Skip to main content

Statement on the situation of human rights in Belarus: UN High Commissioner for Human Rights

STATEMENT DELIVERED BY: United Nations Deputy High Commissioner for Human Rights, Nada Al-Nashif

AT: Interactive Dialogue on the situation of human rights in Belarus, 54th session of the Human Rights Council

LOCATION: Geneva, Palais des Nations, Room XX

Mr. President

Excellencies

Dear Colleagues,

I welcome the opportunity to address the Council and provide an update on the human rights situation in Belarus, in accordance with Resolution 52/29.

Three years from the contested Presidential elections of August 2020, the human rights situation in Belarus remains grave, showing no signs of improvement. On the contrary, we are witnessing the further shrinking of civic space and continuing lack of respect for fundamental freedoms, evidenced by a campaign of violence and repression against individuals who oppose the Government, or who are perceived to be doing so, expressing critical or independent views. Systematic impunity continues to allow those who are responsible for gross human rights violations to evade accountability for their actions.

The documentation of OHCHR reveals an ongoing and distressing pattern of arbitrary arrests and prosecutions on trumped-up charges, the targeting of various segments of society, including government critics, human rights defenders, journalists, academics, trade unionists, religious figures, members of minorities, lawyers, and others who seek to exercise their fundamental rights.

As of this month, September 2023, the Belarus authorities' crackdown on those critical or perceived to be critical of the Government has resulted in over 3,750 individuals being convicted in criminal trials characterized by severe and disproportionate prison sentences, with little regard for due process or indeed, the right to a fair trial. Notably, pursuant to amendments to the criminal code made in 2022, trials in absentia are now possible and have been conducted against prominent political opponents and individuals currently residing outside Belarus. Inside Belarus, 1,500 individuals are currently detained on charges that our Office believes to be politically motivated.

I am deeply concerned about the conditions of detention, in particular for those charged or convicted on politically motivated charges. Detainees, both men and women, are subjected to torture and ill-treatment, including beatings, overcrowding, sleep deprivation, denial of access to medical care, repeated solitary confinement and unsafe or exploitative compulsory labour. In addition, some detainees were subjected to severe psychological violence, including death threats, rape threats, sexually abusive comments, insults, and other forms of abuse.

High-profile opposition figures and human rights defenders serving sentences face broad restrictions in contacting their family or lawyers, with some of them held fully incommunicado for months, their families lacking official information about their whereabouts or conditions. Of particular concern is the increasing difficulty for detainees to access legal assistance. Over 100 lawyers have been disbarred since 2020, with some being detained, even prosecuted for fulfilling their professional duties. Over 200 lawyers have chosen to leave the profession, while many others have fled the country due to fear of arrest.

We are deeply troubled by the reported deaths in detention, including cases of suicide. I remind the Government of its special responsibility for the safety and health of all persons in its custody, and call for thorough investigation of each and every such death – whatever the cause - to clearly establish the facts and circumstances, to ensure the appropriate accountability and to enable measures to be put in place to avoid recurrence.

Since our last update, the authorities have further tightened their already far-reaching control over civic space. Again, as of this month, the Government's so-called "extremists" list includes almost 3,300 individuals. The authorities are increasingly employing the label “extremism” to stifle dissent, loosely classifying activities described as disseminating false information, insulting officials, discrediting institutions, organizing mass riots, calling for sanctions and inciting social hatred as also constituting “extremist” acts subject to criminal penalty. The particular situation, once again, of journalists is alarming, with more than 670 arrests recorded by the Belarusian Association of Journalists since 2020.

The crackdown on civil society organizations continues, with as many as 900 NGOs being dissolved and 492 organizations forced to shut down to avoid criminal prosecution. Similarly, new restrictions on political party registration raise concerns as they effectively exclude opposition parties, including from participation in the upcoming parliamentary elections scheduled for February 2024.

I am deeply concerned by recent legislative proposals that, if adopted, would pose significant threats to communities and individuals, exposing them to discrimination and harassment. One such troubling draft aims to unduly regulate religious groups, imposing restrictions on their activities and religious education based, once again, on vague terms such as "extremism", "terrorism," or incompatibility with "the ideology of the Belarusian state." Another discriminatory proposal seeks to arbitrarily restrict freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and association of members of the LGBT community, under the guise of prohibiting so-called “propaganda”. This proposal also aims to penalize a so-called “child free lifestyle”, in violation of personal freedom and reproductive choice of individuals.

