Skip to main content

Statement on the situation of human rights in Belarus: UN High Commissioner for Human Rights

STATEMENT DELIVERED BY: United Nations Deputy High Commissioner for Human Rights, Nada Al-Nashif

AT: Interactive Dialogue on the situation of human rights in Belarus, 54th session of the Human Rights Council

LOCATION: Geneva, Palais des Nations, Room XX

Mr. President

Excellencies

Dear Colleagues,

I welcome the opportunity to address the Council and provide an update on the human rights situation in Belarus, in accordance with Resolution 52/29.

Three years from the contested Presidential elections of August 2020, the human rights situation in Belarus remains grave, showing no signs of improvement. On the contrary, we are witnessing the further shrinking of civic space and continuing lack of respect for fundamental freedoms, evidenced by a campaign of violence and repression against individuals who oppose the Government, or who are perceived to be doing so, expressing critical or independent views. Systematic impunity continues to allow those who are responsible for gross human rights violations to evade accountability for their actions.

The documentation of OHCHR reveals an ongoing and distressing pattern of arbitrary arrests and prosecutions on trumped-up charges, the targeting of various segments of society, including government critics, human rights defenders, journalists, academics, trade unionists, religious figures, members of minorities, lawyers, and others who seek to exercise their fundamental rights.

As of this month, September 2023, the Belarus authorities' crackdown on those critical or perceived to be critical of the Government has resulted in over 3,750 individuals being convicted in criminal trials characterized by severe and disproportionate prison sentences, with little regard for due process or indeed, the right to a fair trial. Notably, pursuant to amendments to the criminal code made in 2022, trials in absentia are now possible and have been conducted against prominent political opponents and individuals currently residing outside Belarus. Inside Belarus, 1,500 individuals are currently detained on charges that our Office believes to be politically motivated.

I am deeply concerned about the conditions of detention, in particular for those charged or convicted on politically motivated charges. Detainees, both men and women, are subjected to torture and ill-treatment, including beatings, overcrowding, sleep deprivation, denial of access to medical care, repeated solitary confinement and unsafe or exploitative compulsory labour. In addition, some detainees were subjected to severe psychological violence, including death threats, rape threats, sexually abusive comments, insults, and other forms of abuse.

High-profile opposition figures and human rights defenders serving sentences face broad restrictions in contacting their family or lawyers, with some of them held fully incommunicado for months, their families lacking official information about their whereabouts or conditions. Of particular concern is the increasing difficulty for detainees to access legal assistance. Over 100 lawyers have been disbarred since 2020, with some being detained, even prosecuted for fulfilling their professional duties. Over 200 lawyers have chosen to leave the profession, while many others have fled the country due to fear of arrest.

We are deeply troubled by the reported deaths in detention, including cases of suicide. I remind the Government of its special responsibility for the safety and health of all persons in its custody, and call for thorough investigation of each and every such death – whatever the cause - to clearly establish the facts and circumstances, to ensure the appropriate accountability and to enable measures to be put in place to avoid recurrence.

Since our last update, the authorities have further tightened their already far-reaching control over civic space. Again, as of this month, the Government's so-called "extremists" list includes almost 3,300 individuals. The authorities are increasingly employing the label “extremism” to stifle dissent, loosely classifying activities described as disseminating false information, insulting officials, discrediting institutions, organizing mass riots, calling for sanctions and inciting social hatred as also constituting “extremist” acts subject to criminal penalty. The particular situation, once again, of journalists is alarming, with more than 670 arrests recorded by the Belarusian Association of Journalists since 2020.

The crackdown on civil society organizations continues, with as many as 900 NGOs being dissolved and 492 organizations forced to shut down to avoid criminal prosecution. Similarly, new restrictions on political party registration raise concerns as they effectively exclude opposition parties, including from participation in the upcoming parliamentary elections scheduled for February 2024.

I am deeply concerned by recent legislative proposals that, if adopted, would pose significant threats to communities and individuals, exposing them to discrimination and harassment. One such troubling draft aims to unduly regulate religious groups, imposing restrictions on their activities and religious education based, once again, on vague terms such as "extremism", "terrorism," or incompatibility with "the ideology of the Belarusian state." Another discriminatory proposal seeks to arbitrarily restrict freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and association of members of the LGBT community, under the guise of prohibiting so-called “propaganda”. This proposal also aims to penalize a so-called “child free lifestyle”, in violation of personal freedom and reproductive choice of individuals.

The recent expansion of the application of the death penalty to include the ill-defined crime of "terrorism" and "high treason by government officials or members of the armed forces" is similarly alarming and distressing, running flatly counter to the worldwide movement away from the death penalty. I note with deep concern that dozens of activists and human rights defenders have been charged with "terrorism", and may therefore run the risk of capital sentences for conduct that is entirely protected under international human rights law. Once again, I urge an immediate moratorium on the imposition of the death penalty, as a first step towards its eventual abolition.

