Skip to main content

Japan | "Conditions on death row are abhorrent"

In the latest of the DPRU's Q&A series with death penalty experts from around the world, Michael H. Fox, an anti-death penalty advocate in Japan, tells DPRU Research Officer Jocelyn Hutton about his current work and about how the death penalty disproportionately affects foreign nationals in Japan.

Can you tell us a little bit about the work that you do in relation to the death penalty?


Much of my work is researching, writing and speaking about the death penalty in Japan, in order to advocate for individuals' cases and in an effort to educate the public. I run the Japan Innocence and Death Penalty Information Centre which monitors every death penalty case in Japan. We also assist numerous defence teams fighting both wrongful convictions and the death penalty in general. My work in Japan also led me into the bowels of the American criminal justice system, and I have visited and supported many death row prisoners there - all of whom have now thankfully had their sentences reduced (and one, Debra Milke, has been exonerated!)

What led you to work on the death penalty?


In 1994, I attended a symposium by Etsuko Yamada, a wrongfully arrested woman who was charged with murder after the death of a child under her care at an institution. After her arrest, she was interrogated for two weeks from morning until night, and constantly threatened with the death penalty in order to force a confession. In that moment, I was awakened to the awful power of the death penalty to be used as a tool of the state to coerce confessions from detainees, both real and imagined. Since then, I have worked tirelessly to support those who have been wrongfully convicted, as well as those sentenced to death. As long as the death penalty continues, wrongful convictions and wrongful executions will occur again and again.

Can you tell us more about the extent of the use of the death penalty in Japan?


For the most part, death sentences have been decreasing year by year. Crime is falling, the population is ageing, and there is virtually no unemployment. In 2009, a mixed jury system was introduced, with three professional judges sitting together with six laypeople. As jurors tend not to want the responsibility of taking a life, prosecutors have been demanding the death penalty less and less, in order to ensure a guilty verdict is not avoided by the lay jurors. For example, in one case in 2010, soon after the system was introduced, the prosecution requested the death penalty but the jurors found the defendant not guilty, which is extremely rare. Usually in such cases, the conviction rate is 99.7%. If the death penalty is not requested by the prosecutor, jurors are more likely to find the defendant guilty as they will instead receive a ‘less risky’ prison sentence.

Since 1993, there have been 133 executions, which averages at about four to five executions per year. But in some years, there have been astronomical leaps in these numbers. The worst examples were in 2008 and 2018 - in both years 15 hangings were carried out. In 2015, 13 of those executed had been members of a cult that had carried out several murders and a gassing of the Tokyo subways in 1995. The justice minister wanted to wipe the slate clean with these executions before the succession of the new, current emperor.

Executions are completely at the discretion of the Minister of Justice, currently Yoshihisa Furukawa. In 2008, the then ‘hang-happy’ justice minister, Kunio Hatoyama, began holding press conferences to personally announce executions. He finally stopped after being called the ‘grim reaper’ by the Asahi Shimbun newspaper.

Why are foreign nationals considered a threat to Japan?


Japan is a fairly nationalistic country, which managed to successfully remain closed to much of the rest of the world for over 250 years. This legacy of exclusion has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic and has led to one of the more extreme closed border policies globally, that still continues today. There are about 2 million foreigners living in Japan, about 1.5% of the population, and yet foreigners are still considered a big threat to Japanese society. Whenever a social problem arises, for example, an increase in AIDS cases or a rise in crime, the blame tends to be put on foreigners. However, with an increasingly ageing population, millions more foreign workers are needed to support businesses and the economy.

How many foreign nationals are on death row? Are there any specific political and diplomatic issues that affect sentencing and executions in Japan?


There are currently six foreigners on death row out of a total death row population of 108. This means foreign nationals are overrepresented on death row, comprising about 5.5% of the death row population and only 1.5% of the general population. Five of the foreign nationals sentenced to death are from China and one is from Malaysia.

