Skip to main content

Alabama Supreme Court Eliminates Critical Safeguard Against Wrongful Convictions in Death Penalty Cases

When appellate lawyers read the transcript of Samuel Ivery’s capital murder trial in Mobile, Alabama, they were stunned to read that the prosecutor, in his closing argument, rebutted evidence that Mr. Ivery, who is Black, suffered from mental illness by telling jurors “this is not another case of niggeritous.” They were even more stunned that Mr. Ivery’s lawyer did not object.

At Judy Haney’s capital murder trial, appellate lawyers discovered that her attorney at trial was so intoxicated during the proceedings that the trial judge stopped the trial midway through and ordered the lawyer to be incarcerated in the city jail overnight.  The next day, the trial resumed with no objections and Ms. Haney was sentenced to death.

Under Alabama Rule of Appellate Procedure 45A, known as the “plain error” rule, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals is required to review on appeal whether incidents like these necessitate a new trial, even if there were no objections at trial.

Last week, the Alabama Supreme Court announced, without input from the Alabama Appellate Rules Committee, that it is eliminating mandatory plain error review, effective immediately. The decision will have a profound impact on death penalty litigation and the reliability and fairness of capital convictions and sentences in Alabama.

In most criminal cases, Alabama appellate courts will address errors or issues on appeal only if the defense lawyer objected at trial. Rule 45A provided that, because death penalty cases require the highest possible level of reliability and scrutiny, the Alabama Court of Criminals is required to address errors or issues raised for the first time on appeal. It applied a higher standard to claims that were not preserved at trial, but it could not refuse to consider those claims.

As the Court of Criminal Appeals described Rule 45A in Ms. Haney’s case:

This rule requires that we notice any plain error or defect in the proceedings under review, whether or not brought to the attention of the trial court, and take appropriate action whenever such error has or probably has adversely affected the substantial rights of the appellant.

Rule 45A allowed appellate attorneys to identify and correct unconstitutional conduct that has occurred in capital trials throughout the state. As a result, many wrongful convictions and illegal sentences have been brought to light.

Mandatory plain error review has been responsible for nearly 40% of all reversals in Alabama death penalty cases. 

In a state with no statewide public defender system where, for decades, appointed defense lawyers were paid less than minimum wage for representing defendants in capital trials, the plain error rule has been critical in addressing and identifying wrongful convictions and illegal sentences in death penalty cases. Eliminating the rule raises serious questions about the reliability of Alabama’s capital system moving forward.

Plain error has been especially important for addressing illegal racial discrimination in jury selection. Prosecutors have routinely excluded Black prospective jurors from serving on capital trial juries in Alabama.  At the capital murder trial of Joe Henderson, the prosecutor struck all 10 Black potential jurors from serving on Mr. Henderson’s jury, but his defense lawyer did not object. 

After he was convicted and sentenced to death by an all-white jury, Mr. Henderson’s appellate lawyers argued that the prosecutor had illegally discriminated against Black jurors. The plain error rule required the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals to address the claim even though there was no objection at trial. The court agreed that the conviction was infected by illegal racial bias and granted a new trial.

Similarly, the prosecutor at Maxine Walker’s trial struck 11 of the 15 Black potential jurors.  The prosecutor used various pretexts for removing Black jurors.  He claimed that some Black jurors did not appear “well kept,” or were “slow” and “dumb,” or had “no teeth,” or were “country,” “hefty,” or “effeminate.” 

Again, the defense lawyer in the case did not object to the prosecutor’s conduct and again the plain error rule required the appellate court to address the claim on appeal. The Court of Criminal Appeals corrected the injustice and granted a new trial due to illegal racial discrimination in jury selection.

The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals implements and enforces Rule 45A. Both of the Alabama Supreme Court justices who previously served on the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals—Hon. Kelli Wise and Hon. Greg Shaw—were among the three justices who objected to the court’s order changing the rule last week.

Alabama has an Appellate Rules Committee comprised of outstanding appellate practitioners from across the state who represent parties on all sides of both civil and criminal litigation. Committee members devote a great deal of time to researching and evaluating proposed changes to the appellate rules and offer important perspectives on how proposed rules will impact appellate practice in Alabama. 

Proposed rule changes typically are researched and evaluated by the committee, which makes recommendations to the Alabama Supreme Court before the court makes a final decision about whether to adopt proposed new rules or change existing rules.

But the court changed Rule 45A last week without notifying the committee or seeking its recommendation about the rule change, which is unprecedented, especially for a critical and longstanding appellate rule that impacts the most serious cases.

Source: eji.org, Staff, January 17, 2023





🚩 | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.




Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!



"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." -- Oscar Wilde

Popular posts from this blog

Biden Commuted Their Death Sentences. Now What?

As three men challenge their commutations, others brace for imminent prison transfers and the finality of a life sentence with no chance of release. In the days after President Joe Biden commuted his death sentence, 40-year-old Rejon Taylor felt like he’d been reborn. After facing execution for virtually his entire adult life for a crime he committed at 18, he was fueled by a new sense of purpose. He was “a man on a mission,” he told me in an email on Christmas Day. “I will not squander this opportunity of mercy, of life.”