Against this grim background, the situation in Belarus has forced at least an estimated 300,000 persons to leave the country since May 2020 and the repression is increasingly extending beyond the borders of Belarus, targeting those who have already left. Regrettably, many have been added to the Government's "extremists" list, as I outlined, while their relatives and friends remaining in Belarus face tremendous pressure and, at times, direct retaliation from the authorities.

In this context, amendments to the Citizenship Law, effective since July of this year, are deeply concerning. They provide the authorities with the power to revoke the citizenship of individuals residing abroad who have been convicted – including in absentia – of "extremism" or and I quote "causing serious harm to the interests of Belarus." Additionally, Belarusians are required to inform the authorities about their residences abroad, leading to heightened surveillance of those in exile as well as their families remaining at home. These amendments risk inflicting statelessness and provide broad space for abuse and misuse; they should be repealed. Of further concern, on 4 September, a Presidential Decree was issued ordering Belarusian diplomatic missions abroad to stop the issuance and renewal of passports for Belarusians in those countries.

Mr. President,

Our Office deeply regrets the Government’s ongoing lack of cooperation. We call on the Government to engage constructively with our Office and other human rights mechanisms. Urgent actions are needed, including the prompt release of detainees and prisoners charged on politically motivated grounds. Human rights violations, including the systematic repression of civil society, independent media, and opposition groups, must end. Belarus should take immediate steps to uphold human rights and protect all individuals within its borders.

I call for prompt, effective, thorough, independent, impartial and transparent investigations into past human rights violations, ensuring appropriate remedies and holding those responsible to account. In light of the prevailing impunity in the country, Member States should actively support other forms of accountability, notably through national proceedings based on established principles of extraterritorial and universal jurisdiction, consistent with international law.

I would express our acknowledgment and gratitude to the many victims, the survivors, the members of civil society who have shared their often deeply painful experiences, in cooperation with our Office. I am especially grateful to our experts Karinna Moskalenko, Susan Bazilli, and Monika Platek for their invaluable advice to the Office in the discharge of this mandate, and for the continued support provided by the Council’s Special Rapporteur on Belarus. A detailed report with recommendations will be presented at the next Council session.

Thank you, Mr. President.

Source: ohchr.org, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, September 22, 2023


_____________________________________________________________________

Home  |  Twitter/X  |  Facebook  |  Telegram  | Contact us






"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."

— Oscar Wilde

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

USA | What happens in the final weeks before an execution? These reporters were inside the room.

The journalists behind ‘The Last 12 Weeks’ earned extraordinary access to a death penalty defense team—and faced difficult ethical choices Many defense lawyers are naturally cagey. They work in a pressure cooker, protecting their clients’ rights while fighting for the best possible outcome. And arguably, the stakes can’t get any higher than trying to save a client’s life. So no, defense lawyers don’t usually invite journalists into strategy meetings. But that’s what happened when Marshall Project reporter Maurice Chammah and Serial Productions senior producer Alvin Melathe spent the final few months before a Texas execution embedded with a capital defense team.

North Korea | 'I was only 9': North Korean defector recalls childhood memory of public execution

Kim Eun-joo was 9 years old when her teacher stopped their lesson and told the class to follow her outside. The children were marched to a public execution ground in North Korea. “I would cry even when our family dog died,” Kim said in a recent interview with The Korea Times. “But the first time I watched humans killing a human, I had no words for what I was feeling. It was the most brutal scene I have ever seen, in any movie or in real life.” The memory has stayed with her ever since. Now a human rights advocate after defecting from North Korea, Kim recently brought that childhood scene to the 9th World Congress Against the Death Penalty in Paris, where North Korea’s use of public executions and capital punishment was officially placed on the agenda for the first time.

19 July 1943 | Auschwitz's Largest Public Hanging: 12 Polish Prisoners Executed in Escape Reprisal

OSWIECIM, Poland — The SS carried out the largest public hanging in Auschwitz history on July 19, 1943, executing 12 Polish prisoners before other inmates as collective punishment for escapes and civilian contacts. The victims, all from the camp’s surveyors’ labor unit, were hanged on gallows built in front of the camp kitchen during an Auschwitz I roll call. The SS orchestrated this reprisal following prisoner escapes from the surveyors’ detail and unauthorized communication between inmates and civilians. Camp authorities used the recent escapes as a pretext to impose collective punishment.

