Friday, September 30, 2011

China executes man after rare retrial

Chinese police officers
rehearsing executions
September 29, 2011: a man convicted of killing a young woman and her 3-year-old brother after his offer of marriage was refused was executed in Zhaotong city, Yunnan province, according to the local court.

Li Changkui, 29, was executed by the Zhaotong Intermediate People's Court after the Supreme People's Court (SPC) approved the death penalty, as every execution is subject to SPC review.

Li pled guilty to raping 19-year-old Wang Jiafei before killing her and her brother Wang Jiahong in the village of Yingge in May 2009 in Yunnan.

The execution came after the Yunnan Provincial Higher People's Court sentenced Li to death in August, after he was tried for the third time.

The sentence overturned a lenient one made by the same court, which sparked public outcry demanding that Li be sentenced to death.

The SPC supported the verdict the Provincial Higher Court made after the second retrial, saying that all the trial procedures were conducted according to the law, and the facts were reliable, clear and sufficient, and the conviction and measurement of Li's crimes were accurate and proper.

Months earlier, the Provincial Higher Court in the second trial had given Li the death penalty with a two-year reprieve, almost tantamount to life imprisonment in China, overturning the death sentence made by the Zhaotong Intermediate People's Court in July last year.

The Provincial Higher Court said the second retrial was made after the relatives appealed to the court.

Source: China Daily, September 29, 2011

Related articles:
Aug 23, 2011
BEIJING ( Caixin Online ) — By raping and murdering a 19-year-old woman before killing her 3-year-old brother, Li Changkui incurred the wrath of the victims' relatives, a Yunnan Province village stunned by the horror, and ...

Thursday, September 29, 2011

Troy Davis's execution 'should not occur in the 21st century'

Myuran Sukumaran (left)
Andrew Chan (right)
The President of the Criminal Lawyers Association of Western Australia has called the execution of United States man, Troy Davis, "barbaric" and says all countries should move to abolish capital punishment altogether.

Mr Davis protested his innocence in his dying minutes before United States authorities administered the lethal injection at 11.08am, Georgia time.

The 42-year-old Georgia man was executed 20 years after he was convicted of the fatal shooting of a police officer and despite a plea for clemency from almost a million people worldwide.

Phil Urquhart, of the CLAWA, said Australia will soon be faced with the similar situation when two of the Bali Nine, Andrew Chan and Myuran Sukumaran, face their upcoming executions in Indonesia.

The Sydney pair was among nine Australians caught trying to smuggle 8.3 kg of heroin through Bali, Indonesia which carries a death sentence for drug smuggling.

"There's only a handful of western democracies that still have capital punishment and most have demolished it a considerable time ago since it is a barbaric and totally inappropriate punishment," he said.

"To have someone executed for a crime no matter how serious it is should not occur and it is time to move into the 21st century and abolish capital punishment."

He said the problem was that a large number of those executed by capital punishment in the United States have since been found to be innocent due to the advancement in forensics.

"There's no victory for them if years afterwards they are exonerated, you can't bring back the dead," he said.

He said in those cases two families unfairly suffer; the victim's family and the family of the person wrongfully executed.

And in the case of the two young Sydney men and their families, they face a penalty that would never be carried out in Australia had they been arrested on the other side of the border, he said.

"Capital punishment is too serious for any type of offending, particularly when it's in relation to drugs," he said.

He said the problem faced by South East Asian countries was that their governments don't want to be seen offering clemency or leniency towards foreigners while at the same time executing their own people for the same offence.

"The death penalty is seen as a deterrent but the fact is it doesn't really serve as a deterrent because Australians and other foreigners are still being caught over there, in countries where the death penalty applies," he said.

"The Australian Government should be pushing for the abolition of capital punishment full stop, rather than arguing for clemency for its individual citizens facing the death penalty."

Sukumaran and Chan are currently in Kerobokan Prison awaiting the date of their execution unless granted clemency by Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono.

Source: The Sydney Morning Herald, Sept. 22, 2011

Related articles:
Jul 09, 2011
Myuran Sukumaran (left) Andrew Chan (right). Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd has used his visit to Indonesia to raise the issue of 2 members of the Bali Nine who have lost their final appeals against the death penalty. Andrew...
May 20, 2011
The courses were inspired and partly run by Sukumaran, Chan and fellow Bali 9 member Matthew Norman, as part of their bid to provide rehabilitation behind bars and to give something back to Indonesia. Fellow Australian...
Jul 19, 2011
The Indonesian Supreme Court this month rejected Sukumaran's final appeal against his death sentence for his part in the 2005 plot to smuggle more than eight kilograms of heroin from Bali to Australia. Sukumaran was the...
Sep 21, 2010
BALI Nine ringleaders Andrew Chan and Myuran Sukumaran (left) will appear in court as their final appeals against the death penalty begin. It is expected the pair will tell judges of their regret and their rehabilitation since being ...

Bahrain jails medics, protester gets death penalty

DUBAI — A special court in Bahrain on Thursday sentenced a Shiite protester to death and another to life in jail after convicting them of killing a policeman, the BNA state news agency said.

The same court also sentenced 20 Shiite medics to between five and 15 years in prison for their roles in a month-long protest which the authorities quashed in mid-March.

The national safety court was set up under a three-month quasi-emergency law declared by King Hamad ahead of the mid-March crackdown on the protest led by the Shiite majority of the Sunni-ruled Gulf nation.

