Skip to main content

Alabama | Proposed bill would require unanimous jury decision to impose death sentence

House Bill 14 would require a unanimous vote by jurors to impose a death sentence in capital murder cases in the state of Alabama. The bill is sponsored by State Representative Chris England of Tuscaloosa County.

"When I started practicing almost every state imposed the death penalty. Now we are down to 27," said Richard S. Jaffe, a local criminal defense lawyer. "That is very significant in what's going on with the national trend which is many, many, many fewer death verdicts and fewer states even allowing the death penalty. That's the trend."

In 3 states, a death sentence can be handed down without a unanimous jury decision.

At least 10 jurors are needed to sentence someone to death in Alabama. In Missouri and Indiana, judges determine the sentence, which could be death, even if a jury isn't unanimous in their decision.

"It's kind of hard, I think, to argue with those other 20-something states that require a unanimous verdict because we are talking about eliminating a life, putting someone to death rather than allowing them to die in prison," said Jaffe. "A lot of people think that it's more expensive to house someone for their life even if sentenced at a young age but the fact of the matter is it's 5 times more expensive to seek the death penalty and 45% of death verdicts are overturned on appeal anyway. It's really not fair to the victims' families for our sentencing structure to be the way it is."

He added, to sentence a person to life in prison without parole, there have to be at least seven jurors in favor.

"Anything in between gets very messy," said Jaffe.

Criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor, Leslie Schiffman Moore, explained a unanimous verdict is required to convict a person of capital murder. She believed it should be the same for a death sentence.

"It's the most serious decision a jury has to make putting somebody to death, putting another human being to death regardless of what they've done, and they have done something horrible to get to that point obviously," she said.

The bill also has some retroactive measures. It allows for people who've been sentenced to death without a unanimous verdict to be resentenced.

Before 2017, juries provided non-binding advisory verdicts in capital murder cases. The judge was able to make the final decision, which could be something different than the jury advisory. Judges were required to give the advisory verdict consideration.

Inmates who had a judge hand down a sentence not matching the jury advisory could also be resentenced under this bill.

Those with a non-unanimous sentence or with a sentence from a judge different than the jury advisory could petition to be resentenced by filing a form with the Administrative Office of Courts if HB 14 passed into law.

"I think we're heading toward the point where the United States Supreme Court is going to require a unanimous verdict for death, a unanimous recommendation for death from a jury. I think we are getting ahead of the game on this by changing the law before we are told to change the law by the federal government or before we end up with a bunch of appeals based on a new opinion by the United States Supreme Court, " said Moore. "[A non-unanimous jury] makes people think that we want to impose the death penalty, or make the death penalty more easy to impose when we're not in line with the rest of the country."

Jaffe said there is a weight put on jurors who are tasked with deciding life or death.

"They are weighing decisions to basically play God and step into that role and decide whether someone lives or dies, especially since we just don't know all the time what really happened in many of these cases," said Jaffe.

According to the bill, if a jury is unable to reach a verdict during the sentencing phase, a mistrial is declared. The mistrial does not impact the conviction. Another sentencing hearing will be conducted for a different jury. After one or more mistrials, the right to have a verdict from a jury can be waived and the judge can decide the sentence without a recommendation from a jury.

Changes to the state's execution process have been ongoing. In November, Gov. Kay Ivey ordered a review of the state's execution process after failed executions.

In January, the Alabama Supreme Court abolished the previous one-day time frame to carry out a death sentence. The governor will now set the window of time for the execution.

The Court also eliminated an automatic "plain error review". That review allowed the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals to automatically review death penalty cases for a clear error at trial even though the defense lawyer did not object.

A spokesperson with the Alabama Department of Corrections said the review is nearing completion.

Source: ABC News, Staff, February 24, 2023

_____________________________________________________________________




_____________________________________________________________________


FOLLOW US ON:


TELEGRAM


TWITTER







HELP US KEEP THIS BLOG UP & RUNNING!



"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."


— Oscar Wilde

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

Idaho will soon turn to firing squad executions. Police will pull the triggers

Trained members of Idaho law enforcement with demonstrated firearms proficiency are expected to fill slots for carrying out the death penalty by firing squad as the state prison system transitions to the controversial execution method next month.  Six volunteers certified for no less than three years apiece through Peace Officer Standards and Training, or POST, will be recruited to ensure the Idaho Department of Correction is ready to comply with a state law that prioritizes shooting prisoners to death over lethal injection starting July 1.  No one on the team may have faced disciplinary action over firearms, use of force, or related conduct over the prior year, according to new execution protocols the prison system released this week. 

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight.  In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution.  Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order. 

Alabama | Judge bars nitrogen gas execution, says method is unconstitutionally cruel

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- A federal judge on Tuesday permanently blocked Alabama from executing an inmate with nitrogen gas after declaring it violates the ban on cruel and unusual punishment. U.S. District Judge Emily Marks issued the ruling hours after an appeals court reversed her initial finding that the method was constitutional. Marks permanently enjoined the state from executing Jeffrey Lee, 49, by nitrogen gas. He was scheduled to be executed Thursday. The decision, for now, blocks the use of the controversial new execution method that the state has championed since 2024, but the issue will likely end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

US | Army lays groundwork for death row executions if Trump gives approval

The Army is preparing to carry out the executions of the military's four death-row inmates if ordered to do so by the president, according to an internal planning document reviewed by ABC News. If carried out, it would mark the first time the military executed convicted American inmates in more than a half-century The plan, dubbed "Operation Resolute Justice" and issued internally in February, directs Army officials to coordinate with the Federal Bureau of Prisons to transfer condemned prisoners from the U.S. Disciplinary Barracks at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, to the federal execution facility in Terre Haute, Indiana, where the Justice Department carried out a series of non-military federal executions during President Donald Trump's first term.

Texas | Tanner Horner now incarcerated at the Polunsky Unit

Convicted child killer Tanner Horner has now taken up residence in one of the most brutal death row prisons after being sentenced to die by a Texas jury last month. Horner is incarcerated at the Polunsky Unit, an infamously restrictive prison outside Houston where the state's death row inmates are housed in an all-solitary confinement wing and spend at least 22 hours a day in their 60-square-foot cells. The former FedEx deliveryman, 34, was booked at the notorious prison on May 5 within hours of being sentenced for the gruesome murder of Athena Strand, 7, whom he admitted strangling while delivering a Christmas gift to her home in November 2022.

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.