Skip to main content

Moroccan Cultural Actors Are Mobilizing to Oppose Death Penalty

The campaign aims to mobilize intellectuals and artists in support of the movement for the abolition of capital punishment.

Rabat- A World Day Against the Death Penalty exhibition entitled "The right to live" will appear on October 9 at the Museum of Art and Culture of Marrakech (MACMA) on the occasion of the worldwide campaign against capital punishment. 

The campaign, which advocates for the abolition of the death penalty,  has been organized around the world since 2003, each year on October 10.

The “right to live” initiative reproduces the original texts of 37 Moroccan intellectuals and writers, in addition to the reproductions of works from the exhibition in defense of the abolition of what campaigners have described as an inhuman punishment.

Spearheading the initiative are Driss El Yazami, former president of the National Council for Human Rights (CNDH); Younes Ajarrai, artistic director of Marrakech 2020; and Mahi Binebine, a writer and artist who believes the death penalty to be inhumane and unfair. 

The main aim of the campaign is to mobilize intellectuals and artists to use culture to broaden the popular support for the abolition of capital punishment.  

A paradoxical situation


For critics, however, several paradoxes characterize the national environment in which the “right to live” mobilization is taking place. Due to a de facto moratorium on capital punishment in Morocco, Moroccans have not experienced capital executions since 1993. 

Ajarrai acknowledged the paradox in an interview with Moroccan news outlet Le360. "Morocco has not practiced full death since the execution of Commissioner Tabet, 28 years ago," he conceded.

He added, however, that Morocco has been “in the midst of a paradox" every year for much of the past two decades.  Every year in December, when the UN General Assembly votes on a resolution calling on all states to refrain from carrying out executions, the Moroccan government abstains from voting, Ajarrai explained.

But “this is not the only contradiction” that Moroccans live in, he continued. While the country is engaging in a de facto moratorium on executions, the court system continues to execute defendants on death row, “sending them to swell the ranks of death row inmates, who live in fear of being executed any time.” 

Ajarrai invoked Article 20 of the 2011 Constitution to support his advocacy against the death penalty. “The right to life is the first right of every human being. The law protects this right,” he said.  

Popular support for the death penalty


For all the legal and institutional arguments against capital punishment in Morocco, there have been regular - and numerous - occurrences of the public taking to social media to call for the resumption of executions and the retention of death penalties for despicable crimes.

“There was this horrible crime perpetrated last year in Tangier. Adnane, a little boy, was raped and then killed. At the time, passions were totally unleashed, both in social networks and in newspapers, as well as in the ranks of activists who practically called for lynching and crime,” Ajarrai recalled. “This situation made us react because we told ourselves that it was not possible that we would still be there.”

Art and social responsibility


As the artistic director of Marrakech 2020, Ajarrai spoke at length about art and social commitment, repeatedly arguing that artistic creation comes with a certain, relative imperative of social responsibility. 

A discussion around this question will be the focus of the “right to live” round table on October 9, and several speakers will address it, including the philosopher Ali Benmakhlouf.

“I think that the work of plastic artists and writers already proceeds from something intimate, and also from a certain number of questions that they ask themselves in relation to human, humanist, societal, personal causes,” Ajarrai said. “They have a point of view and they must be allowed to express it with the means that are theirs, each with their own medium.”

Source: moroccoworldnews.com, Hanna Chaudhry, September 29, 2021


🚩 | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.


Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!



"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." -- Oscar Wilde

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight.  In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution.  Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order. 

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

Alabama | Judge bars nitrogen gas execution, says method is unconstitutionally cruel

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- A federal judge on Tuesday permanently blocked Alabama from executing an inmate with nitrogen gas after declaring it violates the ban on cruel and unusual punishment. U.S. District Judge Emily Marks issued the ruling hours after an appeals court reversed her initial finding that the method was constitutional. Marks permanently enjoined the state from executing Jeffrey Lee, 49, by nitrogen gas. He was scheduled to be executed Thursday. The decision, for now, blocks the use of the controversial new execution method that the state has championed since 2024, but the issue will likely end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Idaho will soon turn to firing squad executions. Police will pull the triggers

Trained members of Idaho law enforcement with demonstrated firearms proficiency are expected to fill slots for carrying out the death penalty by firing squad as the state prison system transitions to the controversial execution method next month.  Six volunteers certified for no less than three years apiece through Peace Officer Standards and Training, or POST, will be recruited to ensure the Idaho Department of Correction is ready to comply with a state law that prioritizes shooting prisoners to death over lethal injection starting July 1.  No one on the team may have faced disciplinary action over firearms, use of force, or related conduct over the prior year, according to new execution protocols the prison system released this week. 

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.