The recent expansion of the application of the death penalty to include the ill-defined crime of "terrorism" and "high treason by government officials or members of the armed forces" is similarly alarming and distressing, running flatly counter to the worldwide movement away from the death penalty. I note with deep concern that dozens of activists and human rights defenders have been charged with "terrorism", and may therefore run the risk of capital sentences for conduct that is entirely protected under international human rights law. Once again, I urge an immediate moratorium on the imposition of the death penalty, as a first step towards its eventual abolition.

Against this grim background, the situation in Belarus has forced at least an estimated 300,000 persons to leave the country since May 2020 and the repression is increasingly extending beyond the borders of Belarus, targeting those who have already left. Regrettably, many have been added to the Government's "extremists" list, as I outlined, while their relatives and friends remaining in Belarus face tremendous pressure and, at times, direct retaliation from the authorities.

In this context, amendments to the Citizenship Law, effective since July of this year, are deeply concerning. They provide the authorities with the power to revoke the citizenship of individuals residing abroad who have been convicted – including in absentia – of "extremism" or and I quote "causing serious harm to the interests of Belarus." Additionally, Belarusians are required to inform the authorities about their residences abroad, leading to heightened surveillance of those in exile as well as their families remaining at home. These amendments risk inflicting statelessness and provide broad space for abuse and misuse; they should be repealed. Of further concern, on 4 September, a Presidential Decree was issued ordering Belarusian diplomatic missions abroad to stop the issuance and renewal of passports for Belarusians in those countries.

Mr. President,

Our Office deeply regrets the Government’s ongoing lack of cooperation. We call on the Government to engage constructively with our Office and other human rights mechanisms. Urgent actions are needed, including the prompt release of detainees and prisoners charged on politically motivated grounds. Human rights violations, including the systematic repression of civil society, independent media, and opposition groups, must end. Belarus should take immediate steps to uphold human rights and protect all individuals within its borders.

I call for prompt, effective, thorough, independent, impartial and transparent investigations into past human rights violations, ensuring appropriate remedies and holding those responsible to account. In light of the prevailing impunity in the country, Member States should actively support other forms of accountability, notably through national proceedings based on established principles of extraterritorial and universal jurisdiction, consistent with international law.

I would express our acknowledgment and gratitude to the many victims, the survivors, the members of civil society who have shared their often deeply painful experiences, in cooperation with our Office. I am especially grateful to our experts Karinna Moskalenko, Susan Bazilli, and Monika Platek for their invaluable advice to the Office in the discharge of this mandate, and for the continued support provided by the Council’s Special Rapporteur on Belarus. A detailed report with recommendations will be presented at the next Council session.

Thank you, Mr. President.

Source: ohchr.org, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, September 22, 2023


_____________________________________________________________________

Home  |  Twitter/X  |  Facebook  |  Telegram  | Contact us






"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."

— Oscar Wilde

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

'No Warning': The Death Penalty In Japan

Stakes for wrongful convictions are high in Japan, where the death penalty has broad public support despite criticism over how it is carried out. Tokyo: Capital punishment in Japan is under scrutiny again after the world's longest-serving death row prisoner, Iwao Hakamada, was awarded $1.4 million in compensation this week following his acquittal last year in a retrial. Stakes for wrongful convictions are high in Japan, where the death penalty has broad public support despite international criticism over how it is carried out.

Louisiana's First Nitrogen Execution Reflects Broader Method Shift

Facing imminent execution by lethal gas earlier this week, Jessie Hoffman Jr. — a Louisiana man convicted of abducting, raping and murdering a 28-year-old woman in 1996 — went to court with a request: Please allow me to be shot instead. In a petition filed with the U.S. Supreme Court on March 16 seeking a stay of his execution by nitrogen hypoxia, a protocol that had yet to be tested in the state, Hoffman requested execution by firing squad as an alternative.

A second South Carolina death row inmate chooses execution by firing squad

Columbia, S.C. — A South Carolina death row inmate on Friday chose execution by firing squad, just five weeks after the state carried out its first death by bullets. Mikal Mahdi, who pleaded guilty to murder for killing a police officer in 2004, is scheduled to be executed April 11. Mahdi, 41, had the choice of dying by firing squad, lethal injection or the electric chair. He will be the first inmate to be executed in the state since Brad Sigmon chose to be shot to death on March 7. A doctor pronounced Sigmon dead less than three minutes after three bullets tore into his heart.

