Skip to main content

Alan Eugene Miller says he chose execution by nitrogen. Alabama says he didn't

Alan Eugene Miller swore he turned in the form choosing to die by an alternate method of execution the state still isn’t ready to use. Alabama says he didn’t.

The state plans to execute him by lethal injection on Sept. 22.

In a lawsuit filed Monday in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Miller says that the Alabama Department of Corrections lost a form he claims he submitted in 2018 electing to be executed by nitrogen hypoxia. 

Miller requested that the court enjoin the state from putting him to death by lethal injection.

To date, no state has carried out an execution by nitrogen hypoxia. Since it was approved by Gov. Kay Ivey in 2018, Alabama has not created a protocol for its use. ADOC Commissioner John Hamm has not said when the state will be ready to proceed with the untested method of execution.

Former death row inmates have alleged that the state practically postponed the executions of those who chose nitrogen hypoxia.

“As a consequence of the Defendants’ failure to adopt a protocol, they have indefinitely suspended and postponed the executions of all inmates who elected death by nitrogen hypoxia,” Nathaniel Woods’ attorneys argued ahead of his 2020 execution.

Miller, 57, petitioned the Alabama Supreme Court in May not to set a date for his execution by lethal injection and filed a signed affidavit to the court attesting that he signed and submitted a form electing death by nitrogen to the appropriate correctional officer the same day it was given to him.

In response, Holman Warden Terry Raybon submitted an affidavit saying it had not found a record of Miller’s form. Miller’s attorneys argue that the contradiction “created a quintessential factual dispute that can only be resolved by a trial court after an evidentiary hearing.”

Defendants Raybon, Hamm and Attorney General Steve Marshall have not yet submitted responses in court. Raybon and Marshall declined to comment for this story. The Montgomery Advertiser has not received a response from ADOC.

Miller, 57, was sentenced to death for the killing of three men in a workplace shooting in Shelby County in 1999. Prosecutors say an employee entering Ferguson Enterprises in Pelham saw Miller exit the building on Aug. 5, 1999, before finding Lee Holdbrooks and Scott Yancy fatally wounded inside.

Miller then drove to nearby Post Airgas, where he had previously worked, and killed Terry Jarvis, an employee at that location, prosecutors say.

The jury deliberated for 20 minutes before finding Miller guilty and recommended the death penalty, which a judge imposed. The U.S. Supreme Court has rejected several of Miller’s appeals.

The Alabama Supreme Court set Miller’s execution date on July 18, 2022. Chief Justice Tom Parker dissented, and associate justices Alisa Kelli Wise and Jay Mitchell recused themselves from the vote. The justices did not offer written explanations of their decisions, and a clerk at the Alabama Supreme Court said the office could not comment on Parker’s behalf.

‘A haphazard approach’ to a momentous decision


When Ivey signed a law approving nitrogen hypoxia as a means of execution in 2018, death row inmates were to be given a 30-day window to choose the untested method. Officials said the 30 days began on June 1, 2018, but the new law did not describe how an inmate could opt in beyond informing the prison warden "in writing."

Officials also claimed they did not have to inform inmates of the new option, and most didn’t know about it until less than a week before the deadline.

Attorneys with the U.S. Federal Defenders showed up at Holman Correctional Facility, the site of Alabama’s death row and execution chambers, on June 26, 2018, with forms they created for their clients to fill out if they chose death by nitrogen. The inmates then had five days to choose how they would die.

Holman correctional officer Jeff Emberton said in a January 2019 affidavit that he distributed election forms in “mid-June” to every prisoner on death row. Multiple death row inmates disputed Emberton’s claim, the Montgomery Advertiser's Melissa Brown reported, saying they were unaware of the option until they were contacted by their attorneys in late June.

In 2019, Federal Defender John Palombi told the Advertiser that ADOC only distributed his office’s form to inmates after the Federal Defenders met with their clients. He said ADOC did not provide death row inmates with information about the election period.

“The Department of Corrections handed out the form without notice or explanation,” Palombi said. “To take such a haphazard approach to such a momentous decision does not create confidence in the operation of the department.”

Palombi said the state did not have a process in place for collecting election forms from death row inmates, which Miller also alleges in his lawsuit.

Miller is not the first person on death row to say the state lost their election form.

In 2019, Marshall withdrew his request to execute Jarrod Taylor although neither his office nor the ADOC had his form.

On July 29, 2019, Marshall moved the Alabama Supreme Court to schedule Taylor’s execution by lethal injection. A day later, Taylor’s attorneys told Marshall that he elected nitrogen hypoxia in writing during the 30-day window.

In his motion to withdraw the request for setting Taylor’s execution date, Marshall says that Taylor’s attorneys sent him a copy of Taylor’s election form and correspondence around the time supporting the assertion that Taylor had submitted a form.

Marshall conceded that his office “was never given this form, and counsel for the Alabama Department of Corrections did not have this form in their files” but that “the documentation provided by Taylor's counsel supports the assertion that he made a timely election of nitrogen hypoxia.”

“The State intends to honor that election,” he wrote.

Whether the state intends to honor Miller’s alleged election is unknown, considering that Miller did not provide similar documentation in his court filings. The Advertiser has been unable to reach Miller’s attorneys to ask whether such documentation exists, but Miller claims he was unable to make a copy or notarize his election form in his affidavit.

Source: montgomeryadvertiser.com, Evan Mealins, August 24, 2022





🚩 | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.




Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!



"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." -- Oscar Wilde

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Iran: Flogging still a common practice

Flogging of Sufis in Gonabad: Fourteen Ne’matollahi dervishes received 25 lashes each for allegedly disturbing the public security "The lash ruling against 14 Ne'matollahi dervishes of Gonabad was carried out. They were residents of Baydokht and had been arrested and condemned by the Public Prosecutor of Gonabad after a protest against the illegal treatment dealing with the Sufis in June of last year [2010]. According to the website of Majzuban-e-Nur, Mr. Sa'id Kashani, Mr. Amir Roshan-Mojaver-Sufi, Mr. Alimohammad Amanian, Mr. Ruhollah Safari, Mr. Ali Abbasi-Baydokhti, Mr. Ebrahim Abbaszadeh, Mr. Mohammadali Ja'fari, Mr. Hossein Mahdavi, Mr. Hossein Abbaszadeh-Baydokhti, Mr. Rahmat Hosseini, Mr. Reza Kakhki, Mr. Behruz Mojaver-Sufi, Mr. Ali Mir, and Mr. Hassan Baluchi-Baydokhti are the fourteen dervishes whose requests were not only rejected, but who were condemned to 25 lashes for disturbing the public security. It should be mentioned that Ruhollah Safari, the ...

Japan’s Internet Wants Uchida Riko Executed. Here’s Why That Won’t Happen

This week, the prosecution in the case of a murder of a 17-year-old girl in Hokkaido came out with its sentencing recommendation. Japanese social media reacted by clamoring for the accused woman’s blood. But, while the facts of the case are heinous, the prosecutor’s decision not to seek the death penalty is grounded in long-standing precedent. Murdered for looking at the accused wrong Uchida Riko (内田梨瑚), 23, and her friends stand accused of murdering 17-year-old Murayama Runa (村山瑠奈) in Hokkaido’s Asahikawa. Prosecutors say the dispute began after Murayama posted a photo of Uchida to social media. They say Uchida’s group abducted the girl, made her undress, and then forced her to jump from a bridge.

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight.  In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution.  Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order.