Israel must try Hamas terrorists for their crimes against humanity

Israel will likely be victorious in its war of self-defense against the Hamas terrorists who perpetrated the Oct. 7 massacre. But the expected victory will not truly resolve the situation.

There will have to be further medical and psychological support for the displaced and resilient but traumatized Israelis. It will take time to rebuild devastated communities, homes and families. Israel will have to work to fortify its borders.

But justice is also required. Truth-telling is essential. The world must understand what happened.

This is the main reason Israel must prosecute individual Hamas terrorists in a trial in Jerusalem, just as Israel famously tried Adolf Eichmann, and just as the victorious Allies tried Nazis for their crimes against humanity.

In 1945, in Nuremberg, the victorious Allies tried individual Nazis for their crimes against humanity. The Nazis had proudly photographed many of their own evil deeds, and the prosecution used that evidence. Hamas has done likewise in its attack, providing ample evidence for similar convictions.

In 1960, Israel captured Eichmann, one of the major organizers of the Holocaust, in Argentina. They put him on trial the following year, but in Jerusalem, not the Hague. It was the right decision. Unlike in the Nuremberg trials, many Holocaust survivors testified against Eichmann. Although Israel has no death penalty, the court found Eichmann guilty and hanged him.

How might Israel put Hamas on trial? Like the U.S., Israel is not a state member of the International Criminal Court. It would therefore not be suitable for Israel to ask the United Nations, a body that created this Court, to adjudicate the Islamist genocide of the Jewish people.

However, the definition of what constitutes “crimes against humanity” under International law is both clear and relevant to the Oct. 7 massacre and other Hamas atrocities.

Under international law, crimes against humanity comprise a certain set of criminal actions whenever they are “committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack.”

The actions in this category include murder; “extermination;” rape; “enforced disappearance of persons;” false imprisonment; torture; ethnic persecution; “deportation or forcible transfer of population;” enforced disappearances; apartheid; and “other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.”

The Iranian-backed Hamas, which has misgoverned Gaza since taking power in a 2006 election, has committed all of these crimes against Jewish Israelis, and many more, including on Oct. 7. It has also committed crimes against Palestinians, such as recruiting and indoctrinating Gazan children into martyrdom operations; building its military command posts and locating its weaponry under hospitals, schools and mosques in Gaza; demanding that Gazan civilians remain in place as human shields; and apparently even shooting them down when they attempt to flee.

There are many wild assertions in the West about Israel’s conduct, as if to draw a moral equivalency. But Israelis did not pre-emptively go into Gaza to murder Arabs. They do not reciprocate Hamas’s desire, stated in its founding charter, to genocidally exterminate all Jews. In fact, 20 percent of Israeli citizens are Arabs.

Israel has also never “enslaved,” “deported” or “transferred” Gazan Arabs. In fact, Israel left Gaza entirely in 2005. Israel has not “falsely imprisoned” any Gazan without a trial. Israeli forces have never entered Gaza to “torture,” “rape” or “kidnap” Gazan civilians, nor have they filmed themselves committing such atrocities.

In order for Jews to be safe again within the international community, at least for another 50 years, it is crucial to prosecute Hamas. It is only right to put the truth on display, and to sway whatever hardened hearts can be swayed.

Source: thehill.com, Phyllis Chesler, Opinion, November 14, 2023. Phyllis Chesler is an emerita professor of psychology at City University of New York.

_____________________________________________________________________

Twitter/X | Facebook | Telegram | Contact Us

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term: Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight. In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution. Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order.

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

Alabama | Judge bars nitrogen gas execution, says method is unconstitutionally cruel

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- A federal judge on Tuesday permanently blocked Alabama from executing an inmate with nitrogen gas after declaring it violates the ban on cruel and unusual punishment. U.S. District Judge Emily Marks issued the ruling hours after an appeals court reversed her initial finding that the method was constitutional. Marks permanently enjoined the state from executing Jeffrey Lee, 49, by nitrogen gas. He was scheduled to be executed Thursday. The decision, for now, blocks the use of the controversial new execution method that the state has championed since 2024, but the issue will likely end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Idaho will soon turn to firing squad executions. Police will pull the triggers

Trained members of Idaho law enforcement with demonstrated firearms proficiency are expected to fill slots for carrying out the death penalty by firing squad as the state prison system transitions to the controversial execution method next month. Six volunteers certified for no less than three years apiece through Peace Officer Standards and Training, or POST, will be recruited to ensure the Idaho Department of Correction is ready to comply with a state law that prioritizes shooting prisoners to death over lethal injection starting July 1. No one on the team may have faced disciplinary action over firearms, use of force, or related conduct over the prior year, according to new execution protocols the prison system released this week.

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.

Death Penalty News

Search This Blog