Skip to main content

Texas | A possible reprieve for the mentally ill on death row

Scott Panetti was deemed incompetent for execution. What does this mean for other prisoners?

A federal judge has declared that Scott Panetti, a longtime resident of Texas’ death row, is incompetent for execution due to the severity of his mental illness. The decision comes more than 15 years after the U.S. Supreme Court determined—also in Panetti’s case—that the Eighth Amendment bars the state from executing someone who doesn’t understand the reason for their execution. 

For three decades, Panetti has been among the most well-known severely mentally ill death row prisoners in the United States. But if he were to be executed, it wouldn’t be a first for Texas—in the past two decades, the state has executed numerous people with severe mental illnesses, including Kelsey Patterson in 2004. And while the governorship has changed hands since then, many of Texas’ decision-makers remain the same. 

This latest ruling decision in Panetti’s case, experts say, might even have some bearing on other mentally ill death row residents’ situations.

Panetti was sentenced to death in 1995 for the 1992 murder of his in-laws, Joe and Amanda Alvarado. Panetti, who had a documented history of paranoia, hallucinations, and reality distortions for decades before the murders, killed the couple after their daughter, his wife, got a restraining order against him and went to live with them.

But his trial was a spectacle. No longer on his antipsychotic medication—convinced God had cured him of his mental illness—he represented himself dressed as a “TV-Western cowboy” in a burgundy costume. He tried to subpoena witnesses including John F. Kennedy, the pope, and Jesus Christ. According to legal documents, he “rambled incessantly and incoherently…he visibly frightened the jurors. His trial was a mockery of the criminal justice system.” 

That was no act. Panetti had been exhibiting symptoms of schizophrenia since the 1970s. In 1986, he was caught in full-blown religious delusion, convinced he was “engaged in spiritual warfare with Satan,” per court documents. He was involuntarily committed more than 10 times in the decade before the murders. In 1988, he had been deemed “incompetent to manage his own affairs” by the Social Security Administration. 

The state swiftly set an execution date for Panetti in 2004, but even then his lawyers argued that his mental illness was too severe for him to comprehend. Panetti allegedly believed that he was being executed by the state as part of the devil’s attempt to “thwart his divine mission” and to cover up what he believed was a pedophile ring his in-laws were participating in.  

The Supreme Court took up Panetti’s case, and they determined in 2007 that the Eighth Amendment dictated that the bar for a person to understand why they’re being executed is high—they have to have a “rational understanding of the connection between his crime and his punishment,” per the decision.

While serving as solicitor general for the State of Texas, Ted Cruz himself argued in front of the Supreme Court that Panetti should be put to death. Cruz said he was faking his illness. 

Despite Panetti’s belief that his execution was actually part of a larger conspiracy, he was deemed competent and a new execution date was set for December 2014. Then, that execution date was also stayed while lawyers again argued his competency.  

A similar argument has now continued for decades.

“Scott Panetti’s mental health has deteriorated significantly since the last time he was evaluated, which was in late 2007,” said Panetti’s longtime attorney, Gregory Wiercioch. “We were able to use records from the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and our own interactions with Mr. Panetti that indicated his mental health had deteriorated since [then].” 

Experts have previously estimated that up to 20 percent of Texas death row prisoners receive ongoing mental health care. Some, like Panetti, have visible symptoms. 

Andre Thomas has been on Texas’ death row since 2004. He was convicted after stabbing his estranged wife to death, along with their 4-year-old son and her 13-month-old daughter. He had committed the crimes during what his lawyers would argue was a dangerous frenzy caused by a schizophrenic and psychotic episode—at the time, he believed he was fighting satanic forces, according to his lawyers. 

Thomas’ mental health issues began in his childhood and continued after his incarceration. After the murders, he gouged out his own right eye with his fingers, allegedly compelled by the Bible. He later removed his left eye. 

Thomas’ team is currently working to prove that he, too, is incompetent to be executed due to the severity of his mental illness. He was previously scheduled to be executed April 5, but a Grayson County court withdrew the date so his team could work on his competency case. 

Thomas’ attorney Maurie Levin said that his acts in prison—including the self-mutilation—”speak volumes about the severity of his mental illness.”

“The District Court’s opinion in Panetti underscores that to be competent to be executed, a prisoner must have a ‘rational understanding of the reason for [his] execution.’ Mr. Thomas, like Mr. Panetti, does not,” Levin told the Texas Observer.

She said Thomas, when asked recently to explain the reason for his execution, did not think it was due to his crime. Rather, he thought it was part of a biblical plot. 

