Skip to main content

Ohio | Judges find Peter Romans not guilty on all charges for the 2008 fire that killed his family

LONDON — Peter Romans dropped his chin to his chest and sobbed Thursday morning as a judge's words echoed through the Madison County courtroom: Not guilty. 

A three-judge panel had deliberated about four hours before rendering not guilty verdicts on each of 11 charges Romans faced that accused him of starting the fatal fire that killed his wife and two children in 2008. The charges against him included aggravated murder that could have carried the death penalty.

Killed in the blaze that happened just after midnight on April 6, 2008 were Romans' wife, Billi; 12-year-old son Caleb; and daughter Ami, 16.

Romans' current wife, two grown stepsons and the sisters of his late wife — who were there to support Romans — all wept uncontrollably in the courtroom as the verdicts were read.

"God had this," one sister said as she embraced his wife, Robin Fritz Romans, who was so overcome with emotion that her cries were nearly wails.

Romans, 60, had been in jail since his arrest in July 2019, but he walked out of the courthouse a free and exonerated man Thursday.

After the verdicts were read, defense attorney Sam Shamansky said his client had trusted the judges to do what was right.

"He is so incredibly relieved and eager to get home to his family," Shamansky said.

In a rare move, Romans elected to forego a trial by jury and instead asked a panel of judges to hear his capital case.

Following 11 days of testimony from 50 witnesses in Madison County Common Pleas Court, those judges appointed by the Ohio Supreme Court — retired Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Judges Janet Burnside in charge, and retired Cuyahoga Common Pleas Court Judge Thomas Pokorny and retired Brown County Common Pleas Court Judge R. Alan Corbin — deliberated following dramatic closing arguments on Wednesday before announcing their decision in open court Thursday morning.

Romans had been charged with aggravated murder, murder, and aggravated arson in the deaths of his family. 

Romans has lived under a cloud of suspicion — at least in the eyes of investigators from several state and local agencies — since almost immediately after the fire. He was the sole survivor.

He was not charged or arrested until July 2019 as the case spent a decade being passed through a host of various investigators and prosecutors.


During the trial, Shamansky said "Peter Romans lost everything that mattered to him. It was all taken from him in an instant." 

Yet investigators had never given up on their theory that Romans had killed his family, but whether it was done for his love of another woman or because he needed insurance money (or both) they could never decide. Prosecutors floated both theories in court.

During the trial, which was handled by prosecutors from the Ohio Attorney General's Office, the state made its case that Romans was in financial ruin in 2008 and was having an affair with the then-married Robin Fritz. (The two married each other in 2010).

Robin Fritz Romans was barred from the court during most of the proceedings because she could have been called to testify. She sat faithfully each day in the hallway of the historic courthouse, passing the time by cross-stitching and waving to her husband through the doorway at each break. She alternately cried and shook her head in denial at accusations made during closing arguments Wednesday after she was allowed in.

She listened as prosecutors recapped how they believed Romans poured gasoline over the driver's side floorboards of his family's 2001 Ford Expedition SUV that was parked within two feet of their modular home (and next to a propane gas line) and set it ablaze as his family slept that night.

Then, as the fire roared and his wife and daughter both awoke and called 911, he left the house without them — to move his pickup truck that had a full tank of gas away, he said — and couldn't get back in. He ran to his landlord's house about two football fields away for help.

"Peter Romans made a number of decisions, and every one of them was to make sure that Ami, Billi and Caleb died," state prosecutor Joel King told the judges.

But this case was always also about that Ford Expedition and whether it was to blame instead. The Dispatch featured it in 2011 as part of its "Killers Among Us" cold-case series. 

After the fire, Romans told investigators he had been having trouble with the SUV. Ford for years had had a documented problem with the cruise-control deactivation switches failing and causing spontaneous vehicle fires. The Romans' SUV was under recall, but had never been repaired.

Insurance companies as well as law enforcement launched investigations. 

In February of 2009, Romans sued Ford Motor Co. and the switch manufacturer alleging the defect caused the fatal fire. In August of that year, however, the state fire marshal's office ruled it an arson. And so began more a decade of legal back and forth.

At trial, both sides presented experts who used the same evidence — the very switch taken from the Romans' SUV as evidence after the fire — but brought competing theories. State experts said the fire clearly was set in the passenger compartment and spread; defense experts said the fire clearly started in the switch.

State prosecutor Dan Kasaris summed it up for the judges: "What this case boils down to is really, who do you believe? Whose evidence do you give the greater weight to?"

And the judges made their decision.

Romans still has a case against Ford pending in federal court that had been placed on hold pending the outcome of this criminal trial.

Source: dispatch.com, Holly Zachariah, October 29, 2020


🚩 | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.


Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!



"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." -- Oscar Wilde

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Iran: flogging still a common practice

Flogging of Sufis in Gonabad: Fourteen Ne’matollahi dervishes received 25 lashes each for allegedly disturbing the public security Public flogging in Iran "The lash ruling against 14 Ne'matollahi dervishes of Gonabad was carried out. They were residents of Baydokht and had been arrested and condemned by the Public Prosecutor of Gonabad after a protest against the illegal treatment dealing with the Sufis in June of last year [2010]. According to the website of Majzuban-e-Nur, Mr. Sa'id Kashani, Mr. Amir Roshan-Mojaver-Sufi, Mr. Alimohammad Amanian, Mr. Ruhollah Safari, Mr. Ali Abbasi-Baydokhti, Mr. Ebrahim Abbaszadeh, Mr. Mohammadali Ja'fari, Mr. Hossein Mahdavi, Mr. Hossein Abbaszadeh-Baydokhti, Mr. Rahmat Hosseini, Mr. Reza Kakhki, Mr. Behruz Mojaver-Sufi, Mr. Ali Mir, and Mr. Hassan Baluchi-Baydokhti are the fourteen dervishes whose requests were not only rejected, but who were condemned to 25 lashes for disturbing the public security. It should be mentioned th...

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

Japan’s Internet Wants Uchida Riko Executed. Here’s Why That Won’t Happen

This week, the prosecution in the case of a murder of a 17-year-old girl in Hokkaido came out with its sentencing recommendation. Japanese social media reacted by clamoring for the accused woman’s blood. But, while the facts of the case are heinous, the prosecutor’s decision not to seek the death penalty is grounded in long-standing precedent. Murdered for looking at the accused wrong Uchida Riko (内田梨瑚), 23, and her friends stand accused of murdering 17-year-old Murayama Runa (村山瑠奈) in Hokkaido’s Asahikawa. Prosecutors say the dispute began after Murayama posted a photo of Uchida to social media. They say Uchida’s group abducted the girl, made her undress, and then forced her to jump from a bridge.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight.  In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution.  Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order.