Todd Willingham: Ex-wife says convicted killer confessed

The former wife of a man whose 2004 execution in Texas has become a source of controversy has said he admitted setting the fire that killed their three daughters during a final prison meeting just weeks before he was put to death, according to a Texas newspaper. Stacy Kuykendall, the ex-wife of Cameron Todd Willingham, said in a statement to the Fort Worth Star-Telegram published Sunday that Willingham told her he was upset by threats to divorce him after the new year. The fire that killed the couple's three girls was Dec. 23, 1991. Her last threat to divorce him, she said in a statement, occurred the night before the fire. "He said if I didn't have my girls I couldn't leave him and that I could never have Amber or the twins with anyone else but him," according to the statement from Kuykendall to the newspaper. Willingham went to his death proclaiming his innocence. And over the years, she has offered differing accounts. A Tribune investigation in 2004 showed the...

Saudi Arabia executes Somali national, Saudi citizen

Mogadishu (HOL) — Saudi authorities executed a Somali national convicted of drug smuggling and a Saudi citizen found guilty of murder, the Ministry of Interior announced on Sunday. The Somali national, identified as Mohamed Nur Hussein Ja'al, was arrested for attempting to smuggle hashish into Saudi Arabia. A specialized court found him guilty and sentenced him to death under tazir punishment, a discretionary ruling in Islamic law for severe crimes. After an appeal, the Supreme Court upheld the sentence, and a royal decree authorized the execution, which was carried out on Sunday in Najran, southern Saudi Arabia.

Louisiana man with execution date next month dies at Angola

Christopher Sepulvado, the 81-year-old man who was facing execution next month for the 1992 murder of his stepson, died overnight at Louisiana State Penitentiary in Angola, according to his attorney. Shawn Nolan, who had represented Sepulvado, said his client had had a gangrenous leg amputated last week at a New Orleans hospital. Doctors had determined Sepulvado, who had multiple serious ailments, was terminally ill and recommended hospice care at the time a judge set his execution date for March 17, according to his attorney.

U.S. | AG Bondi orders federal inmate transferred for execution

President Donald Trump's newly installed attorney general, Pam Bondi, has ordered the transfer of a federal inmate to Oklahoma so he can be executed, following through on Trump's sweeping executive order to more actively support the death penalty. Bondi this week directed the Federal Bureau of Prisons to transfer inmate George John Hanson, 60, so that he can be executed for his role in the kidnapping and killing of a 77-year-old woman in Tulsa in 1999.

South Carolina death row inmate chooses firing squad as execution method

Brad Sigmon, 67, is scheduled to be killed on March 7 A South Carolina death row inmate has chosen to be executed by a firing squad, which would make him only the fourth inmate in the U.S. to die by this execution method. Brad Sigmon, 67, who is scheduled to be killed on March 7, informed state officials on Friday that he wishes to die by firing squad rather than by lethal injection or the electric chair, citing, in part, the prolonged suffering the three inmates previously executed in the state had faced when they were killed by lethal injection.

Violent and sudden. What a firing squad execution looked like through my eyes

COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) — I’ve now watched through glass and bars as 11 men were put to death at a South Carolina prison. None of the previous 10 prepared me for watching the firing squad death of Brad Sigmon on Friday night. I might now be unique among U.S. reporters: I’ve witnessed three different methods — nine lethal injections and an electric chair execution. I can still hear the thunk of the breaker falling 21 years later. As a journalist you want to ready yourself for an assignment. You research a case. You read about the subject.

Singapore Court Of Appeal Grants Stay Of Execution To Pannir Selvam

SINGAPORE, Feb 19 (Bernama) -- Singapore Court of Appeal on Wednesday has granted Malaysian death row inmate Pannir Selvam Pranthaman a stay of execution just hours before he was scheduled to be executed on Thursday (Feb 20). Judge of the Appellate Division Woo Bih Li, in his judgment, said the stay was granted pending the determination of Pannir Selvam’s Post-Appeal Applications in Capital Cases (PACC) application.

Singapore | Pannir set to be executed on Feb 20

His former lawyer, M Ravi, says the only recourse now is for the Malaysian government to file an urgent application to the International Court of Justice challenging the execution. PETALING JAYA: Pannir Selvam Pranthaman, the 38-year-old Malaysian convicted of drug trafficking in Singapore, will be executed on Thursday (Feb 20), according to his former lawyer, M Ravi. In a Facebook post today, Ravi said Pannir’s sister told him that she had received a letter from the prison today confirming his execution in four days. Ravi claimed that during his time representing Pannir in 2020, Singapore’s prison authorities improperly forwarded confidential information on 13 inmates to the Singapore Attorney-General’s Chambers.

Alabama executes Demetrius Frazier

Alabama puts man to death in the nation's fourth execution using nitrogen gas ATMORE, Ala. — A man convicted of murdering a woman after breaking into her apartment as she slept was put to death Thursday evening in Alabama in the nation's fourth execution using nitrogen gas. Demetrius Frazier, 52, was pronounced dead at 6:36 p.m. at a south Alabama prison for his murder conviction in the 1991 rape and killing of Pauline Brown, 41. It was the first execution in Alabama this year and the third in the U.S. in 2025, following a lethal injection Wednesday in Texas and another last Friday in South Carolina.