Skip to main content

Texas: Law enforcement officers join Texas lawmaker to try and stop Rodney Reed's execution

Rodney Reed
Less than a month before Rodney Reed's scheduled execution, a group of law enforcement officials joined a state lawmaker to make an 11th hour effort to save his life.

State Representative Vikkie Goodwin of Austin is one of the many people who believe Reed could be innocent. “I’m more convinced that he did not receive a fair trial, that there is a racial basis against Rodney Reed and Reed did not kill Stacey Stites,” said Goodwin

Rodney Reed was convicted of Stites' rape and murder in 1998. His defense argued he and Stites were having an affair, and that Jimmy Fennell, Stites fiance, had motive and opportunity to kill her. Fennell later served ten years in prison for the kidnapping and improper sexual conduct with a woman in his custody as a police officer in Georgetown.

Goodwin spoke in the same room with the people behind an amicus brief sent to the U.S. Supreme Court. The group made up of 13 current and former Texas law enforcement officers believe Reed’s execution needs to be stopped until there’s a more thorough investigation into his case.

Deke Pierce is one of those officers. “I have as much responsibility to apprehend wrongdoers as I do to help exonerate innocent people as well,” said Pierce.

The amicus brief is in addition to a flood of new information from the Innocence Project hoping to pause Reed’s November 20th execution. 

The Innocence Project filed a number of motions to get DNA evidence collected at the 1996 murder scene tested. Reed’s defense teams believe there could be DNA from skin cells possibly on the belt used to strangle Stites.

A federal case from August argues Reed’s civil rights were violated when previous courts blocked the testing of additional DNA evidence to prove his possible innocence.

“There are so many pieces of evidence that haven’t been tested, haven’t been looked at, expert witnesses have changed their testimony. Like I said, I could go on and on about all the things wrong with this case,” said Pierce.

Source: cbsaustin.com, Staff, October 29, 2019


Pressure mounts to keep Rodney Reed alive


The Walls Unit, Huntsville, Texas
The State of Texas will execute Rodney Reed on November 20th. This week, multiple events are scheduled to draw attention to Reed, who’s convicted of killing Stacey Stites in 1996.

Monday at 4 PM, Texas state representative Vikki Goodwin, D-Austin, will join law enforcement officers to file a brief with the United States Supreme Court, asking to stop the execution. Many believe Reed did not kill Stites.

“I don’t think anyone can say (Reed) is guilty without a shadow of a doubt, and I don’t believe we should carry out the death penalty when there’s doubt about the truth of the case,” Goodwin wrote KXAN in a release.

Reed — and the Innocence Project, which recently filed a U.S. Supreme Court petition to stall the execution — say more DNA testing will prove he did not kill 19-year-old Stacey Stites in 1996. Stites, a bride-to-be who worked at H-E-B, was found dumped on the side of a rural road north of Bastrop after a search that began when she didn’t show up for work that morning.

While Reed was not looked into initially, he became a suspect when investigators ran his DNA as part of a separate alleged sexual assault case that was later dropped, the Reed defense says.

Authorities said Reed’s DNA matched evidence found in the Stites case, and he was arrested and charged with capital murder in 1997.

Reed claims he had a secret and consensual relationship with Stites, which explains the DNA match. Reed’s legal team has continuously pointed the finger at Stites’ then-fiance, former police officer Jimmy Fennell, as the killer. Investigators considered Fennell a suspect, prior to Reed’s DNA match.

Fennell was later accused of raping a woman in his custody while he was a Georgetown Police Office in 2007. He pleaded guilty to lesser charges, served 10 years in prison and was released in 2018.

Reed’s family has been fighting for a new trial for years, and he has tried to appeal the case at least 8 times over 2 decades. He filed a lawsuit in federal district court last month against the state for repeatedly denying requests for DNA testing.

Kim Kardashian West waded into the Rodney Reed case, urging Gov. Greg Abbott to halt the death row inmate’s planned execution on Saturday.

The reality TV star tweeted her support for Reed in the early hours of Saturday morning.

