Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Missouri: The future of the death penalty

Missouri has executed 67 people since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976. Only Texas, Virginia, Oklahoma, and Florida have carried out more death sentences since that time.

Missouri did not put anyone to death until 1989, but executions reached an all time high in the state from 1990 to 1999. During that time, 40 prisoners were executed by lethal injection. Texas and Virginia were the only states to execute more prisoners in those 10 years.

Death sentences reached their highest peak in Missouri in 1988, when 17 prisoners were condemned to die after being found guilty of 1st degree murder. In 1999, the state carried out nine executions, the most in Missouri since the death penalty was reinstated.

"That is a reflection of where the death penalty was in the 90s," said Corinne Farrell, Communications and Education Director at the Death Penalty Information Center in Washington, D.C. "Tons of people were being sentenced to death, and it was very popular."

A stall in the process

While Missouri has been a leader in executions over the past 2 decades, 15 other states have conducted more executions between 2009-2010.

Since 2005, the state has carried out one death sentence. The decline stems from a 2006 case regarding the constitutionality of lethal injection, and a national moratorium, which put all executions on hold in 2008.

In January 2006, a decision by the US District Court, based on the constitutionality of Missouri's execution procedure, placed a moratorium on all executions in the state.

The case was filed by Michael Taylor who was to be put to death in 2006, but was given a stay of execution just minutes before the sentence was carried out.

The decision by the court came after the surgeon, who prepared the three drugs for the lethal injection process, admitted to only using half of the set dosage of Thiopental, the first drug injected in the three-drug protocol, which puts the inmate to sleep.

Doctors at the trial testified that without the proper dosage of Thiopental, the third drug, Potassium Chloride, would result in a painful death.

Because the Department of Corrections did not have a written protocol for executions, Dr. "Doe 1" as he was referred to in the 2006 court document, felt he could use his own judgment for the execution procedure. Dr. "Doe 1" also admitted to being dyslexic.

During the Taylor litigation, the district court determined Missouri's unwritten method of execution subjected condemned prisoners to an unconstitutional risk of pain and suffering and ordered the state to prepare a written protocol, according to the 2006 document.

After the Missouri Department of Corrections installed a written protocol for its execution process in July 2006, the 8th Circuit Courts of the Appeals vacated their previous decision in June 2007.

Shortly after, the US Supreme Court ordered a national moratorium, which put all executions on hold, to examine the three drug protocol in Kentucky.

On April 16, 2008, the supreme court ruled that Kentucky's three-drug protocol for carrying out lethal injection did not amount to cruel and unusual punishment. As a result, the national moratorium was lifted.

Only five states issued more death sentences than Missouri, which imposed 6 that year. Across the country there were only 111, bringing death sentences to an all time low.

Missouri only issued one death sentence in 2007, during which the Taylor case was still going on.

The Supreme Court decision did not bring the debate over lethal injection in Missouri to a close. Taylor and 7 other inmates appealed to the courts again.

According to the 2009 8th circuit court document, the inmates contended that Missouri's current execution protocol violated the 8th Amendment because the substantial risk of the protocol, and that it may be improperly administered by incompetent, or unqualified medical personnel.

While a final decision was still being made in the case, Missouri executed its first inmate since 2005. Dennis Skillicorn became the 67th inmate to be put to death on May 20, 2009. Because Skillicorn was not a part of the current lawsuit, the process was allowed to take place.

Reginald Clemens was scheduled to be executed in June 2009, but was given a stay because he was part of the case.

On Nov. 10, 2009 the federal appeals court ruled against the inmates. Taylor said they would appeal that decision as well.

While 61 inmates remain on Missouri death row, the state has not scheduled any executions for 2011, but Farrell believes its just a matter of time before executions resume in Missouri.

Roderick Nunley was scheduled to die by lethal injection late last month but a Federal District Court issued a stay on Oct. 20 to decide if Nunley was entitled to a jury for sentencing. Missouri is appealing that stay.

The Missouri Supreme Court says it will look into the case again in January.

Jacquline Lapine, the Chief Public Information Officer at the Missouri Department of corrections, said the department would resume executions as soon as directed by the courts.

Where the trend is heading

The lethal injection debate has given anti death penalty supporters more reason for opposition, and public opinion polls show that there are less people in favor of the death penalty than there was in the mid-90s.

A 2006 Gallup Poll found that the overall support for the death penalty was 65%, down from 80% in 1994.

"We are seeing a diminishment in practice across the country on the death penalty," Sister Helen Prejean said. "I have not found in the last 20 years, that the American public is wedded to it."

Prejean has accompanied 16 prisoners to their execution over the past two decades. For 20 years, her goal has been to get people to reflect on the death penalty, and ultimately, see it eliminated.

Source: Daily Mirror, November 30, 2010

Tennessee Supreme Court Halts Executions for 4 death row Inmates

The Tennessee Supreme Court today issued an order staying the execution of Stephen Michael West scheduled for Nov. 30 to allow the trial court to test the constitutionality of the state’s new lethal injection procedure.

Pending the resolution of this issue, the Court has also stayed the scheduled executions for Billy Ray Irick, Edmund Zagorski and Edward Jerome Harbison.

On Nov. 22, West and Irick filed motions requesting the Tennessee Supreme Court postpone their executions after a Davidson County Chancery Court ruled the state's lethal injection procedure to be unconstitutional. After a 2-day evidentiary hearing, the trial court ruled the state's current procedure did not offer a safeguard to ensure the prisoner was unconscious before the final 2 drugs are administered.

In the State's response, filed Nov. 24, they argued that a stay of execution should not be granted as it had changed its execution procedure to include a test to confirm that the inmate is unconscious before the administration of the final 2 drugs. After considering the motions filed by both parties, the Supreme Court denied West and Irick's motions to postpone their scheduled executions.

West filed a motion to reconsider on Friday arguing that he was not afforded the opportunity to respond to the State's new execution procedure. The Supreme Court has granted West's motion to reconsider to allow the constitutionality of the new procedure to be fully tested in trial court.

The Supreme Court has directed the trial court to allow the parties to submit argument or evidence on the revised protocol, and the trial Court must render its final judgment within 90 days. The executions of West, Irick, Zagorski and Harbison are stayed pending any appeal of the trial court's judgment and until the State files motions to reset the execution dates of each prisoner.

Source: WDEF News, November 29, 2010


Tennessee Supreme Court Delays Execution For West

The Tennessee Supreme Court has issued an order staying the execution of Stephen Michael West to allow the trial court to test the constitutionality of the state's new lethal injection procedure.

The Supreme Court issued the stay on Monday. West had been moved to death watch and was scheduled to die by lethal injection at 10 p.m. on Tuesday.

