Skip to main content

Federal judge wants Arizona to identify its execution drugs

"Death penalty states are struggling to obtain execution drugs."
A federal judge on Wednesday said he won't resume a civil rights lawsuit against the state of Arizona until it reveals which execution drugs it has in its possession.

The order issued Wednesday requires the state to tell the court which drugs it has and which of the four drug combinations it plans on using when it resumes executions. The lawsuit was put on hold last year, and the state wants the lawsuit to continue. Attorneys have until Nov. 18 to respond.

The state will comply with the judge's order, Department of Corrections spokesman Andrew Wilder said. Dale Baich, a federal death penalty defense attorney, said the order "maps out a reasoned and serious approach for the next steps in this litigation."

Meanwhile, Arizona is battling the federal government over a seized $27,000 shipment of sodium thiopental, an execution drug banned in the U.S. Arizona and Texas have tried to import the drug, but the Food and Drug Administration says that is illegal.

Death penalty states are struggling to obtain execution drugs, resulting in executions being put on hold or in alternative methods. Utah, for example, brought back firing squads as a backup. The shortage of drugs began about 5 years ago, when European manufacturers stopped supplying them.

The FDA stopped Arizona's drug shipment in July at the Phoenix airport, saying that it's illegal to import the drug.

Arizona confirmed Wednesday that it had filed an appeal with the FDA over the seizure. Attorneys for the state say the FDA doesn't have the authority to stop the shipment.

In a letter dated Oct. 23, a private attorney hired to represent the state argues that the importation doesn't violate the rules the FDA cited in its withholding of the drug.

Arizona put executions on hold following the lengthy death of convicted murderer Joseph Rudolph Wood in July 2014. Officials can't seek death warrants until the lawsuit, filed on behalf of Wood and other death-row inmates over the secrecy of execution drugs, is resolved.

It took a step last week toward resuming executions by asking the judge to allow the lawsuit to resume.

Wood took nearly 2 hours to die after he was injected with a combination of midazolam, a sedative, and hydromorphone, a painkiller. State officials have since changed execution protocols twice, ending the use of that 2-drug combination. It now has 4 drug combinations available as options to use in executions.

The FDA says it is reviewing appeals by Arizona and Texas, where officials also tried to import the drug without success.

"The FDA will follow standard importation procedures, which allow for the importer of the detained products to offer testimony as to why the shipment is in compliance with the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and should not be refused entry," spokesman Jeff Ventura said in a written statement. Venture said the FDA is currently evaluating Arizona's and Texas' appeals. It's unclear how long that process can take.

Texas Department of Criminal Justice spokesman Jason Clark said the state legally purchased the drugs and obtained an import license from the federal Drug Enforcement Administration before the drugs were shipped.

Texas hasn't used sodium thiopental in recent years, but prison officials want to "explore all options, including the continued use of pentobarbital or alternate drugs to use in the lethal injection process," Clark said.

Source: Associated Press, October 29, 2015


Arizona's New Lethal-Injection Drugs Don't Guard Against Botched Executions, Critics Declare

More than a year after the use of an experimental-drug cocktail left an inmate gasping on the executioner's gurney for nearly 2 hours, the Arizona Department of Corrections has revised its lethal-injection protocols - but prisoner advocates say the changes won't fix the problem.

"When the prisoner is paralyzed, he'll experience a feeling of suffocation like a horse sitting on his chest. Then, when the 3rd drug is administered, it'll be like liquid fire going through his veins." - Federal Public Defender Dale Baich

When Joseph Wood was put to death in July 2014, he was sedated with midazolam, a valium-like drug, then pumped full of the narcotic hydromorphone to stop his heart. When the mixture failed to kill him in a timely manner, officials re-administered the drugs 15 times. Witnesses counted more than 600 tortured breaths while his attorneys scrambled unsuccessfully to halt the procedure.

Arizona historically has relied on sodium thiopental and pentobarbital for executions but has struggled to find an acceptable replacement since the U.S. distributor ceased production in 2010. The FDA has not approved the drugs for importation; however, state officials twice have been caught attempting to illegally smuggle them into the states from overseas.

The new protocol, issued in response to a lawsuit calling for more transparency in Arizona's capital punishment process, trades the hydromorphone used on Wood for potassium chloride, and adds a drug to prompt paralysis. However, it relies on the same sedative, midazolam.

Arizona Federal Public Defender Dale Baich argues that midazolam isn't strong enough to ensure inmates remain unconscious throughout the execution process.

