Skip to main content

Idaho | Death-row inmate lawyer wants State to release date it bought execution drugs

Idaho paid $50,000 for 15 grams of pentobarbital

Attorneys for 2 men on Idaho death row have challenged the state prison system’s effort to withhold the date that officials bought drugs intended for use in a future execution, asking a federal judge to step in and force disclosure of the information.

The Idaho Department of Correction revealed in October that prison officials had for the 1st time in years “secured” lethal injection drugs when it announced a death warrant and execution date for prisoner Thomas Creech. The lethal chemicals have become difficult for state prisons to obtain because drug suppliers increasingly refuse to provide them for executions.

Creech, 73, is the state’s longest-serving prisoner on death row. He’s been incarcerated in Idaho since 1974 and convicted for the murder of 4 people. Creech received his latest death sentence after murdering fellow prisoner David Dale Jensen in 1981.

Creech’s November execution was put on hold when the state parole board agreed to review whether to drop his sentence to life in prison at a hearing next month. It was at least the 11th time Creech avoided his scheduled execution, according to records provided by his attorneys.

Just 2 days before Creech’s most recent death warrant was issued, state officials said in a separate federal court filing involving Gerald Pizzuto that Idaho’s prison system “does not have the present ability to carry out an execution via lethal injection,” suggesting it lacked the execution drugs it needed. Creech’s attorneys with the nonprofit Federal Defender Services of Idaho also represent Pizzuto, 67, who is the state’s 2nd-longest serving death row prisoner.

$50,000 for 15 grams of pentobarbital


But prison officials have declined to release the date they bought the execution drugs. A purchase order for the drugs, first obtained by the Idaho Statesman through a public records request, showed IDOC paid $50,000 for 15 grams of pentobarbital, a powerful depressant that can stop a person’s breathing in higher doses.

However, the state prison system redacted the date on the document and cited several public records exemptions related to executions for withholding the information. Among them, IDOC asserted that the date could be used to help identify its execution drug supplier, which a state shield law prohibits, because doing so could jeopardize Idaho’s ability to carry out an execution. IDOC also argued that the public’s interest in confidentiality “clearly outweighs” its interest in release of the requested information.

The Statesman has continued to ask IDOC for clarifications about its application of the records exemptions to justify redacting the purchase order date, including through the newspaper’s attorney. The prison system failed to respond by a requested Thursday deadline with further explanation or the execution drug purchase order without the date redacted.

Death row prisoner attorneys want purchase date


The legal nonprofit representing Pizzuto and Creech — which later received the purchase order document on its own through the legal process known as discovery — on Friday made a formal demand that the date be released. In the filing before U.S. District Judge B. Lynn Winmill for the District of Idaho, they questioned the prison system’s rationale for redacting the information.

“They contend that such dates ‘can be used to trace the supplier of the chemical,’ ” read the court filing for Pizzuto. “Nevertheless, the defendants have never explained how, and the fear is unfounded.”

IDOC Director Josh Tewalt, who is the named defendant in the case, is represented by the Idaho attorney general’s office. Both agencies declined to comment Friday to the Statesman. IDOC cited pending litigation, while the attorney general’s spokesperson said the office would be filing its response in court soon.

In court records included in Friday’s filing, Tewalt last month said that prison officials obtained lethal injection drugs by Oct. 12 — the same day the death warrant was issued for Creech. But Tewalt, through his attorneys, objected to answering questions about whether IDOC identified its drug supplier before that date.

Tewalt’s responses also for the first time stated that IDOC has the liquid pentobarbital in its possession, that it’s a manufactured version of the drug rather than produced by a compounding pharmacy, and that it has already been tested, in accordance with state execution protocols. If not used to lethally inject Creech, the drugs could instead be used to execute Pizzuto, Tewalt acknowledged. Compounding pharmacies are less regulated, custom drug producers that aren’t closely monitored by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

Tewalt refused to answer whether IDOC’s drug source agreed to provide pentobarbital to Idaho for any future executions. He again cited state law that prevents release of information that may identify a supplier.

The date of the purchase order “poses no such risk,” Pizzuto’s attorneys said Friday in their court filing.

The legal nonprofit cited a U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruling from earlier this year to support its argument. In it, the D.C. Circuit found that the federal Bureau of Prisons had not adequately justified withholding several pieces of information, including the purchase dates, in response to a public records request concerning execution drug acquisitions.

In the Friday filing, the Federal Defender Services attorneys also referenced additional examples in Arizona and Tennessee. In the two other states that also maintain active capital punishment, both redacted identifying details, such as the company name, to avoid revealing to the public their execution drug supplier on billing records — but not the date.

“There is plainly nothing about the date of an execution-drug purchase that jeopardizes a state’s ability to put inmates to death,” Pizzuto’s attorneys wrote.

Tewalt’s legal team in the attorney general’s office has three weeks to respond, with its filing due by Jan. 5.

Source: The Spokesman-Review, Staff, December 15, 2023

_____________________________________________________________________











Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Tennessee executes Harold Wayne Nichols

Thirty-seven years after confessing to a series of rapes and the murder of Karen Pulley, Nichols expressed remorse in final words Strapped to a gurney in the execution chamber at Riverbend Maximum Security Institution Thursday morning, Harold Wayne Nichols made a final statement.  “To the people I’ve harmed, I’m sorry,” he said, according to prison officials and media witnesses. “To my family, know that I love you. I know where I’m going to. I’m ready to go home.”

