Accused Australian drug trafficker Michael Sacatides says he is living a 'nightmare'

Australian Michael Sacatides, 43,
facing his first trial at Denpasar District Court
in Bali, Monday, December 20, 2010

AUSTRALIAN man Michael Sacatides, who appeared in a Bali court where he faces the death penalty, maintains the drugs in his bag are not his and has told his lawyer he is living a "nightmare".

Looking serious and grim, the 43-year-old Sydney man, appeared in Denpasar District Court, where prosecutors outlined the allegations against him and reaffirmed he is facing a charge of drug trafficking which carries the death penalty as the maximum.

Sacatides, a kickboxing instructor who was living in Thailand, has told police that he travelled to Bali to renew his visa on October 1 this year and that he had borrowed a suitcase from an Indian friend of two years known as Peter.

When he arrived in Bali a Customs x-ray and subsequent search of the suitcase found 1.7kg of methamphetamine secreted inside the lining of the suitcase.

Sacatides has maintained from day one that he had no idea the drugs were in the bag and that he is innocent.

Sacatides made no comment as he was lead from the prison truck to the court's holding cells but later, before court began, his lawyer Erwin Siregar described the Australian as a "victim".

Mr Siregar said that ever since his arrest that Sacatides had been telling him "Erwin I am innocent, I am not guilty, I don't know about this'.

"He is only a victim," Mr Siregar said of his client.He said Sacatides had told him: "This is unjustice (sic), I am not make the mistake, the drug is not belong to me and I don't know about this. This is like a nightmare."

Mr Siregar was Schapelle Corby's initial lawyer at trial.

Asked yesterday about the defence of not knowing the drugs were in the bag and about the chances of success this time, given Corby's guilty verdict and 20-year sentence, Mr Siregar admitted that the Indonesian drugs law was harsh for those with drugs found in their luggage and with no explanation.

But he said "every case is different".

Mr Siregar, who is being funded by Australian legal aid, said his client intends fighting the case at every level and will call a criminologist from Australia to testify about the characteristics of a drug trafficker.

He said the defence also had an Australian-based lawyer working with them to hunt down the Indian owner of the suitcase.

Sacatides has told police the man is Akaleshi Tripathi, alias Peter and that he had known him for two and a half years since Peter had worked as a tailor making clothes for Sacatides.

"When we were having lunch I told Peter that I am going to go to Bali to renew my visa, then he suggested to me to borrow his suitcase and I agreed with it because I don't have suitcase to bring to Bali," Sacatides told police in his interrogation statement.

"The handing over of the suitcase was on 30 September 2010 in an apartment in Bangkok. I went to that apartment by taxi, then a security guy at that apartment gave me a suitcase, Action brand, as I was told by Peter to pick up that suitcase in the apartment. When I received that suitcase it was empty then I brought to my apartment ... I don't know about the drugs because I was never involved in this case. And I don't know what the purpose is to keep or hide the goods in the suitcase lining."

It is unclear whether the details of the Indian man have been passed to Interpol and whether any attempt has been made to track him down. Sacatides was coming to Bali for four days to renew his visa for Thailand and said he borrowed the suitcase because he didn't have one of his own.

However police allege he had very little clothes inside.

Sacatides faces two charges.

The first or primary charge, under article 113 of Indonesia's narcotics laws, is of drug importation which carries a maximum death sentence or life with a minimum term of five year, for those caught with more five grams of type one narcotics.

The secondary charge of drug possession or supply, under article 112, carries a minimum term of five years and a maximum term of life.

Yesterday in court, where Sacatides was not required to enter a plea or make any statement, prosecutor Agung Atmaja read out a four-page indictment or list of allegations which listed the series of events leading to Sacatides' arrest on October 1 this year.

But Mr Siregar said he was optimistic that Sacatides would not get the death penalty and he did not talk with his client about the death sentence.