"If the sedative wears off when the prisoner is paralyzed, he'll experience a feeling of suffocation like a horse sitting on his chest," he said. "Then, when the 3rd drug is administered, it'll be like liquid fire going through his veins. It is excruciatingly painful."

Before the debacle with Wood, midazolam was used in 2 other high-profile botched executions in 2014.

The traditional cocktail of drugs, when properly administered, completes its lethal job in about 5 to 10 minutes, but with an experimental cocktail including midazolam, it took Ohio's Dennis McGuire 26 minutes to die. A witness to his execution compared him to "a fish lying along the shore puffing for that 1 gasp of air that would allow it to breathe." After Oklahoma inmate Clayton Lockett was shot up with midazolam and declared unconscious a few months later, he raised his head and said, "Oh, man . . . I'm not . . ." then continued to writhe, groan, convulse, and try to rise from the table. He suffered a heart attack 43 minutes later and died.

The Arizona Department of Corrections declined to comment on its new protocols.

The U.S. Supreme Court in June, though, ruled 5-4 that the use of midazolam as a sedative during executions does not violate the Constitution's ban on cruel and unusual punishment, saying the group of inmates behind the challenge had failed to "establish that the method creates a demonstrated risk of severe pain and that the risk is substantial when compared to the known and available alternatives."

Arizona's new protocol also allows for journalists to watch over closed-circuit television as a prisoner enters the death chamber, is strapped to the gurney, and is injected with the catheters carrying the lethal drugs. At that point, the curtains will be opened and witnesses will be allowed to watch the execution through a window. Previously, witnesses could not tune in until the catheters were inserted.

"No one is above the law - certainly not the state agency whose charge is to punish those who break the law. But they do what they damn well please." - Dan Peitzmeyer, Death Penalty Alternatives for Arizona

The inmate's attorneys also will be permitted to bring a cell phone and computer into the prison so they can move quickly to halt the execution should things turn sour.

Dan Peitzmeyer, a board member with the grassroots advocacy group Death Penalty Alternatives for Arizona, said he was "delighted" by the move toward greater transparency.

"As it's written, it's beautiful," he said.

But he has little faith that the Department of Corrections will be so open in practice, he said, pointing to the department's recent tangle with the FDA over its attempts to smuggle sodium thiopental, a more effective anesthetic than midazolam, into the country.

The agency, working with local U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials to skirt the ban on drug imports, paid $27,000 to obtain 1,000 vials of the anesthetic in July. Because many reputable manufacturers in Europe have blocked state governments from purchasing sodium thiopental as a means of protesting the death penalty, according to a recent Buzzfeed News investigation (see related article below), Arizona may have turned to India, where a salesman without a pharmaceutical background is charging states seven times the retail price for drugs of questionable origin. The FDA flagged the shipment when it arrived at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport.

"No one is above the law - certainly not the state agency whose charge is to punish those who break the law," Peitzmeyer said. "But they do what they damn well please."

Executions, which were put on hold following Wood's death, will not resume until the department resolves the lawsuit with the U.S. Public Defenders Office.

Source: phoenixnewtimes.com, October 29, 2015

Related article:
Report an error, an omission: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com 
Follow us on Facebook and on Twitter

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight.  In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution.  Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order. 

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

Alabama | Judge bars nitrogen gas execution, says method is unconstitutionally cruel

MONTGOMERY, Ala. -- A federal judge on Tuesday permanently blocked Alabama from executing an inmate with nitrogen gas after declaring it violates the ban on cruel and unusual punishment. U.S. District Judge Emily Marks issued the ruling hours after an appeals court reversed her initial finding that the method was constitutional. Marks permanently enjoined the state from executing Jeffrey Lee, 49, by nitrogen gas. He was scheduled to be executed Thursday. The decision, for now, blocks the use of the controversial new execution method that the state has championed since 2024, but the issue will likely end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Idaho will soon turn to firing squad executions. Police will pull the triggers

Trained members of Idaho law enforcement with demonstrated firearms proficiency are expected to fill slots for carrying out the death penalty by firing squad as the state prison system transitions to the controversial execution method next month.  Six volunteers certified for no less than three years apiece through Peace Officer Standards and Training, or POST, will be recruited to ensure the Idaho Department of Correction is ready to comply with a state law that prioritizes shooting prisoners to death over lethal injection starting July 1.  No one on the team may have faced disciplinary action over firearms, use of force, or related conduct over the prior year, according to new execution protocols the prison system released this week. 

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.