Sunday, February 28, 2010

Spanish Prime Minister calls for the abolition of the death penalty worldwide by 2015




United Nations, New York, 24 February 2010 - (Translation below) SOUNDBITE (Spanish) Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, Prime Minister, Spain:
It is unfortunate that there are still numerous places today where the death penalty is still applied and we need to work hard to step up our efforts for its universal abolition.

SOUNDBITE (Spanish) Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero, Prime Minister, Spain:
My friends we have 5 years to achieve our goal -- to stop executions around the world: If we work together it is a goal within our reach.

Addressing the World Congress Against the Death Penalty meeting in Geneva today, the Prime Minister of Spain, whose country currently holds the presidency of the European Union, said it was unfortunate that today numerous countries still continue to apply the death penalty.

The two-day congress, organized by the French NGO Ensemble together with the Swiss government, and the World Coalition Against the Death Penalty, aimed to persuade more countries to sign up to a United Nations (UN) moratorium on the death penalty.

Referring to the death penalty as state sanctioned murder, Bianca Jagger, goodwill ambassador for the Council of Europe said she was shocked at the continued application of the death penalty in the United States (US), saying only when the US got its own house in order can it claim to stand for freedom and justice.

The Norwegian Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs, Gry Larsen, said the world was at a turning point with an ever growing shift towards abolition. 138 countries have outlawed the death penalty but it still exists in 58 countries, including the US and Japan.

The death penalty exists in 35 of the 51 states in the US said Elizabeth Zitrin, US representative of the World Coalition Against the Death Penalty. Case by case defense lawyers had tried their best to defy the death penalty but that a universal moratorium was needed.

The World Congress Against the Death Penalty is a triennial opportunity to bring together abolitionist groups and strengthen the international dimension of the fight against the death penalty.

Source: United Nations, Feb. 24, 2010

Bali 9, boat people, thorny issues for SBY-Rudd talks

President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono (left) will meet Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd next month to talk on wide bilateral relations, including thorny issues, such as Australians on death row and stranded boat people.

However Jakarta and Canberra both say their relations are fine.

"Indonesia and Australia have been experiencing intensive convergence in terms of their national interests, which now also include climate change and terrorism issues, and their participation in global economic reform as mutual members of the G20..." Dino told a press conference at the Presidential Office.

However, news reports also indicate that Australian diplomats in Jakarta have told Indonesian officials that the possible execution of three Australians, members of the Bali Nine group, for drug smuggling in Denpasar, would be very sensitive for Australia's government in an election year.

Australian acting Foreign Minister Simon Crean denied any link between discussing the possible executions and the upcoming election.

Rudd has promised to raise the issue with Yudhoyono when Indonesian court processes are concluded and if the death penalties still stand.

Observers have said that any approach for clemency would be a sensitive issue for both countries, with some Indonesian lawmakers and local media likely to see any such approach as interference in RI affairs.

Source: The Jakarta Post, Feb. 28, 2010

8 hanged in Iran

Iran Human Rights, February 27: Three men were hanged in the prison of Birjand in eastern Iran, reported the daily newspaper Khorasan.

The men, who were not identified by name, were convicted of murdering several security forces during armed clashes close to the eastern borders of Iran.

Iran Human Rights, February 25: Five men were hanged in the prison of Kerman, southeastern Iran, reported the state run Iranian news agency ISNA today.

The men were identified as "Rouhollah Kh.", "Saeed M.", "Shokrollah N." and "Zabihollah Kh." and were all convicted of drug trafficking and keeping arms.

The charges have not been confirmed by independent sources.

Source: Iran Human Rights, Feb. 28, 2010

Saturday, February 27, 2010

Live from death row


Mumia Abu-Jamal on the phone with his defense counsel Robert Bryan. from ECPM on Vimeo.


The 180 members of the public who had gathered to view the film Manners of dying had an opportunity to witness a discussion between Mumia Abu-Jamal and his lawyer Robert Bryan.

The film screening organized Tuesday evening at Maison des arts du Grütli by the International Film Festival and Forum on Human Rights saw a phone discussion with the famous American death row inmate Mumia Abu-Jamal – 15 minutes live from death row.

“ It was a very moving moment live from death row,” a member of the audience said. “Thanks for the privilege we had to discuss with him,” another person added. The emotion was palpable among the public.

“Mumia doesn’t feel like a symbol of the anti-death penalty campaign,” said Robert Bryan. Today, Barack Obama can make the difference, he continued, referring to a petition to the US president already signed by 17,000 people.

According to Bryan, the death penalty is a privilege reserved for the poor, but it is also a public finance issue. “If it is more expensive to execute somebody than to send them jail for an entire life, why not use this money for education, for instance ?», he asked.

For more information about Mumia Abu jamal, and to sign the international petition, please visit http://www.mumialegal.org/

Source: World Coalition Against the Death Penalty, Feb. 25, 2010

Final Declaration 4th World Congress Against the Death Penalty

We the participants at the 4th World Congress Against the Death Penalty, held in Geneva, Switzerland, from 24 to 26 February 2010 organized by the association Ensemble Contre la Peine de Mort (ECPM), with sponsorship from the Swiss Confederation in partnership with the World Coalition Against the Death Penalty (WCADP),

adopt this declaration after three days of fruitful discussions, exchange of experiences, elaboration of relevant strategies, sharing of testimonies, including the commitment and strong support expressed from states and international institutions:

Noting with satisfaction the implementation of several recommendations made at the end of the 3rd World Congress in Paris in 2007; the increasing number of countries that have ratified the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights from 62 to 72; the resolution for a moratorium on the use of the death penalty passed twice by majority in the United Nations General Assembly with more than 100 hundred votes in favor; new regional coalitions against the death penalty which were created; the number of member organizations of the WCADP significantly increased to 104.

Noting also the urgent need to intensify our efforts in the courts, bar associations, the media, schools and universities, in human rights organizations, parliaments, governments, international and regional organizations to continue to encourage presently underrepresented retentionist countries in the international community, to be transparent in their practice of capital punishment, to reduce the number of crimes punishable by death in their criminal codes, so they can join the community of abolitionist states;

Highlighting the actions and the continued support of the European Union in the fight against the death penalty;

We welcome the initiatives and commitment of Switzerland, beyond the Congress, together with Spain, which aims to implement universal moratorium on executions in 2015, with a view of universal abolition;

We reconfirm that the death penalty may in no circumstances be regarded as an appropriate response to the violence and tensions which permeate through our societies, taking into account the emotional burden they create, particularly in the context of terrorism,

We call, from the host city of international organizations and a symbol of peace:

- The de facto abolitionist states to enact legislation abolishing the death penalty in law;

- The abolitionist states to integrate the issue of universal abolition in their international relations by making it a major focus of their international policy of promoting human rights;

- The international and regional organizations, to support the universal abolition of the death penalty including the adoption of resolutions calling for a moratorium on executions, by supporting educational activities, and increased cooperation with abolitionist NGOs that act locally;

- Abolitionist organizations and actors from retentionist states to unite their strength and determination in creating and developing national and regional coalitions, with the aim to promote locally, the universal abolition of capital punishment.

Geneva,
On February 26, 2010.

Source: World Coalition Against the Death Penalty, Feb. 26, 2010

Friday, February 26, 2010

Executions in Iran: Nabi Dadtajik Can’t Afford ‘Blood Money’

Iranian human rights attorney Mohammad Mostafaei’s client, a young Afghan [-Iranian] man named Nabi Dadtajik, was sentenced to death in 2005 for manslaughter. He killed a man (unintentionally) in a fight, most probably over a girl in Dadtajik’s family that he was interested in. Mohammad Mostafaei (pictured) was assigned to the case last year.

When Mostafaei became his lawyer, he tried to gain forgiveness from the victim’s family to spare Dadtajik’s life. Now, the victim’s family have forgiven Dadtajik, under the condition that they receive blood money for the approximate amount of $15,000 USD.

