Skip to main content

Innocent man speaks out against death penalty

A bible, blanket, towel and a bar of soap were the 4 things that replaced the comfort of Randy Steidl's home when he was wrongfully convicted of the tragic murder of Dyke and Karen Rhodes on June 14, 1987. Steidl sat on death row for 12 out of the 17 years (6305 days) he was in the Danville Correctional Center in Pontiac, Ill. trying to prove that he was an innocent man.

The only other things he had access to were what he referred to as "garbage food" and an hour outside a day. Meanwhile he was locked inside a jail holding cell waiting for his execution day to be set, only to come back with another rebuttal to attest to his innocence. Most importantly, Steidl had access to the law library and he spent his 1st 3 months in prison reviewing how to defend his case.

On Nov. 27, Steidl visited Northern Kentucky University to speak out against the death penalty and share his story. He has traveled across the country to change hearts and minds and correct common misconceptions that surround the death penalty. Room 302 in the Student Union was filled with over 80 students and professors on the edge of their seats awaiting Steidl's deliverance of his story.

Steidl grew up in the small town of Paris, Ill. with a conservative farm family. He described Paris as a "blue collar farm community with 30 churches and 40 bars." And he wasn't one to stray away from that standard; Steidl said he "played hard and worked hard." With a construction job during the day, he liked to hang out at the bar at night and had a few misdemeanors for battery in his early twenties.

On the night of July 4, 1986, Steidl was coming back from a family reunion with his mother, son and aunt. After that he proceeded to go out with some friends and stayed with a girlfriend.

His aunt called to tell him the next morning that Karen and Dyke Rhodes' house had burnt to the ground. Later they found out that the couple didn't die of smoke inhalation, but of being stabbed to death over 50 times each.

Karen Rhodes had worked for an employer who had reportedly been protecting drug sales and doing drugs. The day after the death, he walked into a packed bar where Steidl was playing pool, came up to him and asked him if he knew anything about what had happened at the Rhodes' house the previous night.

Steidl said, "He came up to me and said I don't have a lot of clout in this town yet, but I have a lot of money. And he offered me $25,000 if I knew anything about the Rhodes murder."

After Steidl turned the employer away, the phone rang at the bar and it was the Illinois State Police asking him to come down to the station and answer some questions. Steidl was asked to bring his friend Herb Whitlock in as well. Not more than a second later, 5 police officers stormed into the bar and asked him to come with them.

After giving the police their step-by-step alibis, Steidl and Whitlock had to go through seven months of ridicule in their small town every time they went out in public. On Feb. 19, 1987, 5 more cops arrived at Steidl's house with their guns drawn and took him to the correctional center and placed him in a holding cell until he was convicted on June 14.

Steidl's own brother, who was a city cop, believed he was guilty. His brother told him if he confessed now they wouldn't use the death penalty and the police department "doesn't arrest people who aren't guilty."

The only forensic evidence linking Steidl and Whitlock to the crime scene were two unreliable eyewitness testimonies. He also had an upstanding alibi that his friends and family could have verified if his attorney tried to dispute the evidence brought to the stand by the prosecutor. By day 3 of his 4-day trial, Steidl realized his case was a "sinking ship."

"They had just convicted me of a double murder that I had nothing to do with," Steidl said.

However, Steidl still "believed in the system" at this point. Steidl filed for motion for an ineffective counsel and seven months later he had an evidentiary hearing where the 2 eyewitnesses confessed to lying about their testimonies given previously. He filed motion after motion including direct appeals, misconduct against police, misconduct against court and post-conviction alibis.

After sitting on death row for nine and a half years the news media became interested in Steidl's story and the police and prosecutor were embarrassed. Steidl received a new investigator on his case and wanted a full-blown investigation to be redone. He also had a cop, Michale Callahan, stand up for his case. Then Northwestern University had a class of journalism students that reviewed his case and found 20 eyewitnesses who would have discredited the 2 eyewitnesses.

9 months later evidence favoring the defense was withheld.

"I had an expert witness come forward, and a federal state judge combing through my records," Steidl said. "Others on death row haven't been as lucky."

According to Steidl, he's free in spite of the system, not because of it. Out of the 141 other men on death row in Illinois with Steidl, 19 were also innocent.

"You can release an innocent person from prison but you can't release them from the grave," Steidl said. "Our country has no room for the death penalty."

After Steidl finished, the room at NKU was full of applause and some were even on their feet.

Steidl's friend Herb Whitlock was in prison for 4 extra years and no one was ever convicted for the crime.

Steidl had to readjust to everyday life after getting out of prison. He moved to Missouri and got a job in the printing industry. He had forensic counseling and has been diagnosed with post traumatic stress disorder. He has been suing Illinois for 8 years and settled for $2.5 million last year.

"The only way to fix the death penalty is to abolish it," said Steidl. "All murders are heinous but I don't believe that anyone has the right to take anyone's life, there is no closure for the death regardless."

Source: The (Northern Kentucky University) Northerner, Brook Clifford, Staff Writer, November 28, 2012

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

Florida Supreme Court halts execution of police officer convicted of raping, murdering girl

STARKE, Fla. (AP) — The execution of a former Florida police officer convicted of raping and murdering an 11-year-old girl was temporarily halted Thursday by the Florida Supreme Court. The court issued a stay in execution for 68-year-old James Aren Duckett, who was scheduled to receive a three-drug injection Tuesday at Florida State Prison near Starke. Duckett was sentenced to death in 1988 after being convicted of first-degree murder and sexual battery.

