Skip to main content

Roland Freisler – Hitler’s Screaming Nazi Judge

Judge Roland Freisler (center) gave the Nazi salute in a courtroom in July 1944.
Nazi Germany perverted every democratic institution that was supposed to uphold the rule of law and ensure the people of Europe’s most powerful nation were governed fairly. And in relation to the law, Roland Freisler played a huge part in this warped ideology.

Freisler displayed a strong patriotic streak towards his country from a young age. He was awarded the Iron Cross 1st Class and 2nd Class because of his actions with the German Imperial Army’s 22nd Division during the First World War.

It was during this action that the lawyer was captured by the Russian forces and interned in a prison camp in 1918. It was then that Freisler learned Russian and was appointed a Commissar and given the duty of organising the camp’s food supplies.

This title, handed to him by the communists, that would prevent Freisler from advancing further in the Nazi party as it tainted his reputation and made him appear to be someone who had co-operated with the Soviets.

Freisler’s action during the Great War interrupted his law studies and after the conflict had ended the lawyer returned to the University of Jena and was awarded a Doctorate of the Law in 1922.

Within four years he would use his legal knowledge for immoral ends and ended up defending Nazi party members in court after he joined the party in 1925.

Despite being thought unsuitable for authority by members of the Nazi party, he nevertheless caught the eye of the bigwigs, thanks to his performances in court. Freisler was appointed as the Director of the Prussian Ministry of Justice in 1933, followed by stints as Secretary of State in the Prussian Ministry of Justice (1933-1934) and the Reich Ministry of Justice (1934-1942).

This evil advocate of National Socialism quickly became one of the most feared judges in all the land, thanks to a combination of his excellent legal knowledge, berating and aggressive delivery and humiliation tactics in the courtroom.

Freisler would think nothing of denying a defendant braces and a belt, and then condemning them for not being able to keep their trousers up during the trial. He would also think nothing of sending children to their death, or plotting the genocidal destruction of the entire Jewish population of Europe.


90% of cases resulted in death or a life of imprisonment


Johann Reichart (center), Hitler's executioner
Despite this fervent and wide-eyed commitment to Hitler and his ideology, Freisler was never promoted to a post beyond the judiciary. There are a number of theories surrounding why this was: one idea suggested Freisler lacked the backing of anyone in a senior position within the party – another says his past association with communism prevented any further progression.

But the judge never lets this cloud the tyrannical way he policed the People’s Court, to which he was promoted to the role of President in 1942.

This was a separate administrative system beyond the reach of the regular judicial system and being brought before it under Freisler was tantamount to a death sentence. 90% of cases brought to the court by the judge resulted in death or a life of imprisonment.

In fact, Freisler succeeded in turning the court into a psychological weapon and a way to control the citizenry of Nazi Germany. He also had the dubious honour of being the man who introduced the death penalty for juveniles for the first time in his county’s history.

The trials that he held have been described as an executive execution arm of the state, with Freisler as the gleeful judge, jury and executioner. He even took the court records and peppered them with as much Nazi terminology as possible to lend the verdicts some form of twisted legitimacy.

Between 1942 and 1945 Freisler put to death 5,000 people – in three years he put as many defendants in front of the executioner as the People’s Court had done in the years 1934-1945. He even sent the family of Joseph Muller, a Catholic priest, the bill for his execution by guillotine.

Acts like that show the cold-blooded nature of the man, and also the vim and vigour which he brought to his role in the People’s Court – which had become a byword for show trials and vicious sentences.

Perhaps because of this, Freisler was thought important enough to be invited to the 1942 Wannsee Conference, which sought to deal with the ‘final solution’ for the Jewish race throughout Europe.

As a judge, this Nazi was a force to be reckoned with. He spoke with such ferocity, often brow-beating and shouting down those who had been brought before him. Freisler was clearly a devoted follower of Hitler and of his ideology – something that is reflected in the charges of those brought before him.

High profile cases


Most of these were for ‘defeatism’, or for selling items on the black market and for work slowdowns.  These crimes came under the broad brush of the term “political offences,” and most were dealt with harshly by the raving judge.

The White Rose : Hans Scholl (left), Sophie Scholl (center) and Christoph Probst
Freisler was the judge who oversaw many high-profile cases, including that of the White Rose group, who had been captured by the Gestapo. 

The organisation was non-violent, but met a bloody death when the ring leaders were beheaded by guillotine in 1943.

One of his most documented moments was during the 1944 show trials of the group who had plotted to assassinate Hitler.

The trial was documented so it could be used as propaganda, and the film showed Freisler clinically interrogating the defendants, before descending into hyperbolic abuse and mental degradation.

Nearly all of those brought before him during that trial were hanged, many within two hours of a sentence being proclaimed.

The judge would meet his death while the war still raged around him, in a bombing raid on Berlin during 1945. It was a Saturday, and Freisler was presiding over a session of the People’s Court when an American air raid caught them unawares.

The court was swiftly evacuated, but Freisler ran back into the building to retrieve some documents he thought were important to the farcical trials he conducted. 