Former Florida cop to be executed on same day as 80-year-old Pasco man

In an unprecedented move in the modern history of capital punishment, Gov. Ron DeSantis on Tuesday cleared the way for 2 executions to occur on the same day.  DeSantis reset the execution of James Duckett, whose execution earlier this year was stayed amid efforts to secure DNA testing and analysis of evidence in his case.  Duckett’s execution was reset for July 28. That is the same day previously set for the execution of Dominick Occhicone.  Court records indicate that Duckett’s execution is scheduled for noon. Occhicone’s is set to follow at 6 p.m. 

Texas: The inmates who refused to die quietly and had to be gassed out of their cells before execution

Former crime reporter Michelle Lyons, who witnessed nearly 300 executions in Texas, US, reveals the desperate acts of death row prisoners who refused to accept their fate After spending years or often decades locked up in a tiny cell for 23 hours a day, most Death Row inmates go willingly to their executions. However, some refuse to die quietly - with officers forced to gas them out of cells, strap up their heads and even give chase across prison grounds. Michelle Lyons, who has witnessed nearly 300 executions in Texas, US, exclusively tells Sun Online how certain inmates "fight like hell" in their last moments. On most occasions, Michelle watched from the witness area, with the killers already on the gurney - the stretcher where they'd be given a lethal injection. Seven prisoners once tried to escape from the Row in Huntsville - with one shoving magazines and newspapers under his clothes to help him roll over razor-wire fences. Others have had to b...

Florida to execute William Silvia for 2006 shooting murder of wife

William Silvia, convicted of the 2006 shooting murder of his wife, Patricia, is scheduled to die by lethal injection in August, according to a death warrant filed by Gov. Ron DeSantis on July 17. If all previously scheduled executions go as planned, Silvia will be the 13th person put to death in Florida this year, following a record-breaking 19 executions in 2025. Silvia, now 61, went to his estranged wife's mother's house in Seminole County to attempt to reconcile with her, but first he calmly bought a 12-gauge shotgun and ammunition, prosecutors said. After talking to Patricia Silvia, Silvia got the shotgun from his truck, shot her mother, Betty Woodard, in the face, and fatally shot Patricia in the head, court records show. Woodard, who was standing in front of her daughter, lost her left eye and the top portion of her nose.

Japan: Capital punishment for a minor

Death chamber at Tokyo Detention Center The Supreme Court's recent decision to uphold the death sentence given in a lay judge trial to a 24-year-old man for murders he committed when he was a minor raises questions about the lay judge trial system and capital punishment. These include whether the lay judges correctly understood the spirit of the Juvenile Law in sentencing the defendant to death. It was the 1st death sentence handed down on a minor in a lay judge trial. The murders took place in Ishinomaki, Miyagi Prefecture, in 2010 when Yutaro Chiba was 18 - meaning he fell under the purview of the Juvenile Law. Chiba was convicted of entering his ex-girlfriend's house and stabbing to death the girl's sister and a female friend of the girl with a butcher knife, seriously injuring a male friend of the sister and abducting the girl. Prosecutors said Chiba killed the victims because they were trying to separate him and his former girlfriend. Since Chiba pleaded n...

Idaho | Death row prisoners sue over state's new firing squad

BOISE (Idaho Statesman) – Days after Idaho made the switch to a firing squad for executions, two Idaho death row prisoners next in line to be put to death sued the state prison system, saying its director withheld information about how she settled on the specifics for carrying out the method. Attorneys for prisoners Thomas Creech and Gerald Pizzuto filed suit this week in state district court against Idaho Department of Correction Director Bree Derrick. In the filing, they called her approval of an updated standard operating procedure for the firing squad and lethal injection as a backup method “arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion and in excess of the statutory authority of the agency.”

Florida executes Dennis Sochor

Man, 74, becomes oldest inmate executed in Florida in state’s 10th lethal injection this year  Florida put to death one of its oldest prisoners in its history on Tuesday, a 74-year-old convicted murderer who was 1 of 3 older inmates scheduled for execution within the span of a month in the nation’s busiest death penalty state.  Dennis Sochor was pronounced dead at 6:16 p.m. following a 3-drug injection at Florida State Prison near Starke, the office of Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis said. He was convicted of killing a woman on Jan. 1, 1982, just hours after meeting her at a New Year’s Eve party. 

Oldest inmate set to be executed in Florida will face strict spending limit for final meal

An entire category of food is also off-limits for final meal requests in Florida Florida is currently preparing to execute its oldest inmate later today (July 14), a 74-year-old convicted murderer who has been on death row since the 1980s—but his final meal will be limited by a strict budget. Dennis Sochor is scheduled to be put to death later today, making history as the oldest inmate to ever be executed in the state. The criminal, who has been on death row for nearly 40 years, will be administered the lethal three-drug injection, with the process due to begin at around 6pm.