Mostafaei has yet to raise the $15,000. Unfortunately, Dadtajik’s family cannot afford to pay the $15,000. Mostafaei needs to raise this money before Dadtajik’s life is spared.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION:

At a time when momentum is gathering across the world to abolish capital punishment, the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI) currently ranks second for number of executions, after China, and first for per capita executions in the world.

According to the World Coalition against the Death Penalty, Iran executed at least 317 people in 2007, almost twice as many as in 2006 and four times as many as in 2005. In 2008, at least 346 executions were recorded. From January through the end of March 2009, Amnesty International has recorded 120 executions. (1)

These numbers are affirmatively believed to be below reality, since there are no publicly available statistics on executions carried out in the country. (2)

The Iranian legal system distinguishes between punishments considered to be the sole ‘right of Allah’ and those considered to be the ‘right of the people’. An example of the ‘right of people’ is qesas (Qesas is a retributive ‘an eye for an eye’ punishment meted out for a range of offences). (3)

In international law there is no such distinction. A death sentence is a death sentence, whereas in Iranian law, murder is treated as a private dispute between two civil parties, and the state’s role is to facilitate the resolution of the dispute through the judicial process.

In this sense, the death penalty is regarded as being imposed by the state, whereas qesas is imposed by the family of the victim. As a result, sentences of qesas are not open to pardon or amnesty by the Supreme Leader, whereas most other death sentences can be reversed by the Supreme Leader.

Murder by someone with diminished responsibility may be punishable by the payment of diyeh, a form of compensation. (Diyeh, also known as ‘blood money’, is a financial compensation determined by Sharia law and paid to the victim or his/her survivors). (4)


(1) (2) (4) : FHID – Iran/ Death Penalty: A State terror of policy
(3) Amnesty International


Source: Persian2English, Feb. 25, 2010

If you want to provide financial assistance, please contact Mr. Mohammad Mostafaei at: mostafaeilawer@yahoo.com

Death row Briton to launch last-ditch appeal

A British grandmother on death row is to lodge a last-ditch appeal with the US Supreme Court in a bid to save her life.

Linda Carty (left) was convicted in 2002 over the abduction and murder of a 25-year-old woman after a trial which campaigners say was "catastrophically flawed".

A video plea on behalf of the 51-year-old will be submitted to the Supreme Court alongside the appeal from her legal team and an brief from the British Government. If it fails, Carty could be executed within months.

Carty was convicted over the kidnap and murder of Joana Rodriguez, who was seized alongside her four-day-old son by three men on 16 May 2001.

The baby was later found unharmed in a car, but Rodriguez was killed, having suffocated with duct-tape over her mouth and a plastic bag placed around her head.

Prosecutors argued that the men were hired by Carty who, unable to get pregnant herself, intended to "cut the baby out" of the woman and pass it off as her own.

Carty has always maintained that she was framed over the murder by the men who carried out the abduction due to her earlier work as an informant for the Drug Enforcement Agency.

She had been employed by the authorities to befriend suspected drug dealers in a bid to obtain information from them.

Source: YahooNews, Feb. 26, 2010

Iran: Jundullah Leader's Brother Executed

February 24, 2010: Iran executed Jundullah terrorist organisation leader Abdolmalek Rigi's brother Abdulkhamid Rigi for several crimes including murdering several people, including policemen and their families, the source reported.

The death sentence imposed a few months ago had been postponed.

The Jundullah terrorist group, known as the Rigi group, has conducted a series of deadly terrorist acts in eastern Iran.

The group, led by Abdolmalek Rigi, claimed responsibility for an attack that killed over 40 people, including five senior commanders of the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps, in the southeastern province of Sistan-Baluchestan.

Source: Day.Az, Feb. 24, 2010

Uganda's gays fight back



Activists to petition government to scrap Anti-Homosexuality Bill and instead decriminalize gay sex.

KAMPALA, Uganda — Even as Uganda’s parliament considers the Anti-Homosexuality Bill — which calls for the death penalty for some gay acts — a group of about 100 Ugandan gays and lesbians held a secret meeting to determine how to stand up for their rights.

The clandestine conference was held in a hotel function room in downtown Kampala last week and was titled “Standing on the side of Love, Re-imagining Valentine’s Day.”

Organized by the Rev. Mark Kiyimba of the Ugandan Unitarian Universalist Church, and financially supported by the Austria Foundation, the meeting was a strategy session to discuss how to respond to the bill. The participants resolved to petition the Ugandan Speaker of Parliament to scrap the bill and to instead move to decriminalize homosexuality.

“Our conference showed that religion does not need to be an enemy to the cause of LGBT [lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender] concerns,” said Kiyimba, who declares himself a married bi-sexual. “What is at stake here is religious freedom, human rights and minority protections.”

Kiyimba said the conference is “a kick-off or starting point for us, against this bill.” He said in March he will take his petition to various countries, including the U.S., to galvanize international support for Uganda’s gays.

Most of the participants wore bright red T-shirts with a heart showing the “gay pride” rainbow colors in the center.

“This was different from other conferences,” said one gay man attending the meeting, who declined to be named, fearing reprisal. “Gay banners and flags, no pretense, it was very straightforward.”

Two Americans attended the meeting. Gay-rights activist and Episcopal minister Rev. Patricia Ackerman of New York City as well as the Rev. Marlin Lavanhar of the All Souls Unitarian Universalist Church, Tulsa, Okla.

No sooner had the meeting taken place than a newspaper report highlighted how dangerous it was. Kampala's inspector of police, Major General Kale Kayihura, said he was unaware of the gay conference but vowed to arrest participants if he found them, according to a report in the Kampala Daily Monitor.

However, Kayihura also showed that he is not completely on the side of the anti-gay campaigners. Kayihura denied a permit to anti-gay activist the Rev. Martin Ssempa who had planned to hold a “Million Man March” against homosexuality.

Ssempa, chairman of the National Pastors Task Force against Homosexuality, and David Bahati, member of parliament and author of the “Anti-Homosexuality Bill,” are at the forefront of Uganda’s current anti-gay movement.

Ssempa responded by moving his march from Kampala to Jinja — about an hour’s drive from Kampala and famous for containing the source of the Nile River. About 2,000 Ugandans marched against homosexuality there.

In Kampala, instead of a mass march, Ssempa held a “Million Prayers Vigil” at a local church. He said, “this will kick-off 40 days of prayer against homosexuality, to correspond with Lent.”

At the vigil, attended by about 300 Ugandans, including children, Ssempa performed homosexual exorcisms and showed slides of graphic gay porn to drive home his stance against homosexuality.

Bahati also gave a brief address where he admitted that there might be some changes to his bill, but that there would be a vote. After his speech, he was invited to kneel on the floor where several pastors placed their hands upon his head and prayed that Bahati be used to “deliver us from sodomy!”

The anti-gay bill, currently being debated in the legal and parliamentary affairs committee, must pass the speaker of the parliament before going to the Ugandan parliament floor for a vote. Many speculate that a full vote might take place in early March.

Since Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni distanced himself from the bill in January it is not certain whether the bill will pass, be rejected or amended to remove the harsher punishments including the death penalty, according to some political analysts in Kampala.

Source: globalpost.com, Feb. 26, 2010

Thursday, February 25, 2010

Death row inmate gets new punishment hearing

Charles Dean Hood, the death row inmate whose case has drawn national attention because of a relationship between the presiding judge and prosecutor at his trial, has been granted a new punishment hearing by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.

The new hearing was not ordered because of the acknowledged relationship, but because the court ruled that the jury was not given proper instructions on how to consider Hood's background when determining his punishment.

Hood's attorneys claimed that Hood didn't deserve death because he suffered from mitigating circumstances, which included learning disabilities and abuse as a child, including being beaten with a pipe, and that these things resulted in his poor "impulse control."

