Saudi Arabia Executes Abdul Majid Al-Nimr

The Judiciary Fabricates Charges and Issues Arbitrary Sentences, While the Interior Ministry Falsifies Information

On August 17, 2024, the Saudi Press Agency published a statement issued by the Ministry of Interior announcing the execution of Abdul Majid bin Hassan bin Abdullah Al-Nimr.

The statement did not specify the type of sentence carried out, but it mentioned that it was issued by the Specialized Criminal Court, indicating that it was likely a discretionary (ta’zir) sentence. The statement listed the charges that the sentence was supposedly based on, including committing criminal acts involving betrayal of his country, joining a terrorist cell affiliated with the Al-Qaeda organization, financing terrorism and terrorist activities, and supporting extremist ideologies.

The European Saudi Organization for Human Rights had included Abdul Majid Al-Nimr’s name on its list of individuals at risk of execution in Saudi Arabia before the sentence was carried out, alongside approximately 70 others, most of whom are facing charges related to expressing opinions or participation in protests and events that took place in the Qatif Governorate in the Eastern Province. شهدتها محافظة القطيف في المنطقة الشرقية.

The preliminary judgment document, which the organization obtained a copy of and was issued against Al-Nimr in October 2021, reveals clear falsification in the Ministry of Interior’s statement and highlights significant flaws in Saudi Arabia’s justice system, alongside blatant violations of international laws.

Charges:

The Ministry of Interior claimed that the charges Al-Nimr faced were related to joining a cell affiliated with the terrorist organization Al-Qaeda, despite the fact that he belongs to the Shia sect. Additionally, the list of charges in the judgment document indicates that the charges he faced are remarkably similar to those routinely directed by the Public Prosecution against defendants sentenced in connection to the events in Qatif Governorate.

According to the document, Al-Nimr faced the following charges:

• Seeking to destabilize the social fabric and national unity through participating in demonstrations, attending funerals of those killed, and repeatedly doing so in Qatif Governorate, supporting sabotage activities, chanting slogans against the state and insulting the ruler, and inciting others to do so.

• Glorifying Nimr Al-Nimr and protesting against the arrest and trial decisions of wanted and detained individuals, and stirring sectarian strife by resigning from military service after the arrest of the deceased Nimr Al-Nimr, and inciting Shia employees at the Dammam Traffic Department to join protests.

• Financing terrorism and terrorist activities, criminalized under the Anti-Terrorism Law, by renting out his brother's farm, knowing that it was being used as an illegal car dismantling site and a hideout for several wanted individuals, providing food supplies to several wanted individuals, and preparing and sending content that could harm public order by joining a WhatsApp group with wanted and detained individuals to exchange information, monitor, and track the movements of security personnel.

The charges mentioned in the ruling do not include the accusation of belonging to Al-Qaeda, as claimed by the Ministry of Interior’s statement, which clearly constitutes a falsification of the truth.

The organization considers this discrepancy as further evidence of the lack of trust in official statements, which the organization had previously identified as containing hidden or inaccurate information.

Justice System:

The European Saudi Organization notes that the Public Prosecution did not initially request the death penalty in the indictment it filed against Abdul Majid Al-Nimr.

According to the ruling document, the Public Prosecution requested the maximum penalty under Article 6 of the Anti-Cybercrime Law and the maximum penalty under Article 16 of the Anti-Money Laundering Law, in addition to a severe discretionary (ta'zir) punishment and a travel ban.

The Specialized Criminal Court issued a ruling against him on 19/3/1443 (Islamic calendar) sentencing him to 9 years in prison and a travel ban. However, the Court of Appeal later changed the sentence to the death penalty, even though the Public Prosecution did not initially request it.

"The organization believes that the escalation of the sentence from imprisonment to execution at the appeal stage shows a complete disregard for the right to life and forces convicts to abandon their right to appeal due to the absence of justice.

The organization also notes that Al-Nimr confirmed during the trial that he was subjected to torture, which led to his transfer to the hospital, and he requested medical reports to prove it. Despite submitting the reports to the court and proving his health condition due to torture, those responsible were not held accountable, and the court relied on confessions extracted under torture.

The European Saudi Organization for Human Rights considers the execution of Abdul Majid Al-Nimr as further evidence of the complete lack of trust in all stages of the justice system in Saudi Arabia, culminating in the execution and the Ministry of Interior’s announcement.

The organization believes that fabricating charges, issuing a death sentence despite him not facing the most severe charges under international law, and the fact that most of the charges relate to freedom of expression and participation in gatherings, along with changing the sentence at the appeal stage and withholding the body after execution, are clear indications of the retaliatory nature of this punishment."

The organization points out that the execution of Abdul Majid Al-Nimr, alongside the high numbers of executions since the beginning of 2024, with the number of those executed reaching 147 by August 19, is a clear message confirming Saudi Arabia's complete disregard for its commitments and promises, and its continued engagement in executions that violate international laws.

