal treatment dealing with the Sufis in June of last year [2010]. According to the website of Majzuban-e-Nur, Mr. Sa'id Kashani, Mr. Amir Roshan-Mojaver-Sufi, Mr. Alimohammad Amanian, Mr. Ruhollah Safari, Mr. Ali Abbasi-Baydokhti, Mr. Ebrahim Abbaszadeh, Mr. Mohammadali Ja'fari, Mr. Hossein Mahdavi, Mr. Hossein Abbaszadeh-Baydokhti, Mr. Rahmat Hosseini, Mr. Reza Kakhki, Mr. Behruz Mojaver-Sufi, Mr. Ali Mir, and Mr. Hassan Baluchi-Baydokhti are the fourteen dervishes whose requests were not only rejected, but who were condemned to 25 lashes for disturbing the public security. It should be mentioned that Ruhollah Safari, the ...

Japan’s Internet Wants Uchida Riko Executed. Here’s Why That Won’t Happen

This week, the prosecution in the case of a murder of a 17-year-old girl in Hokkaido came out with its sentencing recommendation. Japanese social media reacted by clamoring for the accused woman’s blood. But, while the facts of the case are heinous, the prosecutor’s decision not to seek the death penalty is grounded in long-standing precedent. Murdered for looking at the accused wrong Uchida Riko (内田梨瑚), 23, and her friends stand accused of murdering 17-year-old Murayama Runa (村山瑠奈) in Hokkaido’s Asahikawa. Prosecutors say the dispute began after Murayama posted a photo of Uchida to social media. They say Uchida’s group abducted the girl, made her undress, and then forced her to jump from a bridge.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

Two men executed with AK-47 for raping and murdering boy, 12, in Yemen as children watch on

“Public execution is an even more grotesque violation of human rights, particularly in a country where the ability of the accused to obtain adequate legal representation and the coverage of the process is highly limited.” --  Human Rights Watch director Sarah Leah Whitson TWO  paedophiles have been executed with AK-47s in front of a bloodthirsty crowd for raping and murdering a 12-year-old boy in Yemen. Chilling images show Wadah Refat and Mohamed Khaled being marched at gunpoint through the port city of Aden. Yemen is one of the few countries in the world where capital punishment is legal, and even children were in attendance to watch the gruesome event. Refat, 28, and Khaled, 31, were condemned for the abduction, rape, and murder of a young boy who was snatched after playing next to the house of one of the men. The pair reportedly dragged him into their home and raped him. When sentencing the pair, The Daily Star reported that the judge said: “Afte...

Florida execution of 74-year-old death row inmate Dusty Ray Spencer reignites debate

Florida has set an execution date of June 25, 2026, for 74-year-old death row inmate Dusty Ray Spencer, a move that would make him the oldest person ever executed in the state’s history . Governor Ron DeSantis signed the death warrant on May 26, 2026, marking the tenth such warrant issued this year as the state continues its current pace of capital punishment. Spencer was convicted in 1992 of the first-degree murder of his wife, Karen Spencer, in Orange County. Court records detail a prolonged and violent pattern of abuse preceding the homicide. On January 18, 1992, after prior incidents of physical assault and threats, Spencer stabbed his wife to death in their backyard. The trial evidence included testimony that the victim was alive and conscious during the attack, which involved blunt force trauma and multiple stab wounds while the couple's son was present.

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.