FEATURED POST

Biden Fails a Death Penalty Abolitionist’s Most Important Test

Image
The mystery of Joe Biden’s views about capital punishment has finally been solved. His decision to grant clemency to 37 of the 40 people on federal death row shows the depth of his opposition to the death penalty. And his decision to leave three of America’s most notorious killers to be executed by a future administration shows the limits of his abolitionist commitment. The three men excluded from Biden’s mass clemency—Dylann Roof, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, and Robert Bowers—would no doubt pose a severe test of anyone’s resolve to end the death penalty. Biden failed that test.

India | SC Sets Aside Death Penalty Awarded To Man For Rape, Murder Of Three-Month-Old Infant Girl

The apex court observed that the trial was conducted in a "hurried manner"

The Supreme Court has set aside the conviction of a man who was awarded the death sentence for the alleged rape and murder of a three-month-old infant girl and has ordered a retrial in the case, noting that the accused was not provided the "proper opportunity" by the trial court to defend himself. 

The apex court observed that the trial was conducted in a "hurried manner". 

The petition to overturn the trial court verdict was granted by a three-judge SC bench led by Justice BR Gavai. The bench also comprised Justices PS Narasimha and Prashant Kumar Mishra. The appellant, Naveen, approached the top court after the trial court verdict was upheld by the Madhya Pradesh High Court. 

"We are of the considered view that the trial court conducted the trial in a hurried manner without giving proper opportunity to the accused to defend himself," the bench was quoted as saying by news agency PTI. 

"Therefore, the judgement of conviction and sentence passed by the trial court and affirmed by the high court is hereby set aside and the matter is remitted back to the trial court for de novo (new) trial by affording proper opportunity to the appellant to defend himself," it added. 

The top court also observed that the accused wasn't given ample time to produce, during the trial, the experts who filed the DNA and FSL reports as they were government servants and could not have attended the court at his request. 

"The trial court treated the accused as if he is carrying a magic wand which is available to produce highly qualified experts, who are government servants, on a phone call. There was no opportunity, in the real sense, to the appellant to cross-examine the experts," the SC bench said while delivering its judgment. 

Source: JND, Staff, October 21, 2023


_____________________________________________________________________

Home  |  Twitter/X  |  Facebook  |  Telegram  | Contact us






"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."

— Oscar Wilde

Most Viewed (Last 7 Days)

Women Being Sent to the Gallows in Alarming Numbers in Iran

Oklahoma executes Kevin Underwood

Indiana executes Joseph Corcoran

USA | Biden commutes sentences of 37 of the 40 men on federal death row, excluding Robert Bowers, Dylann Roof, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev

Indonesia | 14 years on death row: Timeline of Mary Jane Veloso’s ordeal and fight for justice

Philippines | Mary Jane Veloso returns to joyous welcome from family after narrowly escaping Indonesian firing squad

Indonesia | Ailing Frenchman on death row pleads to return home as Indonesia to pardon 44,000 prisoners

USA | The Death Penalty in 2024: Report

Martin Sheen: Why President Biden Should Commute Federal Death Row

Biden Fails a Death Penalty Abolitionist’s Most Important Test