Skip to main content

Indonesia's controversial new criminal code: 7 things to know

MEDAN, Indonesia -- Indonesia has been thrown into turmoil following the passage of a controversial new criminal code this week, with critics accusing the government of trying to usher in a new era of authoritarianism.

The code is a complete overhaul of the previous version, much of which was based on Dutch law drafted during the colonial period. Indonesia's previous criminal code, known by its Indonesian initials as the KUHP, dates from 1918 and was codified and unified in 1946, following Indonesia's independence the year before.

The task of overhauling the law, which included abolishing or rewriting existing articles, as well as adding new ones, was overseen by Edward Omar Sharif Hiariej, the deputy law and human rights minister. But it had been in the works for years, as Indonesia sought to establish its own post-colonial rules and regulations.

Here are six things to know about the issues surrounding the new criminal code.

What does the new criminal code say?


The new code has been decades in the making and has been controversial for years, sparking nationwide demonstrations in 2019, when Indonesians took to the streets to protest some of its articles, which critics said were undemocratic and a breach of human rights.

Some controversial passages in the new code include articles that criminalize insulting the president, cohabitation, blasphemy and sex out of marriage, and limit the right to protest. Under the new code, anyone found to have violated these provisions could be sent to prison for a period ranging from a few months to a few years.

Other contentious passages include imposition of the death penalty, which has now been described in the new code as a "last resort," which could be imposed, in some cases, with a 10-year probationary period, after which a death sentence could be commuted to life in prison if the offender is deemed to have reformed in prison.

Foreign tourists visiting Indonesia and expatriates based in Indonesia are subject to all the same laws as Indonesians.

How did human rights groups react to the new code?


Groups such as Amnesty International have been lobbying for years for the death penalty to be abolished completely.

Critics also say the new code continues to disproportionately criminalize women. Although it does allow for abortion in cases of rape or medical emergency if a pregnancy is less than 12 weeks old, the bill threatens those who have an abortion with up to four years' imprisonment, which critics claim discriminates against women by taking away their bodily autonomy and right to choose.

According to Usman Hamid, head of Amnesty Indonesia, the new code will affect, "mostly minorities, activists and regular citizens who are critical of the government." Minority groups such as women and the LGBT community could be particularly at risk, he said in a statement following the passage of the law.

"Outlawing sex outside marriage is a violation to the right to privacy protected under international law. Such 'morality' provisions could even potentially be misused to criminalize victims of sexual assault or to target members of the LGBT community. Consensual sexual relationships should not be treated as a criminal offense or a violation of 'morality.'"

He added that the law could particularly affect areas that rely on tourism. "Fewer tourists will want to visit areas with conservative attitudes," Hamid said.

How did the bill pass and what happens next?


The bill passed on Monday when lawmakers from across Indonesia's political parties agreed on its content. It will first go through a transition period as the previous code is phased out.

Hiariej, the deputy minister, said that the new law would not be applied immediately and that this would take up to three years. The law "has a lot of implementing regulations that must be worked out, so it's impossible in one year," he said following the bill's passage.

Critics can challenge the law in Indonesia's Constitutional Court, which can rule on whether any of the articles are unconstitutional. There is already legal precedent for such action. Last year, the court ruled that some provisions of the "Jobs Creation Law" were unconstitutional and contained a number of procedural flaws. The law was challenged by Indonesian labor unions, and the court has given the government two years to fix the problems. If changes are not made, the legislation will be deemed invalid.

"But even if the new criminal code is subject to a Constitutional Court challenge, until the Constitutional Court declares it unconstitutional, the law remains the formal rule," Hamid said.

Why was the passage of the code controversial?


In addition to the content of the new criminal code, the way it was passed has caused concern across Indonesia. According to Citra Referandum, director of Jakarta's Legal Aid Institute, the bill was passed without transparency and public participation, as the public was not able to see the full draft of the code before it was voted on.

As a result, the public was not able to participate in the lawmaking process, something that the government had promised after the 2019 demonstrations through a mechanism known as "socialization" meant to allow the public to air its concerns through focus groups.

"The process of socialization was also only done one way. The public was invited to hear what the government had to say, but the government didn't listen to the people," Referandum said.

Who will be affected by the new code?


There are fears the new code will impact business owners and potentially scare off foreign investors. According to Adinova Fauri, an economic researcher at the U.S.-based Center for Strategic and International Studies, "The impact of the criminal code on business and investment will be bigger than imagined."

Fauri told Nikkei Asia that this could be particularly true with regard to provisions related to corporate crime. These have been expanded under the new code, as has the scope of who can be held responsible within companies for violations, including shareholders.

"This has the potential to become an elastic law, and it is necessary to specify how far the shareholder's role [extends] in making decisions regarding [a] company's violations. Do not let all shareholders be the subject of punishment or over-criminalization," he said. "This has the potential to reduce investment intentions from investors."

While provinces have the right to enact their own local laws, these laws fall under the umbrella of the national-level criminal code and cannot conflict with the code.

Will the bill affect the 2024 elections?


In 2024, Indonesians will go to the polls to elect a new president and will hold simultaneous elections to elect regional heads across the country, including governors, regents and mayors.

