Skip to main content

Indiana | Eight men languish on death row as state struggles to obtain execution drugs

INDIANAPOLIS — Eight men languish on Indiana’s death row as the state struggles to obtain the drugs needed to conduct an execution. Its longest resident has lived 29 years awaiting execution; its most recent addition has waited eight.

The de-facto moratorium on executions in Indiana has some prosecutors doubting that even a successful sentencing will be carried out, and defenders concerned for the convicted who live years under threat of death.

Meanwhile, other states such as Texas and Oklahoma have moved forward with executions this year.

Four of the men on Indiana’s death row have exhausted all their appeals and have no other recourse, according to the Indiana Public Defender Council’s website. But Indiana’s Department of Correction has no orders for executions and no dates set, according to spokeswoman Annie Goeller.

Indiana hasn’t put a man to death since December 2009, when it executed Matthew Eric Wrinkles. All the men reside in the Indiana State Prison in Michigan City.

That’s because the agency has no supply of the three drugs — methohexital, pancuronium bromide and potassium chloride — it would use in its lethal injection drug cocktail, Goeller confirmed.

Indiana and other governments have in recent years struggled to acquire the drugs from pharmaceutical manufacturers who don’t want their products — which have therapeutic purposes — to be used in executions. Some, like Texas, have switched to a single-drug protocol of Pentobarbital.

“Indiana, like many states, is looking into available options,” Goeller wrote in an email.

‘My responsibility is to move forward’


Madison County Prosecutor Rodney Cummings has pursued the death penalty in two of at least four cases since he took office in 1994.

Cummings announced his second on Aug. 17. But he’s skeptical of how it’ll unfold.

Carl Roy Webb Boards II, 42, Anderson, is accused of shooting Elwood Police Officer Noah Shahnavaz, 24, Fishers, to death during a 2 a.m. traffic stop on July 31.

“The process in this case is, “Is this case among the worst of the worst?” And I’ve never seen anything like this before in a police shooting, basically,” Cummings said. “I mean, he shot him 36 times.”

Cummings said he made the decision to pursue the death penalty after taking a hard look at the evidence himself, getting experienced prosecutors from around Indiana to evaluate the case and asking Shahnavaz’s family if they’d like to move forward with it.

“I think the likelihood of conviction is fairly — very high,” Cummings said.

Still, he added, “I think the likelihood that this defendant would ever be executed is unlikely. But we all have our responsibilities in the process, and my responsibility is to move forward in an appropriate case.”

Cummings’ office asked for an additional $50,000 in its 2023 budget to cover the early costs of a case that’s likely to stretch for years to come.

A cruel wait?


Eric Koselke defended his first death penalty case in 1985, six months out of law school. Since then, Koselke told the Capital Chronicle, “I’ve done it all.”

That Indiana has no executions planned and no drugs in stock offers him little comfort.

“They could get them at any time. I mean, we don’t know what’s going on with that, as defense attorneys. They’re not going to tell us,” said Koselke, who’s a death penalty consultant for Indiana’s Public Defender Council in addition to running his own cases.

The wait changes no calculations, he said, because for defense attorneys, chances of success peak at trial and drop with each appeal.

But the wait for death concerns him.

“I still think the sentences should be commuted,” Koselke said. “Those guys are just sitting there, captive, to people who they know, one day, are going to kill them, and they don’t even know when they’re going to die.”

“In my opinion … I think that’s cruel and unusual punishment,” he said. “I mean, they’ve been there for years waiting to be executed, and I can’t imagine living under that kind of pressure.”

Four of the men sitting on Indiana’s death row have run out of appeals. Three have appeals pending, and another was found incompetent to be executed.

Other states moving forward


Not everyone’s struggling to obtain drugs used for lethal injections.

Five states have executed 10 people in 2022, as of Aug. 25, according to the Death Penalty Information Center, a nonprofit that tracks death penalty data and disseminates reports.

Texas’s Department of Criminal Justice — which has conducted two executions this year — uses only pentobarbital, according to Director of Communications Amanda Hernandez.

Asked if her agency had experienced any difficulties in procuring the drug, Hernandez wrote simply, “We have ample supply.”

The Indiana Department of Correction didn’t respond to questions about its procurement attempts, and declined multiple requests for interview.

