FEATURED POST

Will the U.S. Finally End the Death Penalty?

Image
In the past, abolition efforts have faced a backlash—but Gavin Newsom’s moratorium may be different.
The American death penalty is extraordinarily fragile, with death sentences and executions on the decline. Public support for the death penalty has diminished. The practice is increasingly marginalized around the world. California, with its disproportionately large share of American death-row inmates, announces an end to the death penalty. The year? 1972. That’s when the California Supreme Court declared the death penalty inconsistent with the state’s constitutional prohibition of cruel or unusual punishments—only to have the death penalty restored a year later through popular initiative and legislation.
On Wednesday, again, California walked back its commitment to the death penalty. Though not full-fledged abolition, Governor Gavin Newsom declared a moratorium on capital punishment lasting as long as his tenure in office, insisting that the California death penalty has been an “abject…

Nebraska: Senator Chambers challenges Pfizer to stop any use of its drugs in execution

Pfizer logo
The letter begins: TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE.

With that, Omaha Sen. Ernie Chambers challenged a major drug company to use the courts to block use of any of its drugs that may be used in the scheduled execution of condemned Nebraska prisoner Carey Dean Moore.

Chambers sent the letter Friday to a Pfizer pharmaceutical company executive in an effort to persuade him to go beyond Pfizer's request to the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services for return of any lethal injection drugs manufactured by the company.

Another drug company, Alvogen, successfully filed a legal objection in Nevada this month to stop one of its drugs from being used in an execution. A judge blocked the use of its sedative midazolam from being used in the scheduled execution of Scott Raymond Dozier.

"Does Pfizer's desire to protect its integrity, good name and public image rise to the level of Alvogen's?" Chambers asked Robert Jones, Pfizer vice president of government affairs.

Moore is scheduled to die by lethal injection Aug. 14 and has been informed that four drugs, never before used in an execution in this combination, are to be administered to put him to death. They are fentanyl, diazepam, cisatracurium besylate and potassium chloride.

Jones sent a letter to Nebraska Corrections Director Scott Frakes in October asking for the return of any Pfizer products to be used for capital punishment.

The letter from Jones informed the department that diazepam and fentanyl had been added to the company's list of 11 restricted products from lethal injection for capital punishment. He requested the return of any restricted use Pfizer or Hospira products in the department's possession.

"Pfizer makes its products to enhance and save the lives of the patients we serve," Jones said in the letter. "Consistent with these values, Pfizer strongly objects to use of its products as lethal injections for capital punishment."

Nebraska, like some other states, has shrouded the source of its lethal injection drugs in secrecy, Chambers told Jones in the letter. ACLU of Nebraska, the Lincoln Journal Star and the Omaha World Herald have sued the state to compel it to reveal the sources of the drugs.

A Lancaster County District judge has ordered the state to release records of communications with its lethal injection drug suppliers, as well as several other documents related to Nebraska's efforts to carry out the death penalty.

The court found certain other documents were exempt from disclosure under a state law protecting the identities of members of the state's execution team, including purchase orders and chemical analysis reports.

The department appealed the decision and no records were released, so the source of the four drugs is still unknown.

In his letter, Chambers told Jones it was a puzzling fact that Pfizer had not initiated any legal action in Nebraska to force the department to return its drugs.

"The courts are open for business, as demonstrated by Alvogen; and I am confident that the judicial system will give serious, expeditious consideration to the goal of maintaining intact and unblemished and uncompromised by others Pfizer's declared mission and purpose -- 'to enhance and save the lives of patients' -- if you but initiate appropriate legal proceedings," Chambers wrote.

He questioned Pfizer's will to employ its "standing and legal wherewithal" to protect its interests in this situation.

Chambers said it might be understandable if a cynic were to suggest that Pfizer is being disingenuous and calculatingly trying to have it both ways, to stave off accusations of being complicit in executions, but by taking no legal action managing to continue active participation in the capital punishment market.

"What is Pfizer's good name worth?" he asked.

Jones, or a representative of Pfizer, could not be reached immediately for comment.

Source: Lincoln Journal Star, July 29, 2018


⚑ | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.


Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!



"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." -- Oscar Wilde

Most Viewed (Last 7 Days)

California: Convicted killer changes gender while on death row

Alabama: Tuscaloosa County jury recommends death penalty in capital murder case

Bill to abolish Louisiana death penalty coming; California governor halts executions

Eyewitness to execution: The Sacramento Bee’s coverage of 1992 gas chamber execution

PHOTOS: California's Death Chamber Dismantled!

Singapore: Harvesting organs from death row "donors"

Lawyer calls on Singapore to halt Malaysian's Friday execution

Will the U.S. Finally End the Death Penalty?

China: Ethiopian woman awaits capital punishment, draws international attention

D.C. sniper killer to have his sentence reviewed by Supreme Court