FEATURED POST

Iran: The death penalty is an inhumane punishment for death row prisoners, their families and society as a whole

Image
"Whether guilty or not, the outcome of the death penalty is the same. In Iran, the death penalty is by hanging, and it takes from several agonising seconds to several harrowing minutes for death to occur and for everything to be over."

Every year several hundred people are executed by the Iranian authorities.
According to reports by Iran Human Rights (IHR) and other human rights groups, death row prisoners have often no access to a defence lawyer after their arrest and are sentenced to death following unfair trials and based on confessions extracted from them under torture. 
These are issues which have been addressed in IHR’s previous reports. The current report is based on first-hand accounts of several inmates held in Iran's prisons and their families. The report seeks to illustrate other aspects of how the death penalty affects the inmate, their families and, as a consequence, society.
How does a death row inmate experience his final hours?
Speaking about the final ho…

Bill to abolish death penalty in Montana receives no objections

HELENA – Opponents of the death penalty are making another run at abolishing it in Montana – and told a House committee Monday there are multiple reasons for getting rid of what they called an ineffective, costly sentence.

“The death penalty system, like so many government programs, is wasteful, ineffective and unjust,” said Rep. Adam Hertz, R-Missoula, the sponsor of the bill abolishing it.

Hertz’s House Bill 336 would abolish the death penalty and replace it with life-in-prison without parole as the harshest criminal sentence in Montana.

If the bill passes, the two men on Montana’ death row would be resentenced to life in prison, with no parole. They’ve been on death row for 34 and 25 years, respectively.

Hertz told MTN News he thinks HB336 has a chance to pass the Republican-controlled Legislature, because there are “a lot of really good arguments for a lot of really different ideologies” to abolish the death penalty.

Conservatives who are pro-life can support it, he said, and also should like the fact that getting rid of the death penalty will save taxpayer money.

He told the House Judiciary Committee that studies have shown that having a murderer sentenced to death can cost 10 times as much as someone sentenced to life in prison, because of the costs of multiple appeals and legal proceedings.

“While we taxpayers don’t like paying for a criminal to sit in prison for 20 or 30 or even 50 years, it’s a travesty to pay 10 times that amount while dragging out a lengthy judicial process mandated by the Supreme Court,” he said. “It’s a painful process that can put a victim’s family through decades of legal maneuvering and often doesn’t even lead to an execution.”

The House Judiciary Committee took no action Monday. Chairman Alan Doane, R-Bloomfield, said he doesn’t expect a vote for at least a week or so.

A similar bill made it to the floor of the Montana House two years ago but failed on a 50-50 vote. Republicans controlled that chamber by the same margin they do now: 59-41.

No one testified against the bill Monday, but several committee members suggested the death penalty could still be a deterrent, and questioned whether murderers sentenced to life in prison would truly never be released.

Hertz said his intent is that anyone sentenced to life-in-prison without parole would stay incarcerated the rest of their lives.

Department of Corrections spokeswoman Judy Beck told MTN News that Montana’s prison system already has 63 inmates with a sentence of life, without parole.

Supporters of the bill said the death penalty not only costs the state a lot of money in legal costs, but also is immoral and doesn’t deter crime.

Susan DeBree, a Methodist minister from Livingston, said her daughter, Gretchen, was murdered in 1990, but the killer was never charged. If the person they thought killed her had been charged and sentenced to death, it wouldn’t have redeemed Gretchen’s life, she said.

“There are many family members of murder victims who favor abolishing the death penalty and replacing it with life without possibility of parole,” she said. “I plead that you would listen to our voice. I choose to honor Gretchen’s life by asking for life.”

Source: KTVH, Mike Dennison, February 6, 2017

⚑ | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.


Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!

Most Viewed (Last 7 Days)

Tennessee prepares electric chair, execution date unconfirmed

Malaysia: Minimum 30-years imprisonment to replace death penalty

Botswana using fellow prisoners as hangmen for death row inmates - Official

Tennessee: Zagorski Execution Explained: If, When And How He Could Be Executed

Pakistan: Zainab's killer Imran Ali to be hanged in Lahore on Wednesday

Arizona: Aussie mum who could face death penalty fronts court

Letters from inmates on death row: An overview of why South Korea needs to abolish capital punishment

Texas: "It's wrong for an imperfect system to impose an irreversible punishment."

Death penalty: How many countries still have it?

Indonesia: Busting the myths of the death penalty