Ali Yusof al-Taweel was sentenced to death and Ali Mahdi to life in prison for running over policeman Ahmed al-Mreyssi in the Shiite area of Sitra south of Manama, during unrest that followed the quashing of the protest, BNA said, quoting military general prosecutor Yusof Flaifel.

Thirteen medics were sentenced to 15 years in jail, two others to 10 years and five to five years, including several women, he added.

The medics all worked at the Salmaniya Medical Complex in Manama, which was stormed by security forces after they drove protesters on March 16 out of the nearby Pearl Square -- the focal point of protests inspired by uprisings that have swept the Arab world.

The medics included 13 doctors, one dentist, nurses and paramedics.

BNA said the medics were tried for "forcefully occupying SMC... possessing unlicensed arms (one AK-47) and knives, incitement to overthrow the regime, seizing medical equipment, detaining policemen, and spreading false news."

They were also accused of "inciting hatred to the regime and insulting it, instigating hatred against another sect and obstructing the implementation of law, destroying public property and taking part in gatherings aimed at jeopardising the general security and committing crimes," BNA said.

"All these acts were done with a terrorist aim," it added.

A relative of one of the accused wrote in an emailed statement: "None of the accused medics attended today's hearing. Lawyers and some family members were present."

The 20 medics, many of whom had gone on hunger strike, were released on bail on September 8.

They were among a group of 47 medics rounded up in the wake of the heavy-handed crackdown on the protest, which also targeted Shiite villages across the Gulf archipelago.

Many medics claim to have been tortured in custody.

The national safety court has a mixed military and civil panel. But King Hamad last month promised that all Bahrainis in trials related to protests will see their verdicts issued by a civil court.

BNA said that those convicted on Thursday can appeal their verdicts in a civil court.

Authorities in the kingdom ruled by the Sunni Al-Khalifa dynasty have said that 24 people were killed when the protests were put down, most of them demonstrators. The opposition puts the death toll at 30.

Source: AFP, Sept. 29, 2011

Death penalty case set for USS Cole defendant

A senior Pentagon official Wednesday referred the first death penalty case under President Obama for trial by military commission at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri was charged in April by military prosecutors with murder, terrorism and other violations of the laws of war for his role in the October 2000 al-Qaeda attack on the USS Cole in Yemen.

Under military rules, the Pentagon official, known as the Convening Authority, independently examines the charges filed by military prosecutors and decides whether the defendant will be tried on all, some of none of the charges. In Nashiri’s case, the Convening Authority, Ret. Admiral Bruce MacDonald, forwarded the capital charges sworn by prosecutors.

Nashiri, a Saudi citizen of Yemeni descent, is one of 15 high-value detainees held at Guantanamo, and prosecutors allege that he was “in charge of the planning and preparation” of the Cole attack. Two suicide bombers in a small boat pulled alongside the Navy destroyer in the port of Aden and the ensuing blast, which ripped a 30-by-30-foot hole in the ship, killed 17 American sailors.


Source: The Washington Post, Sept. 29, 2011

AI: Surge in Executions in Saudi Arabia

Eight men on death row have been executed in Saudi Arabia since 5 September, representing a dramatic increase in the number of executions. It is feared that more executions could be carried out at any time.

Since the end of the Holy month of Ramadan, executions have resumed in Saudi Arabia at an alarming rate. The authorities have announced the execution of eight inmates, including three foreign nationals, since 5 September.

Amnesty international has the names of more than 100 prisoners, most of them foreign nationals, who are currently on death row in Saudi Arabia for alleged drugs-related offenses. Most are said to have been sentenced to death in trials that failed to meet international standards for fair trial; some apparently were not assisted by a defense lawyer or other legal assistance.

Death sentences imposed for drugs-related offenses do not fall into the category of "most serious crimes" embodied in international standards such as the UN Safeguards. These guarantee the protection of the rights of those facing the death penalty, and require that the scope of crimes punishable by death "should not go beyond intentional crimes with lethal or other extremely grave consequences."

Karim Ruslan al-Ruslan, a Syrian national, was executed on 14 September for alleged drugs-related offenses in al-Jawf. This was the first known execution in Saudi Arabia for drugs-related offenses since 24 January 2010, prompting fears that other death row prisoners sentenced for drugs-related offenses are also at imminent risk of execution.

Please write immediately in English, Arabic or your own language:
-Expressing concern at the surge in executions in recent weeks;
-Urging the King to impose an immediate moratorium on executions as a first step towards the abolition of the death penalty, and to commute all existing death sentences;
-Reminding the authorities that, pending full abolition, they should act in accordance with international minimum standards and limit the use of the death penalty to "most serious crimes", which do not include drugs-related offenses, and should abide fully with the UN Safeguards guaranteeing protection of the rights of those facing the death penalty, which state that capital punishment may only be imposed after a fair trial in which the defendant is provided with "adequate legal assistance at all stages of the proceedings".