Hood, 40, was convicted in 1990 of murder in the shooting deaths of Ronald Williamson and Tracie Lynn Wallace at Williamson's home in Plano. Hood had lived at the house and worked for Williamson.

Julie Wallace, Wallace's sister, was resigned to the court's decision.

"We gotta do what we gotta do. I want no one to come back and say he didn't get a fair trial," Wallace said.

"It doesn't change the fact that he's guilty. There are others who have had bad upbringings or lifestyles, and they haven't murdered," she said. "This was the path that he chose, and he needs to live with his decision."

Collin County prosecutors said in a statement that they would "begin evaluating the case to determine what punishment to seek," but "it is likely we will again seek the death penalty."

The Texas Defender Service, which represents Hood, also released a statement saying the court's decision "recognized a clear flaw in the punishment phase of Mr. Hood's case."

But the statement added: "It should not distract the courts or the public from the more troubling issue at the center of this case: that the judge and prosecutor admitted under oath that they had a long-term, intimate sexual relationship prior to Mr. Hood's trial and that they intentionally kept this affair hidden for 20 years."

The romance between now-retired Judge Verla Sue Holland and then-District Attorney Tom O'Connell had been rumored for years. But proof was elusive until 2008, when Holland and O'Connell revealed in affidavits that they had a sexual relationship before the trial and a close friendship after the romance ended.

Defense attorneys have tried repeatedly to get the Court of Criminal Appeals to address the issue, but the court has declined on procedural grounds, saying Hood waited too long to raise the issue. Instead the court agreed to re-examine the question of improper jury instructions.

In December, defense attorneys filed a petition in December asking the U.S. Supreme Court to decide whether the intimate relationship between the judge and the prosecutor violated Hood's right to due process.

Last week, dozens of legal ethicists and prominent lawyers – including former Gov. Mark White and former FBI director and federal Judge Williams Sessions – asked the court to take the case.

Prosecutors declined to comment on the petition to the Supreme Court. Their response to the court is due next month.

Source: dallasnews.com, Feb. 25, 2010

World Coalition Delivers 90,000 Signatures Against Juvenile Executions

A morning with the World Coalition in Paris. Activists preparing to visit the Embassies of Iran, Saudi Arabia, Sudan and Yemen in order to hand over more than 90,000 signatures on the petition demanding the complete stop of juvenile executions. Three of these countries have ratified the convention on the rights of the child, but do not follow it. The Iranian Embassy refused to accept the petitions. However it will be mailed directly to the authorities in Teheran.

Source: Texas Death Penalty Blog, Feb. 24, 2010

Bali Nine: Rush was a courier, not an organiser, lawyer says

IN a last-ditch attempt to overturn the death penalty, Scott Rush's lawyers will call on three witnesses to give evidence in the Bali Nine inmate's final appeal in the Indonesian Supreme Court late next month.

Rush (pictured), 24, will be the first to lodge his appeal, ahead of fellow Australians Andrew Chan and Myuran Sukumaran, also facing death for their part in a plot to smuggle 8.3kg of heroin from Indonesia to Australia in 2005.

Mr Khuana outlined the arguments he would use to try to save Rush from execution, saying Rush was a courier, not an organiser, did not technically export the drugs, and that the judges failed to read all the facts and did not differentiate between the cases.

He will argue that Rush was one of six of the Bali Nine classified as drug couriers, while three were "organisers", including Tan Duc Thanh Nguyen, "the recruiter", whose death sentence was commuted to life in 2008.

"We will argue this is not fair, that it is a mistake. Our question is why was the decision different for Scott compared with the other five couriers? Why did they apply the same facts but impose a different punishment?"

Mr Khuana will review the role of the Australian Federal Police, who had the power and the information to stop Rush and the group travelling to Bali following a telephone call from Rush's father, Lee. "Why did they let them come to the airport? The intention was to catch them in customs to be able to charge them with exportation," Mr Khuana said.

Had the Bali Nine not passed through customs they would have been charged with possession, which carries a 10-year jail sentence.

Under the Indonesian Customs Act No 10 1995, the customs area is classed as an export and import area. But under Article 102 of the act, a person who enters or leaves Indonesia cannot be charged with exportation while carrying one or more documents including a passport, ticket and boarding pass. The Bali Nine had this documentation.

Read more>>>

Source: theaustralian.com, Feb. 25, 2010

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Cuba: death of political prisoner after prolonged hunger strike

Havana, Cuba (CNN) -- Cuban President Raul Castro said Wednesday he regretted the death of a prisoner after a prolonged hunger strike, even as human rights activists reported 30 people were detained on the way to the dissident's funeral.

Orlando Zapata Tamayo, who was jailed in 2003 in a crackdown on political opposition, died Tuesday after a hunger strike that lasted for more than 80 days. He began the strike to demand better prison conditions.

According to an unprecedented government statement, Castro "lamented the death of Cuban prisoner Orlando Zapata Tamayo, who died after leading a hunger strike." He blamed the United States for the death, but did not explain why.

"Tortured people do not exist," Castro added. "There were no tortured people. There was no execution."

Separately, about 30 Cuban dissidents were detained Wednesday and dozens of others were blocked from leaving their homes, human rights activist Elizardo Sanchez said.

"All of this to prevent them from attending the funeral of Orlando Zapata Tamayo," he said. "It's not what we wanted, but the government has turned him into a martyr."

Zapata, 42, died in Havana. His body was flown to the eastern province of Holguin for burial.

In Havana, a couple dozen friends and activists donned black armbands and held a symbolic wake at the small home of dissident Laura Pollan.

Amnesty International said in a statement that Zapata was jailed for disorderly conduct, among other crimes. His initial three-year sentence was repeatedly extended as officials said he accrued new penalties for infractions while in prison.

On Wednesday, Amnesty International demanded the release of all "prisoners of conscience" in Cuba.

"The tragic death of Orlando Zapata Tamayo is a terrible illustration of the despair facing prisoners of conscience who see no hope of being freed from their unfair and prolonged incarceration," said Gerardo Ducos, Amnesty International's Caribbean researcher.

Cuba says there are no political prisoners in the nation. The Cuban government calls many of the dissidents "mercenaries" being paid by the United States and other countries to undermine the government. Read more>>>.

Source: CNN.com, Feb. 24, 2010

Europeans step up pressure for global halt to death penalty

European countries on Wednesday stepped up pressure for a global halt to the death penalty, as opponents of capital punishment hailed the growing number of countries scrapping or suspending executions.

The United Nations and participants in the World Congress Against the Death Penalty in Geneva said about 140 countries had now abolished death sentences or stopped carrying them out under a moratorium.

"More than 2/3 of the United Nations member states abolished the death penalty, by law or in practice," Prime Minister Jose Luis Zapatero of Spain, which holds the presidency of the European Union, told the congress.

2 decades ago the list included just about 50 countries.

"The balance has tipped and the speed has been extraordinary, we have seen a grand global change," said Norwegian Deputy Foreign Minister Gry Larsen.

But concern was focused on the countries that account for about 93 % of executions between them, according to Amnesty International -- China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and the United States -- as well as North Korea.

Zapatero said Spain would set up an international commission made up of eminent people later this year to press for a global moratorium on the death penalty by 2015, "as a preliminary step to total abolition."

Italy said it would table a new resolution against the death penalty in the UN General Assembly later this year.

"Abolition is gaining ground, but not fast enough," said Italian secretary of state Enzo Scotti.

"The time has come to abolish the death penalty around the world," he added, as representatives of several EU states vowed to press the issue throughout their international contacts.

In 2007, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution calling on countries that still have the death penalty to establish a moratorium.

Source: European Business, Feb. 24, 2010

Court throws out death penalty for Texas man

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals threw out the death sentence Wednesday of a convicted killer whose case has been dogged by admissions of an affair between his trial judge and the prosecutor.

