Skip to main content

17 January 1977: Gilmore Execution Sees Death Penalty Reinstated

Gary Gilmore
Gary Gilmore
On 17th January 1977, Gary Gilmore became the first person to be executed in the United States in almost ten years. His death by firing squad marked the end of a ban on the death penalty which had been in place since 1972. Capital punishment has long been controversial. Globally it’s been in decline for a long time, yet it remains a feature of the US justice system. Throughout US history attempts have been made to eliminate the use of the death penalty. Undoubtedly, the most successful came in the 1970s, resulting in the four year ban.

The key to the ban was the 1972 Furman v. Georgia case. William Henry Furman was accused of killing a resident in a house during a burglary. Furman’s statement changed, from having killed the resident unintentionally by blindly firing a shot while fleeing, to his gun firing accidentally after he’d tripped.

Seeing as the death occurred as part of a burglary, Furman was eligible for the death penalty if found guilty. He was convicted, although his defenders say the verdict was reached purely on the basis of Furman’s own statement. Furman was ultimately sentenced to death, but the punishment was never carried out.

The case was brought before the US Supreme Court, who ruled that the imposition of the death penalty would have constituted a “cruel and unusual punishment” under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Supreme Court ruled that Georgia’s death penalty statute which gave juries full discretion could lead to arbitrary sentencing. The verdict immediately freed several other criminals on Georgia’s death row from the death sentence.

In June 1972, the Supreme Court voided forty death penalty statutes, commuting the death sentences of some 629 inmates across the United States and effectively suspending the death penalty in the country.

Despite the ban, polls showed that by 1976 some 66% of Americans still supported the death penalty. Ultimately, the case of Gary Gilmore provided a precedent for the return of capital punishment.

Gary Gilmore was executed by firing squad at Utah State Prison.
Gary Gilmore was executed by firing squad at Utah State Prison.
A career criminal who by the age of 35 had already spent half of his life in jail, over the course of two days in July 1976 Gilmore killed two men: gas station attendant Max Jensen and motel manager Ben Bushnell. Both men had been robbed by Gilmore and despite complying with his demands, were killed.

Gilmore was quickly found guilty of murder and sentenced to death, reigniting the debate around capital punishment in the USA. The American Civil Liberties Union and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People united to launch campaigns to prevent his execution, fearing the precedent it would set. 

Gilmore himself accepted the sentence. Firing his legal team who’d attempted to have his sentence overturned, he then took the unusual step of campaigning for a hasty execution; launching a hunger strike in protest at the delay in carrying out the sentence and having a letter published in the press asking his mother to stop trying to intervene on his behalf.

The Supreme Court set basic requirements that needed to be met if the death penalty was to be reinstated in a state:

1. Capital sentencing must be based upon objective criteria to direct and limit the exercise of discretion.

2. The adjudicator must take into account the character and record of the individual defendant.

Any state complying with those criteria was allowed to enact new death penalty laws, something 37 states of the USA have done since 1976.

Gilmore meanwhile, was executed by firing squad on 17th January 1977. Supposedly, his last words were: “Let’s do it.”

Source: New Historian, Daryl Worthington, January 17, 2017

⚑ | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.


Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Tennessee executes Harold Wayne Nichols

Thirty-seven years after confessing to a series of rapes and the murder of Karen Pulley, Nichols expressed remorse in final words Strapped to a gurney in the execution chamber at Riverbend Maximum Security Institution Thursday morning, Harold Wayne Nichols made a final statement.  “To the people I’ve harmed, I’m sorry,” he said, according to prison officials and media witnesses. “To my family, know that I love you. I know where I’m going to. I’m ready to go home.”

China | Former Chinese senior banker Bai Tianhui executed for taking US$155 million in bribes

Bai is the second senior figure from Huarong to be put to death for corruption following the execution of Lai Xiaomin in 2021 China has executed a former senior banker who was found guilty of taking more than 1.1 billion yuan (US$155 million) in bribes. Bai Tianhui, the former general manager of the asset management firm China Huarong International Holdings, was executed on Tuesday after the Supreme People’s Court approved the sentence, state broadcaster CCTV reported.

Burkina Faso to bring back death penalty

Burkina Faso's military rulers will bring back the death penalty, which was abolished in 2018, the country's Council of Ministers announced on Thursday. "This draft penal code reinstates the death penalty for a number of offences, including high treason, acts of terrorism, acts of espionage, among others," stated the information service of the Burkinabe government. Burkina Faso last carried out an execution in 1988.

