Tuesday, May 31, 2011

Torture on Death Row in Texas




POLUNSKY UNIT - WELCOME TO HELL!

Texas' Death Row is a disgrace to the state of Texas. Click HERE to view 50 recent annotated pictures of the 'living' conditions on Texas' Death Row. These photos were provided by the State of Texas in response to a Freedom of Information Act request filed by attorney Yolanda Torres. They were then posted on Thomas Whitaker's blog, "Minutes Before Six". Mr. Whitaker is currently on Death Row in the state of Texas.
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Two beheaded for murder in Saudi Arabia

May 30, 2011: two men have been beheaded recently in Saudi Arabia for murder.

Ibrahim al-Muwis was executed on May 29 for the fatal stabbing of Sulaiman al-Saqr, also a Saudi, in Al-Ahsa in the east of the kingdom, the interior ministry announced in the state-run news agency SPA.

On May 27 Saudi Arabia beheaded a Sudanese man convicted of murdering a compatriot in the capital Riyadh, the interior ministry announced.

Sadiq Abdel Mullah was sentenced to death for the fatal stabbing of Ahmed Mohammed, it said, quoted by the state-run news agency SPA.

Source: AFP, May 27-29, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Supreme Court Takes the "Radical" Stance That Prisoners Are Human Beings

California State Prison, Los Angeles County,
August 2006. It currently holds 4,275 inmates;
it is designed to hold 2,300
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, in his dissenting opinion to last week's Brown v. Plata decision, called the ruling “perhaps the most radical injunction issued by a court in our nation’s history.”  Since Scalia is the ultimate legal literalist, we presumably ought to take his written opinions literally. So what is this decision that the Court's most conservative justice finds more "radical" even than Roe v. Wade or Brown v. Board of Education? It is no less than the radical notion that prisoners are human beings, entitled to the most basic human rights even while incarcerated.

In rendering the majority opinion in the Plata case, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote: "Prisoners retain the essence of human dignity inherent in all persons. Respect for that dignity animates the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment."

And cruel and unusual punishment is what California prisoners are receiving, according to the Supreme Court's 5-4 ruling, in a prison system so overcrowded that it cannot provide anything close to adequate mental health care or medical care to its 147,000 inmates. To comply with the Court's ruling California must remedy the situation by reducing its prison population to a mere 137.5 percent of capacity, rather than the current 175.5 percent.

It's a decision that runs counter to the federal courts' take on prisoners' rights over at least three decades, especially since the passage of the 1996 Prison Litigation Reform Act, which severely limited the ability of prisoners to file civil lawsuits and of courts to intervene on their behalf. In citing the "essence of human dignity" inherent even in the nation's 2.3 million prison inmates, the decision also runs counter to the mentality of mass incarceration, by which prisoners have been so effectively dehumanized that otherwise decent people condone treating them in ways that often approach--and sometimes constitute--torture.

Kennedy actually references torture in insisting that a "prison that deprives prisoners of basic sustenance, including adequate medical care, is incompatible with the concept of human dignity and has no place in civilized society."

To show that California's prisons have in fact reached this level of inhumanity, Justice Kennedy cites just a handful of examples from the voluminous documentation submitted on behalf of the plaintiffs by the Prison Law Office and others. (Solitary Watch readers will be particularly interested to note that Kennedy singles out the solitary confinement of prisoners with mental illness for a special dose of approbation.)
Prisoners in California with serious mental illness do not receive minimal, adequate care. Because of a shortage of treatment beds, suicidal inmates may be held for prolonged periods in telephone-booth sized cages without toilets. A psychiatric expert reported observing an inmate who had been held in such a cage for nearly 24 hours, standing in a pool of his own urine, unresponsive and nearly catatonic. Prison officials explained they had “ ‘no place to put him.’ ”

Other inmates awaiting care may be held for months in administrative segregation, where they endure harsh and isolated conditions and receive only limited mental health services. Wait times for mental health care range as high as 12 months. In 2006, the suicide rate in California’s prisons was nearly 80% higher than the national average for prison populations; and a court-appointed Special Master found that 72.1% of suicides involved “some measure of inadequate assessment, treatment, or intervention, and were therefore most probably foreseeable and/or preventable.”

Prisoners suffering from physical illness also receive severely deficient care. California’s prisons were designed to meet the medical needs of a population at 100% of design capacity and so have only half the clinical space needed to treat the current population. A correctional officer testified that, in one prison, up to 50 sick inmates may be held together in a 12- by 20-foot cage for up to five hours awaiting treatment. The number of staff is inadequate, and prisoners face significant delays in access to care. A prisoner with severe abdominal pain died after a 5-week delay in referral to a specialist; a prisoner with “constant and extreme” chest pain died after an 8-hour delay in evaluation by a doctor; and a prisoner died of testicular cancer after a “failure of MDs to work up for cancer in a young man with 17 months of testicular pain.”...Many prisoners, suffering from severe but not life-threatening conditions, experience prolonged illness and unnecessary pain.
Kennedy also takes the unusual step of appending photographs to his opinion. (These can be viewed in Mother Jones.com's powerful montage, here.) Together with the written descriptions, they depict California prisons as something akin to Hieronymus Bosch's paintings of an overcrowded Hell. Berkeley Law professor Jonathan Simon believes that the photographs forced the Court to confront "the sheer magnitude of California's penal depravity," and goes so far as to compare the images to another notorious set of photos:

"Like the pictures from Abu Ghraib," he writes, "these photos locate California's penal practices in a place of inhumanity, degradation, and torture that cannot be tolerated (even by judges disciplined by decades of punitive populism and crime fear)."
Simon is among the many commentators who believe that the Plata decision has far-reaching implications, and even "represents a turning point. The system of mass incarceration depends deeply and irretrievably on a simple condition, the denial of the humanity of prisoners. Yesterday the Supreme Court overturned that denial." If this is true, it may someday affect the host of other human right violations that take place every day in prisons across the country--from the tolerance for prison rape to the widespread use of solitary confinement. But it will take more than a single Supreme Court decision to wean the incarceration nation off of its 30-year addiction to prisons.

Source: Solitary Watch, May 31, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Monday, May 30, 2011

Qatar: Man awaits execution after mercy plea rejected

15 years after he walked into a police station with a severed head and a blood-dripping sword in his hand, Mahendra Nath Das is set to be sent to the gallows with his mercy petition rejected by President Pratibha Patil.