Iranian Gay Activist: "They Forced Me to Watch Executions So I Would Know How Mine Would Be"

Iranian LGBT activist now living as a refugee in Spain. He was sentenced to death by the ayatollah regime for being homosexual and for his support campaign for the community. "The enemy was already at home," he says about the current war In 11 countries around the world, homosexuality is punishable by death - it is criminalized in almost 70 countries. One of them is the Islamic Republic of Iran, from where Ramtin Zigorat (Tabriz, 1988) managed to escape after avoiding a death sentence and enduring the worst tortures. He has been living as a refugee in Spain for six and a half years. Question . His life, his testimony, can help us better understand what the Iranian Islamist regime is. I believe that until adolescence, you did not fully understand that you were homosexual.

Arizona | Death Row Inmate Challenges Execution Warrant, Citing 2025 Cyberattack and Protocol Failures

Leroy Dean McGill was sentenced to death for a 2002 gasoline attack in North Phoenix against a couple, Charles Perez and Nova Banta. PHOENIX — Attorneys for Arizona death row inmate Leroy Dean McGill have formally challenged the state’s attempt to secure an execution warrant, citing a catastrophic 2025 cyberattack and a long history of troubled lethal injection protocols. The challenge comes as Arizona seeks to resume capital punishment following a year-long hiatus. If the Arizona Supreme Court grants the state’s request, McGill would become the first person executed in the state since 2024.

Faith Leaders, Advocates Plan Protests Against Firms Tied to Idaho Execution Chamber Project

BOISE, Idaho — Faith leaders, community advocates and relatives of a person executed by firing squad are joining national advocacy groups to protest firms involved in constructing Idaho’s execution chamber, as states increasingly turn to alternative methods amid lethal injection drug shortages. Due to the refusal of pharmaceutical companies, especially in the past decade, many states have had to find alternative methods because of extensive shortages of lethal injection drugs. Further, this has led the state of Idaho to pass legislation authorizing execution by firing squad, which is one of the most aggressive among alternative methods.

Once Nevada’s youngest on death row, double murderer paroled as victims’ family claims silence from state

LAS VEGAS — A man who once stood as the youngest person on Nevada’s death row has officially transitioned from a life behind bars to a life under supervision, following his release from High Desert State Prison last month. Edward Michael Domingues, 49, was released on parole on Feb. 13, 2026. His freedom marks the end of 32 consecutive years of incarceration for the 1993 murders of Arjin Chanel Pechpho and her 4-year-old son, Jonathan Smith. Since his release, the case has ignited a renewed debate over Nevada’s victim notification systems. Tawin Eshelman, the mother and grandmother of the victims, confirmed that the family was never formally notified of the parole hearing that led to Domingues' freedom.

Texas: Dexter Darnell Johnson to die on August 15; Larry Ray Swearingen on August 21

Dexter Darnell Johnson's execution is scheduled to occur at 6 pm CDT, on Thursday, August 15, 2019, at the Walls Unit of the Huntsville State Penitentiary in Huntsville, Texas.  31-year-old Dexter is convicted of the murder of 23-year-old Maria Aparece and 17-year-old Huy Ngo on June 18, 2006, in Houston, Texas.  Dexter has spent the last 11 years of his life on Texas’ death row. Dexter was born and raised in Texas. He dropped out of school following the 9th grade. During the early morning hours of June 18, 2006, Dexter Johnson and 4 of his friends, Ashley Ervin, Louis Ervin, Keithron Fields, and Timothy Randle, were driving around in Ashley’s car, looking for someone to rob. The group discovered Maria Aparece and Huy Ngo siting in Maria’s vehicle on the street. Johnson took a shot gun and stood outside the driver’s side door, threatening to shoot Maria if she did not cooperate. Johnson demanded she open the door, and when she did, he threw her into the ...

Texas inmate seeks to stop looming execution after codefendant confesses to double murder

In his appeal, James Broadnax, who wants a new trial, included a signed confession by his cousin saying he committed the 2008 Garland murders. With just 42 days remaining until his scheduled execution by lethal injection on April 30, 2026, in Huntsville, Texas death row inmate James Broadnax, 37, filed a new appeal Thursday with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, seeking to stay the date, remand his case for a new trial, and ultimately vacate his death sentence for the 2008 capital murders of music producers Stephen Swan, 26, and Matthew Butler, 28, outside their Zion Gate Records studio in Garland. A fabricated story The appeal centers on a signed written declaration from Broadnax's cousin and codefendant, Demarius Cummings, 37—dated March 11 and obtained by media outlets in which Cummings confesses that he alone planned the June 19, 2008, robbery, obtained the pistol used in the crime, and fired the fatal shots during the botched holdup that netted only $2 in cash and a 1995 Fo...

Georgia | 11th Circuit confirms lethal injection execution for Georgia inmate wanting firing squad

In his complaint, Michael Wade Nance said his veins were so severely compromised that they were likely to blow and cause him to suffer “excruciating pain” during the execution. ATLANTA (CN) — A panel for the 11th Circuit on Thursday upheld a judge’s ruling against a death row inmate who sought an execution by a firing squad instead of lethal injection. The decision paves the way for the state’s long-awaited execution of Michael Wade Nance, who was convicted of murder and sentenced to death over 25 years ago. In a unanimous opinion, the circuit judges agreed with a federal judge’s conclusion that Nance failed to prove lethal injection was likely to cause him an unconstitutional level of pain or discomfort.

Sonia Sotomayor Warns That Texas May Execute an Innocent Man

Law is, as legal scholars and commentators have long recognized , both a refuge for those seeking to escape abuses of power and a trap in which their claims of justice get lost in a maze of statutory intricacies. Nowhere has this been more clearly on display than in the world of capital punishment. Over the span of half a century, the Supreme Court has gone from championing the rights of capital defendants and death row inmates to deflecting and denying their pursuit of justice. Where once the court carefully scrutinized procedures used in death cases, insisting that they had to conform to the dictates of so-called super due process , today it has made the due process accorded in those cases not super at all .