Kardashian West, who has 62 million followers on Twitter, said she has been “investigating” Reed’s case and tagged Abbott, telling him to “do the right thing.”

KXAN has reached out to Governor Abbott’s office for a comment and has not yet heard back.

Source: KXAN news, Staff, October 29, 2019


Rodney Reed presses for DNA tests on murder weapon


With a Nov. 20 execution date looming, lawyers for death row inmate Rodney Reed are making a last-ditch effort to force DNA testing on the murder weapon in his case.

Defense lawyers say the testing, routine in modern investigations but never done in Reed’s case, could support claims that the Bastrop man did not commit the 1996 murder that sent him to death row 21 years ago.

They argue that the brown woven belt used to strangle Stacey Stites, applied with such force that it broke in two, likely includes DNA-bearing skin cells that could identify the killer.

Prosecutors, however, have been fighting to block the testing for years, arguing that results could not be trusted.

The belt and other crime scene evidence that Reed wants tested were likely contaminated by repeated handling during and after Reed’s trial, they argue. In addition, several items were stored in the same box but not packaged separately, allowing potential DNA to mingle, prosecutors say.

Thus far, a visiting judge and the state’s highest criminal court have sided with prosecutors, rejecting Reed’s request for DNA testing. Last year, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear Reed’s appeal of the matter.

Defense lawyers — in the midst of increasingly frantic legal challenges to Reed’s conviction, arguing that he is innocent — responded by filing a federal lawsuit in August saying that Reed’s civil rights are being violated by the refusal to grant him access to evidence for DNA testing.

The final brief is due in Austin federal court on Tuesday, and thus far U.S. District Judge Lee Yeakel has not indicated how he will handle the challenge or when he might rule on it.

Defense lawyers are also asking Yeakel to delay Reed’s execution to allow time to fully consider the DNA issues. In the alternative, they asked Yeakel to rule quickly, leaving “adequate time for any necessary appeals” before Reed’s execution date.

Murder weapon


The belt, established as the murder weapon by autopsy, was found in two pieces — one near the truck belonging to Stites’ fiance, Jimmy Fennell, that was found parked at Bastrop High School, and one near Stites’ body, which had been left along a rural road about 10 miles away.

In Reed’s lawsuit, his lawyers argue that basic fairness demands that never-before-done DNA testing be allowed on the belt and other crime scene evidence that was likely touched by the killer, including clothing and Stites’ nametag, which had been positioned in the crook of her knee. Today’s sophisticated techniques can identify DNA from skin cells in ways that were not available when Reed was tried in 1996, and in ways that can make allowances for cross contamination, they say.

The Walls Unit, Huntsville, TexasThe lawsuit also argues that Reed’s rights were violated when the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the state’s highest criminal court, rejected his request for DNA testing with a 2017 ruling that questioned the usefulness of examining the evidence due to potential contamination.

Texas law gives inmates access to DNA testing to help identify wrongful convictions, but the law also requires that the evidence was “subjected to a chain of custody sufficient to establish that it has not been substituted, tampered with, replaced, or altered in any material respect.” The appeals court ruled that the items in evidence met the law’s definition of being altered or tampered with, making them unavailable for testing, after they were handled by ungloved lawyers, court personnel and possibly jurors during Reed’s trial and were not separately packaged when placed into storage afterward.

Reed’s lawsuit argues that the state appeals court improperly created a contamination condition that is nowhere in state law, making it unlikely that DNA testing would be allowed in other cases without the approval of prosecutors while making Reed pay for poor evidence-handling procedures that were out of his control.

Scientific data


Bastrop County Criminal District Attorney Bryan Goertz, represented by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s office on the Reed appeals, has asked Yeakel to dismiss Reed’s lawsuit, arguing that the federal court lacks jurisdiction to review a state court ruling and that the district attorney is immune from being sued.

Paxton’s lawyers also argue that, even without potential contamination, the evidence that Reed wants tested is unlikely to produce results that could lead to exoneration.

Reed’s lawyers have long argued that Stites was likely killed by her fiance, Fennell, with whom she had been living. As the Court of Criminal Appeals determined, “the jury would most likely not be surprised” if Fennell’s DNA was found on the belt and other items that were owned by Stites or taken from the Fennell’s truck, prosecutors told Yeakel.