PLEASE SEND APPEALS BEFORE 9 NOVEMBER 2011 TO:

King
His Majesty King 'Abdullah Bin 'Abdul 'Aziz Al-Saud
The Custodian of the two Holy Mosques
Office of His Majesty the King
Royal Court, Riyadh
KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA
Fax: (via Ministry of the Interior)
011 966 1 403 3125 (please keep trying)
Salutation: Your Majesty

Second Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of the Interior
His Royal Highness Prince Naif bin 'Abdul 'Aziz Al-Saud
Ministry of the Interior
P.O. Box 2933, Airport Road
Riyadh 11134
KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA
Fax: 011 966 1 403 3125 (please keep trying)
Salutation: Your Royal Highness

And copies to:
President, Human Rights Commission
Bandar Mohammed 'Abdullah al-Aiban
Human Rights Commission
P.O. Box 58889, King Fahad Road
Building No. 373, Riyadh 11515
KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA

Ambassador Adel A. Al-Jubeir
Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia
601 New Hampshire Ave. NW
Washington DC 20037
Fax: 1 202 944 5983


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

In Saudi Arabia there have been disturbing patterns of discrimination against vulnerable individuals. Many of those executed over the past years were foreign nationals, mostly migrant workers from poor and developing countries. Despite a decrease in executions in the last few years, there has been a marked increase in executions this year, with 15 people put to death in May alone. So far this year, at least 45 people have been executed, more than the number executed in the whole of 2010. Amnesty International is seriously concerned about over 100 prisoners who are currently known to be under sentence of death in Saudi Arabia.

At least 158 people were executed by the Saudi Arabian authorities in 2007, and at least 102 people in 2008. In 2009, at least 69 people are known to have been executed.

Saudi Arabia applies the death penalty for a wide range of offenses. Court proceedings fall far short of international standards for fair trial. Defendants are rarely allowed formal representation by lawyers, and in many cases are not informed of the progress of legal proceedings against them. They may be convicted solely on the basis of "confessions" obtained under duress or deception.

In a report published in 2008 on the use of the death penalty in Saudi Arabia, Amnesty International highlighted the extensive use of the death penalty as well as the disproportionately high number of executions of foreign nationals from developing countries. For further information please see Saudi Arabia: Affront to Justice: Death Penalty in Saudi Arabia (Index: MDE 23/027/2008), 14 October 2008: http://www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/report/saudi-arabia-executions-target-foreign-nationals-20081014.

Source: Amnesty International, Sept. 28, 2011

Gaile Owens granted parole

Gaile Owens
Gaile Owens will be released on parole after the Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole voted to free her after a quarter-century in prison, according to Tennessee Department of Correction records.

Former Gov. Phil Bredesen said Gaile Owens has been given a second chance now that the state has granted her parole.

Bredesen commuted Owens' death sentence to life in prison in July 2010 and today four members of the seven-member Tennessee Board of Probation and Parole agreed she should be released early.

“I certainly hope that she gets her life together now,'' Bredesen said.

Owens' son Stephen Owens said today was a "beautiful day.''

"I am grateful to the parole board for granting parole to my mother, Gaile Owens, after 26 years in prison. One year ago today was the date that Mom was to be executed had Gov. Phil Bredesen not commuted her sentence. I will always be grateful to Gov. Bredesen, to my mother’s legal team, and to the thousands of friends and strangers who have rallied behind my mom and our family,'' Stephen Owens said in a prepared statement released today.

Owens will not be released immediately, said Melissa McDonald, spokeswoman for the parole board.

"The next step in the process is for her release plan to be approved. After that, there is some administrative paper work that must be done. Her release will probably take place in the next 1 to 3 weeks, although I cannot give you an exact date now.


Source: The Tennessean, Sept. 28, 2011

Related articles:
Jul 13, 2010
Gaile Owens (left), a 57-year-old woman, is due to be executed in the US state of Tennessee on 28 September. She was convicted of soliciting the murder of her husband. She has been on death row for more than 24 years and would be the ...
Apr 21, 2010
NASHVILLE – Supporters of Gaile Owens – who faces execution Sept. 28 for the contract murder of her husband -- turned their hopes toward Gov. Phil Bredesen today with a request to commute her death sentence to life in ...
Jul 14, 2010
Gaile Owens and her children arrived home after 11 pm and found a bloodied Ron Owens dying on the living room floor. He had suffered a savage beating and died a few hours later at the hospital. During the earliest stages of the ...

The Controversial Willingham Case: What Rick Perry Knew and When

On the day in 2004 that her first cousin Cameron Todd Willingham was scheduled to be executed in Texas, Patricia Cox had good reason to believe he was innocent.

Willingham was convicted of murder for killing his three daughters in a late-1991 house fire following a prosecution that was based almost entirely on a forensic fire analysis performed by an assistant fire chief and a state deputy fire marshal in the days after the blaze. Two weeks before Willingham’s execution date, though, Cox managed to get famed arson analyst Gerald Hurst to take a fresh look at the case.

Working pro bono, Hurst reviewed the evidence and drafted a study that devastated the original findings. While Hurst’s conclusions relied on his own skills, arson forensics had become far more advanced and standardized in the previous 13 years. “A contemporary fire origin and cause analyst might well wonder how anyone could make so many critical errors in interpreting the evidence,” Hurst’s report began.

Hurst found that there was, in fact, no arson at all. Hurst and Willingham’s attorney rushed the report to the office of Governor Rick Perry on Feb. 13, just four days before the scheduled execution, Cox says.

Little is known about why the Hurst report did not compel Perry to use his authority to delay Willingham’s execution for further review. The governor’s office has resisted legal efforts to pry loose Perry’s most sensitive deliberative documents on the Willingham execution. “The governor’s office has been a giant black hole of information,” says Walter Reaves, Willingham’s post-conviction attorney.


Source: Time Swampland, Sept. 27, 2011


Iran: Man hanged in Qom

Iran Human Rights, September 28: One prisoner was hanged in the central prison of Qom (south of Tehran) early this morning reported the Iranain state media.

According to the state-run news agencies Fars and Mehr, the prisoner identified as "M.F." who was convicted of buying and keeping 1572 grams and 800 miligrams of crack, and participation in buying and keeping 2435 grams of crack. The prisoner was arrested in October 2009 and sentenced to death by the revolutionary court of Qom in May 2010.

