Skip to main content

Virginia Jurors Never Heard Critical Evidence of Childhood Abuse

Jerry Terrell Jackson
Lawyers for Jerry Terrell Jackson, who is currently facing execution in Virginia on August 18, recently petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to spare Jackson's life, arguing that the jury in his 2003 trial did not receive sufficient evidence of the abuse he suffered as a child because his trial lawyers were inadequate.

Jackson's current lawyers told the Court that this evidence could have convinced some jurors not to impose a death sentence: "This Court has repeatedly held that, before a defendant is sentenced to death, a jury must be given the opportunity to consider and confront available mitigation evidence, including evidence of serious childhood abuse, relevant to assessing a defendant’s moral culpability." 

Clinical Psychologist Dr. Matthew Mendel, who appears in a clemency video prepared by Jackson's lawyers, said of Jackson's trauma, "People abused by parents or parental figures are those with the poorest prognosis. Jerry Terrell Jackson was not someone who was engaged in extreme misbehaviors to which the family responded. Child protective services referred to what the parents did to him as 'planned, calculated beatings.'"  

A federal District Court judge previously ruled that Jackson was entitled to a new sentencing hearing, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit recently reversed the ruling, holding that federal review was restricted to what had been presented in Virginia courts. 

Jackson also has a clemency petition pending with Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell, who could commute Jackson's sentence based on the evidence of family abuse that the jury never heard. (Click here to view the video. Caution: portions of the video discuss particularly disturbing examples of abuse.)

Source: Death Penalty Information Center, August 10, 2011


Last chance to stay killer’s execution

Attorneys for death row inmate Jerry Terrell Jackson are scrambling to spare their client’s life as his scheduled execution next week nears.

A stay of execution and an appeal of an appellate court’s decision were filed Friday with the U.S. Supreme Court. A petition of clemency has also been submitted to Gov. Bob McDonnell, asking him to consider commuting Jackson’s death sentence to life. Jackson, 29, is scheduled to be executed on Aug. 18.

All of the legal maneuvers focus on the years of what Jackson’s attorneys call “sadistic abuse” their client endured as a child. They argue that had a jury been aware of the extent of the abuse Jackson suffered they may have issued a life sentence rather than death.

In 2002 a Williamsburg-James City jury convicted Jackson of capital murder, rape, breaking and entering, robbery and petit larceny for the 2001 killing of 88-year-old Ruth Phillips.

Jackson is said to have entered Phillips’ apartment in the Rolling Meadows complex off Longhill Road through an open window. He then raped Phillips before smothering her with a pillow.

He took money from her wallet and fled in her 1987 Dodge sedan. Jackson was connected to the crime by DNA evidence and fingerprints from Phillips’s wallet.

Jackson’s death sentence has been upheld against multiple appeals over the last seven years. Many of the appeals center on childhood abuse, including beatings and sexual assault Jackson says he suffered, and that his trial lawyers failed to present evidence of the extreme abuse. The jury did, however, hear some testimony regarding the abuse.

A federal judge in U.S. District Court ordered a new sentencing hearing for Jackson last year, but the 4th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals blocked that hearing in April.

In the stay of execution and the appeal, Jackson’s attorney argued that while some information regarding the abuse was read to jurors from medical and social service reports, the reports were never put into evidence. Jackson’s mother and step-father testified that abuse occurred, but the attorneys argued that the severity of the abuse was “minimized.”

The District Court ruled that “the reality was a boy living in terror, constantly physically and emotionally abused from a very young age.” The court also found that Jackson’s trial attorneys did not request jury instructions to consider age and background as mitigating factors when considering the death penalty.

The Court of Appeals ruled that because evidence of the abuse was presented at Jackson’s trial, additional testimony from his brother and sister about the abuse wouldn’t have had an impact on the jury’s decision.

The stay of execution is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to postpone Jackson’s execution so the court can review the Court of Appeal’s ruling.

“Because the jury never considered powerful mitigation evidence relevant to Jackson’s moral culpability and because Jackson is facing imminent execution, the court should intervene and grant a review,” the appeal states.

The clemency petition asserts that the omission of testimony from Jackson’s siblings could have changed the jury’s mind and therefore the governor should commute his death sentence to life in prison.

It is unclear when a decision on any of the filings may come. Joshua C. Toll, one of Jackson’s attorneys, said in an e-mail Tuesday the Supreme Court is unlikely to make a decision until the Virginia Attorney General’s Office files a response. He said so far no decision has been made by the governor with regards to clemency.

Source: The Virginia Gazette, August 10, 2011

Comments

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Iran: flogging still a common practice

Flogging of Sufis in Gonabad: Fourteen Ne’matollahi dervishes received 25 lashes each for allegedly disturbing the public security Public flogging in Iran "The lash ruling against 14 Ne'matollahi dervishes of Gonabad was carried out. They were residents of Baydokht and had been arrested and condemned by the Public Prosecutor of Gonabad after a protest against the illegal treatment dealing with the Sufis in June of last year [2010]. According to the website of Majzuban-e-Nur, Mr. Sa'id Kashani, Mr. Amir Roshan-Mojaver-Sufi, Mr. Alimohammad Amanian, Mr. Ruhollah Safari, Mr. Ali Abbasi-Baydokhti, Mr. Ebrahim Abbaszadeh, Mr. Mohammadali Ja'fari, Mr. Hossein Mahdavi, Mr. Hossein Abbaszadeh-Baydokhti, Mr. Rahmat Hosseini, Mr. Reza Kakhki, Mr. Behruz Mojaver-Sufi, Mr. Ali Mir, and Mr. Hassan Baluchi-Baydokhti are the fourteen dervishes whose requests were not only rejected, but who were condemned to 25 lashes for disturbing the public security. It should be mentioned th...