A 2-day evidentiary hearing in Davidson County Chancery Court found the state's lethal injection procedure to be unconstitutional because it did not ensure the prisoner was unconscious before the final 2 drugs are administered. The hearing was brought after West and another death row inmate, Billy Ray Irick, filed motions to stay their executions.

The state filed a response 2 days later that a stay of execution should not be granted as it had changed its execution procedure to include a test to confirm that the inmate is unconscious before the administration of the final 2 drugs. After considering the motions filed by both parties, the Supreme Court denied West and Irick's motions to postpone their scheduled executions.

On Friday, West filed a motion to reconsider arguing that he was not afforded the opportunity to respond to the State's new execution procedure. The Supreme Court has granted West's motion to reconsider to allow the constitutionality of the new procedure to be fully tested in trial court.

The Supreme Court has directed the trial court to allow the parties to submit argument or evidence on the revised protocol, and the trial Court must render its final judgment within 90 days.

The executions of West, Irick, Edmund Zagorski and Edward Jerome Harbison are stayed pending any appeal of the trial court's judgment and until the State files motions to reset the execution dates of each prisoner.

West was convicted in the 1986 stabbing deaths of Wanda Romines and her 15-year-old daughter, Sheila Romines, in Union County.

In 2001, he was hours away from death when a judge granted him a stay so he could pursue federal appeals, which he has since completed. Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen declined to intervene when West's attorneys asked for clemency.

Source: newschannel 5, November 29, 2010

Monday, November 29, 2010

Tariq Aziz sentenced on crimes against Iraqi Kurds

Tariq Aziz
BAGHDAD (AP) — An Iraqi court on Monday convicted Tariq Aziz, Saddam Hussein's longtime foreign minister, of terrorizing Shiite Kurds during the Iran-Iraq war, sentencing him to 10 years in prison.

The jail term piles a new penalty on the 74-year-old Aziz, who already faces an execution sentence from another case.

Aziz was spared the death penalty in the Saddam-era crimes against humanity because he had a lesser involvement in the atrocities than some of his co-defendants, said Mohammed Abdul-Sahib, a spokesman for the Iraqi High Tribunal. The case involves crimes targeting Iraq's small sect of Shiite Kurds, known as Faili.

At least three former Saddam loyalists were sentenced to death in the same case, although two of the dictator's half brothers were found not guilty in the campaign against the Faili Kurds.

Saddam was a Sunni Muslim. In all, 15 defendants were charged in the case.

The small Faili minority comes mainly from an area in northeastern Iraq that straddles the Iraq-Iran border. Saddam killed, detained and deported tens of thousands of Faili Kurds early in his 1980-1988 war with Iran, denouncing them as alien Persians and spies for the Iranians.

Aziz was the highest-profile defendant to come before judges on Monday. He already faces execution in an earlier case linking him to Saddam's persecution of Shiite political parties.

His Italy-based lawyer, Giovanni di Stefano, called his return to court an example of "how seriously flawed is the Iraqi criminal justice system." He said all of the allegations against Aziz should have been rolled into one trial.

Di Stefano also said he plans to sue the U.S. government for reneging on what he called an agreement approved by former U.S. President George W. Bush to release Aziz after being questioned about the Saddam regime as a condition of his 2003 surrender to American forces in Iraq.

Aziz is still waiting to hear whether President Jalal Talabani, himself a Kurd, will grant him a presidential pardon or if he will be executed on order from the High Tribunal's appeals court — a decision that could come at any time. Talabani has said he will not sign off on Aziz's death warrant, given his old age and the fact that he was the only Christian in Saddam's inner circle.

But there are ways in Iraq's constitution to bypass the president in capital cases — such as an act of parliament or the approval of one of Talabani's two deputies. It's also not clear if Talabani has the constitutional authority to grant Aziz a pardon.

Source: AP, November 29, 2010

States ask Texas to supply ingredient for executions

As the supply of a key drug used in lethal injections dwindles, state officials are knocking on the door of the busiest execution chamber in the country for help.

Some states that have the death penalty have asked Texas for doses of sodium thiopental, the so-called knockout drug, used as part of the three-drug cocktail in executions by lethal injection, accordingto Michelle Lyons, spokeswoman for the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. She would not identify the states that requested assistance.

The state has declined to make its supply available even though all of its 39 available doses are set to expire in March and there are only three executions scheduled in the state before then, Lyons said.

States — including Arizona, Oklahoma, Ohio, Tennessee and Kentucky — have scrambled to acquire the drug.

Sodium thiopental renders the condemned inmate unconscious, so the prisoner does not feel pain. Hospira, the lone federally approved producer of the drug, has said new batches of the substance would not be available until next year.

Lyons said that despite the looming expiration of Texas' extra inventory, "we do not have plans to distribute the drug to other states."

"We have a responsibility to ensure we have an adequate supply of the drug on hand to carry out any executions scheduled in the state of Texas," Lyons said.

States with shortages are trying to find suppliers abroad or proposing radical changes in their execution protocols to deal with the lack of drugs.

•In Oklahoma last week, a federal judge approved the use of pentobarbital, a drug used in euthanizing animals, to replace sodium thiopental in lethal injections. Oklahoma Assistant Attorney General Stephen Krise said the state was "forced" to find an alternative when sodium thiopental became "unavailable."

•In Arizona last month, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed the execution of convicted murderer Jeffrey Landrigan after his attorneys challenged the state's acquisition of sodium thiopental from an undisclosed supplier in Britain.

In Kentucky in August, Gov. Steve Beshear, a Democrat, postponed the signing of two death warrants because of the shortage of sodium thiopental. "The (state's) repeated attempts to obtain additional thiopental have so far been unsuccessful," Beshear said in written statement.

For Oklahoma, the approval of the sodium thiopental substitute represents a departure from a procedure adopted in 1977, when Oklahoma became the first state in the nation to authorize lethal injection as a means of execution, according to the Death Penalty Information Center. (The first lethal injection was actually carried out in 1982 in Texas.)

Krise said the state settled on a plan for an alternative drug — pentobarbital — after "an exhaustive search" to obtain another source of sodium thiopental.

The assistant attorney general said he did not know how many other sources or death penalty states were approached as potential suppliers for additional sodium thiopental. Last month, he said, Arkansas provided the needed dose to carry out the execution of Donald Ray Wackerly, convicted in the 1996 murder of a Laotian immigrant.

Krise said he did not know whether Texas was asked to share its supply.

"I'm sure some states feel uncomfortable giving it out," he said.

Source: CourierPostOnline.com, November 29, 2010

Britain restricts export of lethal injection drug to US

British controls on sodium thiopental export means some US executions could be halted.

