Skip to main content

Mercy for justice: Why Missouri should stop nation's first execution of transgender woman

Amber Laughlin committed a brutal crime, but what brought her to that moment was a life marked from her earliest years by brain damage, physical and psychological abuse and mental illness.

On Tuesday , Missouri plans to carry out the first execution of 2023 when it puts Amber McLaughlin to death. If it does, McLaughlin would be the first transgendered person ever executed in the United States.

But beyond this historical first, a look at McLaughlin’s case reveals that she is not all that different from many people on death row in this country.

Laughlin committed a brutal crime, but like others awaiting execution, what brought her to that moment was a life marked from her earliest years by brain damage, physical and psychological abuse and mental illness.

Childhood filled with abuse


McLaughlin’s lawyers have petitioned Missouri Gov. Mike Parsons to spare her life. St. Louis Today reports that the lawyers asked him to consider her “abusive childhood, brain damage and fetal alcohol syndrome, bouts of depression as a child and suicide attempts as an adult” as well as the fact that the jury that heard her case was not presented with evidence about those things.

McLaughlin is not the only transgendered woman now awaiting execution in this country. In October, the Ohio State Supreme Court affirmed the death sentence of Victoria Drain, who murdered another inmate in a residential treatment facility where Drain was being held.

Mclaughlin, who was tried in 2006, was convicted of kidnapping, raping and murdering Beverly Guenther, an ex-girlfriend, three years earlier. McLaughlin was sentenced under an unusual provision of Missouri law. At the conclusion of the trial, the jury that heard the case split on its sentencing verdict after rejecting three of the four grounds that the prosecution had advanced as the reason to return a death sentence. In such circumstances, most state laws would not allow anyone to be given a death sentence. They require a unanimous verdict if someone is to be put to death.

But in Missouri (and also in Indiana), when a jury cannot agree on a sentence, the trial judge is allowed to decide, which he did when he sentenced McLaughlin to death.

McLaughlin transitioned during her time on death row. She was able to do so because of a 2018 federal court decision. That decision held that denying hormone therapy to transgendered people in prison violated the Constitution’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment.

So she awaits execution as a woman. According to the Death Penalty Information Center, an anti-death penalty organization that gathers data on capital punishment, “Women are rarely sentenced to death in the United States and executions are even rarer.”

Only 50 women on death row


The center says only 50 of the more than 2,400 people on death row across the country are women. “Although women commit one in eight homicides, they commit a much smaller percentage of offenses that are eligible for capital treatment," law professor Elizabeth Rappaport said.

Most women murderers kill family members or lovers. Those crimes, Rappaport said, “almost never result in death sentences regardless of the sex of the killer.”

If she is executed, McLaughlin would be only the 18th woman executed in this country since 1976, when the Supreme Court allowed executions to resume after a four-year moratorium. No woman has been executed since Lisa Montgomery in January 2021. Her death sentence was carried out as part of former President  Donald Trump’s end-of-term execution spree.

Rappaport attributed the reluctance to execute women to a gender-based inhibition among decision-makers in the death penalty system and the “belief that the public would regard the execution of a woman as inhumane.” She quoted a governor of Oregon who early in the 20th century granted clemency to a woman on death row by saying, “‘When I saw that woman in the penitentiary (the only one there), it made me sick so I turned her loose.’”

That McLaughlin is a transgendered woman may scramble the gender calculus as Gov. Parsons considers whether to grant her mercy. His decision will come when Republican legislators in Missouri have, according to a report in the Springfield News-Leader, “proposed more than a dozen separate pieces of legislation specifically addressing transgender youth…. They come… as swaths of the party continues to focus on anti-transgender rhetoric and policymaking.”

But McLaughlin’s case for clemency has little to do with her gender. It rests instead on a hope that Parsons will recognize the tragic circumstances of her life and how they shaped the person she became.

According to McLaughlin’s clemency petition, she was “abandoned” by her mother and placed into the foster care system, and in one placement, had “feces thrust into her face.” In one foster home, McLaughlin suffered abuse and trauma that included being tasered by her adoptive father.

McLaughlin has been “consistently diagnosed with borderline intellectual disability,” and “universally diagnosed with brain damage as well as fetal alcohol syndrome.”

Her clemency petition concludes that: “Amber McLaughlin never had a chance. She was failed by the institutions, individuals and interventions that should have protected her, and her abusers obstructed, the care she so desperately needed.”

