Skip to main content

Alabama | Cover-Up, Double-Talk, and Trial and Error Mark Lethal Injection’s Current Crisis

An independent post-mortem examination completed earlier this month confirmed that Alabama’s execution of Joe Nathan James was, as Robert Dunham, the executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center, put it, “among the worst botches in the modern history of the U.S. death penalty.”

James was executed on July 28 for the 1994 murder of Faith Hall (despite the objections of her children). In the early preparations for his death by lethal injection, the execution team had great difficulty finding a vein in which to insert the IV line. State officials kept him secluded for three hours while they repeatedly poked him with needles and subjected him to great suffering.

From start to finish, James’s execution may well have been the longest in American history.

He joined a disturbingly long list of people, including Clayton Lockett, Joseph Wood, Doyle Hamm, Romell Broom and John Marion Grant, whose executions by lethal injection made headlines in recent years when they went horribly wrong.

According to an account in The Atlantic, the post-mortem found that James’s “hands and wrists had been burst by needles, in every place one can bend or flex…. Something terrible had been done to James while he was strapped to a gurney behind closed doors without so much as a lawyer present to protest his treatment or an advocate to observe it.”

Yet the state Department of Corrections insisted that his execution scrupulously followed the protocol and regulations governing Alabama executions. “We have protocols,” a spokesperson for the department said, “and we’re very deliberate in our process, and making sure everything goes according to plan.” He also assured media witnesses gathered to observe James’s death that “nothing out of the ordinary” had happened to him.

More investigation is needed to determine exactly what occurred, but we already know enough to be able to say that the state’s response and incredulous denial of responsibility for problems in James’s execution merits censure. It exemplifies the now all-too-familiar response of death penalty states to lethal injection’s intractable problems.

The standard response—cover-up, double-talk, and a trial-and-error approach to executions‑makes mishaps and failures of the kind that marked the James execution more likely. It also is intended to make it harder to know with certainty when an execution is botched.

As lethal injection’s problems multiplied in the last decade, many death penalty states modified their execution procedures by adding steps that, at first glance, appear to make lethal injection more reliable. These steps include doing consciousness checks, ensuring that the IV is clearly visible, and using backup lines in case the primary line fails.

State protocols lay out decisional contingencies (if x, then y) for the officials responsible for carrying out lethal injections. In recent years, they have come to resemble decision trees with many branches, rather than a simple set of instructions.

Seeming to account for potential problems, the new protocols give executioners legal cover, even as they allow the executioners to take a wider variety of actions.

Some of the procedural changes, like precisely defining the waiting period after the administration of each of the lethal drugs used in an execution, make the process appear, on paper, more precise and mechanical. Yet the great variability in those procedures among death penalty states points to the lack of empirical grounding for them.

Death penalty states don’t really have any idea about what to do to prevent executions from going wrong. With human lives in their hands, they take a trial-and-error approach.

At several critical junctures in the lethal injection process, state protocols are frighteningly ambiguous. The vagueness affords executioners complete flexibility to act as they please when something goes wrong.

For example, even as states have added more checks to ensure that IVs are working, they have allowed executioners to continue trying to set lines for longer periods of time and in more places on the inmates’ bodies. They require only that officials act in a “reasonable” manner, without defining what counts as reasonable.

And some, like the Alabama protocol that governed James’s execution, make no reference at all to how long the process for setting IV lines should take.

Lethal injection protocols also frequently allow officials to exercise discretion if the prescribed drug dosage proves insufficient to kill. My research revealed that nineteen state protocols give officials overseeing the execution discretion to inject additional doses as they see fit.

Some death penalty states (including Arizona, Delaware, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, and South Dakota) do not even bother to mandate a particular drug cocktail. Instead, they allow officials to choose from a menu of drugs and drug combinations

Ambiguity and discretion provide executioners with a kind of blank check that brings lingering, fraught deaths into the fold of legally acceptable executions. All lethal injection protocols also contain gaps and omissions about what officials should do in crucial parts of the lethal injection process

Executioners can modify execution procedures on the fly.

Rather than preventing unnecessary pain and suffering, the protocols enable officials to act unethically and disregard a condemned inmate’s evident distress.

Across this country, the lethal injection story is one of bureaucratic maneuver and adaptation designed to keep the machinery of death running. Death penalty states do what they need to do to stay one step ahead of what courts might require and make lethal injection work in spite of its vexing and continuing problems.

The constant, seemingly ad hoc, changes to state protocols have made lethal injection more, not less, haphazard and unpredictable.

As the James execution demonstrated, correctional officials are often ill-equipped to make sound decisions about lethal injection’s implementation. Law professor Corinna Barrett Lain correctly notes that: “Prison personnel have no expertise in deciding what drugs to use or how to perform the procedure…. [L]ethal injection drug protocols are decided by Google searches and other decision-making processes that would be patently unacceptable in any other area of administrative law.”

The cover-up, double-talk, and trial-and-error approach that mark lethal injection’s recent history mean that problems of the kind that occurred in the James execution will keep happening. Unless we stop using lethal injection, its most serious and recurring defects will not be fixed, and the suffering of those subject to this supposedly most humane execution method will not be alleviated.

Source: verdict.justia.com, Austin Sarat, August 23, 2022





🚩 | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.




Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!



