Skip to main content

USA | Donald Trump Wants to Use the Firing Squad, Mass Executions, and Videos to Turn Executions Into Reality TV

Donald Trump has long loved the death penalty. It now seems that he wants to turn executions into spectacles of cruelty.

On February 14, Rolling Stone reported that, if he is returned to the White House, Trump has a three-part plan to heighten the drama of state killing.

First, he would like to have the federal government use the firing squad, hanging, or even the guillotine when it puts people to death. Second, he thinks it should carry out mass executions by killing many people at one time. Third, he would like to film and broadcast at least some part of the execution process.

Since Trump measures all things by how well they play on television, it is not surprising that he would want executions to become made-for-TV events.

Let‘s look at each of the elements in Trump’s plan, starting with his preferred method of execution.

Today, lethal injection is the default method for federal executions. But there are serious problems with this method.

It medicalizes executions and masks the death penalty’s cruelty. Lethal injection also is unreliable and frequently botched.

Some commentators argue that the firing squad would be a more humane way for the state to put people to death. They believe it passes constitutional muster and is not cruel.

But neither sympathy for the plight of condemned inmates nor constitutional scrupulousness move the former president.

He does not think lethal injection is cruel or showy enough.

According to Rolling Stone, Trump believes that those who receive death sentences should pay for their crimes with “their pain.” He has shown “a particular affinity for the firing squad, because it… (seems) more dramatic, rather than how we do it, putting a syringe in people and putting them to sleep.”

These are not merely private musings.


Speaking of the way they deal with drug dealers he said, “And if (they) are guilty, they get executed, and they send the bullet to the family and they want the family to pay for the cost of the bullet. This is called not playing around…If you want to stop the drug epidemic in this country, you better do that … (even if) it doesn’t sound nice.”

In fact, executions by firing squad always mutilate the body and produce a bloody death. That is why the former president favors them.

The firing squad was last used in 2010 when Utah put Ronnie Lee Gardner to death. As ABC News described it, “The rifles exploded and four bullets perforated his heart and lungs. The straps held his head up. A metal tray beneath the chair collected his blood.” ABC quoted a witness who said that “‘Gardner did not seem to die quickly.’”

While Oklahoma, Mississippi, and South Carolina recently have added it their menu of execution methods, the New York Times reports that “the firing squad is largely viewed as an archaic form of justice, and polling has suggested that many Americans view it as inhumane.”

These facts are is unlikely to deter Trump from pushing the federal government to use this method should he be elected president again.

In addition to favoring more “archaic” execution methods, Rolling Stone says that Trump has discussed the desirability of conducting mass executions.

It notes that the former president is “big on the idea of executing large numbers of drug dealers and drug lords because he’d say, ‘These people don’t care about anything,’ … and therefore, they need to be eradicated, not jailed.”

In 2016, Trump openly praised U.S. General John Pershing for executing dozens of Muslim prisoners in the Philippines. While there is no evidence that Pershing actually carried out such an execution, Trump’s enthusiasm for the idea is what matters here.

We should note that in recent years, mass executions have been used by some of the authoritarian regimes that Trump most admires, Saudi Arabia, being one of them.

On March 12, 2022, that nation killed 81 people at the same time. They had been convicted of a wide range of offenses, “including ‘terrorism’-related crimes, murder, armed robbery and arms smuggling.” This was the largest mass execution in Saudi Arabian history.

The mass execution in Saudi Arabia is not an isolated example. In 1988, Iran carried out a series of mass executions, killing thousands of people at various places around the country.

Modeling U.S. justice on Saudi Arabia or Iran is, even for Donald Trump, a fairly shocking idea.

Death penalty jurisdictions in this country generally have eschewed mass executions. According to the Death Penalty Information Center, the largest occurred on December 26, 1862, following the U.S.-Dakota War, when “the federal government hanged 38 members of the Dakota tribe in Minnesota.”

