FEATURED POST

Biden Has 65 Days Left in Office. Here’s What He Can Do on Criminal Justice.

Image
Judicial appointments and the death penalty are among areas where a lame-duck administration can still leave a mark. Donald Trump’s second presidential term will begin on Jan. 20, bringing with it promises to dramatically reshape many aspects of the criminal justice system. The U.S. Senate — with its authority over confirming judicial nominees — will also shift from Democratic to Republican control.

India | SC Sets Aside Death Penalty Awarded To Man For Rape, Murder Of Three-Month-Old Infant Girl

The apex court observed that the trial was conducted in a "hurried manner"

The Supreme Court has set aside the conviction of a man who was awarded the death sentence for the alleged rape and murder of a three-month-old infant girl and has ordered a retrial in the case, noting that the accused was not provided the "proper opportunity" by the trial court to defend himself. 

The apex court observed that the trial was conducted in a "hurried manner". 

The petition to overturn the trial court verdict was granted by a three-judge SC bench led by Justice BR Gavai. The bench also comprised Justices PS Narasimha and Prashant Kumar Mishra. The appellant, Naveen, approached the top court after the trial court verdict was upheld by the Madhya Pradesh High Court. 

"We are of the considered view that the trial court conducted the trial in a hurried manner without giving proper opportunity to the accused to defend himself," the bench was quoted as saying by news agency PTI. 

"Therefore, the judgement of conviction and sentence passed by the trial court and affirmed by the high court is hereby set aside and the matter is remitted back to the trial court for de novo (new) trial by affording proper opportunity to the appellant to defend himself," it added. 

The top court also observed that the accused wasn't given ample time to produce, during the trial, the experts who filed the DNA and FSL reports as they were government servants and could not have attended the court at his request. 

"The trial court treated the accused as if he is carrying a magic wand which is available to produce highly qualified experts, who are government servants, on a phone call. There was no opportunity, in the real sense, to the appellant to cross-examine the experts," the SC bench said while delivering its judgment. 

Source: JND, Staff, October 21, 2023


_____________________________________________________________________

Home  |  Twitter/X  |  Facebook  |  Telegram  | Contact us






"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."

— Oscar Wilde

Most Viewed (Last 7 Days)

Biden Has 65 Days Left in Office. Here’s What He Can Do on Criminal Justice.

Saudi Arabia executed more than 100 foreigners in 2024: AFP tally

Singapore | Imminent unlawful execution for drug trafficking

Trial Judge Declares Melissa Lucio to be ​“Actually Innocent,” Recommends Texas CCA Overturn Conviction and Death Sentence

Mary Jane Veloso to return to Philippines after 14-year imprisonment in Indonesia

Iran | Group Hanging of 10 Including a Woman in Ghezel Hesar Prison; Protest Outside Prison Violently Crushed

Texas Supreme Court Rules that a New Execution Date Can be Set for Robert Roberson

USA | Pro-Trump prison warden asks Biden to commute all death sentences before leaving