The charges have not been confirmed by independent sources.

Source: Iran Human Rights, Sept. 29, 2011

China's debate on the death penalty becomes increasingly open

Chinese police officers
rehearsing executions
Calls for death penalty reform in China are growing, but so is the ability of the public to pressure courts into changing sentences perceived as too lenient – a development some say verges on mob justice.

Li Changkui, a southern Chinese farmer charged with raping and murdering a teenage girl before killing the girl’s 3-year-old brother, was tried for the 3rd time in a Chinese court late last month. Both the evidence and charges against him were virtually the same as those of his previous trial, but this time he was sentenced to death.

Months earlier, the Yunnan Provincial High Court had given Mr. Li a lighter sentence tantamount to life imprisonment – overturning a lower court’s death sentence. But the high court’s leniency sparked a massive public outcry demanding that Li be sentenced to death. “If Li Changkui doesn’t die, there is no law in China!” a commenter in an online forum wrote.

It was this onslaught of public pressure that ultimately led to an unusual decision to retry Li.

Li’s case, the latest in a series of controversial death penalty decisions, shows that the increasingly open debate on death penalty reform in China can be a double-edged sword: Though the contingent of lawyers, scholars, journalists, and judicial officials who advocate for reform has grown, so has the ability of the general public to pressure courts to change sentences perceived as too lenient – a development some say verges on mob justice.

“When it comes to popular will, I'm conflicted,” says Liu Renwen, a legal scholar at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. “On one hand, when the public holds the courts accountable, it prevents problems like corruption, and that’s a positive function. But on the other hand, [in this case] it seems like popular will has too much power.”

World's leader in executions

China infamously executes the largest number of people in the world per year. Amnesty International pegs the figure in the thousands, but the true number is a state secret. Though there are relatively few intellectuals in China who favor completely abolishing the death penalty, judicial reform advocates say there is growing support for reducing the number of death penalty sentences courts hand out.

That movement reached a milestone in February, when an amendment to China’s criminal code struck down 13 charges from the list of crimes punishable by death, including smuggling historical relics and evading taxes. The amendment was heralded as evidence of the government’s commitment to reducing the number of criminals put to death.

The Supreme People’s Court in the past three to five years has been working hard to reduce the number of death sentences,” says He Weifang, a legal scholar at Peking University and longtime activist for judicial reform. “But when it meets with cases that spur major public indignation … the Supreme People’s Court basically can't endure the pressure that comes from public opinion and the Party. They can only apply the death penalty.”

The exact relationship between public pressure and Li’s retrial is unclear. Legal scholars say it is unlikely that public pressure alone forced the court to change the sentence, but most point to it as a dominant factor.

Courts under pressure

Courts are constantly under pressure not to appear “soft on crime,” says Jon Kamm, executive director of the San Francisco-based Duihua Foundation, which conducts research on the death penalty in China. “If you’re constantly handing down unpopular decisions, it will affect your chances for promotion,” he explains.

In China, microblogs and online forums have become a kind of megaphone for critics. After the high court's first ruling, the victim's family posted messages online decrying the decision and calling for Li to be executed.

The messages struck a chord with netizens across China, turning a local murder case into a national story.

Despite the wave of criticism after the Yunnan Provincial High Court issued its first sentence, it initially appeared that the court was willing to stand behind its controversial decision. Tian Chengyou, the court’s deputy chief justice, defended the court’s decision to reduce Li’s sentence at a press briefing July 6. Tian pointed out mitigating factors in Li’s case, including that Li agreed to compensate the victims’ family and that he turned himself in.

“Society should be more rational,” Mr. Tian told journalists. “We can’t sentence someone to death because of public anger.”

But just days later, the court announced its decision to hold the retrial. On Aug. 22, a crowd of villagers formed around the municipal courthouse where the retrial was taking place. The crowd stayed past dusk, shouting and brandishing signs, Chinese news media reported.

The cries for blood in response to the Li case mirrors another high-profile death penalty case this spring, in which a university student murdered a young woman to cover up a hit-and-run accident. Like the Li case, that case also elicited an outpouring of public rage, particularly drawing on perceptions of the defendant’s privileged family background.

Legal experts say it’s still too early to determine whether these cases will have any long-term impact on how public opinion shapes court rulings in China.

“The real problem isn't public opinion; it's that the courts just aren’t independent enough,” says Xu Zhiyong, a well-known legal scholar and human rights activist. “That's what’s not as it should be.”

Source: Christian Science Monitor, Sept. 28, 2011

Florida executes Manuel Valle

Mabuel Valle
A Florida man convicted of killing a police officer during a traffic stop 33 years ago has been executed at the Florida State Prison.

Manuel Valle, 61, was administered a lethal injection and pronounced dead at 7:14 p.m. Wednesday, the governor's office reported. Valle was the 1st Florida inmate to face execution using the state's newly revised mix of lethal drugs, a concoction that faced legal challenges which twice delayed carrying out the death sentence.

Valle fatally shot Coral Gables officer Louis Pena on April 2, 1978, after Pena stopped Valle for a traffic violation while driving a stolen car, according to court records. He also shot fellow officer Gary Spell, who survived and would testify against Valle in court.

Spell testified that when he arrived the day of the shooting, Valle was seated in Pena's patrol car. As Pena was checking the license plate of the car Valle had been driving, Valle walked back to the car, reached inside and then walked back and fired a single shot at Pena, the records indicate. He then fired 2 shots at Spell, who was saved by his bulletproof vest, the records show. Valle fled and was arrested 2 days later.