China | Former Chinese senior banker Bai Tianhui executed for taking US$155 million in bribes

Bai is the second senior figure from Huarong to be put to death for corruption following the execution of Lai Xiaomin in 2021 China has executed a former senior banker who was found guilty of taking more than 1.1 billion yuan (US$155 million) in bribes. Bai Tianhui, the former general manager of the asset management firm China Huarong International Holdings, was executed on Tuesday after the Supreme People’s Court approved the sentence, state broadcaster CCTV reported.

Burkina Faso to bring back death penalty

Burkina Faso's military rulers will bring back the death penalty, which was abolished in 2018, the country's Council of Ministers announced on Thursday. "This draft penal code reinstates the death penalty for a number of offences, including high treason, acts of terrorism, acts of espionage, among others," stated the information service of the Burkinabe government. Burkina Faso last carried out an execution in 1988.

Oklahoma board recommends clemency for inmate set to be executed next week

A voting board in Oklahoma decided Wednesday to recommend clemency for Tremane Wood, a death row inmate who is scheduled to receive a lethal injection next week at the state penitentiary in McAlester.  Wood, 46, faces execution for his conviction in the 2001 murder of Ronnie Wipf, a migrant farmworker, at an Oklahoma City hotel on New Year's Eve, court records show. The recommendation was decided in a 3-2 vote by the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, consisting of five members appointed by either the governor or the state's top judicial official, according to CBS News affiliate KWTV. Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Sitt will consider the recommendation as he weighs whether to grant or deny Wood's clemency request, which would mean sparing him from execution and reducing his sentence to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Iran | Child Bride Saved from the Gallows After Blood Money Raised Through Donations, Charities

Iran Human Rights (IHRNGO); December 9, 2025: Goli Kouhkan, a 25-year-old undocumented Baluch child bride who was scheduled to be executed within weeks, has been saved from the gallows after the diya (blood money) was raised in time. According to the judiciary’s Mizan News Agency , the plaintiffs in the case of Goli Kouhkan, have agreed to forgo their right to execution as retribution. In a video, the victim’s parents are seen signing the relevant documents. Goli’s lawyer, Parand Gharahdaghi, confirmed in a social media post that the original 10 billion (approx. 100,000 euros) toman diya was reduced to 8 billion tomans (approx. 80,000 euros) and had been raised through donations and charities.

Who Gets Hanged in Singapore?

Singapore’s death penalty has been in the news again.  Enshrined in law in 1975, a decade after the island split from Malaysia and became an independent state, the penalty can see people sentenced to hang for drug trafficking, murder or firearms offenses, among other crimes. Executions have often involved trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act, with offenses measured in grams.  Those executed have included people from low-income backgrounds and foreign nationals who are sometimes not fluent in English, according to human rights advocates such as Amnesty International and the International Drug Policy Consortium. 

Afghanistan's Taliban rulers carry out public execution in sports stadium

The man had been convicted of killing 13 members of a family, including children, and was executed by one of their relatives, according to police. Afghanistan's Taliban authorities carried out the public execution of a man on Tuesday convicted of killing 13 members of a family, including several children, earlier this year. Tens of thousands of people attended the execution at a sports stadium in the eastern city of Khost, which the Supreme Court said was the eleventh since the Taliban seized power in 2021 in the wake of the chaotic withdrawal of US and NATO forces.

Afghanistan | Two Sons Of Executed Man Also Face Death Penalty, Says Taliban

The Taliban governor’s spokesperson in Khost said on Tuesday that two sons of a man executed earlier that day have also been sentenced to death. Their executions, he said, have been postponed because the heir of the victims is not currently in Afghanistan. Mostaghfer Gurbaz, spokesperson for the Taliban governor in Khost, also released details of the charges against the man executed on Tuesday, identified as Mangal. He said Mangal was accused of killing members of a family.

Utah | Ralph Menzies dies on death row less than 3 months after his execution was called off

Judge was set to consider arguments in December about Menzies’ mental fitness  Ralph Menzies, who spent more than 3 decades on Utah’s death row for the 1986 murder of Maurine Hunsaker, has died.  Menzies, 67, died of “presumed natural causes at a local hospital” Wednesday afternoon, according to the Utah Department of Corrections.  Matt Hunsaker, Maurine Hunsaker’s son, said Menzies’ death “was a complete surprise.”  “First off, I’d say that I’m numb. And second off, I would say, grateful,” Hunsaker told Utah News Dispatch. “I’m grateful that my family does not have to endure this for the holidays.” 

USA | Should Medical Research Regulations and Informed Consent Principles Apply to States’ Use of Experimental Execution Methods?

New drugs and med­ical treat­ments under­go rig­or­ous test­ing to ensure they are safe and effec­tive for pub­lic use. Under fed­er­al and state reg­u­la­tions, this test­ing typ­i­cal­ly involves clin­i­cal tri­als with human sub­jects, who face sig­nif­i­cant health and safe­ty risks as the first peo­ple exposed to exper­i­men­tal treat­ments. That is why the law requires them to be ful­ly informed of the poten­tial effects and give their vol­un­tary con­sent to par­tic­i­pate in trials. Yet these reg­u­la­tions have not been fol­lowed when states seek to use nov­el and untest­ed exe­cu­tion meth­ods — sub­ject­ing pris­on­ers to poten­tial­ly tor­tur­ous and uncon­sti­tu­tion­al­ly painful deaths. Some experts and advo­cates argue that states must be bound by the eth­i­cal and human rights prin­ci­ples of bio­med­ical research before using these meth­ods on prisoners.