Business Secretary Vince Cable has said he will control the export of the anaesthetic drug sodium thiopental for use in capital punishment after campaigners took him to court.

Although it is not the outright ban for which campaigners have called, the move will make it more difficult for executions by lethal injection in a number of US states to go ahead.

A statement from the Department of Business Innovation and Skills said: "In light of new information the Business Secretary has today announced that the British Government will be placing controls on the export of sodium thiopental.

"The order will be made as soon as practicable and once in force, any person exporting this drug will require a licence issued by the Export Control Organisation."

Earlier this month, Cable was accused of "irrationality" at the High Court for his refusal to ban the export of sodium thiopental, which is one of three drugs used during the process of lethal injection.

A lawyer who was arguing the case of two death row prisoners, Edmund Zagorski and Ralph Baze, said that capital punishment was a clear violation of human rights and the UK government was supposed to be seeking to abolish the death penalty worldwide. It was therefore irrational and unlawful for Cable not to ban the sale of sodium thiopental for use in executions.

It seems Cable hopes that imposing export controls on sodium thiopental will strengthen his case.

A control on UK exports of sodium thiopental is likely to result in the staying of executions in a number of US states as there is currently a national shortage of the drug.

The sodium thiopental shortage has affected executions in California, Oklahoma and Kentucky, while Missouri's supply of the drug will expire in January.

The United States' sole manufacturer of the drug, Hospira, is experiencing problems with sourcing the active pharmaceutical ingredient. The company, for the record, disapproves of its product being used as a lethal injection component.

Source: The First Post, November 29, 2010

Sunday, November 28, 2010

Former Justice John Paul Stevens Criticizes Death Penalty

WASHINGTON — In 1976, just six months after he joined the Supreme Court, Justice John Paul Stevens voted to reinstate capital punishment after a four-year moratorium. With the right procedures, he wrote, it is possible to ensure “evenhanded, rational and consistent imposition of death sentences under law.”

In 2008, two years before he announced his retirement, Justice Stevens reversed course and in a concurrence said that he now believed the death penalty to be unconstitutional.

But the reason for that change of heart, after more than three decades on the court and some 1,100 executions, has in many ways remained a mystery, and now Justice Stevens has provided an explanation.

In a detailed, candid and critical essay to be published this week in The New York Review of Books, he wrote that personnel changes on the court, coupled with “regrettable judicial activism,” had created a system of capital punishment that is shot through with racism, skewed toward conviction, infected with politics and tinged with hysteria.


Source: The New York Times, November 28, 2010


Stevens' Powerful Anti-Death-Penalty Views

Former Justice John Paul Stevens (left), who retired from the Supreme Court in June after turning 90, has come out swinging in the past few days against the death penalty. In an appearance on 60 Minutes this past Sunday and a New York Review of Books essay that is now online, Justice Stevens makes the case that capital punishment as it is now administered in the U.S. is hopelessly flawed  and unconstitutional.

In so doing, he is pushing the death-penalty debate just where it needs to go. Supporters and opponents generally argue over whether capital punishment is right in the abstract. The discussion often comes off as little more than late-night dorm-room philosophizing: "Killing is killing, even if the state does it," or "Are you saying that if the allies caught Hitler, they shouldn't have executed him?"

Yet as Justice Stevens frames the question, it isn't whether you believe in a death penalty, it's whether you believe in this death penalty, the one the U.S. is currently using. It is a more relevant issue for those who care if the justice system is doing the right thing, and he makes a compelling case that none of us should.

Justice Stevens, who was appointed by a Republican President, Gerald Ford, has not always opposed capital punishment. In 1976, shortly after he joined the court, he provided a key vote in Gregg v. Georgia, one of a group of cases that ended a de facto death-penalty moratorium that had been in place since 1972. He did not join the most liberal Justices at the time, William Brennan and Thurgood Marshall, who insisted that any executions violated the Eighth Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishment.

In 2008, Justice Stevens famously changed his mind. In a case challenging Kentucky's method of lethal injection, he said in a separate opinion that the court's decision in 1976 that capital punishment is constitutional was based on a belief that it would be applied in a way that would not be discriminatory, arbitrary, excessive or racially discriminatory. After three decades on the court, it had become clear to him that those conditions were not being met.

In his New York Review of Books essay, Justice Stevens gives a fuller explanation of what made him turn away from the death penalty. As he saw it, the 1976 ruling argued for a careful and narrow use of capital punishment, but since then, the Supreme Court has made its use increasingly less careful and less narrow.

One factor that has Justice Stevens and many other people questioning the death penalty is its unreliability. As Justice Stevens points out, more than 130 people have been exonerated and released from death row since 1973, a number of them based on DNA evidence.

Another chief concern is race. In 1987, a challenge was brought to the death penalty that showed it was being used in a highly disparate way: in Georgia, murderers who killed white people were 11 times more likely to get capital punishment than those with black victims. Justice Stevens, who dissented from that ruling, writes in his essay that the far greater punishment the system imposes for the killing of whites "provides a haunting reminder of once prevalent Southern lynchings."

Justice Stevens is also troubled by the way key procedural rules have been rewritten to make it easier to put people to death. One change involves so-called death-qualified juries -- that is, juries that don't include people who oppose the death penalty. In 1968, the Supreme Court ruled that opposition to the death penalty is not a valid reason to exclude someone from a jury. If you allow jurors to be excluded on this basis, you end up with juries that are much more pro-prosecution, and pro-death penalty, than society as a whole. But three years ago, a bitterly divided Supreme Court undid that ruling -- and cleared the way for death-qualified juries.

Another change is in the use of victim-impact statements. In 1987, the Supreme Court ruled that having a jury hear the often emotionally wrenching stories of victims could unfairly inflame jurors and was inconsistent with the "reasoned decisionmaking we require in capital cases." 4 years later, after turnover among the Justices, the court reversed itself - over Justice Stevens' dissent - and ruled that these statements can be used.

Justice Stevens' critique of death-penalty law is exactly right. It is also badly needed, as the current court is becoming ever more enthusiastic about capital punishment and ever more indifferent to important details -- like how certain we are that the person facing execution is even guilty.

Last year, Justice Antonin Scalia wrapped that indifference in constitutional theory, strongly suggesting in a dissent in a Georgia death-penalty case that there is nothing unconstitutional about executing someone who turns out to be actually innocent, so long as they had a proper trial and appeals process.

A great deal of death-penalty arguments, both pro and con, fall on deaf ears. If you oppose the death penalty as morally wrong, you are not likely to be impressed by reasoned (if flawed) arguments -- that it might deter crime, for example, or that it has long had a central place in western civilization. If you believe in capital punishment, you are unlikely to be moved by someone who simply says the state has no right to take a life.