A 4 p.m. EDT execution was scheduled, but the office of Gov. Rick Scott said when that time elapsed that the execution was being delayed because of an 11th-hour attempt to stop it before the U.S. Supreme Court. The high court announced Wednesday evening it had declined to intervening, allowing the execution to go forward.

Southern prisons had seen a spate of executions in recent days.

On Sept. 21, Georgia executed Troy Davis for the 1989 shooting death of a policeman, despite an international outcry and claims he was innocent. The same day, Texas executed white supremacist Lawrence Russell Brewer for the 1998 hate crime and dragging death of James Byrd Jr., a black man. A day later, Alabama executed Derrick O. Mason for the shooting death of a store clerk during a 1994 robbery.

Pena's son, also named Louis Pena, stood outside the Florida prison Wednesday afternoon as he awaited word whether the execution would go forward as scheduled. He said that step would mean closure for his father.

"It means finally, my dad's soul is put to rest after 33 years," said Pena, who was 19 when his father died and is now 53 years old.

"He killed a cop in cold blood ... He killed a cop and lived 33 years. This man lived another lifetime after taking a life," Pena added.

Valle was initially sentenced to die in 1981, but the state Supreme Court ordered a new trial that year. He was again convicted and sentenced to die, but the U.S. Supreme Court vacated that death sentence in 1986. Another jury recommended the death sentence anew in 1988.

Since Scott signed Valle's death warrant, the original Aug. 2 execution date has been delayed twice — once by the Florida Supreme Court and then by the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta. Both courts later rejected arguments by Valle's lawyers that the new drug mix would cause him pain, and therefore be cruel and unusual punishment.

The state previously used sodium thiopental to render condemned prisoners unconscious before the 2nd and 3rd drugs, pancuronium bromide and potassium chloride, were injected. But sodium thiopental is no longer manufactured in the United States and now Florida and other states are substituting it with pentobarbital, which is marketed under the name Nembutal.

18 people have been executed around the country using pentobarbital as a replacement anesthetic since Oklahoma became the first last year.

Valle's warrant was the 1st Scott has signed as governor. It comes in a year when there have been an unusually high number of police officers killed in Florida. 6 officers have been fatally shot in 2011, according to the Officer Down Memorial Page, a website that tracks officer deaths nationally. That's already more than each of the last three years and one shy of the seven officers killed by gunfire in 2007.

Valle was calm earlier Wednesday and had met with several relatives before the execution, Department of Corrections spokeswoman Gretl Plessinger said.

Valle becomes the 1st condemned inmate to be put to death this year in Florida and the 70th overall since the state resumed capital punishment in 1979. Only Texas (475), Virginia (109), and Oklahoma (96) have executed more inmates since the death penalty was re-legalized in the US on July 2, 1976.

Valle becomes the 37th condemned inmate to be put to death this year in the USA and the 1271st overall since the nation resumed executions on January 17, 1977.

Sources: Associated Press & Rick Halperin, Sept. 28, 2011


Cuban convict executed in Florida: prison

A 61-year-old Cuban man convicted of the 1978 murder of a US cop was executed in Florida by lethal injection Wednesday, after the Supreme Court rejected his petitions for a stay, prison authorities said.

The execution of Manuel Valle came just one week after the highly controversial high-profile execution of Troy Davis, who went to his death proclaiming his innocence in the murder of a policeman in the state of Georgia.

"Manuel Valle was executed tonight. The time of death was 7:14 pm," a spokeswoman for the Florida Department of Corrections, Jo Ellyn Rackleff, said in a statement.

Valle's family has said they will reclaim the body after an autopsy, which is mandatory under Florida law for any inmate who dies in custody, she said.

Relatives of the victim, 41-year-old police officer Louis Pena, said they felt a "great relief that after 33 years, justice has finally been served for Louis and his family."

"Manuel Valle was tried, convicted and sentenced more than once by juries of his peers and there was absolutely no doubt of his guilt because there was an eyewitness, a policeman," the statement said.

Spain had intervened at the last minute, asking the United States to stop the execution on humanitarian grounds and saying Valle was likely eligible for Spanish nationality. The US and Cuba do not have full diplomatic ties.

Source: Agence France-Presse, Sept. 28, 2011


Supreme Court Judge notes 'cruelty' of  Florida execution

A US Supreme Court justice has described the justifications for last night's execution of Cuban national Manuel Valle in Florida as 'close to non-existent', noting the 'cruelty' inherent in the prisoner's three-decade ordeal.

Citing the 33 years that Mr Valle had spent awaiting execution, Justice Breyer wrote "I have little doubt about the cruelty of so long a period of incarceration under sentence of death," adding that "the commonly accepted justifications for the death penalty are close to non-existent in a case such as this one".

The dissenting judgment was delivered at 6.45pm last night, after Manuel Valle's execution was delayed for two hours to allow the US Supreme Court more time to consider the case. The majority decision was to deny a stay, and Mr Valle was pronounced dead at 7.14pm local time.

Justice Breyer has now become the sole advocate for the Supreme Court setting an outer limit on the time a prisoner can spend on death row before execution. This issue is long since resolved in Commonwealth countries, where the Privy Council has held that after five years facing execution there is a presumption that the death penalty is unacceptably cruel. No US court has yet reached a similar conclusion (though many have rejected it) and thus the last several people executed in Florida had all waited on death row for more than 23 years.