The court, in a split decision, said Charles Dean Hood was entitled to a new punishment trial because jurors were not allowed to properly consider mitigating evidence that could have convinced them he didn't deserve a death sentence.

The ruling made no mention of the affair between Hood's trial judge and prosecutor in Collin County in suburban Dallas. Last year, the same court refused Hood's appeal for an entire new trial because of the affair admission.

Hood, 40, a former topless club bouncer, insists he's innocent in the 1989 fatal shootings of Tracie Lynn Wallace, 26, and her boyfriend, Ronald Williamson, 46, at their home in Plano.

A day before he was scheduled to die in September 2008, the Austin-based appeals court gave Hood a reprieve based on the faulty jury instruction claim, which is unrelated to the once secret romantic relationship between Hood's trial judge, Verla Sue Holland, and Tom O'Connell, the former district attorney in Collin County.

O'Connell was the county's elected prosecutor from 1971-82 and from 1987-2002. Holland was a state district judge from 1981-96 before moving on to the Court of Criminal Appeals, where she served before resigning in 2001.

Hood's lawyers blasted last year's ruling, saying their client deserved a new trial before an impartial judge and fair prosecutor. They had no immediate response to Wednesday's ruling for a new sentencing trial.

John Rolater, chief of the appellate division for the district attorney's office in Collin County, said he would withhold comment until after reviewing the decision.

Three of the nine judges dissented from Wednesday's majority ruling, where the court said it was wading "once more into the murky waters" of the Texas death penalty sentencing rules, where capital trial jurors are asked questions to decide whether a convicted killer should be put to death.

Hood was convicted in 1990, after the first of several precedent-setting Texas death penalty cases at the U.S. Supreme Court began refining those jury instructions but before the Texas Legislature could rewrite laws to bring instructions into high court compliance. In the interim, trial judges submitted deliberation questions, known as "special issues," to capital murder juries. On appeal, many of those death penalty sentences, like Hood's, have since been thrown out.

Subsequent U.S. Supreme Court decisions on Texas jury instructions have resulted in a "conundrum (that) has produced starkly different descriptions and versions" of the development of law, the Texas appeals court said Wednesday.

"This is all very awkward," Judge Cathy Cochran, writing for the majority, said. "Not only have the nine justices on the Supreme Court differed wildly in their view ... the nine judges on this court have differed in exactly the same manner."

Specifically in Hood's case, the court said the "nullification instruction" given to his jury wasn't sufficient for jurors to give "meaningful consideration and full effect to the mitigating evidence presented." That instruction, which the Supreme Court later would reject as confusing, told a jury to answer "no" to 1 of 2 special issues if it found mitigating evidence that warranted sparing a defendant's life.

At his trial, Hood's lawyers presented evidence of life-changing injuries Hood suffered as a 3-year-old when a truck backed over him. They also said he had been beaten as a child.

Appeals Court Judge Michael Keasler, joined by two colleagues in a dissent, wrote Hood's claim was late and improper.

"This is exactly the kind of behavior that the Legislature specifically sought to prohibit," Keasler said. "No 'conundrum' exists for Hood because he is simply not entitled to relief in any forum."

Hood was arrested in Indiana while driving Williamson's $70,000 Cadillac, and his fingerprints were at the murder scene at Williamson's home in Plano. Hood said he had permission to drive the car and his fingerprints were at the house because he had been living there.

Neither Holland nor O'Connell have been publicly disciplined by the State Commission on Judicial Conduct or the State Bar of Texas.

Their relationship was apparently an open secret in Collin County legal circles. In an affidavit related to the Hood case, a former assistant district attorney said it was common knowledge. In the legal wrangling to block Hood's execution, the former couple acknowledged under oath they had an intimate relationship.

Source: AP, Feb. 24, 2010

Questions of an Affair Tainting a Trial

Charles Dean Hood was sentenced to death in 1990 by a Texas judge who had been sleeping with the prosecutor in his case. It took Mr. Hood almost 20 years to establish that fact.

But he finally managed to force the two officials to testify about their rumored affair in the fall of 2008. They admitted it.

Texas’s highest court for criminal matters, its Court of Criminal Appeals, considered all of this and concluded that Mr. Hood should be executed anyway. In a 6-to-3 decision in September, the court told Mr. Hood that he had taken too long to raise the issue of whether a love affair between a judge and a prosecutor amounted to a conflict of interest.

Mr. Hood has asked the United States Supreme Court to hear his case. On Thursday, 21 former judges and prosecutors filed a brief supporting him. So did 30 experts in legal ethics.

Click here to read this feature in full.

Source: The New York Times, Feb. 22, 2010 - Photo: Charles Dean Hood, left, was convicted of murder in 1990 and sentenced to death by Judge Verla Sue Holland, who it turned out, had slept with the prosecutor, Thomas S. O'Connell Jr.

Acquitted Death Row inmate files $360M suit

A Chicago man acquitted of murder after spending more than 17 years in prison filed a federal lawsuit Monday that seeks more than $360 million dollars from those who allegedly falsely imprisoned him.

Nathson E. Fields claims he spent 17 years and 11 months in prison after being falsely arrested, indicted and convicted for the April 28, 1984, shooting deaths of Talman Hickman and Jerome Smith on the 700 block of East 39th Street. He was acquitted of the murders on April 8, 2009, following a retrial, according to a suit filed in U.S. District Court.

Fields is a former high-ranking gang member for the El Rukn street gang, according to the Chicago Sun-Times.

The suit lists 38 defendants, including the City of Chicago, Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley, former and current Chicago Police superintendents, former and current Chicago Police officers, the Fraternal Order of Police, Cook County, the Cook County State's Attorney's office, former and current Cook County state's attorneys, former and current Cook County assistant state's attorneys. The suit also lists John Does one through 100 as defendants.

The suit claims eyewitness Sandra Langston gave a description of the shooter, and Fields was arrested on June 14, 1985, despite not fitting that description. Langston told police the gunmen both were men in their early 20s with a light complexion. Fields has a dark complexion and was 31 years old at the time of the shootings, the suit said.

The suit claims the defendants acted in a "concerted effort and pursuant to policies, practices, customs and unconstitutional actions" in prosecuting Fields. Judge Thomas J. Maloney sentenced him to death for the murders, the suit said.

The judge was later convicted in federal court of taking bribes in murder cases and was sentenced to 15 years in prison, the suit said. Maloney died after spending 13 years in prison.

Fields spent more than 17 years in prison, and spent about 6 years free on bond, before he was acquitted. Fields claims that while in prison he was beaten and gassed at the Pontiac Correctional Center, beaten by guards at the Menard Correctional Center and Cook County Jail and was denied the opportunity to attend his mothers funeral services, according to the suit.

"I feel like my prayers have been answered," Fields told the Sun-Times after Judge Vincent Gaughan issued the not guilty verdict in the retrial. "It's like a dream."

Gaughan said he found the prosecutors' witnesses, including key witness and initial co-defenant Earl Hawkins, not credible.

Hawkins, who admitted to killing 15 to 20 people, pleaded guilty to a lesser charge of armed violence in exchange for his testimony against Fields.

Fields is seeking more than $360 million plus the cost of attorneys fees in the 15-count suit. No lawyer is listed on the suit and Fields himself is listed as the only contact.

Source: Chicago Sun-Times, Feb. 23, 2010

The Death Penalty in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam

The International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) today released a special edition for the 4th Congress against the death penalty, a report on the death penalty in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, entitled "The Death Penalty in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam."

As 1,700 abolitionists from over 100 countries gather in Geneva for the 4th World Congress against the Death Penalty, the Vietnam Committee on Human Rights (CVHR) and the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) express their opposition to the use of this inhuman and degrading punishment and call upon Vietnam to implement an immediate moratorium as a 1st step to abolishing the death penalty. In Vietnam, statistics on capital punishment are classified State secrets."

