Skip to main content

Florida | The stuff of nightmares

Vatican Media presents a story by Dale Recinella, a former Wall Street finance lawyer who, along with his wife Susan, acts as a chaplain for prisoners in Florida.

It is not possible to be prepared to witness the execution of a man I believe is innocent. But that is exactly what happens in 2006. The man’s death warrant is signed. He asks me to be his spiritual advisor. He claims innocence and alleges that the state’s star witness is in fact the one who committed the murder.

This condemned man’s request for clemency to life in prison deserves serious consideration. He is a decorated Vietnam Veteran who returned with PTSD and Agent Orange sickness; he was a single parent raising his children by working as a carpenter. Since coming to death row, he has continued as the parental figure in his daughters' lives through mail and visits. Moreover, his death sentence was handed down by a jury vote of just seven to five. One vote different and he would have been given a life sentence.

His three daughters beg the governor to grant clemency, to commute his death sentence to life imprisonment. But in practice, there is no clemency in Florida in death penalty cases. It simply does not exist.  

His appeals lawyers have collected boxes of sworn affidavits to the effect that his assertion of innocence is true. They beg the Florida Supreme Court to order an evidentiary hearing that will allow the judge to hear from the witnesses under oath and under cross-examination. That would allow a determination of whether in fact he is innocent and was framed by the state’s star witness.

The Florida Supreme Court refuses to consider the mess at all and hides behind a procedural doctrine that it is too late to hear evidence of innocence. All that sworn testimony will never be heard. The sworn evidence of his innocence will sit in a box in the basement of a Florida panhandle courthouse while this man is being killed by the state.

My wife and I are severely concerned about the well-being of his three daughters ranging in age from twenty-two to thirty. Susan obtains permission from the prison to be present at the final family visit the morning of the execution. Susan and I arrive together at FSP at about 7:00 a.m. The noncontact visits (with a glass partition) last for two hours and are grueling. Then it gets harder.

The contact visits require going through another security gate and then through two solid steel doors into an area down and across the hall. The one-hour contact visit is broken up into four fifteen-minute segments: first the brothers together, then the youngest daughter, then each of the other two daughters.

Each contact visit with a daughter ends with her holding onto her father for dear life and sobbing uncontrollably. One after another, I must peel each daughter off their father, take her by both arms and lead her out of the room and into the hall. When the second steel security door closes from behind, each of them freeze in uncontrollable grief, doubling over, sobbing and crying, "Daddy, I love you. Why are they going to kill my Daddy?"

Then I must practically carry each daughter through the hall security gate and back to the gathering area where Susan is waiting to assist her.

Meanwhile, I must escort the next daughter in for her fifteen-minute goodbye visit with her dad. Each visit ends the same. Each daughter crumples in a heap around the table by Susan, crying, “Why do they have to kill him? Why can’t they just let him live in prison?”

After the gut-wrenching goodbyes, Susan and I gather the daughters together and escort them out of the prison to the parking lot where we pray with them for a last time.

Then Susan prays with me before I return inside to the death house to take up my station with the condemned man at his cell, a dozen feet from the execution room, for the last five hours of his life.

At about 5:30 p.m., I go to the main lobby of the administration building of FSP. The announcement is made for the witnesses to proceed to the special entrance to the death house witness room. I take my spiritual advisor seat and wait for the curtain to open.

When the curtain opens, he is lying on the gurney in front of the window. I try to make eye contact with him, but the glare of the lights on the glass are interfering with his vision.

"Where is Brother Dale?" He calls out, lifting his head to peer through the window from the gurney. I raise my hand hoping he will be able to see it despite the glare.

"I love you, man."  He speaks clearly but softly, nodding directly at me.

All the witnesses hear him through the overhead mike. There is an immediate shift in the emotional feel of the entire witness room. In a split second those words have changed him from an object of scorn to a human being with connectedness to others. The effect is palpable.

Driving home from the execution, it occurs to me that watching an innocent man be killed may be all that is necessary to unleash nightmares. At that moment it is beyond my imagination that a deeper level of horror is in store for me.

By the week of Thanksgiving 2006, Susan and I have been through three executions in nine weeks. As our Thanksgiving preparations fall in place, we finally exhale and dare to assume that the gurney in Starke is done for the year. 

Then, just two days before Thanksgiving, Angel Diaz is pulled to the death house. His family is notified the day before Thanksgiving. They are driving up from Miami overnight, after work, in multiple vehicles for an all-day deathwatch visit with him. They will meet Susan and me at FSP at 5:00 p.m. on Thanksgiving Day.

On Thanksgiving Day, at 4:45 p.m., Susan and I are standing at the steps of FSP inside the gates waiting to meet this new family. They are warm and gentle people. We know they have been driving all night and in a deathwatch visit all day. We invite them to a late Thanksgiving dinner at our home just 15 miles from FSP.

It seems that we and they are the only ones out driving that evening. The multiple vans follow us easily on the deserted county roads to our home in town. Soon, they are gathered around our dining room table--great aunt, brother, sister, nieces and nephews, cousins, and grandchildren playing on the floor while the adults talk and eat.

This is a middle-class Catholic family just like us. They never dreamed they would be at FSP on Thanksgiving for deathwatch visits. The execution date is set for December 13.

On the morning of the execution, I meet the family at FSP about ninety minutes before the noncontact visits are set to begin. The noncontact visits and then contact visits are by the book. The family leaves on time.