Law professor Charles Ogletree cited a study published in 2014 that “showed that the vast majority of executed offenders suffered from one or more significant cognitive and behavioral deficits. 

McLaughlin’s case gives Americans another chance to confront those facts and to ask, as Bryan Stevenson, the author of "Just Mercy," puts it: “Why do we want to kill all the broken people?”

Her case calls on all of us to acknowledge, in Stevenson’s words, “our brokenness…our weaknesses, or deficits, our biases, our fears. Maybe if we did,” he said, “we wouldn’t want to kill the broken among us who have killed others.”

Source: USA Today, Austin Sarat, January 2, 2023. Austin Sarat is the William Nelson Cromwell professor of jurisprudence and political science at Amherst College in Massachusetts.





🚩 | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.




Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!



"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." -- Oscar Wilde

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Iran: Flogging still a common practice

Flogging of Sufis in Gonabad: Fourteen Ne’matollahi dervishes received 25 lashes each for allegedly disturbing the public security "The lash ruling against 14 Ne'matollahi dervishes of Gonabad was carried out. They were residents of Baydokht and had been arrested and condemned by the Public Prosecutor of Gonabad after a protest against the illegal treatment dealing with the Sufis in June of last year [2010]. According to the website of Majzuban-e-Nur, Mr. Sa'id Kashani, Mr. Amir Roshan-Mojaver-Sufi, Mr. Alimohammad Amanian, Mr. Ruhollah Safari, Mr. Ali Abbasi-Baydokhti, Mr. Ebrahim Abbaszadeh, Mr. Mohammadali Ja'fari, Mr. Hossein Mahdavi, Mr. Hossein Abbaszadeh-Baydokhti, Mr. Rahmat Hosseini, Mr. Reza Kakhki, Mr. Behruz Mojaver-Sufi, Mr. Ali Mir, and Mr. Hassan Baluchi-Baydokhti are the fourteen dervishes whose requests were not only rejected, but who were condemned to 25 lashes for disturbing the public security. It should be mentioned that Ruhollah Safari, the ...

Japan’s Internet Wants Uchida Riko Executed. Here’s Why That Won’t Happen

This week, the prosecution in the case of a murder of a 17-year-old girl in Hokkaido came out with its sentencing recommendation. Japanese social media reacted by clamoring for the accused woman’s blood. But, while the facts of the case are heinous, the prosecutor’s decision not to seek the death penalty is grounded in long-standing precedent. Murdered for looking at the accused wrong Uchida Riko (内田梨瑚), 23, and her friends stand accused of murdering 17-year-old Murayama Runa (村山瑠奈) in Hokkaido’s Asahikawa. Prosecutors say the dispute began after Murayama posted a photo of Uchida to social media. They say Uchida’s group abducted the girl, made her undress, and then forced her to jump from a bridge.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

Two men executed with AK-47 for raping and murdering boy, 12, in Yemen as children watch on

“Public execution is an even more grotesque violation of human rights, particularly in a country where the ability of the accused to obtain adequate legal representation and the coverage of the process is highly limited.” --  Human Rights Watch director Sarah Leah Whitson TWO  paedophiles have been executed with AK-47s in front of a bloodthirsty crowd for raping and murdering a 12-year-old boy in Yemen. Chilling images show Wadah Refat and Mohamed Khaled being marched at gunpoint through the port city of Aden. Yemen is one of the few countries in the world where capital punishment is legal, and even children were in attendance to watch the gruesome event. Refat, 28, and Khaled, 31, were condemned for the abduction, rape, and murder of a young boy who was snatched after playing next to the house of one of the men. The pair reportedly dragged him into their home and raped him. When sentencing the pair, The Daily Star reported that the judge said: “Afte...

Florida execution of 74-year-old death row inmate Dusty Ray Spencer reignites debate

Florida has set an execution date of June 25, 2026, for 74-year-old death row inmate Dusty Ray Spencer, a move that would make him the oldest person ever executed in the state’s history . Governor Ron DeSantis signed the death warrant on May 26, 2026, marking the tenth such warrant issued this year as the state continues its current pace of capital punishment. Spencer was convicted in 1992 of the first-degree murder of his wife, Karen Spencer, in Orange County. Court records detail a prolonged and violent pattern of abuse preceding the homicide. On January 18, 1992, after prior incidents of physical assault and threats, Spencer stabbed his wife to death in their backyard. The trial evidence included testimony that the victim was alive and conscious during the attack, which involved blunt force trauma and multiple stab wounds while the couple's son was present.

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.