New Delhi, March 2 (IANS) -- The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a PIL by former Bombay High Court judge Michael Saldanha, seeking directions for donation of organs by four convicts in the 2012 Nirbhaya gang-rape and murder case, saying "death is the saddest part and the organ donation has to be voluntary."
A bench headed by Justice R. Banumathi rejecting the petition asked the petitioner to "have human approach".
Saldana in the petition contended that the apex court may pass directions to the Tihar jail authorities, where four death row convicts are currently lodged, to give them an option to offer their bodies for medical research and also donate their organs, which could help in saving lives of critically ill people.
The top court said, "The execution of a person is the saddest part for the family. You (petitioner) want their body to cut into pieces... have some human approach....organ donation has to be voluntary".
The petitioner also urged the apex court to consider the desirability of making it as a condition in cases where convicts are on death row. All four death row convicts have exhausted all the legal remedies available for death row convicts.
Earlier today, the top court rejected a curative petition by Pawan Gupta, one of the four convicts, a day before the four convicts are scheduled to be executed.
Gupta, 25, was the lone convict in the case who had not exhausted his legal options of a curative petition.
Gupta, 25, was the lone convict in the case who had not exhausted his legal options of a curative petition.
Gupta has also filed a mercy plea before the President.
Akshay Singh has not yet challenged the rejection of his mercy petition.
A death warrant was issued against Kumar along with three other condemned prisoners for the execution of death sentence on March 3. Advocate A.P. Singh, representing Kumar, said he was a juvenile during the time of the commission of the offence, and the death penalty should not awarded to him.
Singh also sought a stay on the execution of the black warrant on the hanging issued by the trial court.
He is the only convict who is yet to exhaust all legal remedies -- the curative petition, which is the final legal remedy available, and the filing the mercy petition before the President.
Speaking to media persons, Singh had said there have been many errors in the previous judgements and he expected through this curative petition those errors are amended.
"Our main contention is that at the time of the commission of the offence, Pawan was attending a musical programme", said Singh.
The top court had earlier dismissed separate pleas filed by Mukesh and Vinay challenging the decision of the President to reject their mercy petitions. Akshay is yet to challenge the rejection of his mercy petition.
A fresh date of execution of death warrant was issued by the trial court on February 17. The trial court fixed the execution on March 3 at 6 am for the four convicts -- Mukesh Kumar Singh (32), Pawan (25), Vinay Kumar Sharma (26) and Akshay Singh (31) -- in the Nirbhaya gang rape and murder case.
The President has rejected the mercy petitions of three convicts -- Mukesh, Vinay and Akshay.
On December 16, 2012, a 23-year-old physiotherapy intern was gang raped and brutally murdered in a moving bus in South Delhi. She died after a fortnight. --IANS
Source: IANS, Staff, February 2, 2020
Tihar Jail | Dummy executions carried out after President Ram Nath Kovind rejected Gupta's mercy petition
As all legal ways exhaust one-by-one for Nirbhaya gangrape and murder convicts, time of their hanging comes closer. Preparations are on in Delhi's Tihar Jail to hang Mukesh Singh, Vinay Sharma, Pawan Gupta and Akshay Thakur at 6 am on Tuesday (March 3).
Pawan Jallad, the hangman who is to carry out capital punishment conducted a dummy execution in Tihar Jail on Monday.
The dummy execution was carried out just after the news broke that President Ram Nath Kovind rejected Pawan Gupta's mercy petition. Clock ticks for the convicts and time for their hanging draws closer.
Pawan Gupta got a double blow on Monday as Supreme Court dismissed the curative petition and his mercy plea with the President was rejected.
Pawan, in the curative plea, had urged the top court to commute his death penalty to life imprisonment, besides seeking a stay on the execution of black warrant issued by the trial court.
His lawyer argued that he was a juvenile during the time of the commission of the offence, and the death penalty should not be awarded to him.
Singh also sought a stay on the execution of the black warrant, on the hanging, issued by the trial court.
He is the only convict who was yet to exhaust all legal remedies -- curative petition, which is the final legal remedy available, and the filing of the mercy petition before the President.
Speaking to media persons, Singh had said there have been many errors in the previous judgements and he expects through this curative petition those errors are amended. "Our main contention is that on the time of the commission of the offence, Pawan was attending a musical programme", said Singh.
The top court had earlier dismissed separate pleas filed by Mukesh and Vinay challenging the decision of the President to reject their mercy petitions.
Akshay is yet to challenge the rejection of his mercy petition.
Source: indiatvnews.com, Staff, March 2, 2020
⚑ | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.
 |  |
Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!
"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." -- Oscar Wilde
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." -- Oscar Wilde