The case was adjourned until January 5 when Mr Siregar will make an objection or exception to the charges - the equivalent of a not guilty plea.

Source: The Daily Telegraph, December 20, 2010

Comments

Iran: Flogging still a common practice

Flogging of Sufis in Gonabad: Fourteen Ne’matollahi dervishes received 25 lashes each for allegedly disturbing the public security "The lash ruling against 14 Ne'matollahi dervishes of Gonabad was carried out. They were residents of Baydokht and had been arrested and condemned by the Public Prosecutor of Gonabad after a protest against the illegal treatment dealing with the Sufis in June of last year [2010]. According to the website of Majzuban-e-Nur, Mr. Sa'id Kashani, Mr. Amir Roshan-Mojaver-Sufi, Mr. Alimohammad Amanian, Mr. Ruhollah Safari, Mr. Ali Abbasi-Baydokhti, Mr. Ebrahim Abbaszadeh, Mr. Mohammadali Ja'fari, Mr. Hossein Mahdavi, Mr. Hossein Abbaszadeh-Baydokhti, Mr. Rahmat Hosseini, Mr. Reza Kakhki, Mr. Behruz Mojaver-Sufi, Mr. Ali Mir, and Mr. Hassan Baluchi-Baydokhti are the fourteen dervishes whose requests were not only rejected, but who were condemned to 25 lashes for disturbing the public security. It should be mentioned that Ruhollah Safari, the ...

Japan’s Internet Wants Uchida Riko Executed. Here’s Why That Won’t Happen

This week, the prosecution in the case of a murder of a 17-year-old girl in Hokkaido came out with its sentencing recommendation. Japanese social media reacted by clamoring for the accused woman’s blood. But, while the facts of the case are heinous, the prosecutor’s decision not to seek the death penalty is grounded in long-standing precedent. Murdered for looking at the accused wrong Uchida Riko (内田梨瑚), 23, and her friends stand accused of murdering 17-year-old Murayama Runa (村山瑠奈) in Hokkaido’s Asahikawa. Prosecutors say the dispute began after Murayama posted a photo of Uchida to social media. They say Uchida’s group abducted the girl, made her undress, and then forced her to jump from a bridge.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term: Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

Two men executed with AK-47 for raping and murdering boy, 12, in Yemen as children watch on

“Public execution is an even more grotesque violation of human rights, particularly in a country where the ability of the accused to obtain adequate legal representation and the coverage of the process is highly limited.” -- Human Rights Watch director Sarah Leah Whitson TWO paedophiles have been executed with AK-47s in front of a bloodthirsty crowd for raping and murdering a 12-year-old boy in Yemen. Chilling images show Wadah Refat and Mohamed Khaled being marched at gunpoint through the port city of Aden. Yemen is one of the few countries in the world where capital punishment is legal, and even children were in attendance to watch the gruesome event. Refat, 28, and Khaled, 31, were condemned for the abduction, rape, and murder of a young boy who was snatched after playing next to the house of one of the men. The pair reportedly dragged him into their home and raped him. When sentencing the pair, The Daily Star reported that the judge said: “Afte...

Florida execution of 74-year-old death row inmate Dusty Ray Spencer reignites debate

Florida has set an execution date of June 25, 2026, for 74-year-old death row inmate Dusty Ray Spencer, a move that would make him the oldest person ever executed in the state’s history . Governor Ron DeSantis signed the death warrant on May 26, 2026, marking the tenth such warrant issued this year as the state continues its current pace of capital punishment. Spencer was convicted in 1992 of the first-degree murder of his wife, Karen Spencer, in Orange County. Court records detail a prolonged and violent pattern of abuse preceding the homicide. On January 18, 1992, after prior incidents of physical assault and threats, Spencer stabbed his wife to death in their backyard. The trial evidence included testimony that the victim was alive and conscious during the attack, which involved blunt force trauma and multiple stab wounds while the couple's son was present.

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.

Death Penalty News

Search This Blog