Mr Valle, who has strong family ties to Spain, also endured a raft of other failures by Florida, ranging from denial of a clemency process to a lack of consular notification on his arrest to his ultimate execution with an experimental new drug.

Significantly, Justice Breyer cited the difficulty with death penalty "as currently administered" to both avoid cruelty and also "to assure that the wrong person is not executed" - suggesting, as many did following the Troy Davis case, that the system is inherently dysfunctional.

Reprieve's Director, Clive Stafford Smith said:

“The US death penalty is in an awful mess, because even spending a long time on appeals does not equate with reliability. Too many gross mistakes are made even with many years spent on so-called safeguards, and speeding things up will only make matters worse in that sense. Yet there is no doubt that delay such as that suffered by Manuel Valle is agony. The serious flaws in the death penalty system are in urgent need of attention and Justice Breyer's concerns should serve as a wake-up call for the US Supreme Court.”


Source: Reprieve, Sept. 29, 2011


The last word: covering the execution of Manuel Valle

I stared at Manuel Valle as he lay restrained to a gurney in the execution chamber at Florida State Prison. He shut his eyes and said he didn’t have any last words.

But he did.

After the 1st of 3 deadly drugs was administered, Valle suddenly came to life. His feet shifted. His eyes flashed open. He turned to the warden — and spoke.

The microphone was off. I couldn’t hear him. I worried I had missed the most important part of his execution.

Most journalists who witness lethal injections have never seen or heard the condemned until they appear in the death chamber, minutes before they die.

But I had encountered the 61-year-old Valle in a Miami courtroom two months before his execution. He wore an orange-and-blue prison uniform. He smiled weakly at his family. He referred to the judge as “Your Honor.”

Reporters make a point of keeping a distance from our subjects — especially with executions. Inmates live in faraway prisons. They almost never give interviews. Their relatives rarely want to speak. We write our stories, as a result, with a certain degree of detachment.

For my 1st execution, it would have been easier to remain dispassionate. But I didn’t have that luxury.

Sitting a few feet from Valle when he was alive altered my lens. I felt pity.

Valle committed a fierce, horrendous crime. He killed Coral Gables Police Officer Louis Pena, a father of four, in 1978. Valle shot Pena in the neck. He shot another cop in the back.

Yet when I first saw Valle, more than three decades later, he did not look like a threat. He was a meek and submissive old man who turned to a gaggle of courtroom guards to return to prison instead of sitting through the remainder of the hearing.

“If you guys want to go...” he said, asking for permission.

I followed the complicated turns of Valle’s final legal appeals. I sifted through yellowing newspaper clippings about his first trial. I met two of Pena’s children, so desperate for closure, for justice.

The execution day came — an odd, somber occasion made more tense by a late delay by the U.S. Supreme Court.

When the court stalled the proceedings, 5 reporters and I were already inside the prison in Starke, carrying only our driver’s licenses. 4 hours we waited in a bare canteen, beige and antiseptic. We wrote drafts and doodled using pencils and notepads provided by the department of corrections. We made small talk. We paced.

If it was this difficult to wait locked up for 4 hours for a date with death, I can’t imagine what it would be like to wait for 33 years.

After he was declared dead at 7:14 p.m., Valle’s inaudible last words still haunted me.

I imagined him crying out in pain. Remembering an important message to his family. Apologizing.

In a news conference more than an hour later, I found out the truth. And it was not profound.

A spokeswoman for the corrections department relayed to the press Valle’s words to the warden: Valle asked if he should start counting backwards again.

Asking for permission. This time, like a patient going into surgery.

The warden told him to close his eyes. He did.

They didn’t open again.

Source: Commentary, Patricia Mazzei, Miami Herald, October 10, 2011

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Another Troy Davis in Missouri

Reggie Clemons faces execution in Missouri with no more evidence of wrong doing than Troy Davis. Like Davis, there is no physical evidence; there are police coercion allegations and a stacked jury in the Clemons case according to Amnesty International that called for public Tuesday to stop this execution.

Clemons, who has been on death row for 18 years, was sentenced to death in St. Louis as an accomplice to a 1991 murder.

"There was no physical evidence and since allegations have arisen of police coercion, prosecutorial misconduct, and a ‘stacked’ jury in the Clemons case," reported Amnesty International Tuesday.

"Despite so many lingering questions, Missouri is still planning to execute Reggie Clemons."

The Clemons is yet another case illustrating the many flaws of the United States death penalty system.

"Of the 4 co-defendents, Marlin Gray and Reggie Clemons were sentenced to death, and Antonio Richardson was sentenced to life," the St. Louis American had reported in 2009 when Clemmons execution date had been set for that summer.

"Daniel Winfrey – the only defendant who is not black – made a plea bargain, was sentenced to 30 years and was freed on parole on June 4, 2007, according to the Missouri Department of Corrections." Soon after the 2009 execution date was stayed, the Missouri Supreme Court assigned a judge (a "Special Master") to investigate reliability of his conviction and proportionality of his sentence according to Amnesty International.

Amnesty International is urging the state of Missouri to "recognize the serious problems with Reggie Clemons' case and to commute his death sentence."

The human rights organization is also urging the public to join the campaign to urge Missouri Governor Jay Nixon to stop the execution. Amnesty's petition to Governor Nixon explains the case:

"In the interest of justice, I urge you to grant Reggie Clemons clemency. Mr. Clemons was sentenced to death in St. Louis as an accomplice in the 1991 murder of 2 young white women, Julie and Robin Kerry. 2 other black youths were also convicted, including Marlin Gray (executed in 2005). Clemons has consistently maintained his innocence, and his case illustrates many of the flaws in the U.S. death penalty system.