Das, now aged 49, is lodged at the Jorhat Jail in eastern Assam where preparations being made for his execution.

“Already, we have started preparations for the execution, but we need to get a hangman from either Bihar or Uttar Pradesh as we don’t have anyone here in Assam,” a jail official said.

On April 24, 1996 around 7am Das entered the Fancy Bazar police outpost in the heart of Assam’s Guwahati city with a severed head and the weapon before placing it on the verandah. He was immediately arrested and a court in 1997 sentenced him to death.

Das, in a fit of anger, murdered 68-year-old Harakanta Das, then secretary of the Guwahati Truck Drivers Association while he was sipping his morning cup of tea at a roadside stall accompanied by at least half-a-dozen other acquaintances.

“The appellant amputated the right hand and thereafter severed the head of Harakanta Das. With the head of the deceased in one hand and the blood-dripping weapon in the other hand, he moved majestically towards Fancy Bazar police outpost,” the court said whole sentencing him to death.

Thereafter, a long drawn legal battle ensued, with the now 74-year-old mother of Mahendra Nath Das appealing for mercy.

“I am still hopeful and pray my son’s death sentence is reversed and made into life imprisonment,” said Kusumbala Das, bedridden with old age ailments at her village home in Bohori in the western Barpeta district.

But the victim’s son Amal Das, a businessman, is praying for justice to be delivered.

“I am looking for that day when he is hanged until death,” Amal said as tears welled up in his eyes as he recollected the ghastly incident narrated to him earlier by witnesses.

But the condemned prisoner said in December while being brought for health checkup at the Gauhati Medical College that he was not given a fair trial.

“I have no regrets for killing him as they attempted to take my life. I already completed 14 years in prison. Then why should there be double punishment for me now. I was not given a fair trial,” Mahendra Nath Das had said.

“I should not be hanged as I already completed life imprisonment term of 14 years in jail.”

Even as preparations are on for the execution, rights groups have questioned the concept of capital punishment.

“Reports that India will execute two men (Devinder Pal Singh Bhullar and Mahendra Nath Das) after an encouraging 7-year hiatus are hugely disappointing, and will be a step backwards for human rights in the country,” Amnesty International’s Asia-Pacific director Sam Zarifi said in a statement.

“For India to revive capital punishment now would also be bucking the global trend towards abolition of the death penalty, with numbers of executions continuing to decline,” Zarifi added.

Bhullar was sentenced to death in 2001 for plotting terror attacks that killed nine people in Delhi in 1993.

Source: Gulf Times, May 30, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

China: Food safety violators to face death penalty

Beijing (CNN) -- Amid deepening public concerns over the country's food safety following a wave of recent scandals, China's highest court has ordered judges nationwide to hand down harsher sentences, including the death penalty, to people convicted of violating food safety regulations.

In a directive released by the state-run Xinhua news agency over the weekend, the Supreme People's Court said in cases where people die from food safety violations, convicted suspects should be given the death sentence, while criminals involved in non-lethal cases should face longer prison terms and larger fines.

It also called for harsher punishment for government officials found protecting food safety violators or accepting bribes from them.

"The overall food safety situation is stable and improving, but incidents that still occur regularly have seriously endangered people's lives and caused strong social reactions," the directive quoted Wang Shengjun, the country's top judge, as saying. "Our task to maintain food safety remains challenging."

From milk laced with melamine, pigs fed with performance-enhancing drugs to watermelons juiced up with growth-stimulating chemicals, a series of recent scandals have outraged Chinese consumers, despite ramped-up government crackdown and state media campaign against food safety violations.

From last September to April this year, Chinese courts have tried and convicted 106 people accused of violating food safety, including two who received life imprisonment last month in a "melamine milk" case, Xinhua reported.

"It's clear that the credibility of the system will suffer," said Peter K. Ben Embarek, the World Health Organization's food safety official. "The (Chinese) consumer will continue to lose confidence in Chinese products and consumers abroad will equally lose confidence in Chinese products."

The latest announcement by China's supreme court, however, seems to run counter to another recent initiative to limit the use of the death penalty by the same court.

In its annual work report, the Supreme People's Court last week instructed lower courts to suspend death sentences for two years if an immediate execution is not deemed necessary.

The Chinese legislature had earlier amended the country's penal code to reduce the number of crimes punishable by death by 13 to 55.

China executes more people than all other countries combined, according to Amnesty International. It estimated the figure, considered a state secret, to be in the thousands last year for "a wide range of crimes that include non-violent offences."

The number of executions elsewhere in the world in 2010 was at least 527, according to the London-based group's annual report released earlier this year.

Source: CNN.com, May 30, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Sunday, May 29, 2011

Nebraska Supreme Court issues stay of execution in the case of Carey Dean Moore

The Supreme Court of Nebraska has issued a stay of execution in the case of Carey Dean Moore, who was scheduled to be put to death on 14 June. The execution warrant has been withdrawn.

Carey Dean Moore’s lawyer filed an emergency motion in the Nebraska Supreme Court requesting a stay of execution on 17 May. He also filed a legal brief in a lower court raising certain challenges relating to the state’s lethal injection protocol, including concerns surrounding the state’s recent purchase of sodium thiopental from a company in India.

Nebraska was the last state in the USA to use electrocution as its sole execution method. In 2008, the Nebraska Supreme Court ruled that use of the electric chair violated the state’s constitution. In 2009, a bill providing for lethal injection in Nebraska passed into law. The state’s adoption of lethal injection has coincided with a national shortage of sodium thiopental – one of the three drugs used in such executions - and the decision in early 2011 by the only US manufacturer of this drug to withdraw from the market. States have been seeking alternatives and have engaged in some questionable practices in so doing, including importing sodium thiopental from foreign companies under circumstances that have been challenged under federal law. The Drug Enforcement Administration at the US Department of Justice is currently conducting an investigation into some such imports. In early January 2011, the Nebraska Department of Corrections received a shipment of sodium thiopental it had purchased from a company in India. That company has since announced that it will not sell any more drugs if they are to be used in executions.

In its order issued on 25 May, the Nebraska Supreme Court noted the legal action initiated in the lower court by Carey Dean Moore and that the court proceeding was “sufficient cause” to warrant a stay of execution. The Supreme Court ordered such a stay and withdrew the execution warrant it had issued on 21 April scheduling the execution for 14 June.

