![]() |
| California Death Row |
The countries the US most rails against for their undemocratic tyrannies: Iran, China, Afghanistan etc.. are countries that the US has more in common with than it would like. America has democratic structures that the other ‘less enlightened’ countries don’t possess: a powerful constitution, the Rule of Law, Due process, Habeas Corpus, and a Constitution that enshrines equal rights for all (in theory, and in practice if rich and white). It is therefore imperative that the US proves that it is far more sophisticated and refined than a common murderous thug that chooses to kill. How does the US set the example by killing in retort?
A rapid glance at the states that have committed the most executions since 1976, post-segregation reveals a sombre, but predictable pattern: if I told you that Texas, Oklahoma, Virginia, Florida, Missouri and Alabama led the way in executions, would you blink an eye? If I then asked you for an ethnic composition of the death row inmates executed, would you be surprised to learn that over 60% were black?
I do understand that the US is a land governed by the law of the dollar, so allow us to look at the economic argument – does it cost less to kill inmates off? Again, the answer is negative. Amnesty International has published an array of cost studies on this topic. Highlights include: a legislative audit carried out by Kansas that estimated that costs of a death penalty case are 70% higher than of a non-death penalty case. California currently spends over $135 million per year executing people – an alternative system could cost them just short of $12 million USD. The pre and post-trial costs of death penalty cases are cripplingly excessive, although this salient point often goes unmentioned in death penalty apologist circles.
Source: Refractory, August 15, 2014