It was at this moment that a bomb struck, and the judge was crushed to death beneath a falling piece of masonry.

Source: War History Online, Russell Hughes, September 2017

➤ Related content:


⚑ | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.


Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!



"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." -- Oscar Wilde

Comments

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Oklahoma | Richard Glossip on Life After Decades on Death Row

In an exclusive interview at home in Oklahoma City, Glossip describes his first days of freedom in a world he hasn’t experienced for nearly 30 years. For three decades, Richard Glossip lived on concrete. First at the Oklahoma County jail, after his arrest for murder in 1997, and then in the underground bunker housing death row inmates at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary. As with the rest of his surroundings, he eventually got used to the hard, unforgiving floors, although recently he’d developed painful swelling in his legs.

Florida executes Andrew Richard Lukehart

Jacksonville man who killed his girlfriend’s 5-month-old baby in 1996 executed 30 years later A Jacksonville man who confessed to killing his girlfriend’s 5-month-old daughter and throwing her body in a pond 3 decades ago was executed on Tuesday evening.  Andrew Richard Lukehart, 53, was scheduled to receive a 3-drug injection starting at 6 p.m. at Florida State Prison near Starke.  He was sentenced to death after being convicted of aggravated child abuse and felony murder in the death of Gabrielle Hanshaw. The baby’s mother told News4JAX she plans to attend the execution.

US | Army lays groundwork for death row executions if Trump gives approval

The Army is preparing to carry out the executions of the military's four death-row inmates if ordered to do so by the president, according to an internal planning document reviewed by ABC News. If carried out, it would mark the first time the military executed convicted American inmates in more than a half-century The plan, dubbed "Operation Resolute Justice" and issued internally in February, directs Army officials to coordinate with the Federal Bureau of Prisons to transfer condemned prisoners from the U.S. Disciplinary Barracks at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, to the federal execution facility in Terre Haute, Indiana, where the Justice Department carried out a series of non-military federal executions during President Donald Trump's first term.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

Florida | 2-time Jacksonville baby abuser is set for execution

Thirty years ago while on probation for fracturing an infant’s skull, Andrew Lukehart inflicted at least five blows to the head of another baby, then concocted a story that she was abducted before eventually leading authorities to her body in a swamp area.  At 6 p.m. Tuesday, June 2, the 53-year-old from Jacksonville is set to become Florida’s eighth man on death row to be executed in 2026. He will become the 36th under Gov. Ron DeSantis after a record 19 inmates were executed by the state in 2025, including another from Duval County: Michael Bell.

Tennessee | Questions Raised About the Doctor Who Was Overseeing Tony Caruthers’ Execution

Mark Fowler, according to a deposition, had not placed a central line in a patient for more than a decade when he attempted to put one in Carruthers Around 11 a.m. Thursday morning in the execution chamber at Riverbend Maximum Security Institution in Nashville, a medical doctor stepped in and attempted to place a central IV line in Tony Carruthers’ chest. By that point, the prison staff had spent some 30 minutes trying unsuccessfully to insert a backup IV line that would allow them to proceed with the lethal injection. According to Carruthers’ attorney Maria DeLiberato, who was in the room, after asking a staff member to attempt inserting a line through Carruthers’ jugular vein, the doctor moved on to the central line, which is identified as the last resort in Tennessee’s lethal injection protocol .

Alabama Plans to Execute Jeffrey Lee Despite Jury Vote for Life

Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey has scheduled the execution of Jeffrey Lee by nitrogen suffocation for June 11, 2026, even though his capital jury voted 7-5 against the death penalty and chose a sentence of life imprisonment without parole. The trial judge overrode the jury’s verdict and sentenced Mr. Lee to death in 2000, relying on a unique Alabama practice that allowed judges to overrule jury verdicts in death penalty cases. Alabama is the only state where judges overrode jury verdicts of life to impose the death penalty routinely—in more than 100 cases since 1976. As a result, nearly 20% of the people currently on Alabama’s death row were sentenced to death by elected judges even after their juries chose life imprisonment without parole.

Can the state execute a man who already survived? | Opinion

A second execution would be an unimaginable nightmare for Tony Carruthers and a moral horror for the rest of us. Tony Carruthers is not supposed to be alive . On May 21, Tennessee set out to execute him. It failed. Carruthers survived. He is not the first person to survive an execution in the United States, and he won’t be the last. For Carruthers, the question is: Now what? Will the state seek to arrange a second execution?

Iran executes Esma Zarei in Ardabil Prison after she gave birth in custody

Hengaw – Saturday, May 23, 2026. Iranian authorities have executed Esma Zarei, a 28-year-old Turkish woman from Parsabad in Ardabil Province, who had previously been sentenced to death on charges of “premeditated murder” in connection with the killing of her husband. She is the sixth woman executed in Iran since the beginning of 2026. According to information received by Hengaw Organization for Human Rights, Zarei was executed at dawn on Wednesday, May 20, 2026, in Ardabil Central Prison. She had been sentenced to qisas (retribution-in-kind) after being convicted of her husband’s murder.