But in a years-long lawsuit, the agency’s staff argued that without confidentiality for manufacturers and distributors, it was “practically impossible” to get the drugs.

Washington, D.C. lawyer Katherine Toomey asked for information related to lethal injections in 2014 under Indiana’s Access to Public Records Act.

“The Department of Correction wrote her a letter that essentially said, ‘Take a long walk off of a short pier,’” said Peter Racher, a partner at Indianapolis-based Plews Shadley Racher & Braun. He and Josh Tatum eventually litigated Toomey’s case, filed in 2016.

Debra Lynch, a federal judge for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, wrote an order in Toomey’s favor in 2017. But behind the scenes, the Department of Correction was working with the governor’s office to devise a legislative solution Racher believes was aimed at Toomey’s request.

On the last day of 2017’s legislative session, lawmakers inserted a provision exempting information related to lethal injections from the state’s public records law into a lengthy budget bill. Lynch granted summary judgement to the agency instead.

When the Indiana Supreme Court took it up, its four members — one recused himself — split, affirming Lynch’s decision in 2021.

But the records Toomey had requested showed Indiana hadn’t successfully procured drugs for years beforehand.

“Even if, you know, The New York Times published on the front page the records that we got, there was no way that that information was going to have any current impact on anything,” Racher said.

“They made it sound like if these records were released, that’ll be the end of the death penalty in Indiana,” he added. “But I don’t think you can say it’s because of Kate Toomey’s request for public records.”

Indiana’s death row
  • Eric D. Holmes, sentenced March. 26, 1993; no appeals left.
  • Joseph E. Corcoran, sentenced Aug. 26, 1999; no appeals left.
  • Michael D. Overstreet, sentenced July 31, 2000; found incompetent to be executed.
  • Benjamin Ritchie, sentenced Oct. 15, 2002; no appeals left.
  • Roy Lee Ward, sentenced June 8, 2007; no appeals left.
  • Kevin Charles Isom, sentenced March 8, 2013; pending federal habeas corpus review.
  • Jeffrey Alan Weisheit, sentenced July 11, 2013; pending federal habeas corpus review.
  • William Clyde Gibson III, sentenced Nov. 26, 2013 and April 15, 2014; pending federal habeas corpus review.
 Sources: Indiana Public Defender Council

Source: indianacapitalchronicle.com, Leslie Bonilla Muñiz, August 30, 2022





🚩 | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.




Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!



"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." -- Oscar Wilde

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Tennessee executes Harold Wayne Nichols

Thirty-seven years after confessing to a series of rapes and the murder of Karen Pulley, Nichols expressed remorse in final words Strapped to a gurney in the execution chamber at Riverbend Maximum Security Institution Thursday morning, Harold Wayne Nichols made a final statement.  “To the people I’ve harmed, I’m sorry,” he said, according to prison officials and media witnesses. “To my family, know that I love you. I know where I’m going to. I’m ready to go home.”

China | Former Chinese senior banker Bai Tianhui executed for taking US$155 million in bribes

Bai is the second senior figure from Huarong to be put to death for corruption following the execution of Lai Xiaomin in 2021 China has executed a former senior banker who was found guilty of taking more than 1.1 billion yuan (US$155 million) in bribes. Bai Tianhui, the former general manager of the asset management firm China Huarong International Holdings, was executed on Tuesday after the Supreme People’s Court approved the sentence, state broadcaster CCTV reported.

Burkina Faso to bring back death penalty

Burkina Faso's military rulers will bring back the death penalty, which was abolished in 2018, the country's Council of Ministers announced on Thursday. "This draft penal code reinstates the death penalty for a number of offences, including high treason, acts of terrorism, acts of espionage, among others," stated the information service of the Burkinabe government. Burkina Faso last carried out an execution in 1988.