But Reed’s lawyers question why the courts would engage in speculation about what DNA tests might find when the solution — allowing the tests — would provide real scientific data to examine.

“Proceeding with Mr. Reed’s execution while arbitrarily denying DNA testing capable of proving his innocence would violate the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment,” they told the judge.

Source: Austin American-Statesman, Staff, October 29, 2019


Death Row Inmate To Die Next Month Despite Victim’s Family Trying To Save Him


Texas' death chamber, The Walls Unit, Huntsville, Texas
A death row inmate is being put to death in Texas next month, despite the victim’s family campaigning to save him.

Rodney Reed, 52, was charged with the rape and murder of Stacey Stites, 19, in 1996. Reed was convicted of strangling Stacey during an aggravated sexual assault in Bastrop, Texas.

However, in the years that followed, Stacey’s family have worked tirelessly to protest Reed’s innocence, claiming the young woman was actually strangled by her police officer fiancé, Jimmy Fennell. Reed himself has continuously maintained his innocence.

Reed has been on death row for 22 years. His original execution date was scheduled for 2015, but was postponed because of new witness testimony and forensic analysis.

However, the court then ruled against Reed, who is now facing execution on November 20, as reported by CBS Austin.

Earlier this month, Reed’s attorneys filed a motion asking the Bastrop County District Court to withdraw Reed’s execution date to allow them more time to investigate claims from 2 new witnesses in the case.

Among these witnesses was one individual who claims Stacey’s cop fiancé told them she ‘got what she deserved’. They said:

I was down at the funeral home when Stacey was down there, I was standing in the hallway and Jimmy himself come up beside me.

He said something about she was buried in her white wedding dress. He said something to me to the effect… she more or less got what she deserved.

UNILAD spoke with Julie Strickland, a woman who has known Reed since they were teenagers together in Wichita Falls, Texas.

She is among the individuals who are still campaigning for a new trial or exoneration for Reed, believing him to be wrongfully accused.

Julie told UNILAD:

We have our sights set on a new trial or an exoneration. We are with Rodney when he says he doesn’t entertain the idea of being executed. We are still continuing to campaign for Rodney, and we love everything our supporters are doing to share Rodney’s message.

Source: unilad.co.uk, Staff, October 29, 2019


⚑ | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.


Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!



"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." -- Oscar Wilde

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

The doctor defending Louisiana’s controversial execution method

Dr. Joseph Antognini travels across the nation, being paid over $500 an hour by government officials who rely on him to vouch for their execution protocols. This [article] is part of “ Operating Capital ,” an ongoing Lens discussion about Louisiana’s resumption of executions. Earlier this month, Dr. Joseph Antognini, a California-based retired anesthesiologist, walked into the execution chamber at Louisiana State Penitentiary at Angola. He tried on the air-tight mask that prison staff plan to use to execute Death Row prisoner Jessie Hoffman , using nitrogen hypoxia, a method that Louisiana executioners have never before used.

Louisiana executes Jessie Hoffman Jr.

Louisiana used nitrogen gas Tuesday evening to execute a man convicted of murdering a woman in 1996, the 1st time the state has used the method, a lawyer for the condemned man said.  Jessie Hoffman Jr., 46, was put to death at the Louisiana State Penitentiary, defense lawyer Cecelia Kappel said in a statement. He was the 1st person executed in the state in 15 years, and his death marked the 5th use of the nitrogen gas method in the US, with all the rest in Alabama.  Hoffman was convicted of the murder of Mary "Molly" Elliott, a 28-year-old advertising executive. At the time of the crime, Hoffman was 18.

Indonesia | Lindsay Sandiford convinced she will be released soon

A British drugs mule grandmother on Indonesia's death row is so convinced she will be freed from prison that she has started given her clothes away to other inmates.  Lindsay Sandiford, 67, has been incarcerated in a cramped cell inside Bali's hellish Kerobokan prison since 2013 where she is facing execution by firing squad.  The grandmother-of-two was sentenced to death for attempting to smuggle £1.6million worth of cocaine into Indonesia's capital by stuffing it into the lining of her suitcase.  But her pals say she has now 'slumped into depression' as she thought she would have been released by now due to a change in the country's law. 