The State-controlled media has reported 11 death sentences since January 2010, and 58 death sentences in 2009, 14 of them for drug offences. However, the real figures are much higher. Peaceful dissent is punishable by death under vaguely-defined "national security laws," such as Article 79 of the Criminal Code, which makes no distinction between acts of terrorism and peaceful exercice of the right to freedom of expression. In 2010, human rights lawyer Le Cong Dinh and 4 pro-democracy activists were sentenced to up to 16 years in prison under Article 79 for calling for political reforms.

The use of the death penalty is frequent in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (SRV). Capital punishment is applied for 22 offences, including murder, armed robbery, drug trafficking, rape, sexual abuse of children, and a range of economic crimes, such as graft and corruption, fraud and embezzlement (for 500 million dong - $33,200 or more of state property), illegal production and trade of food, foodstuffs and medicines. 7 political acts perceived as "threats against" national security carry the death penalty as a maximum sentence.

Capital punishment is most often used to sanction drug-related offences, followed by corruption, black-market trade and violent crimes. Vietnam has some of the harshest drug laws in the world. A 1997 law made possession or smuggling of 100g or more of heroin, or 5 kilograms or more of opium, punishable by death2. In 2001, 55 sentences were pronounced for drug trafficking alone.

Death sentences are frequently pronounced, despite revisions in the Criminal Code adopted by the National Assembly in 1999 which reduced the number of offences punishable by death from 44 to 29, and further revisions in 2009, which reduced this number to 22. Many high-ranking government officials, including President Nguyen Minh Triet, have expressed their opposition to the too-frequent use of the death penalty, but their stance has had no effect on the rising trend of executions. A reform of the death penalty adopted in May 2000 made only one change death sentences were commuted to life imprisonment for pregnant women and mothers of children under 3 years old.

Source: International Federation for Human Rights, Feb. 24, 2010

Japan: Lay judges to hear murder case with possibility of death sentence

The trial of a murder-robbery case started at the Tottori District Court on Tuesday, and prosecutors may possibly seek the death sentence under the lay judge system for the 1st time.

The 55-year-old defendant, Hiroshi Kageyama, is accused of killing Hideo Ishitani, 82, and Ishitani's cohabiter Masako Omori, 74, in Yonago, Tottori Prefecture, on Feb 21 last year and stealing 70,000 yen in cash, according to the indictment. Kageyama worked at Ishitanis accounting office.

Kageyama admitted to the killings but said robbery was not the motive, denying part of the indictment at the first hearing.

It is the 1st time for a murder-robbery case involving more than 1 victim to be examined by citizen judges since the 1st lay judge trial was held in Tokyo last August.

The statutory penalty for murder-robbery is capital punishment or life imprisonment.

4 men and 2 women were chosen as lay judges and 2 men and 2 women as their substitutes. The verdict will be handed down on March 2.

Source: Japan Today, Feb. 24, 2010

Monday, February 22, 2010

Save Linda Carty

British grandmother Linda Carty (pictured) was wrongfully sentenced to death by a Texan court and is now dangerously close to execution. Please watch this video about her disastrous case - and find out how you can help save her life.

Who is Linda Carty?

After a catastrophically flawed trial, Linda Carty was sentenced to death in February 2002 and faces execution within months. She desperately needs your help.

* Watch a video featuring Linda, her family and lawyers explaining what went wrong in her case
* Listen to Linda's appeal to the British people
* Look back at Linda's case history

Why is Linda Carty on death row?

Linda would certainly not be on death row today if she had had a decent defence lawyer at trial. Her story is a damning indictment of the Texas justice system, and exposes the perils of being poor and vulnerable in the USA.

Linda was born on 5 October 1958 on the Caribbean island of St Kitts to Anguillan parents and holds a UK dependent territory passport. She worked as a primary school teacher in St Kitts until she was 23, when she moved to the US to study.

After disastrous failures by her court-appointed lawyer, Linda was convicted of taking part in the murder of 25 year-old Joana Rodriguez.

The crime took place on 16 May 2001, when three men broke into the apartment of Rodriguez and her partner Raymundo Cabrera, demanding drugs and cash. They abducted Rodriguez and her four-day-old son, Ray, who was later found unharmed in a car, while Rodriguez had suffocated.

The prosecution’s rather implausible theory was that Linda was afraid of losing her common-law husband and thought that if she had another baby he would stay. Unable to get pregnant, they allege she had hired three men to kidnap Rodriguez and that she planned to steal the child - a baby of a different race to Linda.

Linda's court-appointed lawyer was Jerry Guerinot, whose incompetence has already led to twenty of his clients ending up on death row, more than any other defence lawyer in the US. His approach to her case was at best, slapdash, at worst, wilfully inept.

Guerinot's catalogue of serious failings in Linda's case includes: failure to meet Linda until immediately before the trial, failure to inform Linda or her husband of their rights; failure to spot obvious flaws and inconsistencies in the prosecution case; failure to interview witnesses; and failure to investigate key mitigating evidence.

After her conviction, investigators from Reprieve visited St Kitts and learnt that Linda was still remembered as a passionate teacher who frequently held extra classes for children with special needs. She also taught at Sunday school, sang in a national youth choir and led a volunteer social-work group.

This information would have enabled Guerinot to present her to the jurors as a dedicated teacher and community leader – factors that might well have induced them to vote to spare her life. But although Guerinot applied to the court for funds to go to St Kitts before Linda’s trial, neither he nor his staff made the trip.

By the time the Carty family emigrated to the US in 1982, Linda had a daughter Jovelle, then two (born 10 September 1979). Shortly after Jovelle was born, Jovelle’s father emigrated to New York, leaving Linda to care for the child alone. A year after Linda moved to Houston her cousin Harriet died suddenly. Linda and Harriet were very close and Linda was devastated.

During the 80s, Linda had begun to work as a confidential informant for the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), befriending suspected traffickers in order to get information and sometimes to make test purchases of drugs. Linda has always asserted her innocence, and believes that she was framed because of her work with the DEA.

In 1988 Linda was raped in a University of Houston car park. The rape resulted in a pregnancy and Linda gave birth to a baby girl (born 23 June 1989) who was given up for adoption. Linda felt a deep sense of shame and concealed the rape and the pregnancy from her family. Two months prior to giving birth, Linda’s beloved father died, Linda was distraught. Later, she found herself in an abusive relationship and was a victim of domestic violence.

Linda is now incarcerated at Mountain View Unit, one of ten women on death row in Texas.

Will Linda be killed?

Linda's case is now before the Supreme Court; this is the last chance for the legal system to save her life. The Supreme Court hears only a tiny number of cases per year.

It is time to get very worried about Linda. She needs all the support she can get.

What else can I do?

After signing the petition and sending it to your friends, you can write a letter of support to Linda at: Linda Carty, # 999406, Mountainview Unit, 2305 Ransom Rd, Gatesville, Texas 76528, USA. Letters must include a return address.


Source: REPRIEVE, Feb. 22, 2010

USA: The Other Death Penalty Project Announces Letter-Writing Campaign to Anti-Death Penalty Groups

Today, thousands of prisoners around the country will be mailing letters to numerous death penalty abolitionist groups asking them to stop advocating for life without the possibility of parole as a supposedly humane alternative to lethal injection.

The Other Death Penalty Project, a group comprised solely of prisoners serving life without possibility of parole -- the other death penalty -- categorically rejects this hypocritical position taken by too many death penalty abolitionists. Death at the hands of the state, whether by lethal injection or lethal imprisonment, is the death penalty.

The Other Death Penalty Project, similarly, rejects the proposition that life without the possibility of parole is a necessary 1st step toward ultimate abolition of the death penalty. The distinction is one of method, not kind. Instead of moving to the elimination of death sentences, this tactic of trading slow executions for quick executions has resulted in an explosion of men and women sentenced to the slower method.

