FEATURED POST

Unveiling Singapore’s Death Penalty Discourse: A Critical Analysis of Public Opinion and Deterrent Claims

Image
While Singapore’s Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) maintains a firm stance on the effectiveness of the death penalty in managing drug trafficking in Singapore, the article presents evidence suggesting that the methodologies and interpretations of these studies might not be as substantial as portrayed.

Terre Haute | The execution of Daniel Lewis Lee was about politics, not justice

Barr, Trump
There was no good reason for the federal government to rush the execution last week of Daniel Lewis Lee. No good reason, that is, other than politics.

Lee was the 1st of 5 condemned prisoners Attorney General William Barr named in a July 2019 order resuming federal executions after 17 years. 

Barr also ordered the government to abandon the 3-drug combination in favor of a single overdose of the sedative pentobarbital.

The executions have been stalled by a variety of legal challenges. Last Tuesday, however, the Supreme Court issued a 5-4 ruling lifting an injunction in a case that challenged the constitutionality of using pentobarbital, and Lee was dead by breakfast time even though his legal appeals had not been exhausted.

“It is beyond shameful that the government, in the end, carried out this execution in haste, in the middle of the night, while the country was sleeping,” Ruth E. Friedman, Lee’s lawyer said Tuesday morning. It’s appalling that the government moved so quickly to execute Lee as a political gambit.

In its unsigned majority opinion, the court said the condemned men had not established that they would likely win their appeal over the constitutionality of the use of pentobarbital, even though Justice Stephen Breyer expressed doubts about the execution method in his dissent.

This execution has taken place because the Trump administration is driven to display its law-and-order toughness (except, of course, Donald Trump’s cronies) as it confronts significant reelection headwinds. But that move also spotlights some of the reasons the death penalty should be done away with.

When the attorney general gets to pick names for a death list, determining who gets executed is arbitrary. And Lee was 1 of 2 men convicted of those 3 murders; the other man, and by most accounts the one driving the crimes, received a life sentence. One set of crimes, 2 convicted murders, 2 different sentences, and the one with the death verdict gets to the front of the line because of the whims of the attorney general. None of this is justice.

Source: Hawaii Tribune-Herald, Opinion, July 20, 2020


⚑ | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.


Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!



"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." -- Oscar Wilde

Most Viewed (Last 7 Days)

California | San Quentin begins prison reform - but not for those on death row

Oklahoma | Death row inmate Michael DeWayne Smith denied stay of execution

Indonesia | Bali Prosecutors Seeking Death on Appeal

Ohio dad could still face death penalty in massacre of 3 sons after judge tosses confession

Iran | Couple hanged in the Central Prison of Tabriz

Singapore | Court of Appeal rejects 36 death row inmates’ PACC Act constitutional challenge

Tennessee | Nashville DA asks judge to vacate baby murder conviction following new medical evidence