Skip to main content

U.S.: After Decades, a Death Sentence Depends (a Little) Less on Where You Live

Death penalty USA
This year, for the first time in the modern history of the death penalty, no single county in the United States imposed more than two death sentences.

That stands in stark contrast to many years in which the use of capital punishment was more concentrated in counties like Philadelphia, Harris County (which includes Houston) and Los Angeles.

“The patterns are more striking this year than the numbers themselves,” said Robert Dunham, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center, a Washington, D.C., nonprofit that issued an annual report on executions and death sentences on Friday.

The number of executions and new death sentences remained low by historical standards, the report said, despite a small uptick. For the fourth consecutive year there will have been fewer than 30 executions in the United States; before this recent stretch, executions had been above that level every year since 1991.

And the use of capital punishment still remains largely a matter of geography. Only 14 states and the federal government imposed death sentences, with more than half coming from four states: Texas, Florida, California and Ohio. California, which has by far the largest death row population in the country, has not carried out an execution since 2006 amid challenges to its method of lethal injection. In October, Washington became the 20th state to abolish the death penalty after a court ruled it unconstitutional.

The 25 executions carried out this year were in just eight states — Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Nebraska, South Dakota, Tennessee and Texas — reflecting the relative popularity of capital punishment in the South and especially in Texas, which alone accounted for 13 executions. (At the current pace, it would take about a century to execute everyone now on death row in the United States.)

Among those killed was Carey Dean Moore, who was executed by lethal injection in Nebraska for killing two taxi drivers, after a German pharmaceutical manufacturer failed in its legal battle to stop the state from using its products to carry out the sentence. Edmund Zagorski’s last words were “Let’s rock” before he died in Tennessee’s electric chair, a method he chose because he felt it would mean less agony than lethal injection. On Tuesday, Alvin Braziel Jr. was executed in Texas after apologizing to the wife of the man he murdered “for her husband dying at my hand.”

Mr. Dunham defines the death penalty’s modern era as beginning in 1972, when executions were halted after the Supreme Court ruled 5-to-4 that capital punishment, as it was imposed, violated the Constitution, but left open the possibility that states could continue using it if they revised their statutes.

Executions resumed in 1977, and by the late 1990s, more than 50 were being carried out every year.

Select counties sent the condemned to death row in double-digit numbers — just 15 counties accounted for almost a third of all executions from 1977 to 2012. Even that wasn’t enough, in the view of Dale Cox, the former acting district attorney in Caddo Parish, La., one such death penalty stronghold. “I think we need to kill more people,” he famously said.

But critics say capital punishment is still imposed arbitrarily, prompting Justice Stephen G. Breyer to note two years ago that “individuals who are executed are not the ‘worst of the worst,’ but, rather, are individuals chosen at random, on the basis, perhaps of geography, perhaps of the views of individual prosecutors, or still worse on the basis of race.”

Many factors have worked to slow the pace of death sentences and executions in recent years, including pharmaceutical companies trying to prevent their drugs from being used in lethal injections, and moratoriums in some states.

But declining public support has been the main driver of the slowdown. For the first time since Gallup started asking the question in 2000, fewer than half of people surveyed said they believed the punishment was applied fairly. And only 56 percent supported the death penalty for murder, down from 80 percent in 1994.

That has translated into more skeptical jurors. Though national data on how juries vote is hard to come by, some prosecutors have cited juror reluctance in explaining a retreat from seeking the death penalty.

Voters have also had an impact. In almost a dozen of the 30 counties with the highest pace of death sentences, prosecutors have been voted out of office since 2015, Mr. Dunham said.

In 2015, Caddo Parish elected a former judge, James E. Stewart Sr., as its first African-American district attorney.

While he is currently pursuing the death penalty against a man accused of killing a police officer, it would be the first death sentence in Caddo in four years.

Source: nytimes.com, Richard A. Oppel Jr., December 14, 2018


⚑ | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.


Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!



"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." -- Oscar Wilde

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight.  In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution.  Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order. 

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

Alabama | Judge bars nitrogen gas execution, says method is unconstitutionally cruel

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- A federal judge on Tuesday permanently blocked Alabama from executing an inmate with nitrogen gas after declaring it violates the ban on cruel and unusual punishment. U.S. District Judge Emily Marks issued the ruling hours after an appeals court reversed her initial finding that the method was constitutional. Marks permanently enjoined the state from executing Jeffrey Lee, 49, by nitrogen gas. He was scheduled to be executed Thursday. The decision, for now, blocks the use of the controversial new execution method that the state has championed since 2024, but the issue will likely end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Idaho will soon turn to firing squad executions. Police will pull the triggers

Trained members of Idaho law enforcement with demonstrated firearms proficiency are expected to fill slots for carrying out the death penalty by firing squad as the state prison system transitions to the controversial execution method next month.  Six volunteers certified for no less than three years apiece through Peace Officer Standards and Training, or POST, will be recruited to ensure the Idaho Department of Correction is ready to comply with a state law that prioritizes shooting prisoners to death over lethal injection starting July 1.  No one on the team may have faced disciplinary action over firearms, use of force, or related conduct over the prior year, according to new execution protocols the prison system released this week. 

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.