Skip to main content

Oklahoma | John Grant's execution raises questions

The inmate who vomited twice during his execution Thursday was allowed to have food in his holding cell in the hours beforehand, exposing a possible shortcoming in Oklahoma's death penalty protocol.

Corrections Department Director Scott Crow acknowledged at a news conference Friday that John Marion Grant had access to food throughout the day but said "at this point, no, we are not planning on any new changes."

Six more executions are scheduled in Oklahoma through March 10. 

An attorney for death row inmates said what happened was predictable.

“As we have been saying all along, Oklahoma’s execution protocol does not include contingencies for problems that may arise throughout the execution process," said Dale Baich, an assistant federal public defender.

"The Department of Corrections was in complete control of John Grant prior to and during the execution. It is shocking and defies basic common sense that the DOC execution team — that is supposedly trained — allowed a person who was about to be administered sedatives to eat and drink. … Fault lies with the Department of Corrections.”

Oklahoma's three-drug lethal injection procedure begins with the sedative, midazolam, which has been described by attorneys for the state as inducing general anesthesia.

It is generally known that anyone undergoing general anesthesia should not eat ahead of time to avoid complications. Doctors regularly advise surgery patients not to eat after midnight in the hours before a procedure.

The American Society of Anesthesiologists recommends patients begin fasting at least six hours before a procedure and abstain from drinking even water two hours before.

The state's death penalty protocol restricts how long an inmate can visit with his attorneys in the final hours, what the inmate can have in the holding cell and how many witnesses can watch the execution. It requires termination of telephone privileges at 9 p.m. the night before.

The only limitation on food is the cost of his traditional last meal — $25.

Grant, 60, was executed for the fatal stabbing of a kitchen worker at a prison in Hominy in 1998. He was pronounced dead at 4:21 p.m. Thursday at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary in McAlester.

A media witness with The Associated Press reported Grant convulsed about two dozen times before vomiting after the sedative was administered. He convulsed and vomited again after his face was wiped off, the witness, Sean Murphy, said.

The Corrections Department director said at the news conference Friday that Grant "in my opinion started dry heaving prior to actually regurgitating … while on the table." Crow estimated the number of times at less than 10.

"There's some that have indicated it was two dozen. From my vantage point, I didn't see that," Crow said.

"I did confer with the physician and the physician advised that it is not uncommon for regurgitation to occur when someone is undergoing the process of sedation," he also said.

Crow agreed the regurgitation was not pleasant to watch. But he said he did not believe it was inhumane because, according to the physician, by then the inmate was sedated.

Grant was given breakfast at 7:10 a.m. Thursday and ate only the eggs, the director said. 

Grant declined lunch but did have snacks in his cell throughout the day Thursday, he said.

The director did not specify what the snacks were. Grant had asked for a large pack of Nutter Butter sandwich cookies as part of his last meal Wednesday evening.

Also at issue is whether the vomiting and involuntary movements Thursday were caused by the sedative itself.

Grant and more than 30 other Oklahoma death row inmates have complained in a lawsuit that midazolam doesn't work like it is supposed to. Their attorneys contend its use violates the constitutional prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment, An Oklahoma City federal judge will rule on the legal challenge after hearing testimony at a trial next year.

The inmates' attorneys have told the judge their experts "will testify that a prisoner executed using the current midazolam protocol will experience excruciating pain and suffering."

They also have told the judge the rapid injection of the highly acidic sedative will almost immediately cause a prisoner's lungs to fill with blood and other fluids, resulting in “intolerable sensations of asphyxiation.”

The execution for Grant was scheduled after he was kicked out of the lawsuit for refusing to pick an alternative method such as the firing squad. It was carried out about two hours after the U.S. Supreme Court lifted an execution stay.

Death penalty foes, as well as the New York Post and others in the media, quickly characterized what happened as Oklahoma's latest botched execution. The Corrections Department, though, maintained that the execution was carried out "without complication."

"Oklahoma’s lethal injection protocol amounts to torture and human experimentation," tweeted Sister Helen Prejean, a Catholic nun who has long called for the abolition of capital punishment. "In almost 40 years working against the death penalty, I have never heard of a person vomiting while being executed."

The archbishop of Oklahoma City said after the execution that all human life is sacred.

"No matter how serious the crime committed, we do not forfeit the inherent dignity bestowed upon us by our Creator. There are other ways to administer just punishment without resorting to lethal measures," the Most. Rev. Paul S. Coakley said.

Robert Dunham, the executive director of the nonprofit Death Penalty Information Center, said, "Oklahoma knew full well that this was well within the realm of possible outcomes in a midazolam execution.

"It didn't care … and the Supreme Court apparently didn't either." 

Oklahoma first used midazolam in the 2014 execution of Clayton Lockett, but the procedure went awry when an intravenous line failed.

Robert Patton, the Corrections Department director at the time, called a halt to the procedure after Lockett writhed on the gurney, moaned and clenched his teeth. Lockett died anyway 43 minutes after the lethal injection began.

Oklahoma next used midazolam in the 2015 execution of baby killer Charles Frederick Warner. “My body is on fire,” Warner said before dying, according to witness accounts. “No one should go through this."

His execution is considered botched because officials later determined the wrong drug, potassium acetate, has been administered to stop his heart.

The state's multicounty grand jury later concluded the wrong drug was used in Warner's execution and almost used in another in 2015 because of a faulty protocol, inexcusable failures by corrections officials and a pharmacist's negligence.

Source: oklahoman.com, Nolan Clay, October 31, 2021


🚩 | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.


Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!



"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." -- Oscar Wilde

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight.  In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution.  Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order. 

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

Alabama | Judge bars nitrogen gas execution, says method is unconstitutionally cruel

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- A federal judge on Tuesday permanently blocked Alabama from executing an inmate with nitrogen gas after declaring it violates the ban on cruel and unusual punishment. U.S. District Judge Emily Marks issued the ruling hours after an appeals court reversed her initial finding that the method was constitutional. Marks permanently enjoined the state from executing Jeffrey Lee, 49, by nitrogen gas. He was scheduled to be executed Thursday. The decision, for now, blocks the use of the controversial new execution method that the state has championed since 2024, but the issue will likely end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Idaho will soon turn to firing squad executions. Police will pull the triggers

Trained members of Idaho law enforcement with demonstrated firearms proficiency are expected to fill slots for carrying out the death penalty by firing squad as the state prison system transitions to the controversial execution method next month.  Six volunteers certified for no less than three years apiece through Peace Officer Standards and Training, or POST, will be recruited to ensure the Idaho Department of Correction is ready to comply with a state law that prioritizes shooting prisoners to death over lethal injection starting July 1.  No one on the team may have faced disciplinary action over firearms, use of force, or related conduct over the prior year, according to new execution protocols the prison system released this week. 

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.