Justice Stevens' arguments are powerful precisely because they come from someone in the middle of the debate -- a man who long believed capital punishment was constitutional provided it was properly applied. His sharp critique should reinforce the resolve of those who do not support the death penalty and raise unsettling questions for those who do.

Source: TIME Magazine; Adam Cohen, a lawyer, is a former TIME writer and a former member of the New York Times editorial board. Case Study, his legal column for TIME.com, appears every Wednesday, December 1, 2010

Saturday, November 27, 2010

Iran hangs rapist

TEHRAN — Iran has hanged in prison a man convicted of raping several women in the central city of Isfahan, ISNA news agency reported on Saturday.

The man, only identified as Hossein M., was found guilty of raping several women after offering them a ride and then threatening to kill them, the report said, quoting Isfahan's judiciary.

It did not say when the hanging took place.

The latest hanging brings the number of executions in Iran to at least 145 so far this year, according to an AFP count based on media reports. At least 270 people were executed in 2009.

Iran is one of the leading countries that carry out the death penalty each year, along with China, Saudi Arabia and the United States.

The Islamic republic says the death penalty is essential to maintain public security and is applied only after exhaustive judicial proceedings.

Murder, rape, armed robbery, drug trafficking, homosexuality and adultery are all punishable by death in Iran.

Source: AFP, November 27, 2010

Saddam Hussein’s only Christian cabinet member seeks presidential pardon

Lawyers for the only Iraqi Christian in the late Saddam Hussein’s inner circle requested recently for a presidential pardon for their client from death by hanging.

Attorneys for Tariq Aziz, the former vice prime minister of Saddam Hussein, opted for a presidential pardon rather than appeal the death sentence Aziz was given for the complicity in the persecution of Shiite Muslims under Saddam, the AP said.

Aziz’ sentence sparked international requests for leniency and/or amnesty from the Vatican, Greece, Moscow and anti-death penalty European countries, the UPI said. It is largely believed that under Saddam, Christians in Iraq were protected because of Aziz.

Giovanni Di Stefano, lawyer of Aziz, said his client was hardly involved in the despot’s ethnic cleansing of the Shiites, and noted that there were no witnesses in the trial who could prove otherwise, according to the AP.

Di Stefano also cited several constitutional issues that absolve Aziz and said, “It is thus necessary that in all democratic societies where the judiciary potentially or even remotely fails the constitution, the president is duty bound to intervene. The powers of pardon are granted to ensure that injustice does not occur,” according to UPI.

Unjust, vengeful

Archbishop Louis Sako of Kirkuk said that Aziz “could not oppose the government of Saddam Hussein, since those who dared to express a different opinion were killed,” the Catholic News Agency reported.

Sako said the death sentence is “unjust” and “an act of vengeance that will not help bring about peace,” according to the Catholic News Agency.

Risky

According to the AP, the move for presidential pardon is risky. Iraqi President Jalal Talabani, after five years in office, has granted minimal to no pardons, and even if he does, there are constitutional means to bypass it.

The AP said this could be done through an act of parliament, or with the approval of a deputy of Talabani. Furthermore, the constitution only permits presidential pardon “on the recommendation of the prime minister,” who is Nouri al-Maliki of the Shiite Dawa party, one of Saddam’s victims.

If a pardon is not granted, Aziz could be hanged at any time. However, the appeals court has no time limit for deciding whether to uphold or reverse a sentence, the AP said.

An unnamed Justice Ministry official told the AP that appeals tend to focus on specific objections unlike the government, making it a better option for Aziz. However, because the 30-day period to file an appeal has lapsed, it is all moot.

Unfazed

Di Stefano is not fazed by constitutional limits and said an appeal would only waste time because he doubted the court would reverse the sentence adding, “If the trial was unfair, then imagine the appeal.”

Instead, Di Stefano said with the many international appeals, a presidential pardon provides “the diplomatic solution people have been waiting for.” He said Aziz does not seek special treatment for being a Christian, but “He seeks the pardon as a step toward reconciliation of Iraq. Enough people have been killed, enough people have been executed,” the AP reported.

Archbishop Sako said that death penalty sentences show a government is weak. He said Iraq should ban the death penalty “so that the country can truly develop towards democracy and reconciliation,” Catholic News Agency reported.

Last week Talabani, when speaking to reporters from Paris, said that he wouldn’t sign the execution warrant of Aziz, according to the UPI.

Source: The Underground, November 26, 2010

The state Supreme Court authorizes Tennessee to use a revised method of executing inmates

The state Supreme Court has authorized Tennessee to use a revised method of executing inmates, refusing to stop 2 executions including one Tuesday.

The court ruled Wednesday evening that the state has "a contingency procedure should the condemned inmate remain conscious."

Attorneys for Stephen Michael West and Billy Ray Irick had challenged the state protocol on grounds inmates might remain conscious while they were executed by lethal injection.

West is to be executed Tuesday. Irick is to be executed next month.

Earlier Wednesday, the state pledged that the warden will brush a hand over an inmate's eyelashes and gently shake the inmate to check for consciousness under a new lethal injection procedure.

Source: Associated Press, November 26, 2010


Warden to check for consciousness in TN executions

A prison warden will brush a hand over an inmate's eyelashes and gently shake the inmate to check for consciousness under a new lethal injection procedure that became necessary after a judge ruled the old one was unconstitutional, the attorney general said Wednesday.

Chancellor Claudia Bonnyman ruled last week that Tennessee's process "allows for death by suffocation while conscious," in an appeal filed by inmate Stephen Michael West, who was convicted of 2 murders in 1986. Now it will be up to the warden to make sure the condemned inmate is unconscious, including calling out the person's name.

The state Supreme Court late Wednesday said the revised method was satisfactory.

Richard Dieter, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center, said states that have had recent legal challenges, like Ohio and California, have put in similar procedures to check consciousness.

Bonnyman's ruling paved the way for delays in West's Tuesday execution and one in December of another inmate who joined the appeal, Billy Ray Irick. With the Supreme Court's decision, the executions can go on as planned.

During the 2-day hearing last week, Bonnyman heard from medical experts and an Ohio prison official who testified about the effects of the 3 drugs used in the lethal injection procedure.

Bonnyman said in her ruling that the 5 grams of sodium thiopental, the first drug meant to render the inmate unconscious, was insufficient and said the state should adopt some method to determine whether the inmate was awake before being injected with the second drug, a paralyzing agent.

If the warden determines the inmate is unconscious following the first injection, he directs the executioner to administer the next two drugs. If the warden determines the inmate is still conscious, a second IV line will give a second dose of 5 grams of sodium thiopental. The court approved the plans.

Attorneys for West presented medical experts who testified that the autopsies of three executed Tennessee inmates showed concentrations of the two of the drugs were too low to knock the person out.