Carey Dean Moore was convicted in 1980 for the murder of two taxi drivers. He was 21 years old at the time of the crime and has been on death row for three decades.

Source: Amnesty International, May 29, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Two men were hanged in western Iran this morning- 54 executions in the month of May

Iran Human Rights, May 29: Three days after executing 11 people, five of whom were hanged in public, Iranian authorities publicly hanged two prisoners in the city of Kermanshah (western Iran) this morning.

According to the official site of the Kermanshah Judiciary, two men were hanged on Azadi Square this morning. The men were identified as P. Mohammadi Poshtehrizeh, convicted of raping a 12-year-old boy, and A. Namaki, convicted of raping a 9-year-old girl. The charges have not been confirmed by independent sources.

According to official reports, Iranian authorities have executed at least 54 people in the month of May 2011.15 of the executions were carried out in public.

On May 26th five men were hanged in two different cities in Iran. One man was hanged in Qazvin, and a young civilian citizen was used to carry out the public execution.

It is believed that the Iranian authorities have increased the number of public executions to spread fear among Iranian citizens as the anniversary of the June 2009 protests approaches.

Mahmood Amiry-Moghaddam, the international spokesperson for IHR said, "The main goal of the Iranian authorities by executing is not to fight crime but to spread fear among the people seeking fundamental changes in the country. Iranian authorities want the world to become immune to executions, but we urge the global community to react and condemn every single execution in Iran."

Source: Iran Human Rights, May 29, 2011 - [فارسى]
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Saturday, May 28, 2011

Something is rotten in the state of Denmark

To live or not to live?

That is THE question for the Danish government.

12 Lundbeck patients have already been killed in the US, 8 more Lundbeck patients are scheduled to be executed for the sole month of June 2011.

Act Now!

If you are a Danish citizen, why don’t you SEND A MESSAGE to Mr. Bertel Haarder, Minister of Interior and Health, in Copenhagen, to ask:
  • How can a European pharmaceutical company be allowed to participate in the death trade with impunity?
  • How much longer is the Danish government going to tolerate such a violation of European and ethical standards?
  • How is the Danish government going to handle its presidency of the European Union in 2012 with regards to the death penalty?
If you are not a Danish citizen, why don’t you send a message to the Danish Consular representative in your country to submit the same questions? You can find the relevant contact information per country HERE.

Be civil and courteous, insults and angry messages would be counterproductive and damaging.

PentobarbitalX

Source: The Pentobarbital Experiment, May 28, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Friday, May 27, 2011

British writer Alan Shadrake to be jailed for book on death penalty in Singapore

Alan Shadrake (left)
A British writer is set to serve a 6-week jail term for insulting Singapore's judiciary in a book about the death penalty in the city-state after a court on Friday rejected his appeal against the sentence and a fine.

The Court of Appeal allowed Alan Shadrake, author of Once a Jolly Hangman: Singapore Justice in the Dock, to undergo a medical check before starting his prison term on Wednesday, said his lawyer M Ravi.

In his book Shadrake, 76, accused Singapore's courts of succumbing to political influence and of favouring the rich over the poor, basing his allegations on interviews with a former executioner, human rights activists and police officers.

In addition to the jail term, Shadrake was fined 20,000 Singapore dollars (15,400 US dollars).

Based in Malaysia, Shadrake was arrested in Singapore in July following the launch of his book in the city-state.

Human Rights Watch condemned the court's decision.

'The prosecution of Alan Shadrake for doing nothing more than calling for legal reform is a devastating blow to free speech in Singapore,' its deputy Asia director Phil Robertson said in a statement.

In its November 3 decision, Singapore's High Court said 'Shadrake's technique is to make or insinuate his claims against a dissembling and selective background of truths and half-truths, and sometimes outright falsehoods.'

The prosecution had sought a longer jail term, arguing that Shadrake's book contained statements 'to challenge the rule of law by attacking the Singapore judiciary.'

Source: Deutsche Presse-Agentur, May 27, 2011


Singapore rejects British author Alan Shadrake's appeal

A British author of a book about the death penalty in Singapore, Alan Shadrake, has lost his appeal against a 6-week jail sentence.

The 76-year-old, convicted of insulting the judiciary, will undergo medical tests before beginning his sentence.

His book, Once A Jolly Hangman: Singapore Justice in the Dock, alleges a lack of impartiality in the implementation of Singapore's laws.

Singapore has a history of sensitivity to how it is portrayed.

Mr Shadrake was sentenced by the High Court last November and was fined S$20,000 ($16,150; £9,900).

"We affirm the sentence imposed by the judge," said Justice Andrew Phang of the three-member Court of Appeal panel.

The New York-based Human Rights Watch said the ruling was a "major setback for free expression in Singapore".

The rights group said the charges should be dropped.

"The prosecution of Alan Shadrake for doing nothing more than calling for legal reform is a devastating blow to free speech in Singapore," said Phil Robertson, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch.

"More broadly, until the government releases its iron grip on basic freedoms, the Singaporean people will remain all the poorer."

The Singapore government says it has the right to ensure what it sees as accuracy in any reporting of the young state.

Malaysia-based Shadrake was arrested last July when he visited Singapore to launch his book.

The book contains interviews with human rights activists, lawyers and former police officers, as well as a profile of Darshan Singh, the former chief executioner at Singapore's Changi Prison.

It claims he executed around 1,000 men and women from 1959 until he retired in 2006.

"I think I've been given a fair hearing," Shadrake told the media after the verdict was issued last year.

Separately, Shadrake is being investigated by the police for criminal defamation; his passport is being held by the police.

Source: BBC News, May 27, 2011


_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Serbia: Executions Were Mladic’s Signature, and Downfall

Ratko Mladic
With video cameras capturing the moment, Gen. Ratko Mladic’s bodyguards handed out chocolates to Bosnian Muslim children, promising terrified women that the violence was over.

“No one will be harmed,” the Bosnian Serb commander said on July 12, 1995, gently patting a young boy on the head. “You have nothing to fear. You will all be evacuated."

As he spoke, thousands of his soldiers formed a vast cordon around the town of Srebrenica, a United Nations-protected “safe area” that had just fallen to his forces. Over the next 10 days, his soldiers hunted down, captured and summarily executed 8,000 men and boys from the town. Women were raped. And pleas for restraint from the international community were mocked.