Father Jose arrives to FSP for Last Rights at 12 noon. When he returns to the chapel from the death house, I make the trek downstairs on Q-Wing to take my station at Angel Diaz’s death cell.

Angel tells me that he participated in Cursillo, a worldwide Catholic spiritual renewal movement, in high school in Puerto Rico. I participated in Cursillo in Tallahassee. The Cursillo retreat included many Spanish songs about farm animals and simple life. As Angel and I try to sing the Cursillo songs from memory, the death house guards ask us questions. Soon, we are teaching the songs to the uniforms within ear shot.    

At about 4:30 p.m. we close in prayer and I head to the administration building to join the other official witnesses. Before 6:00 p.m. the witnesses are all seated in front of the curtain. At 6:00 p.m. the curtain opens.

“The State of Florida is killing an innocent person.” Angel Diaz gives his last words in Spanish. “The State of Florida is committing a crime because I am innocent. The death penalty is a form of vengeance but also a cowardly act by humans. I am sorry for what is happening to me and my family who have been put through this.”

The warden reads the death warrant and orders the procedure to start. Within minutes I know that something is horribly wrong.

By the time it is over and I exit the death van, bedlam is overtaking the crowds outside FSP. Word of the botching of the execution and its duration has already leaked. There is nothing I can add to this crisis. While I am leaning against my car in the FSP parking lot to assess whether my stomach will stay in place for the drive home, Angel Diaz’s lawyer approaches me.

“Will you be willing to testify to what you just watched?”

“Only under subpoena and under oath.” I respond robotically with the formula that my attorneys have had me memorize for just such an occasion.

“You’ll be hearing from me.”

It takes my car almost twelve miles driving north on State Road 121 to get into cell phone range of my house. As soon as the connection bars pop up on my phone screen, I press the speed dial button for Susan.

“Susan …”

“Dale, is this you?” She asks falteringly.

“Yes, why?”

“Honey, I had no idea it was you. You don’t sound at all like you. What happened?”

“Susan, I just watched a man be tortured to death.”

By the next morning the entire death penalty industry in Florida is in an uproar. Meanwhile, the Florida Supreme Court grants an 8:00 a.m. motion for independent medical personnel to be present at the autopsy and to forestall any attempt at cremation of the body before the investigation is completed.

The medical reports are not pretty. The autopsy reveals that Angel’s arms are horribly burned inside, with a twelve x five-inch chemical burn in his right arm and an eleven x seven-inch chemical burn in his left arm. In fact, the autopsy shows that the lethal injection catheters pierced the front and back walls of his veins, pumping the chemicals directly into underlying soft tissues. Only gradually did enough poison to kill him leech back into his arterial system.

My nightmares start very soon after the botched execution. At first, I refuse to own them.

“Susan, I shouldn’t be having nightmares. It’s not like with Father Joe before me. He watched a man catch on fire and burn to death in the electric chair.”

“Really?” Susan is not supporting my denial. “Then, tell me, Dale: what’s the difference between watching a man burn to death from the outside in with electricity and watching a man burn to death from the inside out with chemicals?”

I know she is right. There is no meaningful difference. My nightmares are mine. And I better deal with them.

And I better deal with the political storm already headed in my direction.

A lawsuit is filed by Angel Diaz’s lawyers to end the use of lethal injection in Florida. I am subpoenaed and will be put under oath. The hearing will be in Ocala in front of a circuit judge. Florida circuit judges are the ones who hand down death sentences.

On May 18, 2007, my lawyer and I drive together to the Marion County Courthouse in Ocala.

The elevator dumps us into an upper-floor lobby, where we are expected. The bailiffs usher us into the courtroom and seal the doors. I will be the first witness to testify. The judge orders me to be put under oath. I am in the witness stand for over two hours.

In August of 2007 the circuit judge in Ocala orders the Florida Department of Corrections to show cause why the death penalty by lethal injection in Florida should not be declared unconstitutional as cruel and unusual punishment. But the window of hope closes quickly, just a month later.

In September 2007, the very same judge issues a final ruling that the Diaz execution cannot be called a botched execution because the goal was to kill the inmate and Diaz is dead.

The Florida Supreme Court simply affirms his ruling that Florida’s lethal injections can continue. The state’s death penalty industry is safe for another day.

Source: vaticannews.va, Dale Recinella, November 21, 2023


_____________________________________________________________________











Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight.  In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution.  Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order. 

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

Alabama | Judge bars nitrogen gas execution, says method is unconstitutionally cruel

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- A federal judge on Tuesday permanently blocked Alabama from executing an inmate with nitrogen gas after declaring it violates the ban on cruel and unusual punishment. U.S. District Judge Emily Marks issued the ruling hours after an appeals court reversed her initial finding that the method was constitutional. Marks permanently enjoined the state from executing Jeffrey Lee, 49, by nitrogen gas. He was scheduled to be executed Thursday. The decision, for now, blocks the use of the controversial new execution method that the state has championed since 2024, but the issue will likely end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Idaho will soon turn to firing squad executions. Police will pull the triggers

Trained members of Idaho law enforcement with demonstrated firearms proficiency are expected to fill slots for carrying out the death penalty by firing squad as the state prison system transitions to the controversial execution method next month.  Six volunteers certified for no less than three years apiece through Peace Officer Standards and Training, or POST, will be recruited to ensure the Idaho Department of Correction is ready to comply with a state law that prioritizes shooting prisoners to death over lethal injection starting July 1.  No one on the team may have faced disciplinary action over firearms, use of force, or related conduct over the prior year, according to new execution protocols the prison system released this week. 

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.