Texas Death Row chef who cook for hundreds of inmates explained why he refused to serve one last meal

Brian Price would earn the title after 11 years cooking for the condemned In the unlikely scenario that you ever find yourself on Death Row, approaching your final days as a condemned man, what would you request for your final meal? Would you push the boat out and request a full steal dinner or play it safe and opt for a classic dish such as pizza or a burger? For most of us it's something that we'll never have to think about, but for one man who spent over a decade working as a 'Death Row chef' encountering prisoner's final requests wasn't anything out of the ordinary.

Oklahoma executes Wendell Grissom

Grissom used some of his last words on Earth to apologize to everyone he hurt and said that he prays they can find forgiveness for their own sake. As for his execution, he said it was a mercy. Oklahoma executed Wendell Arden Grissom on Thursday for the murder of 23-year-old Amber Matthews in front of her best friend’s two young daughters in 2005.  Grissom, 56, was executed by lethal injection at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary in McAlester and pronounced dead at 10:13 a.m. local time, becoming the first inmate to be put to death by the state in 2025 and the ninth in the United States this year. 

South Carolina plans to carry out a firing squad execution. Is it safe for witnesses?

South Carolina plans to execute a man by firing squad on March 7, the first such execution in the state and the first in the nation in 15 years. But firearms experts are questioning whether South Carolina's indoor execution setup is safe for the workers who will shoot the prisoner and the people who will watch. Photos released by the South Carolina Department of Corrections show that the state intends to strap the prisoner, Brad Sigmon, to a metal seat in the same small, indoor brick death chamber where South Carolina has executed more than 40 other prisoners by electric chair and lethal injection since 1985.

Louisiana | Execution by nitrogen gas ‘ugly way to die’: MD

What is it like to be executed by nitrogen gas? Dr. Jonathan Groner, a medical ethicist who studies capital punishment, has not witnessed an execution using this method, but he speculates about what happens to an inmate who is given pure nitrogen to inhale through a mask.   “They don’t go quietly, I will say that,” Groner, a professor of surgery at The Ohio State University College of Medicine, told “Banfield” on Wednesday. A federal judge this week halted the state of Louisiana’s plans to execute an inmate for the first time through “nitrogen hypoxia.” State officials plan to appeal the judge’s decision, which raised questions about whether using nitrogen gas is a cruel and unusual punishment.

Florida executes Edward James

Edward James received 3-drug lethal injection under death warrant signed in February by governor Ron DeSantis  A Florida man who killed an 8-year-old girl and her grandmother on a night in which he drank heavily and used drugs was executed on Thursday.  Edward James, 63, was pronounced dead at 8.15pm after receiving a 3-drug injection at Florida state prison outside Starke under a death warrant signed in February by Governor Ron DeSantis. The execution was the 2nd this year in Florida, which is planning a 3rd in April. 

Louisiana's First Nitrogen Execution Reflects Broader Method Shift

Facing imminent execution by lethal gas earlier this week, Jessie Hoffman Jr. — a Louisiana man convicted of abducting, raping and murdering a 28-year-old woman in 1996 — went to court with a request: Please allow me to be shot instead. In a petition filed with the U.S. Supreme Court on March 16 seeking a stay of his execution by nitrogen hypoxia, a protocol that had yet to be tested in the state, Hoffman requested execution by firing squad as an alternative.

Violent and sudden. What a firing squad execution looked like through my eyes

COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) — I’ve now watched through glass and bars as 11 men were put to death at a South Carolina prison. None of the previous 10 prepared me for watching the firing squad death of Brad Sigmon on Friday night. I might now be unique among U.S. reporters: I’ve witnessed three different methods — nine lethal injections and an electric chair execution. I can still hear the thunk of the breaker falling 21 years later. As a journalist you want to ready yourself for an assignment. You research a case. You read about the subject.