“Over 500 victims of the Srebrenica genocide were boys under the age of 18,” said Hasan Nuhanovic, a survivor from Srebrenica whose father, mother and brother were executed by Mr. Mladic’s forces. “They were 16, 17 years old when they were executed."

The mass executions around Srebrenica became Mr. Mladic’s ghastly trademark — and his undoing. The anger and humiliation felt in Washington and in European capitals prompted the international community to act against Bosnian Serb forces after years in which Serbian forces systematically pushed Muslims and Croats out of areas they claimed belonged to the Serbian ethnic group. Within weeks, NATO airstrikes reversed the course of the war. Within months, a peace accord had been signed and Mr. Mladic was a fugitive.

In the early 1990s, Mr. Mladic supported President Slobodan Milosevic of Serbia as he reignited ethnic divisions and tried to turn the majority of the country into a “Greater Serbia” dominated by ethnic Serbs. In time, fighting erupted between Yugoslavia’s 3 main ethnic groups — Orthodox Christian Serbs, Roman Catholic Croats and Muslim Bosnians — in a series of overlapping civil wars.

Srebrenica was not the general’s first act of brutality. The massacre was the culmination of years of worsening cruelty that began with the siege of Sarajevo in 1992, the longest in modern warfare. The four-year bombardment killed 10,000 people, including an estimated 1,500 children. In Sarajevo, Mr. Mladic embraced a frightening form of warfare where a heavily armed military unleashed artillery and sniper fire on civilians. His forces were also accused of using systematic rape as a weapon of war.

“A professional army conducted a campaign of unrelenting violence,” war crimes prosecutors said in the opening statement of a 2003 trial of one of Mr. Mladic’s subordinates. “There was nowhere safe for a Sarajevan, not at home, at school, in a hospital, from deliberate attack.”

Born in a suburb of Sarajevo, Mr. Mladic grew up in a household haunted by the ethnic divisions that the Yugoslav dictator, Josip Broz Tito, managed to suppress for decades. Mr. Mladic’s father was killed in an attack against ethnic Croat forces allied with Nazi Germany that included some Bosnian Muslims. An infant at the time, Mr. Mladic never knew his father. German records showed that hundreds of thousands of Serbs died during the occupation, and Mr. Mladic had made it his mission to avenge them.

At news conferences, he was a silent, brooding and intimidating presence beside Radovan Karadzic. The 2 men were the leaders of Bosnia’s Serbian secessionists in their war with Croats and Muslims from 1992 to 1995. Both men said that their forces were defending Europe from a Muslim onslaught backed by wealthy Muslim nations. In truth, their opponents were poorly armed local people who had converted to Islam centuries earlier. From the first shots in April 1992 to the eventual peace accord at Dayton, Ohio, in December 1995, the war is commonly reckoned to have cost about 100,000 Bosnian lives, including 10,000 in the siege of Sarajevo.

As commander of the Yugoslav National Army’s Second Military District, headquartered in Sarajevo, Mr. Mladic was ideally placed to lead the Bosnian Serbs in their quest for secession from the newly independent Bosnia. In May 1992, Mr. Mladic ordered his forces to begin the siege of Sarajevo, cutting off all electricity, food and water to the city. United Nations airlifts allowed residents to survive, but the carnage steadily mounted.

In 1993, his forces fired a shell that killed 15 civilians at a soccer game. A month later, another shell killed 12 civilians as they waited in line for water. In 1994, a shell landed in the old city’s crowded Markale marketplace, killing 68 civilians. A year later, a second attack on the Markale market killed 34 people.

Early in the siege, an intercepted radio message caught the general ordering one of his commanders to “burn” the city.

He hitched his yearning for vengeance to a Napoleonic sense of himself, and a contempt for the United Nations forces that were trying, with faltering success, to prevent Mr. Mladic’s forces from breaking through the siege lines around Sarajevo. On one occasion in the spring of 1993, under threat from President Bill Clinton of American airstrikes if he failed to pull his troops back from a height above the city, he led reporters to the contested upland, on a ski slope that had been used for the 1984 Winter Olympics, and swept his arm across the horizon. “All of this, every bit of it, is mine,” he said. Hours later, he withdrew his troops.

Some of his threats were more personal. During a meeting of the Bosnian Serb Parliament, also in 1993, he pulled a reporter aside to send a message, he said, to a Serbian surgeon working with Croat and Muslim colleagues at the trauma center of the Kosevo Hospital in Sarajevo. It was time, he said, for the surgeon to heed demands from the Mladic forces that all Serbs in Sarajevo leave the city and join the secessionist cause. “We need her in our hospital, and she must come. She is a Serb, and it is her duty,” he said.

And what, the reporter asked, were the consequences if she did not? “You know that very well,” he said. Months later, after two attempts by Serbian snipers to kill her, and with a mounting toll of unexplained killings among Serbs remaining in the city, the surgeon fled aboard a United Nations relief flight.

In 1994, Mr. Mladic’s 23-year-old daughter, a medical student in Belgrade, committed suicide. Her death seemed only to increase his ferocity.

He grew increasingly disdainful of United Nations peacekeepers. In 1994, his forces tried to take Gorazde, a town that had been declared, along with Srebrenica, under United Nations protection. When NATO carried out airstrikes to halt Mr. Mladic’s attack, he ordered his men to take dozens of United Nations peacekeepers hostage. He eventually backed down, but the United Nations had been humiliated.

His 1995 attacks on Srebrenica brought the United Nations to one of its lowest moments of its history. Roughly 300 Dutch peacekeepers were defending the town, but his forces cut off their supplies for weeks. When he carried out a coordinated assault in July 1995, NATO jets dropped only 2 bombs on the advancing Serbian forces. Within days, the enclave of 30,000 Bosnian Muslims had fallen. After the fall of Srebrenica, Mr. Mladic mocked United Nations peacekeepers from the Netherlands and forced the commander of Dutch forces to drink a toast with him celebrating the fall of the city. And he promised his soldiers a victory that would linger in history.

While repeatedly telling Bosnian Muslim civilians that they would not be harmed, he aired his true intentions to a camera crew from Bosnian Serb television. As he strolled the center of the fallen town, he told his soldiers the time had come to avenge a massacre that the Ottoman Turks had carried out against Serbs in the area 190 years earlier. “We present this city to the Serbian people as a gift,” he said. “The time has come to take revenge."