Japan’s Internet Wants Uchida Riko Executed. Here’s Why That Won’t Happen

This week, the prosecution in the case of a murder of a 17-year-old girl in Hokkaido came out with its sentencing recommendation. Japanese social media reacted by clamoring for the accused woman’s blood. But, while the facts of the case are heinous, the prosecutor’s decision not to seek the death penalty is grounded in long-standing precedent. Murdered for looking at the accused wrong Uchida Riko (内田梨瑚), 23, and her friends stand accused of murdering 17-year-old Murayama Runa (村山瑠奈) in Hokkaido’s Asahikawa. Prosecutors say the dispute began after Murayama posted a photo of Uchida to social media. They say Uchida’s group abducted the girl, made her undress, and then forced her to jump from a bridge.

I watched Ohio's last execution. Here's what it was like

As Gov. DeWine calls for Ohio to end capital punishment, the state’s last execution remains the one I witnessed in 2018 Inside Ohio's death house, there is a room for executions and separate witness rooms: one for those connected to the victim and another for those connected to the inmate. Windows separate the death chamber from those watching, the condemned from the living. I was there on July 18, 2018 – during Ohio’s most recent execution. Robert Van Hook was put to death that day for killing David Self in 1985. He sat on death row for three decades. I was one of three media witnesses to the execution.

Kansas AG urges governor to deny clemency to 8 sentenced to death

TOPEKA — Attorney General Kris Kobach on Tuesday urged the governor to deny clemency to Kansas inmates who have been sentenced to death. Eight of nine people sentenced to death in Kansas formally filed clemency requests in May, according to a press release from the Attorney General’s Office. Kobach urged Gov. Laura Kelly to reject them.

Gov. Mike DeWine calls for Ohio to abolish the death penalty

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Gov. Mike DeWine Tuesday morning called on Ohio to abolish the death penalty, citing data that he said proves it is no longer a deterrent to violent crime. “For the state to take a human life, there must, in my opinion, there must be evidence that in doing so it will help protect the public, that the threat of that action will deter someone from committing murder,” DeWine said. “I do not believe that argument today can be successfully made.” DeWine cited data showing a decline in the last four decades of executions being carried out and an increase in the time inmates spend on death row.

New Mississippi billboard warns criminals: ‘Firing squad is legal’

DESOTO COUNTY, Miss. (WREG) — A billboard standing on Interstate 55 southbound as you cross the Tennessee state line and enter Mississippi from Memphis is sending a grim message to those coming into the state. DeSoto County District Attorney Matthew Barton recently announced the new billboard campaign, which features the sign reading, “WELCOME TO MISSISSIPPI. WHERE THE FIRING SQUAD IS LEGAL. THINK TWICE.” It references Mississippi’s law permitting execution by firing squad under certain circumstances for inmates sentenced to death. Barton says this campaign is aimed at deterring violent crime and sends a direct message to criminals entering Mississippi.

20 Minutes to Death: Witness to the Last Execution in France

The following document is a firsthand account of the final moments of Hamida Djandoubi, a convicted murderer executed by guillotine at Marseille’s Baumettes Prison on September 10, 1977. The record—dated September 9—was written by Monique Mabelly, a judge appointed by the state to witness the proceedings. Djandoubi’s execution would ultimately be the last carried out in France before capital punishment was abolished in 1981. At the time, President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing—who had publicly voiced his "deep aversion to the death penalty" prior to his election—rejected Djandoubi’s appeal for clemency. Choosing to let "justice take its course," the President allowed the execution to proceed, just as he had in two previous cases during his term:   Christian Ranucci , executed on July 28, 1976 and Jérôme Carrein , executed on June 23, 1977. Hamida Djandoubi , a Tunisian national, was sentenced to death for killing his former lover, Elisabeth Bousquet. He was execu...

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch wanted an execution that a Trump judge deemed illegal

The Supreme Court these days is generally in the business of helping executions go forward. But on Thursday night, the court did something notable: It told Alabama no. Even then, the court wasn't unanimous. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the refusal to let the nitrogen gas execution of Jeffery Lee proceed. What prompted the rare rejection? In line with the typical shadow docket practice, the court didn't explain itself. Nor did the dissenters, who merely noted their disagreement. But a deeper look at the case helps us understand why a majority of the court was unwilling to help the state this time.

With nitrogen gas blocked, Alabama seeks to execute inmate by lethal injection

Jeffery Lee, who successfully challenged his scheduled Thursday execution by nitrogen gas, argued that execution by firing squad would be less painful. The Alabama Attorney General’s Office Friday sought to put an Alabama death row inmate to death by lethal injection a day after the U.S. Supreme Court rebuffed the state’s attempt to execute him by nitrogen gas. In a filing with the Alabama Supreme Court Friday afternoon, the state sought an expedited motion to set a new execution date for Jeffery Lee, 49. The state said that with a permanent injunction in place against nitrogen gas, the method by which the state intended to execute Lee on Thursday, it could execute him by lethal injection or the electric chair.

SCOTUS: Alabama can’t execute Jeffery Lee by nitrogen; Thursday execution called off

After a week of legal volleyball, Alabama death row inmate Jeffery Lee’s execution—scheduled for Thursday evening—was called off after federal courts called the state’s nitrogen gas execution method “likely unconstitutional.” The state took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court, hoping Lee could still be put to death tonight.  In an order issued at 8:10 p.m., the U.S. Supreme Court ordered that it would not lift a ban on Alabama executing Lee via nitrogen . In a short court order, the justices denied Alabama’s motion to go ahead with the execution.  Associate Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch would have granted the appeal and let the execution proceed, according to the order.