While I have tremendous sympathy for the family and friends of Julie and Robin Kerry, and am mindful of the pain and grief that they have experienced, I believe capital punishment only perpetuates a harmful cycle of violence.

I am particularly troubled by the lack of physical evidence in this case, allegations of police coercion and prosecutorial misconduct, questions of inadequate legal representation and questions of race, and finally, what appears to have been a "stacked" jury.

At the time of the trial, the prosecution conceded that Clemons neither killed the victims nor planned the crime because there was no physical evidence that tied him to the crime itself or the events leading up to it. The two main witnesses were a former suspect and a co-defendant.

Clemons alleges that under the pressure of police brutality he confessed to raping one of the victims, though never to murder. Four federal judges have agreed that the prosecutor's conduct during the trial was 'abusive and boorish.' And Clemons' lawyer had a full-time job in another state during her representation of Mr. Clemons, resulting in poor preparation for the trial.

The final issue when considering the case of Mr. Clemons is that of race. Not only were the murder victims white, but the two crucial witnesses were as well. The three convicted defendants were black, and during the jury selection, blacks were disproportionately dismissed, resulting in an unrepresentative jury given the sizable black population of St. Louis. The jury's flaws were also noted in 2002 by a U.S. District Court judge who ruled that Clemons' death sentence should not stand because six prospective jurors had been improperly excluded at the jury selection. Later a high court overturned this ruling on technical grounds.

While I am sympathetic to the pain and suffering caused by this terrible crime, I feel that executing Reggie Clemons would be unfair and unjust. It is clear that Mr. Clemons' trial was flawed in numerous regards and that serious questions persist regarding the reliability of his conviction and the proportionality of his sentence. I hope that you will follow this recommendation and commute the death sentence of Reggie Clemons. Troy Davis was executed September 21, 2011, a deep human rights abuse scar on the United States, one unlikely to heal until the nation's death penalty and solitary confinement units are abolished.

Source: National Human Rights Examiner, Sept. 28, 2011

Oklahoma to continue last meal tradition for condemned inmates

"Last meal: Ruben Cantu"
by Kate MacDonald
Oklahoma will continue to grant special last meal requests for death row inmates before they're executed.

Despite a high-profile move by Texas prison officials to end the long-standing tradition, Oklahoma will continue to grant last meal requests to death row inmates before they're executed.

Last week, the head of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice announced that death row inmates in the Lone Star State will no longer be granted opulent last meal requests after a convicted murderer didn't touch a large offering provided by a Texas prison.

Lawrence Russell Brewer, who was executed Wednesday for the June 1998 dragging death of James Byrd Jr. in Jasper, Texas, reportedly ordered a massive feast for his last meal, including two chicken-fried steaks, a triple-meat bacon cheeseburger, fried okra, a pound of barbecue, three fajitas, a meat lover's pizza, a pint of ice cream and a slab of peanut butter fudge with crushed peanuts.

When Texas prison officials reported that Brewer didn't eat a bite of food before he was killed by lethal injection, state Sen. John Whitmire promptly wrote a letter to the director of the state's corrections department demanding the long-standing practice be discontinued.

Within hours, Whitmire's request was granted by Brad Livingston, the executive director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, who found the senator's demands appropriate.

Jerry Massie, spokesman for the Oklahoma Corrections Department, said he hasn't heard from any angry lawmakers since the news broke in Texas. He said the state has strict guidelines concerning last meal requests that protect against inmates wasting huge quantities of food.

“The meal isn't prepared here at the prison,” Massie said. “There's a $15 limit and all the food must be obtained locally, in McAlester.”

Massie, who's been with the Corrections Department for 25 years, said that wasting a last meal isn't typical. He said executions typically take place at 6 p.m., with a prisoner's last meal delivered about noon the same day.

“For the most part, they eat it,” he said. “Of course, some times they don't.”

In 2011, 2 inmates have been executed in Oklahoma.

Billy Don Alverson, 39, was executed Jan. 6 for the 1995 beating death of a Tulsa store clerk. Jeffrey David Matthews, 38, died by lethal injection 5 days later for killing his uncle in 1994.

According to prison officials, Alverson requested a large pepperoni and Italian sausage pizza and a large Dr Pepper for his last meal. Matthews ordered a small deep-dish pizza, deep-fried shrimp with cocktail sauce and two Hush Puppies with vinegar sauce.

Massie said the tradition of granting a last meal request for a condemned prisoner is universal, at least as far as he's concerned.

“It's pretty much the same throughout the world,” he said. “I believe we've done it here (in Oklahoma) since we started doing executions.”

Since a federal ban on capital punishment was lifted in the 1970s, Oklahoma has executed 96 inmates, according to the Death Penalty Information Center.

Only Texas, with 475, has executed more prisoners. In fact, Oklahoma's nearest rivals, in terms of post-ban executions, are Florida (69) and Missouri (68). [my note----this is factually incorrect....Virginia ranks 2nd in US executions with 109 since the death penalty was re-legalized on July 2, 1976]

Massie said there are currently no executions scheduled in Oklahoma.

Source: The Oklahoman, September 27, 2011

Related articles:
Sep 23, 2011
Texas inmates who are set to be executed will no longer get their choice of last meals, a change prison officials made Thursday after a prominent state senator became miffed over an expansive request from a man ...
Jul 22, 2011
Originally conceived to participate in the Texas Moratorium Network's exhibit Justice For All? Artists Reflect on the Death Penalty, the first painting of the series, Last Meal: Ruben Cantu, has been shown at galleries in Austin ...
Sep 23, 2011
In the final hours before the execution, Mason refused to eat breakfast and he wasn't expected to eat dinner, either, prison officials said. He did not request a special last meal, saying he was fasting today. Several people...