Source: David Rohde was imprisoned by Bosnian Serb forces for 10 days in 1995 after he became the 1st reporter to discover mass graves near Srebrenica. John F. Burns covered the siege of Sarajevo; New York Times, May 27, 2011
________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Thursday, May 26, 2011

Iran hangs eight, five of them in public

TEHRAN (AFP) – Iran has hanged eight men convicted of murder, rape, armed robbery and drug trafficking, including five who were executed in public on Thursday, the official IRNA news agency reported.

The report said "serial killer" Mehdi Faraji, convicted of murdering five middle-aged women who boarded his minibus, was hanged in public in the city of Qazvin (graphic content), northwest of the capital Tehran.

Two more men, Hamid Ranjbar and Hamid Reza Baqeri, were also hanged in public after they were convicted of armed robbery and abduction. The two were executed in the southern city of Shiraz.

Another two, Masoud Dehqan and Mehdi Alipour, were hanged in public in the same city after being found guilty of rape, the report added.

In addition, two men convicted of drug trafficking were hanged on Thursday in a prison in the northern city of Sari, IRNA reported, quoting the city's prosecutor Asadollah Jafari. The report did not name the convicts.

Another man, meanwhile, was hanged on Monday for drug smuggling in the city prison of Behbahan in the southwestern province of Khuzestan, the provincial justice department said on its website. It gave no other details.

The latest hangings bring to 139 the number of executions reported in Iran so far in 2011, according to an AFP count based on media and official reports.

Iranian media reported 179 hangings last year. But international human rights groups say the actual number was much higher, making the Islamic republic second only to China in the number of people it put to death.

Iran says the death penalty is essential to maintain law and order, and that it is applied only after exhaustive judicial proceedings.

Source: AFP, May 26, 2011


_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Young boy used to carry out public execution in Iran early this morning

Source: Iran Human Rights
Iran Human Rights, May 26: A man was hanged in public in the city of Qazvin, west of Tehran, early this morning.

According to the official Iranian news agencies the man who was identified as "Mehdi Faraji" (37) was hanged in public, in the beginning of Qazvin’s "Isfahan street" early this morning.

Mehdi Faraji was convicted of murdering five women between May 2009 and March 2010.

This is the eighth public hanging that has taken in May 2011 in Iran.

According to our reports a young boy (minor) was used to draw the chair Mehdi was standing on and carry out the execution. The picture on the left shows the boy (arrow) while carrying out the execution.

Mahmood Amiry-Moghaddam, the spokesperson of Iran Human Rights strongly condemned today’s execution and said : "These barbaric executions and using ordinary citizens, especially the minors to conduct these executions must be condemned by the world community". He added : "Iranian leaders must be held accountable for promoting a culture of murder and brutality in Iran".

Source: Iran Human Rights, May 26, 2011 - h] [فارسى]


May 29, 2011 Update
Iranian authorities react to IHR’s report: The man who carried out the public execution was 23 years old

Source: Iran Human Rights
Iran Human Rights, May 28: Iran Human Rights (IHR) had published a report (above) on May 26th regarding the public execution of "Mehdi Faraji" in Qazvin titled: "Young boy was used to carry out execution of a man in public in Iran". The information was based on eyewitness reports who said, "A young boy was used to draw the chair Mehdi was standing on and carry out the execution."

In the statement, Mahmood Amiry-Moghaddam, the international spokesperson of IHR said, “These barbaric executions and using ordinary citizens, especially minors, to carry out the executions must be condemned by the world community.” He added, “Iranian leaders must be held accountable for promoting a culture of murder and brutality in Iran”.

In reaction to IHR’s report, Ebrat News, a site close to the Iranian authorities revealed more details about the execution in Qazvin. According to the site, the young man who carried out the execution was identified as Ali, 23, the son of Kimia, one of the women allegedly murdered by Mehdi. Ebrat News wrote: “The man was not a minor as claimed by some sites…so-called human rights defenders have forgotten that, according to the qesas (retribution/eye-for-an-eye) law in a murder case [in Iran], the execution must be carried out by the family or the oldest child of the offended”.


Source: Iran Human Rights
“The age of the young man used to carry out the execution does not change the fundamental issues surrounding the case. In addition to the main issue of execution, it is very serious that Iranian authorities use ordinary citizens to carry out inhumane punishments. By doing so, Iranian authorities place tremendous responsibility on the shoulders of its citizens. In this case, a young man who is grieving the loss of his mother has to also now have the responsibility of death on his shoulders. This is shameful and disgusting,” said the spokesperson of IHR Mahmood Amiry-Moghaddam.


“The young man’s mother was a victim of the growing violence and brutality in the Iranian society. Iranian authorities promote brutality by practicing brutal punishments in public,” he added. Qesas ‘retribution’, or an eye-for-an-eye, is considered fair punishment by Iranian authorities


Mahmood Amiry-Moghaddam said about the retribution ‘eye-for-an-eye’ law, “Retribution is one of the few ‘rights’ given by Iranian authorities to its citizens. The Iranian government deprives its citizens of basic human rights like, freedom of speech, thought and choice, and even personal rights like how to dress, but the ‘rights’ of citizens to carry out executions or blind with acid are insisted on and encouraged.”

Source: Iran Human Rights, May 29, 2011 - [فارسى]
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Arizona executes Donald Beaty

Donald Beaty
Convicted killer Donald Beaty was put to death by lethal injection Wednesday night after hours of legal delays in which his defense team fought to challenge a change in the drugs used to kill him.

Beaty, 56, was put to death at about 8 p.m. at Arizona State Prison Complex-Florence for the 1984 murder of 13-year-old Christy Ann Fornoff. Fornoff disappeared on the evening of May 9, 1984, while collecting money on her newspaper-delivery route at a Tempe apartment complex.

A string of last-minute state and federal appeals filed by Beaty's attorneys Wednesday focused on whether Arizona Department of Corrections officials could legally substitute the drug pentobarbital for sodium thiopental as part of the lethal 3-drug cocktail injected into Arizona's condemned prisoners, including Beaty.

8 hours of legal debate took place in 3 cities - Phoenix, Washington D.C. and San Francisco - before appeals were exhausted and final preparations were made for Beaty's execution.

In arguing for a stay, Beaty's attorneys said more time was needed to determine if the last-minute drug substitution - it was announced late Tuesday - would infringe on Beaty's constitutional rights or constitute cruel and unusual punishment.