State attorneys argued the levels found in an inmate's body hours or sometimes days after the execution wasn't reliable to determine consciousness.

West was convicted in the 1986 stabbing deaths of Wanda Romines and her 15-year-old daughter, Sheila Romines, in Union County.

Source: Associated Press, November 26, 2010

Blasphemy case splits Pakistanis

PAKISTAN'S President faces mounting pressure to intervene in the case of a Christian woman sentenced to death for blasphemy.

The case has drawn the Vatican's attention and sparked street protests in this Muslim-majority nation.

In a report delivered to President Asif Ali Zardari, Minorities Minister Shahbaz Bhatti recommended that the woman, Asia Bibi, 45, be pardoned or released from prison if her pending appeal is not quickly addressed.

Mr Bhatti said he also recommended amendments to the nation's controversial blasphemy law.

The report followed calls for clemency by Pope Benedict XVI, rights groups, newspapers and the governor of the province where Bibi became the first woman condemned to hang for blasphemy.

But opponents have been equally loud, and the response of Mr Zardari's government will be viewed as a barometer of its will to stand up to hard-line religious groups, including some political allies.

Hundreds of Muslim demonstrators in Lahore threatened violence this week if Bibi is released.

Her ordeal began last year when Muslim women in her village near Lahore accused her of speaking ill of the prophet Muhammad. Human rights organisations have long urged a repeal of the blasphemy law, and Mr Zardari's Pakistan People's Party - whose government depends on a fragile coalition with conservative religious parties - has vowed, but done little, to prevent its abuse.

''All Pakistanis, no matter what their religion, are equal under the law,'' said Farahnaz Ispahani, a spokeswoman for Mr Zardari. ''President Zardari has followed the case of Asia Bibi closely and will take appropriate action, if necessary, to issue a pardon or grant clemency.''

Several people have been sentenced to death for blasphemy in Pakistan, but none have been executed. Instead, rights activists and lawyers say the law is widely used to ostracise religious minorities or settle personal scores.

Though police are supposed to investigate cases, lawyers say that accusers often do little more than gather an intimidating group to lodge a claim and police make an arrest to avert an uprising.

That is what happened in Bibi's case, according to Mr Bhatti, who is a Christian. He said Bibi drew the ire of fellow farmhands after a dispute in June 2009, when they refused to drink water she collected and she refused their demands that she convert to Islam.

The women complained to a cleric, who gathered a crowd that forced her to the police station, Mr Bhatti said. He said police did not investigate and a court, without hearing her full account, handed down a death sentence four months later.

Mr Bhatti said he had concluded that Bibi, a mother of five who has been in prison for 17 months, never criticised Islam and the case against her was riddled with flaws.

People accused of blasphemy are frequently so threatened that they must leave their towns, and several convicted blasphemers have been killed in jail, said Ali Dayan Hasan, a researcher for Human Rights Watch.

''The cases that go to trial are really the tip of the iceberg,'' Mr Hasan said. ''The law creates this legal infrastructure which is then used in various informal ways to intimidate, coerce, harass and persecute.''

Bibi's husband and children were in hiding, Mr Bhatti said.

''We are frightened,'' Bibi's husband, Ashiq Masih, a brickmaker, told reporters in Islamabad on Wednesday. ''We are receiving threats, especially from clerics.''

Sahibzada Fazal Karim, the leader of the Sunni Ittehad Council, a key Muslim body, said he agreed that the law should be amended - but not towards leniency. Instead, he said, it should make blasphemy against other religious figures, such as Jesus, also punishable by death.

''Death is the only punishment for a person who commits blasphemy,'' Mr Karim said. ''If such a man or woman is set free by the President, ignoring the decision by the judiciary, it will have a ruinous effect on peace and harmony in the country.''

Source: theage.com.au, November 27, 2010


No quick pardon for Pakistani Christian

Pakistan's president will not immediately pardon a Christian woman sentenced to die for insulting Islam, but may do so later if an appeals court delays her case too long, an official said on Thursday.

The case against Asia Bibi has inflamed religious passions in Pakistan. Hard-line Muslims demonstrated again on Thursday against any pardon for her, and minority Christians held their own protests calling for abolishment of the blasphemy law, which critics say is misused by some to settle personal scores and persecute minorities.

Pope Benedict XVI has appealed for the release of Bibi, a 45-year-old mother of five who has said she was wrongly accused by a group of Muslim women with a grudge against her. The Pope said her case highlights the persecution of Pakistani Christians, who make up less than 5 per cent of the country's 175 million people.

Bibi, 45, is the 1st woman condemned to die under the blasphemy law. She has been jailed for 18 months and was sentenced November 8 to hang for insulting Islam's Prophet Mohammed.

Her lawyer has filed an appeal with the Lahore High Court, and President Asif Ali Zardari has decided to let the appeal process play out instead of immediately pardoning her, said Minister for Minority Affairs Shahbaz Bhatti, who met with Zardari on Thursday.

Pardoning Bibi would carry political risk for Zardari, whose broadly secular ruling party relies on the support of Islamist groupings in parliament.

However, the president agreed to pardon Bibi later if the appeal case is unduly delayed, said Bhatti, who delivered a report to the president on Thursday recommending Bibi be immediately freed. Zardari's spokesman could not be reached on Thursday.

Bhatti said Zardari did not specify any deadline but he believes the president "will not wait months or weeks."

About 100 Muslim demonstrators rallied on Thursday in the central city of Multan, warning against any presidential pardon for Bibi and burning an effigy of the Punjab provincial governor who has supported her appeal.

"We will resist if the government moves against the court verdict and attempts to amend the blasphemy law," warned Tariq Naeemullah, a leader of Citizen Front of Multan.

Dozens of Christians held their own protest in the southern city of Karachi, carrying a large crucifix and placards reading Down with Black Law and Stop Discrimination Against Religious Minorities.

Pakistan's higher courts have always struck down lower courts' death penalties in past blasphemy cases. Still, Bhatti said many who are falsely accused are unjustly jailed for months and often targeted by violence. 2 Christian brothers in Punjab were gunned down earlier this year as they were leaving a court hearing on a blasphemy charge.

The minorities minister acknowledges that repealing the blasphemy law is politically unfeasible but has proposed changes to it including making it a crime to falsely accuse someone, abolishing the death penalty for the crime and requiring initial cases to be heard by higher courts instead of local ones.

Source: Associated Press, November 27, 2010

Friday, November 26, 2010

China overturns 10 percent of death sentences

Execution in China
BEIJING — China has overturned 10 percent of death sentences handed down in the country since the top court began reviewing them in 2007 in a bid to limit use of capital punishment, an official has said.

