Skip to main content

USA | The Unceasing Noise of Solitary Confinement

In solitary, you’re bombarded by the sounds of humans forced into a grinding monotony of hunger, uncertainty, and madness.

The noise in solitary confinement is ceaseless. You’re startled awake throughout the night by the repetitive slam of heavy steel doors and the shrill jangle of guards’ keys hanging from their belts, by the sound of their walkie-talkies crackling through the vast empty space. Once you’re awake, the light that never sleeps takes over—the long fluorescent bulb mounted above you burns bright. You cover your head with a blanket trying to evade its encompassing glare. As soon as you drift off, a guard kicks your door and tells you to show yourself, so they know you’re alive. When you do sleep, the garbled screams of your neighbors invade your dreams.

The noise in solitary confinement is ceaseless.

During the day, the noise distracts you. You find yourself staring at an open book—reading the same sentence again and again, listening to fists beating discordant rhythms against the hard steel doors. Incomprehensible announcements squawk from the loud speakers. Someone’s shoes thud on the concrete floor of the cell above yours, as the prisoner paces back and forth. Someone else is finding comfort in kicking their metal sink next door. There is a steady asthmatic gasp from the ancient, dust-choked ventilation system. Conversations and arguments hollered from one cell to another—the echo bouncing from wall to wall—force their way into your mind and shut down your thoughts. And beneath it all, the bedrock of this cacophony is made of the rants and cries of humans forced to live inside their minds, sliding into a place with no doors, into deep dark holes within themselves.

You drink water to fend off the hunger inflicted by small, cold meals that never satisfy. You could complain, but that only leads to trouble. You mindlessly pace, sometimes counting the steps—one, two, three . . . turn, one, two, three . . . turn—to expel anxious energy. You never see a clock. Time is for another world. The window slit at the back of your cell is painted over or simply out of reach from the view of your eyes, even on the tips of your toes. You crave the sun and its warmth. There is only night and day, and both have grown so long it no longer seems a single cycle could contain them.

Your time out of the cold cell could come long before breakfast, long after dinner, or at any point between. Guards arrive to strip you of your clothes and dignity; after kneeling on the floor, you are tightly cuffed and attached to a dog leash. Two guards grab you tightly as the cuffs cut into your wrists and you are led down the hall to the yard.

The yard isn’t a yard and there is no grass.

But the yard isn’t a yard and there is no grass. It’s a dog run, narrow with high concrete walls. There is no roof. You will not see trees or people. Just an abbreviated segment of sky. You are unlikely to see the sun, but you will be exposed to whatever the day’s elements happen to be—rain, heat, snow, hail. The space has little to offer aside from a chin-up bar and a payphone bolted to the wall. The phone might work—often, it doesn’t. Instead of hearing a loved one’s voice when you place the receiver next to your ear you hear the intractable silence of a dead line.

The guards come back to collect you within an hour, maybe. They could be early, depriving you of the mere hour you’re due. Or maybe they will be gone for hours, leaving you in the rain, or cold, or heat, while they were gone because of some intervening event—a use of force incident where another prisoner was being abused, or a football game on the break room television. You have no way of knowing. 

When the guards do return, they walk you back to your concrete box on a leash, where nothing has changed. You look around at the thin plastic pad that serves as a mattress, the few sheets of paper on your concrete desk, a couple of tattered books, the obscured window, and the same inescapable light that glares down upon your face. The cell somehow feels smaller and more enclosed and claustrophobic every time you re-enter it. You are in a tomb, a place where you’re breathing, yet have ceased to exist in the world.

The next day is exactly the same, over and over, until some distant group of people decides you have had enough. 

This grinding monotony of idleness, hunger, uncertainty, and madness is the horrifying everyday reality for close to 50,000 people in American prisons, including more than 600 people here in Washington State. For many, this has been their existence for years, even decades. But these barbaric conditions lead to harm, fear, and anger that can last a lifetime. Solitary confinement must end if we want people to leave prison healthy, productive, and ready to reintegrate into our neighborhoods.

Solitary confinement is not a solution to anything and certainly doesn’t make us safer.

Solitary confinement is not a solution to anything and certainly doesn’t make us safer. Studies have shown solitary doesn’t decrease violence; it increases it. It doesn’t prevent self-harm or suicide; it exacerbates it. Solitary doesn’t save money; it costs three times more than standard incarceration. It doesn’t make guards safer; it makes them more prone to mental and physical health issues. And solitary doesn’t teach people a lesson or prepare them for release; it makes them angry, isolated, and more likely to be re-incarcerated. 

Despite these findings, prisons across the country continue to protect this system of violence, keeping this torturous tool at their disposal to abuse and control prisoners. The one thing solitary does is give prison systems a form of control that incarcerated people fear most—arbitrary in its application, devastating in its consequences. And to preserve this power, prisons claim they’re dedicated to reform while whispering fear into the ears of politicians and silently filling their ranks with guards rather than funding the mental health and programming needed to make real change.

We must reconstruct a prison system that rehabilitates our fellow citizens, as opposed to further harming them.

If hurt people hurt people, we must reconstruct a prison system that rehabilitates our fellow citizens, as opposed to further harming them. Here in Washington State, the Department of Corrections claims to be “working together to keep communities safer,” but solitary doesn’t make anyone safer. The agency should stop just supporting solitary reform in spirit, and support it in actual practice by ending a system they know is causing irreparable damage to hundreds of lives and ultimately putting our communities at risk.

Source: progressive.org, C. Blackwell, K. Light-Roth, July 28, 2023


_____________________________________________________________________




_____________________________________________________________________


FOLLOW US ON:












HELP US KEEP THIS BLOG UP & RUNNING!



"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."


— Oscar Wilde

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight.  In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution.  Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order. 

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

Alabama | Judge bars nitrogen gas execution, says method is unconstitutionally cruel

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- A federal judge on Tuesday permanently blocked Alabama from executing an inmate with nitrogen gas after declaring it violates the ban on cruel and unusual punishment. U.S. District Judge Emily Marks issued the ruling hours after an appeals court reversed her initial finding that the method was constitutional. Marks permanently enjoined the state from executing Jeffrey Lee, 49, by nitrogen gas. He was scheduled to be executed Thursday. The decision, for now, blocks the use of the controversial new execution method that the state has championed since 2024, but the issue will likely end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Idaho will soon turn to firing squad executions. Police will pull the triggers

Trained members of Idaho law enforcement with demonstrated firearms proficiency are expected to fill slots for carrying out the death penalty by firing squad as the state prison system transitions to the controversial execution method next month.  Six volunteers certified for no less than three years apiece through Peace Officer Standards and Training, or POST, will be recruited to ensure the Idaho Department of Correction is ready to comply with a state law that prioritizes shooting prisoners to death over lethal injection starting July 1.  No one on the team may have faced disciplinary action over firearms, use of force, or related conduct over the prior year, according to new execution protocols the prison system released this week. 

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.