Texas to Execute John Hummel, Former Marine with Service-Related Trauma Whose Trial Lawyer Now Works for Prosecutor Who is Trying to Execute Him

Texas intends to execute John Hummel on June 30, 2021, an honorably discharged former Marine with service-related trauma whose trial lawyer now works for the prosecutor who is trying to execute him.

Hummel came within two days of execution in March 2020, when the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals issued a stay because of health concerns related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Hummel’s current lawyer, Michael Mowla, has indicated that no appeals will be filed to try to halt the execution.

Hummel would become only the second person put to death by any state in 2021 — both in Texas. Plans for his execution have sparked controversy because of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s failure to allow media witnesses at the May 19 execution of Quintin Jones and the department’s lack of transparency in addressing that failure.

Hummel is a former Marine who experienced trauma as a result of his service. At the sentencing phase of his trial, a psychologist testified that Hummel likely had several personality disorders, but his attorney, Larry Moore, presented no evidence about Hummel’s military service or its impact on his mental health and failed to rebut evidence presented by prosecution witnesses who denigrated Hummel’s time in the service.

In a June 30 op-ed in Medium, retired U.S. Navy Captain Art Cody, the Director of Criminal Programs at the Veteran Advocacy Project, noted that two Marines — Hummel and Nevada death-row prisoner Zane Floyd — face execution this summer. “What we ask of our servicemen often gives rise to their mental illness which, when not properly treated, lands them on our death rows.”

Too often, Cody, said, these veterans reach death row because of failures by the governments they served. “[M]ental health resources to veterans have been and continue to be lacking,” Cody said. Counsel appointed to represent veterans in death penalty trials before largely non-veteran juries and judges often fail to adequately explain the veterans’ service to the country and their service-related impairments. “We as a nation should … reexamine our treatment of veterans and ensure that they are given the best in both mental health treatment and criminal representation,” Cody said. “We may wish to consider whether mentally ill veterans should be eligible for the death penalty at all.”

The Alleged Conflict of Interest

Moore is now a prosecutor in the Tarrant County District Attorney’s office, which prosecuted Hummel, filed the motions to set his execution dates, and continues to seek his execution. In earlier appeals, Mowla argued that this presents a conflict of interest that should disqualify Tarrant County prosecutors from involvement in the case.

While the DA’s office argues that Moore has not been directly involved in its work on Hummel’s case, Mowla wrote, “[c]onsciously or not, Larry Moore and the Tarrant County District Attorney’s Office stand to benefit by hastening Hummel’s execution” because the appeals process has drawn attention to Moore’s ineffectiveness in Hummel’s case.

The Controversy Over Media Witnesses

The ACLU of Texas has asked the Texas Department of Criminal Justice to delay Hummel’s execution to ensure that the prison does not repeat the mistakes made during Jones’ execution when, for the first time in the 571 executions performed in Texas since 1976, media witnesses were not brought into the viewing room.

“We are writing to express our deep concern regarding TDCJ’s plan to move forward with future executions, despite the lack of public accountability for the enormous mistakes” made during Jones’ execution, the ACLU said in a letter to TDCJ executive director Bryan Collier. The letter added that a 30-day stay “would give TDCJ additional time to ensure adequate measures are in place to prevent critical errors at Mr. Hummel’s execution, provide the public with an account of the reasons for the errors at Mr. Jones’s execution, and make public the plan to prevent such errors going forward.”

Jeremy Desel, a spokesperson for TDCJ, told Newsweek that the prison system had investigated the exclusion of media witnesses. TDCJ’s failure, he said, was the result of “a culmination of factors” and was “preventable and inexcusable.”

Desel said that several members of the execution team had retired or changed roles in the ten months between Texas’ last execution of 2020 and Jones’ execution in 2021. TDCJ blamed the role changes, as well as a new procedure allowing spiritual advisors to accompany prisoners into the execution chamber, writing, “a lack of institutional knowledge within the administrative team, a recently revised execution procedure, and insufficient oversight all contributed to the incident.” TDCJ said that its internal investigation showed that “extensive training” had been conducted in preparation for Jones’ execution, but “it became clear during the investigation that specific responsibilities for individuals participating in the process were not clearly defined.”

Savannah Kumar, an attorney with the ACLU of Texas, told Newsweek that TDCJ refused to produce records related to failures during the Jones execution and that the ACLU was not satisfied with TDCJ’s lack of transparency regarding its investigation. “We really need to see details about not only these errors, but also how these errors will be fixed,” she said. TDCJ self-interested rendition of the incident “provides Texans with absolutely no reassurance about the execution process, and TDCJ’s ability to ensure that even the most basic standards with regard to communication, oversight and training are actually being followed, especially when using the state’s power to strip a person’s life entirely away from them,” she said.

Source: Death Penalty Information Center, Staff, June 30, 2021

🚩 | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.

Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!

"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." -- Oscar Wilde

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term: Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight. In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution. Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order.

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

Alabama | Judge bars nitrogen gas execution, says method is unconstitutionally cruel

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- A federal judge on Tuesday permanently blocked Alabama from executing an inmate with nitrogen gas after declaring it violates the ban on cruel and unusual punishment. U.S. District Judge Emily Marks issued the ruling hours after an appeals court reversed her initial finding that the method was constitutional. Marks permanently enjoined the state from executing Jeffrey Lee, 49, by nitrogen gas. He was scheduled to be executed Thursday. The decision, for now, blocks the use of the controversial new execution method that the state has championed since 2024, but the issue will likely end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Idaho will soon turn to firing squad executions. Police will pull the triggers

Trained members of Idaho law enforcement with demonstrated firearms proficiency are expected to fill slots for carrying out the death penalty by firing squad as the state prison system transitions to the controversial execution method next month. Six volunteers certified for no less than three years apiece through Peace Officer Standards and Training, or POST, will be recruited to ensure the Idaho Department of Correction is ready to comply with a state law that prioritizes shooting prisoners to death over lethal injection starting July 1. No one on the team may have faced disciplinary action over firearms, use of force, or related conduct over the prior year, according to new execution protocols the prison system released this week.

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.

Death Penalty News

Search This Blog