As a study published in the Harvard Law Review in 2006 entitled "A Matter of Life and Death" concluded, "The purpose of this Note is to argue that [L.W.O.P.] statutes are neither a necessary nor a particularly useful step toward eliminating the death penalty."

Death penalty abolitionists who advocate for life without the possibility of parole are wrong, both in their moral reasoning and in their tactics.

The Other Death Penalty Project plans to call these anti-death penalty groups out to a public accounting by speaking for the close to 40,000 men and women sentenced to face "worse than death," in the words of New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson. These prisoners live on the much bigger, much less well-publicized, death rows all around this country.

It's time to end all forms of the death penalty.

For more information, and for all media inquiries, please visit the http://www.theotherdeathpenalty.org/ or email TODP@live.com

Other interested parties may write to The Other Death Penalty Project, P.O. Box 1486 Lancaster, CA, 93584.

Source: The Other Death Penalty Project, Feb. 22, 2010

Belarus on its own way towards capital punishment ban

Belarus will seek its own way to cancel capital punishment. The statement was made by Nikolai Samoseiko, Chairman of the Legislation and Court Affairs Commission of the House of Representatives of the National Assembly, head of the parliamentary ad hoc group on capital punishment matters, on 22 February.

The MP said that the ad hoc group is supposed to find Belarus' indigenous way to deal with the capital punishment ban due to the country's geopolitical location. On the one side Belarus is bordered by the European Union where all the countries have banned capital punishment. On the other side there is China, the leader in the number of issued death penalties, and Russia which has vetoed capital punishment but the general public is ambiguous about it.

According to the MP, Belarus is now ripe to discuss whether it needs death penalties. There are strong pro and con arguments. In particular, those in favor believe that the possibility of death penalty can prevent crimes while those who oppose capital punishment point out that courts can make errors. There can be no winners in this dispute because the decision will be made depending on the political will, opinion of the general public, the legal base, believes Nikolai Samoseiko.

He stressed that the number of death penalty verdicts has been greatly reduced. While in 1998 the number stood at 47, in 2008 and 2009 it made up 2 per annum. In addition, the number of life sentences pronounced lately is declining. It is an objective process because the number of crimes punishable by death is falling. The parliamentarian also reminded that according to the Constitution capital punishment in Belarus is a temporary measure.

Asked when the bill to ban capital punishment may be ready, Nikolai Samoseiko did not mention specific dates. He added it would be incorrect to say that the decision to ban death penalty will be introduced as a bill. In line with a ruling of the Constitutional Court the decision can be made either by the president or the parliament.

A session of the ad hoc group on capital punishment matters of the House of Representatives took place on 22 February. Members of the House of Representatives and the Council of the Republic discussed a draft schedule for the ad hoc group operation for the next six months. They plan to use the time to scrutinize statistics, review court practices, study law enforcement practices in Russia and Ukraine, visit detention facilities where life sentence convicts serve their term. A preliminary agreement has been reached to hold an international seminar in Minsk to discuss capital punishment practices in association with PACE members.

Source: The National Center of Legal Information of the Republic of Belarus, Feb. 22, 2010

North Carolina: man exonerated after 17 years in jail

February 17, 2010: The North Carolina Innocence Inquiry Commission frees Gregory Taylor, 47, white, who was sentenced to life in 1993 for 1st degree homicide.

In an historic decision, a panel of judges outside of the state's court system unanimously voted to exonerate and release Gregory Taylor, a man who was imprisoned for nearly 17 years for first-degree murder.

In April 1993, Taylor was convicted of the 1991 murder of Jacquetta Thomas, 27, black, a prostitute found dead in Raleigh. Police arrested Taylor after finding his SUV about 100 yards from the crime scene, even though there was never any physical evidence linking Taylor to the victim.

Taylor became the first person in the state to be exonerated by the North Carolina Innocence Inquiry Commission, the only state-run agency in the United States with the power to overturn convictions based on claims of innocence. Earlier, the eight-member Commission had voted unanimously to send Taylor's case to the next level of review before the panel of three judges.

The judges voted unanimously to undo Taylor's 1993 conviction of murdering Thomas. Their decision exonerates Taylor and releases him from a term of life in prison. After the decision was read, Wake County District Attorney Colon Willoughby walked over to Taylor, shook his hand and apologized that he had been convicted. Taylor is the first person in North Carolina to be exonerated using a new process established to handle convicted people's claims of innocence.

Last September, the North Carolina Innocence Inquiry Commission voted unanimously that Taylor's case warranted further review. The North Carolina Innocence Inquiry Commission is a state agency established in August 2006 by the General Assembly to investigate and evaluate post-conviction claims of factual innocence. The Commission only examines new evidence that was not considered at trial.

The Commission is made up of eight members selected by the Chief Justice of the North Carolina Supreme Court and the Chief Judge of the North Carolina Court of Appeals The members include a Superior Court Judge, a Prosecuting Attorney, a Defense Attorney, a Victim Advocate, a Member of the Public, a Sheriff, and two Discretionary members.

"It's unbelievable," Gregory Taylor, 47, said, encircled by family, friends and media. "I mean, you think all these years what this day would be like – 6,149 days, and finally the truth has prevailed."

Taylor had exhausted all avenues of appeals when the North Carolina Innocence Inquiry Commission reviewed his case and decided in September that it merited a review before the special panel.

"I feel like I'm dreaming," Taylor's daughter, Kristen Puryear, 26, said.

"She was 9 years old when I went to prison," Taylor said, embracing her for one of the first times as a free man. "I missed her 10th birthday, I missed her 16th birthday. … I missed her marriage. I missed the birth of my grandson. Now all of that's returned."

"And I'm taking him home," Puryear said.

For six days, Taylor's attorneys argued there were never any physical links between Thomas and Taylor and that despite investigators' claim of blood on Taylor's Nissan Pathfinder, there was no evidence connecting the two.

They wrapped up Wednesday morning with closing arguments in which Wake County District Attorney Colon Willoughby said the evidence presented in support of Taylor wasn't logical, credible or believable. (Read more about the closing arguments.)

"I did not know what to expect," Willoughby said of the judges' decision. "I felt like it was our responsibility to present the evidence and to allow the three-judge panel to make their decision and do what they found the evidence showed."

In asking the judges to free Taylor, defense attorney Joseph Cheshire urged them to undo a wrong and to help assure the public that the judicial system is changing to help ensure it does not happen again.

"Out of tragedy and sadness can actually come a better world," Cheshire said. "Nothing makes our system better than the public acknowledgment that mistakes have been made."

'Innocence points out injustice'

Wednesday's ruling marks the first in the state's history in which a prisoner has been exonerated because of the involvement of the Innocence Commission – the only state-run agency in the country that investigates post-conviction claims of innocence.

Taylor's case is the second case in the commission's four-year history that has gone up for an evidentiary hearing where only new evidence is considered. As of January, the commission has reviewed 634 cases, 463 of which were rejected – the others are in various stages of review or have been closed.

At a news conference Wednesday afternoon, Cheshire credited the agency and the North Carolina Center on Actual Innocence for their attention to the case and for finding inconsistencies with evidence and testimony from Taylor's trial.

"This is one of those fantastic days," he said. "We should all look at this day as a positive day for the state of North Carolina. No innocent, wrongfully accused person should ever have to spend a day in prison."

Gov. Beverly Perdue described the commission as setting "a new standard of jurisprudence in America."

"I believe in this Innocence Commission, and I believe the ruling today shows bad things can happen, even in the finest of systems," she said.

Joining the likes of Dwayne Dail and Darryl Hunt – both men were wrongly convicted of separate crimes and each freed after spending 18 years in prison – Taylor said he hopes to do work to help other people in situations similar to his.

"This is not just about innocent people, this is about injustice," Taylor said. "Innocence points out injustice."

