'China probably executes more prisoners than the rest of the world combined'

'China probably executes more prisoners than the rest of the world combined' - UN Death Penalty report author

China probably executes more prisoners than the rest of the world put together

Hundreds of prisoners are still being executed every year in countries around the world, according to a new United Nations report.

The research shows 4,736 people were killed by the death penalty – equivalent to 947 annually – between 2014 and 2018.

The full UN report - Capital punishment and implementation of the safeguards guaranteeing protection of the rights of those facing the death penalty – has been released this week in all languages and was discussed in a session of the UN Economic and Social Council on Tuesday.

The report, which is produced every five years, makes a number of recommendations including:

➧ States (countries) that continue to apply the death penalty report on the number of persons sentenced to death or executed and the crimes for which it is applied

➧ Retentionist States ensure that the absolute prohibition of the execution of juvenile offenders and pregnant women is respected

➧ Retentionist States prohibit the application of the death penalty to mothers of young children, persons with psychosocial or intellectual disabilities and older persons

➧ Retentionist States in the process of reforming their laws to reduce the number of offences punishable by the death penalty limit the application of the death penalty to the most serious crimes and ensure that the death penalty is discretionary

➧ States that have not yet abolished the death penalty in law but that have ceased executions be encouraged to ratify or accede to the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights

➧ States ensure that prisoners on death row benefit from all the guarantees provided in the Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners and are not subjected to discrimination resulting from their status as prisoners on death row

A total of 31 countries including the United States of America continue to use the death penalty, but the statistics exclude North Korea, China and Vietnam where capital punishment is used regularly.

China’s total probably exceeds the number for the rest of the world taken as a whole, according to the report’s author Professor William Schabas, but the government refuses to release statistics on the ground that this is a matter of national security.

During the five-year period, the Islamic Republic of Iran executed the most prisoners with a minimum of 2,593 executions that can be confirmed followed by Saudi Arabia with 627 which can be confirmed.

In the same time frame, there were 494 and 347 executions in Pakistan and Iraq respectively.

The United States executed 131 prisoners between 2014-2018, a significant reduction compared to 223 in the previous five years and mirroring a global trend in the reduction in the use of capital punishment.

In the countries which carried out the most executions, the most common method used is beheading in Saudi Arabia, hanging in Iran and Pakistan, while the US authorities use lethal injection poisoning.

There are claims public executions are still staged in Saudi Arabia and North Korea, according to the report.

Prof Schabas, who is a Professor of International Law at Middlesex University, said: “This general, progressive trend towards abolition of capital punishment continues.

“To have a long term perspective, over the last 30 or 40 years, you’ve seen a fairly consistent decline but we’re getting to the point where we are now down to the hardcore of the states who use the death penalty, and while there are declining numbers in these states some of them don’t show many signs of moving towards abolition.

“Will they eventually realise they are quite isolated and have to face the reality or will they stubbornly cling to it over the long term? It’s hard to assess.

A Chinese police officer lights an inmate's last cigarette.

“In many ways this is like watching the abolition of slavery in the 18th and 19th century, when you had more and more states abolishing slavery and committed to abolition but you had rogue states, the southern United States and Brazil, who hung onto slavery.

“There was a civil war in the United States and slavery was abolished but you still had Brazil and a couple of other countries who clung onto it for another 20 or 30 years until by the beginning of the 20th century it was virtually eradicated.

“We don’t have any precedent but there clearly is a direction of travel on the abolition of the death penalty, the reduction of it in the states that use it and as an increasing number of states move into the abolitionist camp.

“If the trend continues of two or three states abolishing the death penalty, every year, it should last another 10 to 15 years.

“There’s no criminological evidence that capital punishment provides a superior deterrent effect than prolonged imprisonment.

“Murderers do not sit around and think ‘I would murder that person if I could only serve 20 years in jail’.”

Prof Schabas said China is “regularly carrying out executions” but along with North Korea and Vietnam refuses to disclose official numbers.

“It’s a mystery, they have always been secretive about using capital punishment,” added Prof Schabas.

“Is it because it was so terrible before? It’s one thing to boast it’s declined but if you explain by how much, then you’re admitting how bad it was.

“It makes no sense that they (China) are secretive about it because one of the main justifications for the death penalty is deterrence. But how can it deter people if they don’t know what’s happening?”

In the previous five-year period a total of 3,743 people were executed.

While the number of executions in 2018 dropped to 526 – the lowest figure in 15 years – there had been a dramatic increase in use of the capital punishment in 2015 which was largely attributed to a rise in Pakistan which executed 326 people in 2015 following the Peshawar school massacre compared to seven in 2014.

At the end of December 2018, 167 countries had abolished the death penalty either in law or in practice.

Source: Press release, William Schabas, July 23, 2020. Prof Schabas has authored more than 20 books on international human rights law and international criminal law and was appointed the head of a UN Committee investigating the 2014 Israel–Gaza conflict. His book The Abolition of the Death Penalty in International Law has been repeatedly referenced by national and international tribunals.

⚑ | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.

Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!

"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." -- Oscar Wilde

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight. In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution. Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term: Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

Alabama | Judge bars nitrogen gas execution, says method is unconstitutionally cruel

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- A federal judge on Tuesday permanently blocked Alabama from executing an inmate with nitrogen gas after declaring it violates the ban on cruel and unusual punishment. U.S. District Judge Emily Marks issued the ruling hours after an appeals court reversed her initial finding that the method was constitutional. Marks permanently enjoined the state from executing Jeffrey Lee, 49, by nitrogen gas. He was scheduled to be executed Thursday. The decision, for now, blocks the use of the controversial new execution method that the state has championed since 2024, but the issue will likely end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Idaho will soon turn to firing squad executions. Police will pull the triggers

Trained members of Idaho law enforcement with demonstrated firearms proficiency are expected to fill slots for carrying out the death penalty by firing squad as the state prison system transitions to the controversial execution method next month. Six volunteers certified for no less than three years apiece through Peace Officer Standards and Training, or POST, will be recruited to ensure the Idaho Department of Correction is ready to comply with a state law that prioritizes shooting prisoners to death over lethal injection starting July 1. No one on the team may have faced disciplinary action over firearms, use of force, or related conduct over the prior year, according to new execution protocols the prison system released this week.

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.

Death Penalty News

Search This Blog