They also suggested that corrections officials should have taken more time to train executioners in the use of pentobarbital, since it was not a part of the state's existing execution-drug protocol. One filing called the last-minute change "unconscionable."

The substitution was made at the request of federal authorities, who told state corrections officials Tuesday that the thiopental they proposed to use did not have the proper importation paperwork. It was then the corrections department disclosed that it had pentobarbital on hand as a substitute.

The defense first took its pleas for more time to the Arizona Supreme Court during oral arguments Wednesday morning. The state's high court rejected the arguments several hours later after meeting behind closed doors.

Rejections continued throughout the afternoon: first in U.S. District Court, then twice at the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Meanwhile, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected 2 other legal arguments put forth to block the execution.

In the end, the courts recognized the state's right to substitute pentobarbital for thiopental. One judge noted during oral arguments that pentobarbital already had been reviewed by other courts and approved for executions.

Arizona Attorney General Tom Horne, meanwhile, called the daylong delay a "slap in the face" to the Fornoff family.

By 6 p.m., however, prison officials were cleared to proceed with the execution after the U.S. Supreme Court declined to consider further appeals.

On that May evening in 1984, Fornoff's mother let her out of her sight just long enough to chat with a neighbor, and within hours, police were combing the complex with canine units as Fornoff's parents and neighbors knocked on doors.

2 days later, Beaty, the complex's maintenance man, was seen standing over Fornoff's body, which had been wrapped in a sheet and laid next to a garbage bin. Beaty told the man who saw him that he had just found the body and had already called police.

But evidence linked Beaty to the crime. While his 1st trial ended in a hung jury, his 2nd included a psychiatrist's testimony that he had heard Beaty confess. The doctor said on the stand that Beaty had not intended to kill the girl, but had put his hand over her mouth to muffle her screams and she suffocated on her own vomit.

Beaty was found guilty and sentenced to death.

Beaty becomes the 2nd condemned inmate to be put to death this year in Arizona, and the 26th overall since the state resumed capital punishment in 1992.

Beaty becomes the 19th condemned inmate to be put to death this year in the USA and the 1253rd overall since the nation resumed executions on January 17, 1977. There are 7 scheduled executions in the USA in June, including 4 in Texas, and 1 each in Ohio, Alabama and Virginia.

Sources: Arizona Republic, Rick Halperin, May 25, 2011

_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Nebraska Supreme Court stays Moore's June 14 execution

OMAHA, Neb. (AP) — The Nebraska Supreme Court issued an order Wednesday staying what was to be the state's first execution using lethal injection, giving attorneys for Carey Dean Moore a chance to challenge one of the execution drugs on appeal.

Moore, 53, was scheduled in April to be executed June 14 for the 1979 slayings of two Omaha cabbies.

But the high court said in its two-page order that Moore can't be executed until his appeal in Douglas County District Court is resolved.

"The matter needs to be litigated in the post-conviction motion," Moore's attorney, Jerry Soucie, said. "Once that's done, the state and the defense will move on from there."

A message left Wednesday with the Nebraska Attorney General's Office wasn't immediately returned.

In the pending appeal, Moore challenged the state's purchase of one of the three drugs used in its lethal-injection protocol in district court. Soucie, has questioned the legality of Nebraska's purchase from an Indian company and whether the state bought the right substance. A worldwide shortage of the drug, sodium thiopental, has made it difficult to acquire.

Soucie said during a Tuesday hearing that the state Department of Correctional Services might as well have bought the drug "from some out-of-work meth dealer," the Lincoln Journal Star reported.

The Nebraska Attorney General's Office said such a challenge should be heard in federal court, and the district judge on Tuesday gave Soucie until June 7 to respond to a filing from that office.

The Nebraska Supreme Court last month rejected a similar appeal by Soucie and ordered Moore to be executed.

Moore was convicted of first-degree murder for killing Maynard D. Helgeland and Reuel Eugene Van Ness during botched robberies.

Six days before Moore was scheduled to be executed in 2007, the state's high court issued a stay because it wanted to consider whether the electric chair should still be used. The court ruled in 2008 that the electric chair amounted to cruel and unusual punishment.

Nebraska lawmakers voted in 2009 to replace the electric chair with lethal injection as its preferred method of execution.

Source: timesunion.com, May 25, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

Denmark bans Marmite but not Danish execution drugs

In response to reports that the Danish Government has banned Marmite, legal action charity Reprieve is calling for them to take real action against a Danish pharmaceutical company which is providing lethal injection drugs to the US.

Pentobarbital (also known as Nembutal) supplied by Copenhagen-headquartered firm Lundbeck has so far been used in 11 executions. This number will grow as more states turn to the Danish company’s drugs in order to carry out executions.

Reprieve has asked both the Danish Government and Lundbeck to act to prevent the use of their drugs in lethal injections, but so far neither has taken effective action to put a stop to this.

Reprieve Investigator Maya Foa said:

“It seems incredible that the Danish Government is capable of banning a harmless spread, but not of taking real action to stop a Danish firm’s drugs being used to deliberately kill people.
“Denmark must put real pressure on Lundbeck, or risk a Danish firm becoming the US executioner in chief.”


1. For further information please contact Donald Campbell in Reprieve's press office on +44 (0)20 7427 1082 / 07791 755 415

2. Reprieve has suggested a range of possible courses of action to Lundbeck to put a stop to the use of its drugs in executions – a briefing on the issue can be found here: http://www.reprieve.org.uk/static/downloads/2011_05_12_PUB_NEMBUTAL_DISTRIBUTION_BRIEFING.pdf

3. So far, Lundbeck’s drugs have been used in 11 executions across 6 US states, as follows:

Alabama: Jason Williams
Mississippi: Benny Stevens, Rodney Gray
Oklahoma: John David Duty, Billy Don Alverson, Jeffrey Matthews
Ohio: Johnnie Baston, Clarence Carter, Daniel Bedford
South Carolina: Jeffrey Motts
Texas: Cary Kerr

These numbers are set to grow as more and more states are turning to Lundbeck’s drugs following shortages of the previously-used anaesthetic sodium thiopental.

4. Danish pension fund Unipension recently sold their shares in Lundbeck, citing concerns over their use in executions and the company’s unwillingness to engage with investors on the issue. Unipension told the Associated Press: "It has not been possible for Unipension to get a detailed report regarding Lundbeck's efforts to ensure that its products are not used in an unwanted manner […] It has been our impression that Lundbeck did not want to engage in a genuine dialogue with us as an investor."