USA | Federal death penalty possible for Mexican cartel boss behind 1985 DEA agent killing

Rafael Caro Quintero, extradited from Mexico in 2022, appeared in Brooklyn court as feds weigh capital charges for the torture and murder of Agent Enrique Camarena NEW YORK — The death penalty is on the table for notorious drug lord Rafael Caro Quintero, the so-called “narco of narcos” who orchestrated the torture and murder of a DEA agent in 1985, according to federal prosecutors. “It is a possibility. The decision has not yet been made, but it is going through the process,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Saritha Komatireddy said in Brooklyn Federal Court Wednesday.

Execution date set for prisoner transferred to Oklahoma to face death penalty

An inmate who was transferred to Oklahoma last month to face the death penalty now has an execution date. George John Hanson, also known as John Fitzgerald Hanson, is scheduled to die on June 12 for the 1999 murder of 77-year-old Mary Bowles.  The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals on Tuesday set the execution date. The state’s Pardon and Parole Board has a tentative date of May 7 for Hanson’s clemency hearing, executive director Tom Bates said.

South Carolina | Spiritual adviser of condemned inmate: 'We're more than the worst thing we've done'

(RNS) — When 67-year-old Brad Sigmon was put to death on March 7 in South Carolina for the murder of his then-girlfriend's parents, it was the first time in 15 years that an execution in the United States had been carried out by a firing squad. United Methodist minister Hillary Taylor, Sigmon's spiritual adviser since 2020, said the multifaceted, months long effort to save Sigmon's life, and to provide emotional and spiritual support for his legal team, and the aftermath of his execution has been a "whirlwind" said Taylor, the director of South Carolinians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty.

Inside Florida's Death Row: A dark cloud over the Sunshine State

Florida's death penalty system has faced numerous criticisms and controversies over the years - from execution methods to the treatment of Death Row inmates The Sunshine State remains steadfast in its enforcement of capital punishment, upholding a complex system that has developed since its reinstatement in 1976. Florida's contemporary death penalty era kicked off in 1972 following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Furman v. Georgia , which temporarily put a stop to executions across the country. Swiftly amending its laws, Florida saw the Supreme Court affirm the constitutionality of the death penalty in 1976's Gregg v. Georgia case.

Bangladesh | Botswana Woman Executed for Drug Trafficking

Dhaka, Bangladesh – Lesedi Molapisi, a Botswana national convicted of drug trafficking, was executed in Bangladesh on Friday, 21 March 2025. The 31-year-old was hanged at Dhaka Central Jail after exhausting all legal avenues to appeal her death sentence. Molapisi was arrested in January 2023 upon arrival at Hazrat Shahjalal International Airport in Dhaka, where customs officials discovered 3.1 kilograms of heroin hidden in her luggage. Following a trial under Bangladesh’s Narcotics Control Act, she was sentenced to death in May 2024. Her execution was initially delayed due to political unrest in the country but was carried out last week.

Oklahoma executes Wendell Grissom

Grissom used some of his last words on Earth to apologize to everyone he hurt and said that he prays they can find forgiveness for their own sake. As for his execution, he said it was a mercy. Oklahoma executed Wendell Arden Grissom on Thursday for the murder of 23-year-old Amber Matthews in front of her best friend’s two young daughters in 2005.  Grissom, 56, was executed by lethal injection at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary in McAlester and pronounced dead at 10:13 a.m. local time, becoming the first inmate to be put to death by the state in 2025 and the ninth in the United States this year. 

564 People On Death Row In India, Highest Since The Turn Of The Century

In 90% of of all death penalty sentences in 2024, trial courts imposed sentences in the absence of adequate information about the accused, finds a recent report Bengaluru: Following the uproar and the widespread protests after the August 2024 rape and murder of a medical professional in Kolkata’s RG Kar hospital, there were demands for death penalty for the accused. The state government passed the Aparajita Woman and Child (West Bengal Criminal Laws Amendment) Bill 2024 (awaiting presidential assent) which included mandatory death sentence for rape which results in death of the victim or if the victim is left in a vegetative state, despite such a mandatory sentence being unconstitutional.