“That’s why they want to kill me,” he said. “If we let him out of that freaking pyramid, their prison, we gotta make him promise he won’t use his power on us. Because if he did it would be all over. We’re talking about Revelations, between Michael and the archangels, the devil.”

Federal law bars the execution of people with intellectual disabilities, but no such sweeping restriction applies to people with mental illness. Only Kentucky and Ohio have state laws to ban the practice. (Twenty-seven states allow the death penalty. Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Texas are the only states that have executed people since 2020.)

For years, one Texas lawmaker has attempted to pass legislation to bar the death penalty for people with certain severe mental illnesses, including schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Dallas Democrat Toni Rose first began pushing for this law in 2017, and the Texas House of Representatives has passed the bill in the past three legislative sessions. The state senate received the latest approved version in March but did not take action. Rose did not respond to requests for comment. 

Since 2006, the American Bar Association has taken a strong position by recommending that people should be spared the death penalty if they were significantly impaired by mental illness at the time of committing murder. 

In Panetti’s case, a decades-long legal back-and-forth appears to have been settled by a ruling from U.S.  District Court Judge Robert Pitman on September 28. Pitman wrote that Panetti “lacks a rational understanding of the connection between his offense and his sentence of death and that his execution would therefore violate the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.”

Elaborating, the judge wrote, “There are several reasons for prohibiting the execution of the insane, including the questionable retributive value of executing an individual so wracked by mental illness that he cannot comprehend the ‘meaning and purpose of the punishment,’ as well as society’s intuition that such an execution ‘simply offends humanity.”

In an interview, Wiercioch, the defense attorney, told the Observer it’s been a 20-year process to get the courts to recognize Panetti’s mental illness as it relates to the Eighth Amendment protection against “cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” Wiercioch has been involved with Panetti’s case since 2003, when he worked with the Texas Defender Service. He has continued to work on the case ever since, despite a cross-country move and a career change. 

In a statement, Wiercioch, now a professor with the Frank J. Remington Center at the University of Wisconsin Law School, lauded the judge’s ruling. 

“Judge Pitman’s ruling prevents the State of Texas from exacting vengeance on a person who suffers from a pervasive, severe form of schizophrenia that causes him to inaccurately perceive the world around him,” he wrote.

Source: texasobserver.org, Michelle Pitcher, October 12, 2023


_____________________________________________________________________

Home  |  Twitter/X  |  Facebook  |  Telegram  | Contact us






"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."

— Oscar Wilde

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Iran: flogging still a common practice

Flogging of Sufis in Gonabad: Fourteen Ne’matollahi dervishes received 25 lashes each for allegedly disturbing the public security Public flogging in Iran "The lash ruling against 14 Ne'matollahi dervishes of Gonabad was carried out. They were residents of Baydokht and had been arrested and condemned by the Public Prosecutor of Gonabad after a protest against the illegal treatment dealing with the Sufis in June of last year [2010]. According to the website of Majzuban-e-Nur, Mr. Sa'id Kashani, Mr. Amir Roshan-Mojaver-Sufi, Mr. Alimohammad Amanian, Mr. Ruhollah Safari, Mr. Ali Abbasi-Baydokhti, Mr. Ebrahim Abbaszadeh, Mr. Mohammadali Ja'fari, Mr. Hossein Mahdavi, Mr. Hossein Abbaszadeh-Baydokhti, Mr. Rahmat Hosseini, Mr. Reza Kakhki, Mr. Behruz Mojaver-Sufi, Mr. Ali Mir, and Mr. Hassan Baluchi-Baydokhti are the fourteen dervishes whose requests were not only rejected, but who were condemned to 25 lashes for disturbing the public security. It should be mentioned th...

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

Japan’s Internet Wants Uchida Riko Executed. Here’s Why That Won’t Happen

This week, the prosecution in the case of a murder of a 17-year-old girl in Hokkaido came out with its sentencing recommendation. Japanese social media reacted by clamoring for the accused woman’s blood. But, while the facts of the case are heinous, the prosecutor’s decision not to seek the death penalty is grounded in long-standing precedent. Murdered for looking at the accused wrong Uchida Riko (内田梨瑚), 23, and her friends stand accused of murdering 17-year-old Murayama Runa (村山瑠奈) in Hokkaido’s Asahikawa. Prosecutors say the dispute began after Murayama posted a photo of Uchida to social media. They say Uchida’s group abducted the girl, made her undress, and then forced her to jump from a bridge.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight.  In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution.  Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order.