Referandum said provisions in the new code prohibiting criticism of the government could apply to the upcoming elections, stifling criticism of the electoral process and candidates. "There are passages [in] the bill which mean that people who criticize the government or who organize protests will be jailed," she said.

Will the law taint President Joko "Jokowi" Widodo's legacy?


"This will be Jokowi's legacy because it was passed when Jokowi was in office," Referandum said. "The president is responsible for respecting and upholding human rights enshrined in Indonesia's Constitution. Now we will have an authoritarian regime that is not a regime that respects the principles of the rule of law."

However, Niswan Hanifa, a lecturer in governance and government law at Santo Thomas Catholic University in Medan, North Sumatra, told Nikkei Asia that plans for the new criminal code predate Jokowi's time in office.

He added that the law was not drafted by the president, but by the People's Representative Council in consultation with the government.

"But even if Jokowi does not sign the new bill into law within the stipulated 30 days, it will automatically pass anyway as per the regulations," he said.


In Indonesia, the People's Representative Council -- one of two elected chambers of the People's Consultative Assembly, Indonesia's legislature -- drafts laws in consultation with the government but only the People's Representative Council votes on whether to pass them or not. The new law then goes to the president to sign it into force. If the president does not sign it within 30 days, it automatically passes in to law anyway.

Source: asia.nikkei.com, Staff, December 10, 2022





🚩 | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.




Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!



"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." -- Oscar Wilde

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Iran: Flogging still a common practice

Flogging of Sufis in Gonabad: Fourteen Ne’matollahi dervishes received 25 lashes each for allegedly disturbing the public security "The lash ruling against 14 Ne'matollahi dervishes of Gonabad was carried out. They were residents of Baydokht and had been arrested and condemned by the Public Prosecutor of Gonabad after a protest against the illegal treatment dealing with the Sufis in June of last year [2010]. According to the website of Majzuban-e-Nur, Mr. Sa'id Kashani, Mr. Amir Roshan-Mojaver-Sufi, Mr. Alimohammad Amanian, Mr. Ruhollah Safari, Mr. Ali Abbasi-Baydokhti, Mr. Ebrahim Abbaszadeh, Mr. Mohammadali Ja'fari, Mr. Hossein Mahdavi, Mr. Hossein Abbaszadeh-Baydokhti, Mr. Rahmat Hosseini, Mr. Reza Kakhki, Mr. Behruz Mojaver-Sufi, Mr. Ali Mir, and Mr. Hassan Baluchi-Baydokhti are the fourteen dervishes whose requests were not only rejected, but who were condemned to 25 lashes for disturbing the public security. It should be mentioned that Ruhollah Safari, the ...

Japan’s Internet Wants Uchida Riko Executed. Here’s Why That Won’t Happen

This week, the prosecution in the case of a murder of a 17-year-old girl in Hokkaido came out with its sentencing recommendation. Japanese social media reacted by clamoring for the accused woman’s blood. But, while the facts of the case are heinous, the prosecutor’s decision not to seek the death penalty is grounded in long-standing precedent. Murdered for looking at the accused wrong Uchida Riko (内田梨瑚), 23, and her friends stand accused of murdering 17-year-old Murayama Runa (村山瑠奈) in Hokkaido’s Asahikawa. Prosecutors say the dispute began after Murayama posted a photo of Uchida to social media. They say Uchida’s group abducted the girl, made her undress, and then forced her to jump from a bridge.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

Two men executed with AK-47 for raping and murdering boy, 12, in Yemen as children watch on

“Public execution is an even more grotesque violation of human rights, particularly in a country where the ability of the accused to obtain adequate legal representation and the coverage of the process is highly limited.” --  Human Rights Watch director Sarah Leah Whitson TWO  paedophiles have been executed with AK-47s in front of a bloodthirsty crowd for raping and murdering a 12-year-old boy in Yemen. Chilling images show Wadah Refat and Mohamed Khaled being marched at gunpoint through the port city of Aden. Yemen is one of the few countries in the world where capital punishment is legal, and even children were in attendance to watch the gruesome event. Refat, 28, and Khaled, 31, were condemned for the abduction, rape, and murder of a young boy who was snatched after playing next to the house of one of the men. The pair reportedly dragged him into their home and raped him. When sentencing the pair, The Daily Star reported that the judge said: “Afte...

Florida execution of 74-year-old death row inmate Dusty Ray Spencer reignites debate

Florida has set an execution date of June 25, 2026, for 74-year-old death row inmate Dusty Ray Spencer, a move that would make him the oldest person ever executed in the state’s history . Governor Ron DeSantis signed the death warrant on May 26, 2026, marking the tenth such warrant issued this year as the state continues its current pace of capital punishment. Spencer was convicted in 1992 of the first-degree murder of his wife, Karen Spencer, in Orange County. Court records detail a prolonged and violent pattern of abuse preceding the homicide. On January 18, 1992, after prior incidents of physical assault and threats, Spencer stabbed his wife to death in their backyard. The trial evidence included testimony that the victim was alive and conscious during the attack, which involved blunt force trauma and multiple stab wounds while the couple's son was present.

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.