Most of the reversals were made due to insufficient evidence, procedural flaws, or because the penalty was too harsh, Hu Yunteng, head of research for the Supreme People's Court, was quoted saying by Friday's China Daily.

China is believed by rights groups to execute more people than the rest of the world combined, and it gave the top court final review powers in 2007 amid concerns some death sentences were unwarranted.

"We must make sure the use of the death sentence is accurate and free of mistakes to respect and protect the convicts and their rights," Hu said.

"The Supreme People's Court will not tolerate any mistakes regarding evidence or procedure and will thoroughly investigate questionable judgements."

Hu said the supreme court had overturned "on average" 10 percent of death sentences, according to the report, which provided no further explanation.

Most executions are carried out for violent crimes such as murder and robbery, the report said, but drug trafficking and some corruption cases also are punishable by death.

Hu declined to say how many people were executed each year, the report said. The figure is treated as a state secret in China.

Amnesty International said earlier this year the number was "believed to be in the thousands", compared with 2009's second-ranked executioner Iran, which the rights group said carried out at least 388 in the year.

The National People's Congress, or parliament, is considering an amendment to the country's criminal law that will take 13 offences off the list of 68 crimes now punishable by death, Xinhua news agency said in August.

No decision has been announced.

Source: AFP, November 26, 2010

Thursday, November 25, 2010

Indonesia: Australian man faces death penalty after being caught with 1.7 kg of methamphetamine in his luggage at Bali's airport

AUSTRALIAN man Michael Sacatides faces the death penalty in Indonesia after being formally charged with drug importation offences yesterday.

Sacatides, 43, was caught with 1.7 kilograms of methamphetamine in his luggage at Bali's airport last month.

He maintains his innocence.

Bali police handed a dossier of evidence to prosecutors yesterday, who charged Sacatides with importing drugs, an offence that carries a maximum penalty of death by firing squad.

Sacatides is a kickboxing instructor who hails from Sydney but lived in Bangkok for several years.

He was moved to Kerobokan prison on October 27 and will join three other Australians on death row for drug offences.

Scott Rush, Andrew Chan and Myuran Sukumaran have legal appeals in train.

Sacatides is expected to front a Denpasar court next month.

He has previously told police a man who gave him the bag containing the drugs was a former business associate.

Source: The Age, November 26, 2010 (local time)


Aussie charged over Bali drug smuggling

An Australian man accused of smuggling drugs into Bali will face trial on charges that carry the death penalty, Indonesian prosecutors have confirmed.

Michael Sacatides (left), 43, was arrested at Bali's international airport on October 1 when customs officers found 1.7kg of methamphetamine concealed in his luggage.

The kickboxing trainer from Sydney's west has been in police custody ever since. After a two-month investigation police on Thursday finally handed the case to the Denpasar District Attorney's Office.

Prosecutor Ketut Sujaya confirmed Sacatides was charged under articles 112 and 113 of Indonesia's narcotics laws for possessing and importing drugs.

The latter charge carries a maximum penalty of death where the volume of drugs exceeds five grams.

"We will deliver this to the court in a week to 10 days at the latest," Mr Sujaya told reporters.

Sacatides' lawyer Erwin Siregar said he expected the case to go to trial in the coming months.

"In my estimation, the trial will begin at the end of December or early January," he said.

Sacatides has denied the drugs - worth an estimated $A390,000 - belong to him. He told investigators he had borrowed the bag from an Indian associate in Bangkok, where he had been living.

Three Australians - Scott Rush, Andrew Chan and Myuran Sukumaran - are currently on death row in Bali's Kerobokan Prison over a 2005 attempt to smuggle more than 8kg of heroin from Bali to Australia.

All three currently have final appeals - known as judicial reviews - before the Indonesian Supreme Court.

Another six members of the so-called Bali Nine are serving sentences of between 20 years and life in prison over the plot.

The Gold Coast's Schapelle Corby is serving 20 years for smuggling more than 4kg of marijuana into Bali in 2004.

Source: AAP, November 26, 2010 (local time)

Japan jury hands down death sentence to minor

Execution chamber
at Tokyo Detention Center
TOKYO — Japanese jurors Thursday sentenced a teenager to hang for a double murder, the first death penalty given to a minor under the nation's newly-introduced jury system, court officials said.

The 19-year-old defendant, whose name was withheld, was convicted of stabbing to death both the sister and a friend of his girlfriend at their house in Miyagi, northern Japan, in February this year.

Under Japanese law, people under 20-years-old are tried as minors.

The teenager, who committed the murders after his girlfriend tried to end their relationship, also seriously injured another man in the attack.

"We cannot say he is fully aware of the graveness of the case," presiding judge Nobuyuki Suzuki told the Sendai District Court in Miyagi, according to Jiji Press.

"The possibility of his rehabilitation is extremely low," the judge said, adding that age was not a "decisive" factor on death penalties. The defendant was 18 years and seven months old when he killed the victims.

The sentence -- decided by six members of the jury and three professional judges -- was the first time the death penalty was handed down to a minor since Japan introduced the so-called lay-judge system in May last year.

Last week, jurors at the Yokohama District Court sentenced a 32-year-old man to death for a double murder.

Apart from the United States, Japan is the only major industrialised democracy to carry out capital punishment, a practice that has earned Tokyo repeated protests from European governments and human rights groups.

Source: Agence France-Presse, November 25, 2010


Death penalty given to minor for 1st time in lay judge trial

SENDAI (Kyodo) -- A 19-year-old male accused of killing two women and seriously wounding a man earlier this year in Miyagi Prefecture was sentenced to death Thursday, the first time capital punishment has been given to a minor under the lay judge trial system that began last year.

A panel of three professional and six citizen judges made the decision at the Sendai District Court in northeastern Japan.

The ruling came after the Yokohama District Court last week handed down the first death sentence under the lay judge system to a 32-year-old man found guilty of brutally murdering two men last year.

In the latest case, Presiding Judge Nobuyuki Suzuki sentenced the defendant to death, finding him guilty of stabbing to death his former girlfriend's 20-year-old elder sister, Mika Nambu, and her 18-year-old friend Mikako Omori, and seriously injuring a man who was with them at the time of the crime on Feb. 10 in Ishinomaki.

He then took away his former girlfriend, 18, and injured her in the left leg, the court's findings showed.

The name of the defendant is being withheld as he is a minor under 20.

Prosecutors had sought the death penalty for the defendant who committed the crime while on probation in a separate criminal case, arguing it is unlikely he could be rehabilitated in the future.

The defendant had pleaded guilty as charged.

Source: The Mainichi Daily News, November 25, 2010

Texas: Former DR inmate Nanon Williams ordered released from prison

Abolition Movement member Lucha Rodriguez just received a phone call from Morris Moon, one of several attorneys for former death row prisoner Nanon Williams and he told her that Federal Judge Nancy Atlas has today ordered Nanon released from prison.