Source: WRAL News, Feb. 17, 2010

U.S.: Doctors who aid in executions unlikely to face sanctions

Capital punishment opponents want medical boards to punish these physicians, but a new study finds that boards do not have the legal power to intervene.

No U.S. medical board has disciplined a doctor for taking part in an execution, and that is unlikely to change, according to a new legal study.

The study, published in January in the Federation of State Medical Boards' Journal of Medical Licensure and Discipline, is believed to be the first to comprehensively review all state laws and regulations on doctors, medical boards and executions. The study found that only seven death-penalty states incorporate the American Medical Association's ethics code, which, among other things, bars physician participation in executions.

Nearly all capital punishment states specifically call for doctors to be involved in some way, the study said.

"There is this perception that many people, including judges, have that because of the AMA ethical code, doctors can't participate and won't participate in executions when the reality -- and we've learned this through the legal cases that have been brought -- is that doctors do participate and are willing to participate," said Ty Alper, who authored the study and is associate director of the University of California, Berkeley School of Law's Death Penalty Clinic. "The AMA guidelines are just that -- guidelines -- and not enforceable in most circumstances."

Click here to read this feature in full.

Source: American Medical News, Feb. 22, 2010

United Arab Emirates: Call for more information on the death penalty

In the past month, at least 8 men have been sentenced to die in the UAE; 1 for the rape and murder of a 4-year-old, 2 for killing a sales executive in an airport car park, and 5 for trafficking drugs.

But as these eight men proceed through the justice system and the courts consider their appeals, a survey reveals an appetite in the UAE for more transparency about the death sentence, the ultimate sanction available to the courts and about which little is known.

The survey reveals some reservations about capital punishment. Although only 6 % of respondents think it is applied too readily, just 23 % believe it is applied only in the right circumstances. And 21 % think it is handed down more frequently to people from certain countries.

More than twice as many Emiratis (34 %) as any other group believe that capital punishment is not used often enough, a view less common among Arab expatriates (14 %), westerners (12 %) and Asians (12 %).

However, twice as many westerners (12 %) as any other group think the death penalty is handed out too readily.

Interestingly, 36 % of those surveyed could not make up their mind about capital punishment, an ambivalence expressed across all groups, headed by Arab expatriates and Asians (each 38 %), followed by westerners (28 %) and Emiratis (26 %).

Transparency is a widely shared concern when it comes to the number of death sentences passed and executed in the UAE: overall, 76 % support open public access to the statistics; only 11 per cent think the public does not need to know and 12 % are not sure.

The demand for transparency is strongest among westerners (93 %), followed by Arab expatriates (83 %) and Asians (72 %). Only 64 % of Emiratis would like to see more openness, while 18 % oppose it.

The death sentence, experts said, is a punishment mandated by Shariah law, but is rarely carried out in this country.

No one in the UAE's justice system, law enforcement agencies or Government would comment officially, but more than a dozen interviews confirmed some basic facts about capital punishment in the UAE:

- Death warrants must be signed by both the emirate's Ruler and the President of the UAE.

- A Ruler or the victim's family can pardon a killer.

- The official method of execution is firing squad, except in the case of adultery, in which case it is stoning.

- The last known execution took place in 2008, in Ras al Khaimah.

After that, details are murky. Sources in Dubai Public Prosecution said 43 people had been sentenced to die since 1993. In Abu Dhabi, guards and former inmates of Al Wathba prison, which is estimated to hold more than 1,500 people, say that death row holds fewer than 70 inmates.

A suspect can be sentenced to death for seven crimes: murder, espionage, terrorism, drug trafficking, rape, converting from Islam and giving government secrets to enemy states.

After the sentence is handed down, prisoners are appointed a lawyer to handle their appeal. In all emirates, the case must go through all levels of the judiciary. In Abu Dhabi, Dubai and Ras al Khaimah, that means the Court of First Instance, Appeals Court and the Court of Cassation. The other 4 emirates have only a first instance and appeals court.

In every case, the final judicial authority lies with the Federal Supreme Court in Abu Dhabi.

If all levels of the judiciary sentence an offender to death, the Minister of Justice presents the case to the Ruler of the emirate where the case was adjudicated. Signatures from the Ruler of the emirate as well as the President of the country are required for any execution.

"There are so many checks and balances to make it really the last resort," said an official from the Abu Dhabi Attorney Generals office, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

"Verdicts from court and implementation of these verdicts are 2 very different things," the official added. "The Constitution allows for the death sentence and judges hand down these sentences when necessary, but it is rarely enforced. Just because someone gets the death sentence doesn't mean he is going to be executed."

The Minister of Interior declined to comment on the number of people awaiting execution in Abu Dhabi, in keeping with official practice.

Before an execution is carried out, several additional factors are taken into consideration. The Islamic penal code prohibits executions from being carried out on public or religious holidays.

Pregnant women may not be executed until 2 years after giving birth.

The condemned person's family may visit him on the day of the execution in a location separate from where he will be put to death.

A religious representative can visit the condemned if he wishes it.

Executions are carried out at correctional facilities. Representatives from the Public Prosecutor's office, the correctional facility's warden, the Ministry of Interior, the Ministry of Justice and a forensics doctor must be present.

Members of the victim's family may attend the execution.

As the moment of execution approaches, the warden recites the charges to the condemned person and reads the verdict aloud. If the person wishes to add any statements, the words are recorded by a public prosecutor.

The exact number of executioners is not known; guards, inmates and prosecutors offered varying accounts, from 3 riflemen to 10. But in all cases, only some of the executioners are given live ammunition. The rest have blank cartridges, so that no one rifleman will know for sure that he fired one of the fatal shots.

The condemned are bound, blindfolded and, by some accounts, faced away from the firing squad. In some cases, the condemned can request not to wear a blindfold.

After the execution, the forensic doctor must confirm the death and entera statement into the record. "The Quran does not specify an exact method of killing, except in the case of a married person who commits adultery, and that is stoning until death," one of the country's top advisers on legal affairs said on condition of anonymity.

"The Quran does specify that a killer is to be killed in the same way he killed. Each country interprets this in its own way."

Egypt uses hanging. Saudi Arabia uses decapitation. Most other Muslim countries use variations of the firing squad, experts said.

The adviser said the UAE "tries everything to avoid the death penalty."
A pardon from a death penalty can come from a Ruler or, more often, through negotiations with the victims family, which may choose to accept blood money, or diyaa.

"Capital punishment is only carried out in the most severe cases of heinous crimes and, even then, we urge the families of the victim to show mercy, forgo the death penalty and accept blood money instead," said Ahmed al Khateri, the head of the Federal National Council's Legislative and Legal Affairs Committee, who also has been a judge in RAK for more than 17 years.

"There are so many conditions that have to be met before a death sentence can be issued that it rarely takes place," said Mr al Khateri, who as a judge oversaw only 3 cases that brought the death sentence.

Despite the death penalty's rarity, it cannot be abolished, the legal adviser said.

"First, it is embedded in the Islamic Shariah law. Abolishing it would be unreligious," the adviser said.

"Second, it is simply political. There are many cases where life in prison is simply not good enough. It is there to be used judiciously in extremely violent crimes.

"Third, it is a social tactic. In tribal justice, a murderer must be murdered. If the state doesn't execute the murderer, the family of the victim will. If the state executes the murderer it will avoid a feud and a vicious cycle of vengeance."

It is for these 3 reasons that few Muslims publicly oppose capital punishment, he said. "Let us not forget that executions happen in many secular countries," the adviser said. "It is not specific to Islam. In fact, it happened long before Islamic law was written."

Source: The National, Feb. 22, 2010

Three hanged in Iran

3 men were hanged in 2 different Iranian cities on Saturday February 20.

According to the Iranian daily newspaper Kayhan, 2 men identified as Abdollah A. (43) and Mehdi S. (36) were hanged in the prison of Isfahan early Saturday morning. They were both convicted of drug trafficking.