Iran: acid thrower to be blinded

September 26, 2011: Iran's supreme court upheld a sentence of blinding in one eye for a waiter who hurled acid at a man five years ago in a plot hatched by the victim's brother-in-law, Shargh newspaper reported.

The 26-year-old waiter, identified by his first name, Mohammad, had confessed he was hired to throw acid at the victim, Vali, in return for around one million rials (less than $100), the report said.

Vali, who was injured and blinded in one eye, asked for 'qesas' -- an eye for an eye style of justice -- and that Mohammad be blinded in retribution.

After much deliberation, the panel of judges presiding the case ordered the attacker to be blinded without acid in one eye and pay blood money for Vali's other injuries, the report said.

Source: AFP, Sept. 26, 2011

Related articles:
Dec 15, 2008
TEHRAN, Iran (CNN) -- An Iranian woman, blinded by a jilted stalker who threw acid in her face, has persuaded a court to sentence him to be blinded with acid himself under Islamic law demanding an eye for an eye. ...
May 14, 2011
"Regardless of how horrific the crime suffered by Ameneh Bahrami, being blinded with acid is a cruel and inhuman punishment amounting to torture, and the Iranian authorities have a responsibility under international law to ...
Jul 31, 2011
An Iranian man convicted of throwing acid in the face of a female student has been pardoned from being blinded himself as punishment, a state-run television website has said. Majid Movahedi was sentenced in February ...

Florida execution: drug firm protests to governor over lethal injection

Doctors warn Rick Scott that use of experimental barbiturate to kill Manuel Valle, 61, could lead to extreme suffering.

The head of a Danish drug company has written to Rick Scott, the governor of Florida, to protest about the use of one of its anaesthetics in the execution of a Cuban national scheduled to take place on Wednesday.

Staffan Schuberg, president of Lundbeck, the manufacturers of pentobarbital under the trademark Nembutal, has sent 2 letters to the governor expressing his "adamant" opposition to what would be Florida's 1st use of the drug as part of a lethal injection. Barring an eleventh-hour stay, the 3-drug cocktail will be administered to Manuel Valle, 61, at 3pm for the 1989 murder of a police officer.

Pentobarbital is increasingly being used by some of the 35 states that still practise executions as an alternative to the anaesthetic sodium thiopental, whose only producer in the US, Hospira, has suspended supply in protest at its use to kill people. The new barbiturate has been used in states such as Oklahoma and Texas, and in Georgia where it was used last week as part of the lethal injection that killed Troy Davis.

But doctors and legal experts warn that pentobarbital is untested and could inflict extreme suffering on prisoners as they die. In his letter to Scott, Schuberg wrote that the use of his company's drugs in executions in Florida "contradicts everything Lundbeck is in business to do – provide therapies that improve people's lives."

In a later letter, he added: "The use of pentobarbital outside of the approved labelling has not been established. As such Lundbeck cannot assure the safety and efficacy profiles in such instances."

Lundbeck first began its campaign to stop the drug being used in executions earlier in the summer. It began putting in place distribution restrictions that prevent Nembutal being sold to any prison or corrections department in the US. But Florida and other states already have stockpiles which will allow them to continue its use unless ordered by the US courts to desist.

The company also enlisted the support of the Danish government, which has written to the governors of the states using the drug through its embassy in Washington.

Deborah Denno, an expert in the death penalty at Fordham university law school, said the intervention by the manufacturer itself of Nembutal in writing to the Florida governor took opposition to use of the drug to a whole new level. "I don't know how you could cast more doubt on the use of a drug than when you have the condemnation of it by its own maker," she said.

Valle's scheduled execution has also been condemned by campaigners on a number of other grounds. The prisoner has been on death row for 33 years, a length of time which the UK-based group Reprieve says is tantamount to cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment and a violation of international law.

The prisoner, who has close ties to Spain which has taken up his cause, was convicted and sentenced to death for killing Louis Pena on 2 April 1978. The police officer had stopped Valle for a traffic infringement in Coral Gables.

Florida courts have rejected Valle's lawyers' appeals for stays of execution based on the unreliability of the new drug. Earlier this week a British neurologist who has campaigned globally against the use of pentobarbital in executions petitioned the Florida state supreme court calling for Valle's execution to be stayed because of the uncertainties surrounding its use. Dr David Nicholl pointed out that the use of Nembutal in lethal injections had never been clinically tested or approved and could inflict unnecessary pain.

The petition was denied.

Opponents of the use of Nembutal in death penalties point to the June execution of Roy Blankenship, the first to take place in Georgia using the drug. The death was witnessed by an Associated Press reporter, Greg Bluestein. He observed that the condemned man "jerked his head several times, mumbled inaudibly and appeared to gasp for breath for several minutes after he was pumped with pentobarbital on Thursday in Georgia's death chamber".

After his death, Blankenship's lawyers asked a reputed anaesthetist to give an opinion on his execution based on Bluestien's reporting. David Waisel, a professor of anaesthesia at Harvard medical school, concluded that the use of pentobarbital ran a "substantial risk of serious harm such that condemned inmates are significantly likely to face extreme, torturous and needless pain and suffering."

Source: The Guardian, Sept. 28, 2011