On August 17 Judge Atlas held a de novo on Nanon's case on the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel.

Now, the state of Texas has 30 days to appeal this ruling by Judge Atlas. To appeal, they would have to go to the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans. But it was the 5th Circuit that ordered Nanon's case sent back to the Federal District Court for a de novo hearing. It seems unlikely the 5th Circuit would deny Atlas' ruling.

Nanon Williams was only 17 years old when he was arrested for capital murder in 1992. He was on Texas death row until the U.S. Supreme Court outlawed the execution of juveniles in 2005. Nanon Williams is now 36 years old and at the Ramsey Unit south of Houston serving a life sentence.

Source: TX Death Penalty Abolition Movement, November 25, 2010

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

British sodium thiopental finds its way into Arizonian death chamber

A shortage of one of the lethal injection components has led to the drug being imported from Britain in violation of European law to carry out an execution in Arizona.

Convicted killer Jeffrey Landrigan was executed by lethal injection on October 26 for the 1989 murder of Chester Dean Dyer in Phoenix. The execution took place despite the fact that there is a nationwide shortage of sodium thiopental, the [anesthetic] agent in the 3-drug cocktail. The drug was rushed in from Britain for the execution.

Landrigan's lawyers raised questions over the quality and constitutionality of using the sodium thiopental that was imported from Britain. They argued that the drugs could be of such poor quality that Landrigan could suffer pain during his execution.

The US District Court and the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals granted a temporary restraining order on the execution based on this argument. The courts wanted the State of Arizona to disclose where and how it had obtained the sodium thiopental.

Unfortunately the Supreme Court agreed by a 5-4 decision with Arizona prosecutors that there was no reason to force disclosure and the restraining order was lifted. The court order stated that "there was no showing that the drug was unlawfully obtained, nor was there an offer of proof to that effect."

Complex chain

Archimedes Pharma, the only licensed manufacturer of sodium thiopental in Britain according to the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, denied exporting the drug. Archimedes said that once the drugs entered the complex chain of medical supplies it cannot know where it was eventually sold.

EU Council Regulation 1236/2005 makes it illegal to "trade in certain goods which could be used for capital punishment, torture, or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment."

World Coalition member organization Amnesty International said that Arizona's use of a drug obtained in Britain "raises serious questions about whether there are proper controls on equipment that could be used to torture and kill". Amnesty called for tighter EU controls to ensure that drugs cannot be exported for use in executions in the future.

Source: World Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty, November 24, 2010

Sweden enjoys 100 years without executions

Johan Alfred Andersson Ander
was the last person executed in Sweden.
The guillotine has only been used once in Sweden: exactly 100 years ago. It was the last time a person was executed in the Scandinavian.

At the time most countries still practiced the capital punishment. Only four countries had abolished it: Colombia, Costa Rica, San Marino and Venezuela.

Today still 58 nations, such as the United States, China and Saudi Arabia, actively practice “the ultimate denial of Human Rights”, as Amnesty International calls it.

The last person to be executed in Sweden was Johan Alfred Andersson Ander, who was sentenced to death for a murder during the course of a robbery. The execution took place at Långholmen prison in Stockholm on November 23, 1910.

He was the only person in Sweden to have been executed by the guillotine. Previous decapitations were made with an axe.

Until the beginning of the 19th century hanging by the neck was reserved for commoners and beheadings reserved for nobles.

The support for the capital punishment is low in Sweden; a 2006 study shows that only 36 percent of the population believes that there are crimes that should be punished by death. Penalty by death was officially abolished in Sweden for crimes committed in peacetime in 1921 and all crime in 1976.

More than two-thirds of the countries of the world have abolished the death penalty in law or in practice. While 58 countries retained the death penalty in 2009, most did not use it. The only European country that still has the capital punishment is Belarus. The USA is the only country in the Americas to carry out executions.

“More and more countries have realized that the death penalty is a cruel and inhumane punishment that belongs in history books - not in a modern society, " said Lise Bergh, Swedish Secretary General of Amnesty International.

The guillotine can be seen at the Nordic Museum in Stockholm.

Source: The Swedish Wire, November 24, 2010

Ohio: Outgoing Governor Strickland grants mercy to 39 convicts; no DR inmate involved in clemency process

Outgoing Gov. Ted Strickland
Outgoing Gov. Ted Strickland has granted clemency to 39 people after a review of 176 cases pending from 2008.

Strickland, a Democrat, issued 33 pardons Tuesday to former inmates and commuted the sentences of 6 convicts. Those still behind bars will become eligible for parole or release. The governor denied clemency in 137 of the 2008 cases.

None of the cases involved the death penalty, and Strickland's office said most are associated with minor or nonviolent offenses.

"Executive clemency power is an important part of our justice system it provides a 2nd chance to those who have earned one and ensures that unusually long sentences are in line with similar cases," Strickland said in a statement. "This process also provides an opportunity to show mercy and forgiveness to those who have recognized what is expected of them in our society and who remain committed to being productive and responsible citizens."

Those granted mercy were convicted of sentences including theft, burglary, passing bad checks, drug trafficking and marijuana possession.

Among case decisions released Tuesday, Strickland sided with the Ohio Parole Board 163 times and parted ways 13 times. Of the 13 cases where he disagreed, 2 were cases where the board had recommended clemency and 11 were cases where the board recommended denying clemency.

Strickland, a former prison psychologist who supports the death penalty, most recently granted clemency in a death penalty case last week, when he spared the life of murderer Sidney Cornwell in part because of the handling of evidence during his trial related to an undiagnosed medical condition that led to developmental and physical issues. Cornwell was the 3rd death row inmate spared execution this year.

In November 2009, Strickland granted clemency to another 78 people in non-death-penalty cases. Those decisions followed a review of 3 years of earlier requests for mercy or pardon that had accumulated.

Source: The Toledo Blade, November 23, 2010

John Duty: human guinea pig in Oklahoma's cruel experiment

When Texas first used lethal injection on 7 December 1982, it was meant to usher in an era of a kinder, gentler method of capital punishment. "Fry 'em" or "String 'em up" used to be the harsh mottos of the executioner, but after the horrors of the electric chair and the gallows, some hoped that nobody would find the needle so objectionable.

Some find it counterintuitive that an anaesthetic can cause pain during an execution, but if the anaesthetic does not work, then the prisoner is first paralysed and then poisoned in a particularly painful way. Unfortunately, the probability of such a mistake is very high, no matter what the drug the executioner may use.

