Skip to main content

Israel must try Hamas terrorists for their crimes against humanity

Israel will likely be victorious in its war of self-defense against the Hamas terrorists who perpetrated the Oct. 7 massacre. But the expected victory will not truly resolve the situation.

There will have to be further medical and psychological support for the displaced and resilient but traumatized Israelis. It will take time to rebuild devastated communities, homes and families. Israel will have to work to fortify its borders.

But justice is also required. Truth-telling is essential. The world must understand what happened. 

This is the main reason Israel must prosecute individual Hamas terrorists in a trial in Jerusalem, just as Israel famously tried Adolf Eichmann, and just as the victorious Allies tried Nazis for their crimes against humanity. 

In 1945, in Nuremberg, the victorious Allies tried individual Nazis for their crimes against humanity. The Nazis had proudly photographed many of their own evil deeds, and the prosecution used that evidence. Hamas has done likewise in its attack, providing ample evidence for similar convictions.

In 1960, Israel captured Eichmann, one of the major organizers of the Holocaust, in Argentina. They put him on trial the following year, but in Jerusalem, not the Hague. It was the right decision. Unlike in the Nuremberg trials, many Holocaust survivors testified against Eichmann. Although Israel has no death penalty, the court found Eichmann guilty and hanged him. 

How might Israel put Hamas on trial? Like the U.S., Israel is not a state member of the International Criminal Court. It would therefore not be suitable for Israel to ask the United Nations, a body that created this Court, to adjudicate the Islamist genocide of the Jewish people. 

However, the definition of what constitutes “crimes against humanity” under International law is both clear and relevant to the Oct. 7 massacre and other Hamas atrocities.

Under international law, crimes against humanity comprise a certain set of criminal actions whenever they are “committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack.”

The actions in this category include murder; “extermination;” rape; “enforced disappearance of persons;” false imprisonment; torture; ethnic persecution; “deportation or forcible transfer of population;” enforced disappearances; apartheid; and “other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.”

The Iranian-backed Hamas, which has misgoverned Gaza since taking power in a 2006 election, has committed all of these crimes against Jewish Israelis, and many more, including on Oct. 7. It has also committed crimes against Palestinians, such as recruiting and indoctrinating Gazan children into martyrdom operations; building its military command posts and locating its weaponry under hospitals, schools and mosques in Gaza; demanding that Gazan civilians remain in place as human shields; and apparently even shooting them down when they attempt to flee.

There are many wild assertions in the West about Israel’s conduct, as if to draw a moral equivalency. But Israelis did not pre-emptively go into Gaza to murder Arabs. They do not reciprocate Hamas’s desire, stated in its founding charter, to genocidally exterminate all Jews. In fact, 20 percent of Israeli citizens are Arabs. 

Israel has also never “enslaved,” “deported” or “transferred” Gazan Arabs. In fact, Israel left Gaza entirely in 2005. Israel has not “falsely imprisoned” any Gazan without a trial. Israeli forces have never entered Gaza to “torture,” “rape” or “kidnap” Gazan civilians, nor have they filmed themselves committing such atrocities.

In order for Jews to be safe again within the international community, at least for another 50 years, it is crucial to prosecute Hamas. It is only right to put the truth on display, and to sway whatever hardened hearts can be swayed. 

Source: thehill.com, Phyllis Chesler, Opinion, November 14, 2023. Phyllis Chesler is an emerita professor of psychology at City University of New York.



_____________________________________________________________________











Most viewed (Last 7 days)

'No Warning': The Death Penalty In Japan

Stakes for wrongful convictions are high in Japan, where the death penalty has broad public support despite criticism over how it is carried out. Tokyo: Capital punishment in Japan is under scrutiny again after the world's longest-serving death row prisoner, Iwao Hakamada, was awarded $1.4 million in compensation this week following his acquittal last year in a retrial. Stakes for wrongful convictions are high in Japan, where the death penalty has broad public support despite international criticism over how it is carried out.

South Carolina | Spiritual adviser of condemned inmate: 'We're more than the worst thing we've done'

(RNS) — When 67-year-old Brad Sigmon was put to death on March 7 in South Carolina for the murder of his then-girlfriend's parents, it was the first time in 15 years that an execution in the United States had been carried out by a firing squad. United Methodist minister Hillary Taylor, Sigmon's spiritual adviser since 2020, said the multifaceted, months long effort to save Sigmon's life, and to provide emotional and spiritual support for his legal team, and the aftermath of his execution has been a "whirlwind" said Taylor, the director of South Carolinians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty.