Oklahoma board recommends clemency for inmate set to be executed next week

A voting board in Oklahoma decided Wednesday to recommend clemency for Tremane Wood, a death row inmate who is scheduled to receive a lethal injection next week at the state penitentiary in McAlester.  Wood, 46, faces execution for his conviction in the 2001 murder of Ronnie Wipf, a migrant farmworker, at an Oklahoma City hotel on New Year's Eve, court records show. The recommendation was decided in a 3-2 vote by the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, consisting of five members appointed by either the governor or the state's top judicial official, according to CBS News affiliate KWTV. Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Sitt will consider the recommendation as he weighs whether to grant or deny Wood's clemency request, which would mean sparing him from execution and reducing his sentence to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Iran | Child Bride Saved from the Gallows After Blood Money Raised Through Donations, Charities

Iran Human Rights (IHRNGO); December 9, 2025: Goli Kouhkan, a 25-year-old undocumented Baluch child bride who was scheduled to be executed within weeks, has been saved from the gallows after the diya (blood money) was raised in time. According to the judiciary’s Mizan News Agency , the plaintiffs in the case of Goli Kouhkan, have agreed to forgo their right to execution as retribution. In a video, the victim’s parents are seen signing the relevant documents. Goli’s lawyer, Parand Gharahdaghi, confirmed in a social media post that the original 10 billion (approx. 100,000 euros) toman diya was reduced to 8 billion tomans (approx. 80,000 euros) and had been raised through donations and charities.

Who Gets Hanged in Singapore?

Singapore’s death penalty has been in the news again.  Enshrined in law in 1975, a decade after the island split from Malaysia and became an independent state, the penalty can see people sentenced to hang for drug trafficking, murder or firearms offenses, among other crimes. Executions have often involved trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act, with offenses measured in grams.  Those executed have included people from low-income backgrounds and foreign nationals who are sometimes not fluent in English, according to human rights advocates such as Amnesty International and the International Drug Policy Consortium. 

Afghanistan's Taliban rulers carry out public execution in sports stadium

The man had been convicted of killing 13 members of a family, including children, and was executed by one of their relatives, according to police. Afghanistan's Taliban authorities carried out the public execution of a man on Tuesday convicted of killing 13 members of a family, including several children, earlier this year. Tens of thousands of people attended the execution at a sports stadium in the eastern city of Khost, which the Supreme Court said was the eleventh since the Taliban seized power in 2021 in the wake of the chaotic withdrawal of US and NATO forces.

Afghanistan | Two Sons Of Executed Man Also Face Death Penalty, Says Taliban

The Taliban governor’s spokesperson in Khost said on Tuesday that two sons of a man executed earlier that day have also been sentenced to death. Their executions, he said, have been postponed because the heir of the victims is not currently in Afghanistan. Mostaghfer Gurbaz, spokesperson for the Taliban governor in Khost, also released details of the charges against the man executed on Tuesday, identified as Mangal. He said Mangal was accused of killing members of a family.

Utah | Ralph Menzies dies on death row less than 3 months after his execution was called off

Judge was set to consider arguments in December about Menzies’ mental fitness  Ralph Menzies, who spent more than 3 decades on Utah’s death row for the 1986 murder of Maurine Hunsaker, has died.  Menzies, 67, died of “presumed natural causes at a local hospital” Wednesday afternoon, according to the Utah Department of Corrections.  Matt Hunsaker, Maurine Hunsaker’s son, said Menzies’ death “was a complete surprise.”  “First off, I’d say that I’m numb. And second off, I would say, grateful,” Hunsaker told Utah News Dispatch. “I’m grateful that my family does not have to endure this for the holidays.” 

USA | Should Medical Research Regulations and Informed Consent Principles Apply to States’ Use of Experimental Execution Methods?

New drugs and med­ical treat­ments under­go rig­or­ous test­ing to ensure they are safe and effec­tive for pub­lic use. Under fed­er­al and state reg­u­la­tions, this test­ing typ­i­cal­ly involves clin­i­cal tri­als with human sub­jects, who face sig­nif­i­cant health and safe­ty risks as the first peo­ple exposed to exper­i­men­tal treat­ments. That is why the law requires them to be ful­ly informed of the poten­tial effects and give their vol­un­tary con­sent to par­tic­i­pate in trials. Yet these reg­u­la­tions have not been fol­lowed when states seek to use nov­el and untest­ed exe­cu­tion meth­ods — sub­ject­ing pris­on­ers to poten­tial­ly tor­tur­ous and uncon­sti­tu­tion­al­ly painful deaths. Some experts and advo­cates argue that states must be bound by the eth­i­cal and human rights prin­ci­ples of bio­med­ical research before using these meth­ods on prisoners.