That shameful event was more than 150 years ago, and standards of decency have surely evolved since then. Whenever and wherever they are used, mass executions devalue life and are dehumanizing to those who are executed as well as those who carry them out.

The third part of Trump’s plan to turn executions into television spectacles would require using videos from real executions.

“In at least one instance late last year…,” Rolling Stone reports, “Trump privately mused about the possibility of creating a flashy, government-backed video-ad campaign that would accompany a federal revival of…execution methods (like the firing squad). In Trump’s vision, these videos would include footage from these new executions, if not from the exact moments of death.”

Rolling Stone adds that this is not the first time that Trump has considered the utility of having the government disseminate grisly videos. When he was in office, he talked about how they could play a role in dealing with the opioid crisis. He urged aides to find a film of “people dying in a ditch” and “bodies stacked on top of bodies” to “scare kids so much that they will never touch a single drug in their entire life.”

What Trump says about executions reveals the depth of his fascination with ghoulish things. And his latest death penalty musings offer a frightening reminder of the cruelty he would unleash if he is returned to the Oval Office.

In the meantime, they should spur President Biden to commute all federal death sentences and make sure that he empties death row before the 2024 election.

Source: verdict.justia.com, Austin Sarat, February 17, 2023


_____________________________________________________________________




_____________________________________________________________________


FOLLOW US ON:


TELEGRAM


TWITTER







HELP US KEEP THIS BLOG UP & RUNNING!



"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."


— Oscar Wilde

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

Idaho will soon turn to firing squad executions. Police will pull the triggers

Trained members of Idaho law enforcement with demonstrated firearms proficiency are expected to fill slots for carrying out the death penalty by firing squad as the state prison system transitions to the controversial execution method next month.  Six volunteers certified for no less than three years apiece through Peace Officer Standards and Training, or POST, will be recruited to ensure the Idaho Department of Correction is ready to comply with a state law that prioritizes shooting prisoners to death over lethal injection starting July 1.  No one on the team may have faced disciplinary action over firearms, use of force, or related conduct over the prior year, according to new execution protocols the prison system released this week. 

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight.  In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution.  Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order. 

Alabama | Judge bars nitrogen gas execution, says method is unconstitutionally cruel

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- A federal judge on Tuesday permanently blocked Alabama from executing an inmate with nitrogen gas after declaring it violates the ban on cruel and unusual punishment. U.S. District Judge Emily Marks issued the ruling hours after an appeals court reversed her initial finding that the method was constitutional. Marks permanently enjoined the state from executing Jeffrey Lee, 49, by nitrogen gas. He was scheduled to be executed Thursday. The decision, for now, blocks the use of the controversial new execution method that the state has championed since 2024, but the issue will likely end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

US | Army lays groundwork for death row executions if Trump gives approval

The Army is preparing to carry out the executions of the military's four death-row inmates if ordered to do so by the president, according to an internal planning document reviewed by ABC News. If carried out, it would mark the first time the military executed convicted American inmates in more than a half-century The plan, dubbed "Operation Resolute Justice" and issued internally in February, directs Army officials to coordinate with the Federal Bureau of Prisons to transfer condemned prisoners from the U.S. Disciplinary Barracks at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, to the federal execution facility in Terre Haute, Indiana, where the Justice Department carried out a series of non-military federal executions during President Donald Trump's first term.

Texas | Tanner Horner now incarcerated at the Polunsky Unit

Convicted child killer Tanner Horner has now taken up residence in one of the most brutal death row prisons after being sentenced to die by a Texas jury last month. Horner is incarcerated at the Polunsky Unit, an infamously restrictive prison outside Houston where the state's death row inmates are housed in an all-solitary confinement wing and spend at least 22 hours a day in their 60-square-foot cells. The former FedEx deliveryman, 34, was booked at the notorious prison on May 5 within hours of being sentenced for the gruesome murder of Athena Strand, 7, whom he admitted strangling while delivering a Christmas gift to her home in November 2022.

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.