Kayhan also reported that another man identified as Dadollah Moradzadeh was hanged in the prison of Zahedan (southeastern Iran) at 11 am Saturday morning. He was also convicted of drug trafficking according to the report.

Source: Iran Human Rights, Feb. 22, 2010

Sunday, February 21, 2010

Condemned Duo Scheduled For Lethal Injection One Day Apart

Two condemned Hunt County killers have been given execution dates. Kevin Scott Varga and Billy John Galloway, both 39, are scheduled to die by lethal injection within one day of each other this May, according to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.

Varga and Galloway were convicted in the 1998 beating death of a man while they robbed him for his wallet and rental car. Prosecutors said the duo and one other person beat the victim with their fists, feet, a hammer and a tree limb—killing him.

They were arrested during a routine traffic stop in San Antonio in the victim’s rented vehicle.

Varga, a former construction worker, was originally from Michigan and had a 6th grade education, according to TDCJ records. Prior to the capital murder conviction, Varga spent 13 years in a South Dakota prison for two separate sentences of burglary and grand theft.

Prior to this sentence Galloway also spent time in the South Dakota Department of Corrections for grand theft, parole violations and attempted robbery. He was paroled and let of jail early in 1998 just three months before the Hunt County murder. Galloway was from New York and also had only a 6th grade education, court records show.

Source: nbcdfw.com, Feb. 21, 2010

Behnoud Shojaee’s Lawyer Sentenced to One Year in Prison

Iran’s Revolutionary Court has sentenced human rights lawyer Mohammad Oliyaifard (left) to a one year prison term under the charge of “propaganda against the system” for objecting to the execution of young offenders. Oliyaifard is well known for taking on pro bono child execution cases, and he is one of the lawyer’s who was assigned to the case of executed child offender Behnoud Shojaee (Mohammad Mostafaei was the other lawyer).

Three meetings were held in branch 26 of the Revolutionary Court to discuss Mohammad Oliyaifard’s case. In the first meeting, Oliyaifard filed an appeal that was not accepted by the court.

Afterwards, Mohammad Oliyaifard also met with the judiciary who explained to him that they don’t ”execute,” they ”retribute” [The term retribute is most likely used in the context that the regime is collecting the lives of those sentenced to execution as just payment for punishable crimes].

At the United Nations gathering in Geneva on February 15, 2010, delegates from the Islamic Republic repeatedly stressed to representatives from other countries that no one in Iran is imprisoned for defending human rights. Mahmoud Abbaszadeh Meshkini, the director-general for political affairs of the Ministry of Interior, stressed, “We state explicitly that no one in Iran is arrested for being a human rights activist.”


Source: Persian2English, Feb. 21, 2010

Saudi Arabia: 6th execution in 2010

February 17, 2010: Saudi Arabian man Ahmed al-Anzi was beheaded by the sword in the northern province of Al-Jawf, the Interior Ministry said in a statement carried by the official Saudi Press Agency.

He allegedly stabbed Ahmed al-Sharari to death in a fight.

It was the sixth execution announced in 2010.

Source: Agence France Presse, Feb. 17, 2010

Getting to know your death row inmate

Andrea D. Lyon would like to acquaint you with the kinds of people who face the death penalty.

Lyon, who handled 136 murder cases, many of them as a Cook County public defender, thinks people charged in capital cases too often are portrayed as inhuman. To add some insight into who they are, as well as to tell her own story, she wrote Angel of Death Row: My Life as a Death Penalty Defense Lawyer (Kaplan, $24.94).

A theme throughout her memoir is her repeated discovery that the stories behind even brutal crimes can be more complex than they at first appear.

“People are a product of a lot of different forces, and they end up where they end up for a lot of different reasons,” Lyon said.

In Angel of Death Row, Lyon, who now is associate dean for clinical programs at the DePaul University College of Law, revisits memorable cases she handled while working in Cook County and later while on the faculty at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor. In each case, as she investigates the backgrounds of the defendants she represents, she learns about poverty, childhood abuse, domestic violence or other factors.

But that often not is the image the public sees, she said.

“They are cardboard cutouts of evil,” Lyon said. “I wanted to tell my own story, but I also wanted to tell, even more important, my clients’ stories, so people could see that they are human beings, whether they are innocent or guilty or somewhere in the middle.”


Source: Chicago Sun-Times, Feb. 21, 2010

Ohio: 8 executions on tap and counting

All you crooks might want to think twice before bumping somebody off in Ohio.

Because the state now has a proven method for putting murderers to death quickly and seemingly without pain and a long line of death row inmates waiting to make the trip to Lucasville for their special meals and last
words.

Executions are currently scheduled through October after the Ohio Supreme Courts recent decisions in several cases. On Friday, justices set Oct. 6 for the execution of Michael Benge, convicted in the 1993 murder of his girlfriend in Butler County.

Granted, we're no Texas. Yet. That state accounts for 449 of the 1,195 inmates executed in the United States since 1976, according to statistics compiled by the Death Penalty Information Center (online at http://www.deatpenaltyinfo.org/).

Our once-a-month execution schedule won't match the 24 executions in the Lone Star State last year.

Ohio has put 35 inmates to death since 1999, including last month's execution of Mark Aaron Brown, convicted of murdering 2 men at a Youngstown market.

Next up is Lawrence Reynolds, who will make the trip to the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility on March 9, barring court action.

In January 1994, Reynolds conned his way into the home of an elderly neighbor. He beat her with a tent pole, tied her up with a telephone cord and strangled her to death.

Temporary reprieve

Reynolds was supposed to be executed in October but received a temporary reprieve from Gov. Ted Strickland as state prison officials developed their new execution protocol.

The new single-drug lethal injection has been used successfully 3 times to date. I witnessed 2 of those, and the process went as smoothly as putting someone to death could go.

The one remaining unknown at this point is the effectiveness of the states backup execution method in cases where veins are not accessible a direct injection of a sedative and a painkiller into a major muscle, like the thigh, the deltoid or triceps.

Prison officials began preparing the backup injection about 20 minutes into the execution of Kenneth Biros in December, after they initially struggled to find a suitable vein. But they eventually were able to establish a shunt in one arm, and Biros was put to death without the backup.

It's highly probable that Ohio's Death Chamber will be put to use monthly for the immediate future, with several motions to set execution dates pending before the Ohio Supreme Court and about 10 death row inmates who have exhausted their state and federal appeals.

Which means Ohio could have executions scheduled monthly through at least the end of 2011. That's nothing compared to Texas, but it should serve as a word of warning for crooks who want to kill.

Source: Youngstown Vindicator, Marc Kovac, Feb. 20, 2010

Australia: Rudd government restates its opposition to the death penalty

The Rudd government has restated its opposition to the death penalty, after Tony Abbott said it could be justified in some cases.

The opposition leader said execution was the only fitting sentence for some mass murderers, like terrorists, but had no plans to reintroduce the death penalty.

"I have always been against the death penalty," Mr Abbott said.

"(But) There are some crimes so horrific that maybe that's the only way to adequately convey the horror of what's been done," he said, adding that any policy change would happen with a conscience vote.

The Rudd government says it has no plans to change its policy.

"Successive Australian governments have maintained a long-standing policy of opposition to the death penalty," Attorney-General Robert McClelland said in a statement on Saturday.

"Australia is also a party to (international protocols that) requires all necessary measures be taken to ensure that no one is subject to the death penalty."

Labor also wants to amend the Death Penalty Abolition Act to extend the prohibition on the death penalty to state laws, he added.

The Rudd government came under fire this week over the issue after Indonesian officials accused Australian diplomats of cautioning them against executing members of the Bali Nine during an election year.

The government maintains it never referred to the political sensitivity of executing the three convicted Australian drug couriers, currently on death row.

Source: News.com.au, Feb. 20, 2010