The Japanese government have found they must exercise caution when executing non-Japanese nationals, especially Chinese citizens. In 2009, a little while after Japan had executed a Chinese national, four Japanese prisoners accused of drug transportation were executed in China, in what was widely believed to be retribution. No Chinese nationals were executed in Japan for 10 years after this, until 2019, when a second Chinese national, Wei Wei, was executed in Japan. His two accomplices had fled to China and were caught and sentenced there. This time, the execution did not set off any alarms in Sino-Japanese relations, perhaps because the crime Wei Wei had been involved in was a particularly gruesome murder-robbery of a whole family, including two young children.

What are the conditions like in Japan for death row prisoners? Does the experience of prison differ for foreign nationals and nationals?


Compared to many places in the world, conditions on death row are abhorrent - for Japanese and foreign nationals alike. All death row prisoners are in solitary confinement, and only allowed out to shower and exercise. Exercise must be done in a solitary cage for 30 minutes only, and the prisoners may not speak to or see each other. There is no television or radio provided, music is pumped through the halls. Visits are limited to family members and only for 20 minutes at a time. There are no phone privileges.

Many prisoners are abandoned by their family after conviction, due to the massive stigma attached to those incarcerated, and so some prisoners change their names, or even get married ‘on paper’ in order to be adopted into new families, allowing those who are interested to visit them in prison.

What is current public opinion on the death penalty in Japan? Are there any aspects of abolition for which there is public support?


Public support for the death penalty remains quite high in Japan. In my opinion, the death penalty exists where it does because it fulfils a psychological and sociological need in certain populations. For example, in the US, it assuages white fear of black crime. Japan is somewhat more complicated. It is a very hierarchical society which espouses conformity and obedience, therefore those who violate social norms are considered pariahs. Such a rigid hierarchical society also requires scapegoats in order to vent pent-up frustrations. In the Middle Ages in Japan, the heads of those executed were put on display in village squares. The death penalty continues to serve society in this way; as a visceral satisfaction in the suffering of another. This is clearly observable in Japan; death sentences and executions often make front page headlines. Japan tends to look more to the US than to Europe for guidance and some activists believe if and when the US ultimately abandons the death penalty, Japan might follow suit.

Source: law.ox.ac.uk, Michael H. Fox, June 16, 2022. Michael H. Fox, an American citizen, has lived in Japan for over 40 years. He is the Director of the Japan Innocence and Death Penalty Project (JIADEP). JIADEP advocates against the death penalty and wrongful conviction cases in Japan and assists legal teams in their defence work. Michael also runs the Network for Innocent Arson Defendants and the Women’s Criminal Justice Network. A university faculty member for many years, he is now officially retired and devotes his time and resources to helping the wrongfully convicted and fighting against the death penalty.






🚩 | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.


Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!



"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." -- Oscar Wilde

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight.  In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution.  Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order. 

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

Alabama | Judge bars nitrogen gas execution, says method is unconstitutionally cruel

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- A federal judge on Tuesday permanently blocked Alabama from executing an inmate with nitrogen gas after declaring it violates the ban on cruel and unusual punishment. U.S. District Judge Emily Marks issued the ruling hours after an appeals court reversed her initial finding that the method was constitutional. Marks permanently enjoined the state from executing Jeffrey Lee, 49, by nitrogen gas. He was scheduled to be executed Thursday. The decision, for now, blocks the use of the controversial new execution method that the state has championed since 2024, but the issue will likely end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Idaho will soon turn to firing squad executions. Police will pull the triggers

Trained members of Idaho law enforcement with demonstrated firearms proficiency are expected to fill slots for carrying out the death penalty by firing squad as the state prison system transitions to the controversial execution method next month.  Six volunteers certified for no less than three years apiece through Peace Officer Standards and Training, or POST, will be recruited to ensure the Idaho Department of Correction is ready to comply with a state law that prioritizes shooting prisoners to death over lethal injection starting July 1.  No one on the team may have faced disciplinary action over firearms, use of force, or related conduct over the prior year, according to new execution protocols the prison system released this week. 

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.