Reprieve, a legal action charity, uses the law to enforce the human rights of prisoners, from death row to Guantánamo Bay. Reprieve investigates, litigates and educates, working on the frontline, to provide legal support to prisoners unable to pay for it themselves. Reprieve promotes the rule of law around the world, securing each person’s right to a fair trial and saving lives. Clive Stafford Smith is the founder of Reprieve and has spent 27 years working on behalf of people facing the death penalty in the USA.

Reprieve
PO Box 52742
London EC4P 4WS
Tel: 020 7353 4640
Fax: 020 7353 4641
Website: www.reprieve.org.uk

Source: Reprieve, May 25, 2011


Happy 3rd anniversary as Lundbeck CEO, Mr. Wiinberg!
STOP selling pentobarbital for US executions!

On June 1, 2008, Ulf Wiinberg took up his current position as president and CEO of Lundbeck. For the past 3 years, Mr. Wiinberg has been dedicated to saving lives. Sadly, he failed but we, together, can help him succeed.

Already 11 human beings have been executed with Lundbeck’s Pentobarbital.

Mr. Wiinberg needs our strong encouragements to take all urgent and necessary steps to stop Lundbeck’s contribution to the death trade.

Won’t you send him a message on his 3rd anniversary as Lundbeck CEO? Be civil and courteous, insults and angry messages would be counterproductive and damaging. There are many ways to communicate the urgency of the situation while remaining polite and positive. With the right words, you can convince Mr. Wiinberg to do the right thing.

Click here to send Mr. Wiinberg a message.
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Arizona inmate Donald Beaty granted temporary stay of execution

Donald Beaty
PHOENIX — The Arizona Supreme Court has halted the planned execution of inmate Donald Beaty, who was scheduled to be given a lethal injection Wednesday morning for the rape and murder of a 13-year-old Tempe girl in 1984.

The temporary stay of execution was issued late Tuesday night after Arizona officials said they had planned to replace one of three drugs to be used in the execution because federal officials contended the state failed to fill out a form to import the drug being swapped out.

That prompted Beaty’s lawyers to file motions seeking the stay of execution from the state’s highest court and the U.S. District Court in Phoenix, arguing he hadn’t had adequate opportunity to review the late change in drug protocol.

Defense attorney Dale Baich said “a rush to execute Beaty under these circumstances would be unconscionable.”

The court set a hearing on the matter for Wednesday morning.

The attorney general’s office notified the state Supreme Court on Tuesday that the Corrections Department would replace sodium thiopental with another sedative — pentobarbital.

The state’s filing said the Corrections Department was making the swap because a U.S. Justice Department official told the state the Drug Enforcement Administration believes the Corrections Department “failed to fill out one of the forms necessary for importation of sodium thiopental from a foreign source.”

Defense lawyers for Arizona death row inmates for months have questioned whether the state legally imported its supply of sodium thiopental. State officials previously acknowledged a miscoding on an importation form but insisted they acted legally in obtaining a supply of sodium thiopental from a British supplier last year.

“The question of whether the Department of Corrections legally imported the drug has now been answered,” Baich said before the temporary stay was granted.

Several other states have already switched to pentobarbital because sodium thiopental is in short supply nationally, and state Corrections Director Charles Ryan has said previously that Arizona planned to switch to that drug also.

DEA officials seized several states’ supplies of sodium thiopental because of importation issues.

The Arizona filing said DEA “has not taken any action against the Arizona Department of Corrections to date” and that the Justice Department official who contacted the department Tuesday “offered no explanation for the timing of the call.”

Department of Justice spokeswoman Laura Sweeney declined comment.

Natasha Minsker, death penalty policy director for the American Civil Liberties Union of California, said Arizona’s “11th-hour switch to another execution drug” was unconscionable.

“Rather than rushing to change the rules to carry out an execution, we all should be asking why state and federal officials failed for months to follow or enforce the law,” Minsker said in a statement.

Source: AP, May 25, 2011


DOJ Tells Arizona it Illegally Obtained Death Penalty Drug

Hours before the scheduled execution of an Arizona death row inmate, the Department of Justice informed the state that it should not use a controversial drug as part of the execution protocol because the state had illegally obtained the drug from a foreign source.

The last-minute move stunned lawyers for convicted murderer Donald Beaty who had argued for months that Arizona hadn't been in compliance with federal law regarding the importation of sodium thiopental, one of the three drugs commonly used for lethal injection executions . The drug is no longer manufactured in the U.S.

The chief judge of the Arizona Supreme Court issued an unusual late night order delaying the execution.

Arizona had consistently argued that it had properly obtained the drug.

In a filing with the Arizona's Supreme Court the state's Attorney General said that it in order to "avoid questions about the legality " of the drug it had decided to comply with the request from United States Associate Deputy Attorney General Deborah A. Johnston.

In the filing it said it planned to substitute another fast-acting barbiturate—pentobarbital—for the sodium thiopental.


Source: ABC News, May 25, 2011


May 25, 2011 - 04:14 p.m. Update

Courts refuse to block Arizona execution

PHOENIX (AP) — State and federal courts on Wednesday denied requests by inmate Donald Beaty to block his scheduled execution because of a last-minute replacement of one of three execution drugs.

The Arizona Supreme Court lifted a temporary stay that it issued late Tuesday after Beaty's lawyers objected to the state's announcement of the drug swap.

The justices later ruled 4-1 to lift the stay, with the majority saying Beaty's lawyers hadn't proved he was likely to be harmed by the change.

Meanwhile, a federal judge in Phoenix refused to block the execution. And the U.S. Supreme Court declined to consider two petitions filed on behalf of Beaty.

Beaty was sentenced to death for the 1984 murder of 13-year-old Christy Ann Fornoff, of Tempe.

His lawyers objected to the planned drug switch that the state announced 18 hours before the now-passed scheduled execution time of 10 a.m. Wednesday.

The Arizona court issued the temporary stay Tuesday night after Arizona officials said they had planned to replace sodium thiopental with another sedative, pentobarbital, because federal officials contended the state failed to fill out a form to import a supply of the drug being swapped out.

Beaty defense attorney Jennifer Garcia said Beaty didn't object to using pentobarbital but that the last-minute switch denied his lawyers an opportunity to determine whether the new drug would be properly administered and avoid subjecting him to severe pain inflicted by another execution drug if the sedative isn't effective.