Doctors' ethics prohibit them from taking part in an execution, so the prison must ask one of its employees to mix up the drugs, and then "administer" them. This helps to explain why postmortems in the three most recent executions in Tennessee show insufficient anaesthetic in the prisoner's bloodstream: he was not rendered unconscious. He did not die the painless death that the executioners advertised, but slowly suffocated as the other drugs took effect, an excruciating death.

Oklahoma has chosen to turn to the vets for help. They have asked the court for permission to execute John Duty on 16 December – just in time for Christmas – with [pentobarbitol], the drug the vets currently use to kill dogs. This is, they suggest, a kindness. Unfortunately, they have found a judge in Oklahoma to agree with them.

As ever, it is not that simple. Drugs that work for animals may or may not have the same effect on humans. So, John Duty would become a human guinea pig, and we'll just have to see how much he suffers.

Click here to read the full article.

Related story and update: 'Oklahoma executes John Duty with drug used to euthanize animals', Dec. 17, 2010

Source: Clive Stafford Smith, guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 23 November 2010

Man hanged in Kashan, central Iran

One man was hanged in the central Iranian town of Kashan, reported the Iranian local daily "nesfe Jahan" today.

The man who was identified as "Mahmood N." (24 years old), was convicted of keeping 500 grams of crack, and sentenced to death by the revolutionary court of Kashan, according to the report.

The execution took place inside the prison.

The charges mentioned above have not been confirmed by independent sources.

Source: Iran Human Rights, November 23, 2010 -  [فارسى]

URGENT APPEAL for Khadijeh (Shahla) Jahed at risk of imminent execution in Iran for the alleged murder of her husband's permanent wife

Khadijeh Jahed
Iranian media reported that a footballer's wife, Khadijeh Jahed, may be executed on 1 December. She is sentenced to death for the alleged murder of her husband's permanent wife.

Khadijeh Jahed, known as "Shahla", who had contracted a temporary marriage with Nasser Mohammad-Khani, a former striker for the Iranian national football team, was convicted of stabbing to death her husband's permanent wife. According to a 6 November 2010 report by Fars news agency, an unnamed judiciary official said that her death sentence has been sent to the Office for the Implementation of Sentences in Tehran. A 16 November 2010 report in the newspaper Vatan-e Emrooz said her execution has been set for 1 December 2010 if she is not pardoned by the victim's family. Her lawyer, Abdolsamad Khorramshahi, has told the Iranian Students' News Agency that he has not yet been notified of the date for her execution, which in law must be communicated at least 48 hours beforehand.

Shahla Jahed was initially sentenced to death by Branch 1154 of Tehran General Court in June 2004. She withdrew her "confession" of murder in court. Her sentence was upheld by Branch 15 of the Supreme Court. Shahla Jahed's lawyer requested a review of the execution order in view of the fact that Shahla Jahed's case had not been properly investigated. In November 2005, the then Head of the Judiciary ordered a stay of execution so that the case could be re-examined. However, the death sentence was upheld in September 2006. In early 2008, the Head of the Judiciary in Iran overturned the verdict and ordered a fresh investigation, citing "procedural flaws". However, Shahla Jahed was again sentenced to death in February 2009 by Branch 1147 of the General Court. On 13 September 2010, Shahla Jahed wrote to the current Head of the Judiciary, Ayatollah Sadegh Larijani, asking for a final decision in her case. According to Fars, he has signed the order for her
execution to go ahead.

In Iran, a convicted murderer has no right to seek pardon or commutation from the state, in violation of Article 6(4) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to which Iran is a state party. The family of a murder victim has the right either to insist on execution, or to pardon the killer and receive financial compensation (diyeh).

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Shahla Jahed, who had contracted a temporary marriage with Nasser Mohammad-Khani, a former striker for the Iranian national football team and former manager of a team in Tehran, was accused of stabbing to death Laleh Saharkhizan, her husband's permanent wife, on 9 October 2002. She "confessed" to the killing in pre-trial detention after 11 months in detention, but withdrew her "confession" in court, saying, "Everyone knows the conditions under which I confessed." She was also sentenced to three years' imprisonment, but has now spent over nine years in prison. Nasser Mohammad-Khani, abroad at the time of the murder, was himself initially suspected of complicity in the murder and detained for some months, but was later released after Shahla Jahed "confessed" to the murder.

Under Iranian law, men and women can marry either permanently or temporarily. In a temporary marriage, men and women can commit to be married for an agreed period of time, on payment of an agreed sum of money to the woman, after which the marriage is null and void. Men can have up to four permanent wives, and any number of temporary wives. Women can only be married to one man at a time.

Amnesty International has long expressed concern that torture and other ill-treatment are common in Iran, particularly during interrogation and before they have been charged, when defendants are routinely denied access to defence lawyers. Such "confessions" are often used as the main evidence against defendants.

Amnesty International recognizes the rights and responsibilities of governments to bring to justice those suspected of criminal offenses, but opposes the death penalty in all cases as the ultimate cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment, in violation Iran's obligations under international law.

Amnesty International has been campaigning for Shahla Jahed's death sentence to be overturned since 2005 (see Urgent Action UA 283/05 and updates).

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Please send appeals to arrive as quickly as possible:
- Urging that Shahla Jahed's execution be halted immediately and that her death sentence is overturned;
- Expressing concern that she may have been coerced into making a "confession" during her interrogation;
- Acknowledging that governments have a responsibility to bring to justice those suspected of criminal offenses; but stating your unconditional opposition to the death penalty, as the ultimate cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment and violation of the right to life.

APPEALS TO:

Head of the Judiciary
Ayatollah Sadegh Larijani
[care of] Public relations Office
Number 4, 2 Azizi Street
Vali Asr Ave., above Pasteur Street intersection
Tehran,
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
2nd box (starred)=first name,3rd box(starred)=family name,5th box (starred)=email address, last box=substance of message
Salutation: Your Excellency

Head of the Judiciary in Tehran
Mr Ali Reza Avaei
Corner of 17th Alley, No 149
Sana'i Avenue, Karimkhan Bridge
Tehran,
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Salutation: Dear Mr Avaei

COPIES TO:

Director, Human Rights Headquarters of Iran
Mohammad Javad Larijani
Bureau of International Affairs,
Office of the Head of the Judiciary,
Pasteur St., Vali Asr Ave. south of Serah-e Jomhouri,
Tehran 1316814737,
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Fax: 011 98 21 5 537 8827 (please keep trying)

Iran does not presently have an embassy in the United States. Instead, please send copies to:

Iranian Interests Section
2209 Wisconsin Ave NW
Washington DC 20007
Phone: 202 965 4990
Fax: 202 965 1073

PLEASE SEND APPEALS IMMEDIATELY.

Update on Shahla Jahed's execution here.