"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." -- Oscar Wilde

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Louisiana | Execution by nitrogen gas ‘ugly way to die’: MD

What is it like to be executed by nitrogen gas? Dr. Jonathan Groner, a medical ethicist who studies capital punishment, has not witnessed an execution using this method, but he speculates about what happens to an inmate who is given pure nitrogen to inhale through a mask.   “They don’t go quietly, I will say that,” Groner, a professor of surgery at The Ohio State University College of Medicine, told “Banfield” on Wednesday. A federal judge this week halted the state of Louisiana’s plans to execute an inmate for the first time through “nitrogen hypoxia.” State officials plan to appeal the judge’s decision, which raised questions about whether using nitrogen gas is a cruel and unusual punishment.

America’s next killing spree: 10 days, five states, six death-row prisoners set to die

Desolate spectacle of executions begins again under Trump, in landscape of capital punishment as riven as US is as a whole David Leonard Wood. Jessie Hoffman. Aaron Gunches. Wendell Grissom. Edward Thomas James. Moises Sandoval Mendoza. So many names. So many dead men walking. Ten days, five states, six death row prisoners scheduled for execution. For a decade now, capital punishment in the US has been on the wane. Last year, for the 10th year running, there were fewer than 30 executions in America, and the number of new death sentences is also tracking at historic lows.

Texas | Court stays execution of Texas man days before he was set to die by lethal injection

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — A Texas appeals court on Tuesday halted the execution of a man who has spent more than 30 years on death row and had been set to die by lethal injection this week over the killings of six girls and young women found buried in the desert near El Paso. It was the second scheduled execution in the U.S. halted on Tuesday after a federal judge stopped Louisiana’s first death row execution using nitrogen gas, which was to take place next week. In Texas, the order was another reprieve for David Leonard Wood, who in 2009 was about 24 hours away from execution when it was halted over claims he is intellectually disabled and thus ineligible for execution.

Violent and sudden. What a firing squad execution looked like through my eyes

COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) — I’ve now watched through glass and bars as 11 men were put to death at a South Carolina prison. None of the previous 10 prepared me for watching the firing squad death of Brad Sigmon on Friday night. I might now be unique among U.S. reporters: I’ve witnessed three different methods — nine lethal injections and an electric chair execution. I can still hear the thunk of the breaker falling 21 years later. As a journalist you want to ready yourself for an assignment. You research a case. You read about the subject.

South Carolina plans to carry out a firing squad execution. Is it safe for witnesses?

South Carolina plans to execute a man by firing squad on March 7, the first such execution in the state and the first in the nation in 15 years. But firearms experts are questioning whether South Carolina's indoor execution setup is safe for the workers who will shoot the prisoner and the people who will watch. Photos released by the South Carolina Department of Corrections show that the state intends to strap the prisoner, Brad Sigmon, to a metal seat in the same small, indoor brick death chamber where South Carolina has executed more than 40 other prisoners by electric chair and lethal injection since 1985.

Texas Death Row chef who cook for hundreds of inmates explained why he refused to serve one last meal

Brian Price would earn the title after 11 years cooking for the condemned In the unlikely scenario that you ever find yourself on Death Row, approaching your final days as a condemned man, what would you request for your final meal? Would you push the boat out and request a full steal dinner or play it safe and opt for a classic dish such as pizza or a burger? For most of us it's something that we'll never have to think about, but for one man who spent over a decade working as a 'Death Row chef' encountering prisoner's final requests wasn't anything out of the ordinary.

South Carolina Executes Brad Sigmond

COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) — A South Carolina man who killed his ex-girlfriend’s parents with a baseball bat was executed by firing squad Friday, the first U.S. prisoner in 15 years to die by that method, which he saw as preferable to the electric chair or lethal injection. Three volunteer prison employees used rifles to carry out the execution of Brad Sigmon, 67, who was pronounced dead at 6:08 p.m. Sigmon killed David and Gladys Larke in their Greenville County home in 2001 in a botched plot to kidnap their daughter. He told police he planned to take her for a romantic weekend, then kill her and himself.

Indonesia | Briton faces death penalty for trafficking a kilogram of ecstasy in Bali

A British man is facing the death penalty for allegedly dealing a kilo of MDMA in Bali. Thomas Parker was seen for the first time since his January arrest on Thursday, paraded in front of media in an orange jumpsuit in Denpasar. The 32-year-old could face a firing squad if he is found guilty of trying to push the 1.055kg of Class A drugs police say they recovered in a mail package. MDMA is the main component in the party drug ecstasy. Parker was arrested outside an Airbnb in January, but the case went unreported until authorities showed the Brit shaven and handcuffed at a press conference yesterday.

Iranian dissident risked execution by secretly filming luxurious lifestyle of those connected to the regime

Iranians in Tehran illicitly filmed scenes of their capital for Israeli Channel 12 news, an act that constitutes espionage in Iran and can warrant a death penalty. The clips, broadcast on Saturday, showed locals at high-end shopping malls that the videographers said are only financially accessible to those connected to the regime. “I filmed this video with great difficulty and fear, and I said I would send it to the Israeli Channel 12,” said a 44-year-old Iranian who sent footage for the report and went by the alias Ali, speaking in Persian. “I committed a dangerous act. If you just talk to Israelis, you become a spy and they will execute you.”

Indonesia | Lindsay Sandiford convinced she will be released soon

A British drugs mule grandmother on Indonesia's death row is so convinced she will be freed from prison that she has started given her clothes away to other inmates.  Lindsay Sandiford, 67, has been incarcerated in a cramped cell inside Bali's hellish Kerobokan prison since 2013 where she is facing execution by firing squad.  The grandmother-of-two was sentenced to death for attempting to smuggle £1.6million worth of cocaine into Indonesia's capital by stuffing it into the lining of her suitcase.  But her pals say she has now 'slumped into depression' as she thought she would have been released by now due to a change in the country's law.