"It's not just a simple switch. There's certainly much more to it than that," she said.

Assistant Attorney General Kent Cattani said the only issue is whether the prison medical team, which includes a medical doctor, can mix and administer the drug. Beaty's defense hasn't offered any proof that there's a problem and the stay should be lifted, Cattani said.

The attorney general's office notified the state Supreme Court on Tuesday that the Corrections Department would replace sodium thiopental with pentobarbital.

The state's filing said the Corrections Department was making the swap because a U.S. Justice Department official told the state the Drug Enforcement Administration believes the Corrections Department "failed to fill out one of the forms necessary for importation of sodium thiopental from a foreign source."

Defense lawyers for Arizona death row inmates for months have questioned whether the state legally imported its supply of sodium thiopental. State officials previously acknowledged a miscoding on an importation form but insisted they acted legally in obtaining a supply of sodium thiopental from a British supplier last year.

"The question of whether the Department of Corrections legally imported the drug has now been answered," defense attorney Dale Baich said before the temporary stay was granted.

Several other states have already switched to pentobarbital because sodium thiopental is in short supply nationally, and state Corrections Director Charles Ryan has said previously that Arizona planned to switch to that drug also.

DEA officials seized several states' supplies of sodium thiopental because of importation issues.

The Arizona filing said DEA "has not taken any action against the Arizona Department of Corrections to date" and that the Justice Department official who contacted the department Tuesday "offered no explanation for the timing of the call."

Department of Justice spokeswoman Laura Sweeney declined comment.

Natasha Minsker, death penalty policy director for the American Civil Liberties Union of California, said Arizona's "11th-hour switch to another execution drug" was unconscionable.

"Rather than rushing to change the rules to carry out an execution, we all should be asking why state and federal officials failed for months to follow or enforce the law," Minsker said in a statement.

Source: AP, May 25, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Exonerated DR inmate Anthony Graves likely to get money, but he still wants justice

Anthony Graves
GALVESTON — A bill that would compensate Anthony Graves for the 18 years he spent behind bars for murders he didn't commit is awaiting Gov. Rick Perry's signature, but Graves' attorneys say his fight for justice isn't over.

The House and Senate last week passed a bill with an amendment authored by Sen. Rodney Ellis, D-Houston, that allows Graves to collect the $80,000 per year allowed by law for each year of wrongful imprisonment. That would add up to $1.4 million for Graves.

Texas Comptroller Susan Combs in February denied him the compensation because the document ordering his release did not contain the words "actual innocence."

Graves said Tuesday that he won't count on getting compensation until Perry signs the legislation.

"I'm glad that they put together a piece of legislation that will allow them to compensate me for the wrongdoing," Graves said. "But as of right now nothing has been done. I'm optimistic it will be done. We'll just have to wait and see."

In the meantime, a lawsuit seeking to have the state attorney general declare Graves innocent will proceed, Graves' attorney Jeff Blackburn said. "Until he gets that, we are going to keep on pressing and sue whomever we need to sue," Blackburn said.


Source: Houston Chronicle, May 25, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Mississippi: Appeals court blocks Simon execution

A federal appeal court has stopped the scheduled execution of Mississippi death row inmate Robert Simon Jr. (left)

The 3-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans gave no immediate reason for its decision, which came hours before Simon was to be put to death by lethal injection. The execution had been set for 6 p.m.

Simon was convicted and sentenced to death in the 1990 slayings of Carl Parker; Parker’s wife, Bobbie Jo; and their 12-year-old son, Gregory. The killings occurred a few hours after the family had returned to their rural Quitman County home from church services.

Simon also was sentenced to life in prison for the killing of 9-year-old Charlotte Parker, daughter of the slain couple.

Source: AP, May 24, 2011


Court stays Mississippi execution

Mississippi State Penitentiary
(Reuters) - The scheduled execution in Mississippi on Tuesday of a man who killed a family of four in 1990 has been stayed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, according to a court document.

The Mississippi Department of Corrections said it was waiting for the court's opinion, and was ready to carry out the orders of the court.

Further details were not immediately available.

The lethal injection scheduled for 6 p.m. local time would have been the third execution in the state this month.

Robert Simon Jr., 47, and an accomplice robbed and murdered a couple and their two children in Marks, Mississippi, the night of February 2, 1990, according to corrections officials.

They shot all four family members and cut off the husband's left ring finger to steal his wedding ring, officials said.

A passing motorist saw the family's house burning, and their bodies were found inside.

Simon confessed to the killings after his arrest, officials said. Found guilty of all four murders, he received one life sentence and three death sentences.

His accomplice, Anthony Carr, also was convicted of four counts of capital murder and is currently on death row.

Simon's execution was to be carried out at the Mississippi State Penitentiary in Parchman.

Eighteen people have been executed in the United States so far this year, according to the Death Penalty Information Center.

Source: Reuters, May 24, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.

Hosni Mubarak charged with murder

Former president's sons Alaa and Gamal are also referred to criminal court days before more planned protests in Egypt

Egypt referred Hosni Mubarak to court on Tuesday over the killing of protesters and other charges, defying speculation that Egypt's new military rulers would spare the former president public humiliation.

Mubarak was ousted from power on 11 February after mass demonstrations demanded an end to his 30-year rule. He was then detained by prosecutors investigating corruption during his rule and a crackdown on the protesters.

His two sons, Alaa and Gamal, – the latter of whom many had believed was being groomed by his father to replace him, – were also referred to the criminal court on a range of charges, the public prosecutor said in a statement.

The decision was announced before another demonstration planned for Friday in Cairo's Tahrir Square, the heart of the uprising. Activists have called for a big turnout to demand faster reforms and a public trial for Mubarak and others.

"Every time the youth threaten to go to Tahrir Square again with a huge number of protesters, I think they make some concessions," said Hassan Nafaa, a political scientist and longtime critic of Mubarak.

The crimes listed by the prosecutor included "intentional murder, attempted killing of some demonstrators ... misuse of influence and deliberately wasting public funds and unlawfully making private financial gains and profits".

The prosecutor charged the former intelligence chief Hussein Kamal al-Din Ibrahim Salem, who has fled, with the same crimes.

Source: The Guardian, May 24, 2011
_________________________
Use the tags below or the search engine at the top of this page to find updates, older or related articles on this Website.