Oklahoma board recommends clemency for inmate set to be executed next week

A voting board in Oklahoma decided Wednesday to recommend clemency for Tremane Wood, a death row inmate who is scheduled to receive a lethal injection next week at the state penitentiary in McAlester.  Wood, 46, faces execution for his conviction in the 2001 murder of Ronnie Wipf, a migrant farmworker, at an Oklahoma City hotel on New Year's Eve, court records show. The recommendation was decided in a 3-2 vote by the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, consisting of five members appointed by either the governor or the state's top judicial official, according to CBS News affiliate KWTV. Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Sitt will consider the recommendation as he weighs whether to grant or deny Wood's clemency request, which would mean sparing him from execution and reducing his sentence to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Iran | Child Bride Saved from the Gallows After Blood Money Raised Through Donations, Charities

Iran Human Rights (IHRNGO); December 9, 2025: Goli Kouhkan, a 25-year-old undocumented Baluch child bride who was scheduled to be executed within weeks, has been saved from the gallows after the diya (blood money) was raised in time. According to the judiciary’s Mizan News Agency , the plaintiffs in the case of Goli Kouhkan, have agreed to forgo their right to execution as retribution. In a video, the victim’s parents are seen signing the relevant documents. Goli’s lawyer, Parand Gharahdaghi, confirmed in a social media post that the original 10 billion (approx. 100,000 euros) toman diya was reduced to 8 billion tomans (approx. 80,000 euros) and had been raised through donations and charities.

Who Gets Hanged in Singapore?

Singapore’s death penalty has been in the news again.  Enshrined in law in 1975, a decade after the island split from Malaysia and became an independent state, the penalty can see people sentenced to hang for drug trafficking, murder or firearms offenses, among other crimes. Executions have often involved trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act, with offenses measured in grams.  Those executed have included people from low-income backgrounds and foreign nationals who are sometimes not fluent in English, according to human rights advocates such as Amnesty International and the International Drug Policy Consortium. 

Afghanistan's Taliban rulers carry out public execution in sports stadium

The man had been convicted of killing 13 members of a family, including children, and was executed by one of their relatives, according to police. Afghanistan's Taliban authorities carried out the public execution of a man on Tuesday convicted of killing 13 members of a family, including several children, earlier this year. Tens of thousands of people attended the execution at a sports stadium in the eastern city of Khost, which the Supreme Court said was the eleventh since the Taliban seized power in 2021 in the wake of the chaotic withdrawal of US and NATO forces.

Afghanistan | Two Sons Of Executed Man Also Face Death Penalty, Says Taliban

The Taliban governor’s spokesperson in Khost said on Tuesday that two sons of a man executed earlier that day have also been sentenced to death. Their executions, he said, have been postponed because the heir of the victims is not currently in Afghanistan. Mostaghfer Gurbaz, spokesperson for the Taliban governor in Khost, also released details of the charges against the man executed on Tuesday, identified as Mangal. He said Mangal was accused of killing members of a family.

Utah | Ralph Menzies dies on death row less than 3 months after his execution was called off

Judge was set to consider arguments in December about Menzies’ mental fitness  Ralph Menzies, who spent more than 3 decades on Utah’s death row for the 1986 murder of Maurine Hunsaker, has died.  Menzies, 67, died of “presumed natural causes at a local hospital” Wednesday afternoon, according to the Utah Department of Corrections.  Matt Hunsaker, Maurine Hunsaker’s son, said Menzies’ death “was a complete surprise.”  “First off, I’d say that I’m numb. And second off, I would say, grateful,” Hunsaker told Utah News Dispatch. “I’m grateful that my family does not have to endure this for the holidays.” 

USA | Should Medical Research Regulations and Informed Consent Principles Apply to States’ Use of Experimental Execution Methods?

New drugs and med­ical treat­ments under­go rig­or­ous test­ing to ensure they are safe and effec­tive for pub­lic use. Under fed­er­al and state reg­u­la­tions, this test­ing typ­i­cal­ly involves clin­i­cal tri­als with human sub­jects, who face sig­nif­i­cant health and safe­ty risks as the first peo­ple exposed to exper­i­men­tal treat­ments. That is why the law requires them to be ful­ly informed of the poten­tial effects and give their vol­un­tary con­sent to par­tic­i­pate in trials. Yet these reg­u­la­tions have not been fol­lowed when states seek to use nov­el and untest­ed exe­cu­tion meth­ods — sub­ject­ing pris­on­ers to poten­tial­ly tor­tur­ous and uncon­sti­tu­tion­al­ly painful deaths. Some experts and advo­cates argue that states must be bound by the eth­i­cal and human rights prin­ci­ples of bio­med­ical research before using these meth­ods on prisoners.