Louisiana's First Nitrogen Execution Reflects Broader Method Shift

Facing imminent execution by lethal gas earlier this week, Jessie Hoffman Jr. — a Louisiana man convicted of abducting, raping and murdering a 28-year-old woman in 1996 — went to court with a request: Please allow me to be shot instead. In a petition filed with the U.S. Supreme Court on March 16 seeking a stay of his execution by nitrogen hypoxia, a protocol that had yet to be tested in the state, Hoffman requested execution by firing squad as an alternative.

A second South Carolina death row inmate chooses execution by firing squad

Columbia, S.C. — A South Carolina death row inmate on Friday chose execution by firing squad, just five weeks after the state carried out its first death by bullets. Mikal Mahdi, who pleaded guilty to murder for killing a police officer in 2004, is scheduled to be executed April 11. Mahdi, 41, had the choice of dying by firing squad, lethal injection or the electric chair. He will be the first inmate to be executed in the state since Brad Sigmon chose to be shot to death on March 7. A doctor pronounced Sigmon dead less than three minutes after three bullets tore into his heart.

Bangladesh | Botswana Woman Executed for Drug Trafficking

Dhaka, Bangladesh – Lesedi Molapisi, a Botswana national convicted of drug trafficking, was executed in Bangladesh on Friday, 21 March 2025. The 31-year-old was hanged at Dhaka Central Jail after exhausting all legal avenues to appeal her death sentence. Molapisi was arrested in January 2023 upon arrival at Hazrat Shahjalal International Airport in Dhaka, where customs officials discovered 3.1 kilograms of heroin hidden in her luggage. Following a trial under Bangladesh’s Narcotics Control Act, she was sentenced to death in May 2024. Her execution was initially delayed due to political unrest in the country but was carried out last week.

USA | Federal death penalty possible for Mexican cartel boss behind 1985 DEA agent killing

Rafael Caro Quintero, extradited from Mexico in 2022, appeared in Brooklyn court as feds weigh capital charges for the torture and murder of Agent Enrique Camarena NEW YORK — The death penalty is on the table for notorious drug lord Rafael Caro Quintero, the so-called “narco of narcos” who orchestrated the torture and murder of a DEA agent in 1985, according to federal prosecutors. “It is a possibility. The decision has not yet been made, but it is going through the process,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Saritha Komatireddy said in Brooklyn Federal Court Wednesday.

Oklahoma executes Wendell Grissom

Grissom used some of his last words on Earth to apologize to everyone he hurt and said that he prays they can find forgiveness for their own sake. As for his execution, he said it was a mercy. Oklahoma executed Wendell Arden Grissom on Thursday for the murder of 23-year-old Amber Matthews in front of her best friend’s two young daughters in 2005.  Grissom, 56, was executed by lethal injection at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary in McAlester and pronounced dead at 10:13 a.m. local time, becoming the first inmate to be put to death by the state in 2025 and the ninth in the United States this year. 

Inside Florida's Death Row: A dark cloud over the Sunshine State

Florida's death penalty system has faced numerous criticisms and controversies over the years - from execution methods to the treatment of Death Row inmates The Sunshine State remains steadfast in its enforcement of capital punishment, upholding a complex system that has developed since its reinstatement in 1976. Florida's contemporary death penalty era kicked off in 1972 following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Furman v. Georgia , which temporarily put a stop to executions across the country. Swiftly amending its laws, Florida saw the Supreme Court affirm the constitutionality of the death penalty in 1976's Gregg v. Georgia case.

Louisiana executes Jessie Hoffman Jr.

Louisiana used nitrogen gas Tuesday evening to execute a man convicted of murdering a woman in 1996, the 1st time the state has used the method, a lawyer for the condemned man said.  Jessie Hoffman Jr., 46, was put to death at the Louisiana State Penitentiary, defense lawyer Cecelia Kappel said in a statement. He was the 1st person executed in the state in 15 years, and his death marked the 5th use of the nitrogen gas method in the US, with all the rest in Alabama.  Hoffman was convicted of the murder of Mary "Molly" Elliott, a 28-year-old advertising executive. At the time of the crime, Hoffman was 18.

564 People On Death Row In India, Highest Since The Turn Of The Century

In 90% of of all death penalty sentences in 2024, trial courts imposed sentences in the absence of adequate information about the accused, finds a recent report Bengaluru: Following the uproar and the widespread protests after the August 2024 rape and murder of a medical professional in Kolkata’s RG Kar hospital, there were demands for death penalty for the accused. The state government passed the Aparajita Woman and Child (West Bengal Criminal Laws Amendment) Bill 2024 (awaiting presidential assent) which included mandatory death sentence for rape which results in death of the victim or if the victim is left in a vegetative state, despite such a mandatory sentence being unconstitutional.