Source: ESOHR, Staff, August 19, 2024

_____________________________________________________________________

Twitter/X | Facebook | Telegram | Contact Us

"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."

— Oscar Wilde

Florida executes Michael Tanzi

Florida on Tuesday executed a death row inmate described by one local detective as a "fledgling serial killer" for the murder of a beloved Miami Herald employee. Florida executed Michael Tanzi on Tuesday, 25 years after the murder of beloved Miami Herald employee Janet Acosta, who was attacked in broad daylight on her lunch break in 2000. Michael Tanzi, 48, was executed by lethal injection at the Florida State Prison in Raiford and pronounced dead at 6:12 p.m. ET.

Afghanistan | Four men publicly executed by Taliban with relatives of victims shooting them 'six or seven times' at sport stadium

Four men have been publicly executed by the Taliban, with relatives of their victims shooting them several times in front of spectators at a sport stadium. Two men were shot around six to seven times by a male relative of the victims in front of spectators in Qala-i-Naw, the centre of Afghanistan's Badghis province, witnesses told an AFP journalist in the city. The men had been 'sentenced to retaliatory punishment' for shooting other men, after their cases were 'examined very precisely and repeatedly', the statement said. 'The families of the victims were offered amnesty and peace but they refused.'

South Carolina executes Mikal Mahdi

Mikal Mahdi, 42, was executed for the 2004 murder of 56-year-old James Myers A man facing the death penalty for committing two murders was executed by firing squad on Friday, the second such execution in the US state of South Carolina this year. Mikal Mahdi, 42, was executed for the 2004 murder of 56-year-old James Myers, an off-duty police officer, and the murder of a convenience store employee three days earlier. According to a statement from the prison, "the execution was performed by a three-person firing squad at 6:01 pm (2201 GMT)," with Mahdi pronounced dead four minutes later.

USA | Why the firing squad may be making a comeback

South Carolina plans to execute Mikal Mahdi on Friday for the murder of a police officer, draping a hood over his head and firing three bullets into his heart. The choice to die by firing squad – rather than lethal injection or the electric chair – was Mahdi’s own, his attorney said last month: “Faced with barbaric and inhumane choices, Mikal Mahdi has chosen the lesser of three evils.” If it proceeds, Mahdi’s execution would be the latest in a recent string of events that have put the spotlight on the firing squad as a handful of US death penalty states explore alternatives to lethal injection, by far the nation’s dominant execution method.

I spent 16 years in solitary in South Carolina. This is what it did to me. | Opinion

South Carolinian Randy Poindexter writes about the effects 16 years of solitary confinement had on him ahead of South Carolina’s planned execution of Mikal Mahdi , who spent months in solitary as a young man. For 16 years, I lived in a concrete cell. Twenty-three hours a day, every day, for more than 3,000 days, South Carolina kept me in solitary confinement. I was a young man before I was sent to solitary — angry, untreated and unwell. I made mistakes. But I wasn’t sentenced to madness. That’s what solitary did to me. My mental health worsened with each passing day. At first, paranoia and depression set in. Then, hallucinations and self-mutilation. I talked to people who weren’t there. I cut myself to feel something besides despair. I could do nothing as four of my friends and fellow prisoners took their own lives rather than endure another day of torturous isolation.

South Carolina | Man who ambushed off-duty cop to face firing squad in second execution of its kind

Mikal Mahdi, 48, who was found guilty of killing an off-duty police officer and a convenience store worker, is the second inmate scheduled to executed by South Carolina's new firing squad A murderer who ambushed and shot an off duty police officer eight times before burning his body in a killing spree is set to become the second person to die by firing squad. South Carolina's highest court has rejected the last major appeal from Mikal Mahdi, 41, who is to be put to death with three bullets to the heart at 6pm on April 11 at the Broad River Correctional Institution in Columbia. Mahdi's lawyers said his original lawyers put on a shallow case trying to spare his life that didn't call on relatives, teachers or people who knew him and ignored the impact of weeks spent in solitary confinement in prison as a teen.

Louisiana | Lawyers of Jessie Hoffman speak about their final moments before execution

As Louisiana prepared its first execution in 15 years, a team of lawyers from Loyola Law were working to save Jessie Hoffman’s life. “I was a young lawyer three years out of law school, and Jessie was almost finished with his appeals at that time, and my boss told me we needed to file something for Jessie because he’s in danger of being executed,” Kappel said. Kappel and her boss came up with a civil lawsuit to file that said since they wouldn’t give him a protocol for his execution, he was being deprived of due process, and the lawsuit was in the legal process for the next 10 years.

Lethal Injection, Electric Chair, or Firing Squad? An Inhumane Decision for Death Row Prisoners

South Carolina resumed executions with the firing squad killing of Brad Sigmon last month. Mikal Madhi’s execution date is days away. The curtain shrieked as it was yanked open to reveal a 67-year-old man tied to a chair. His arms were pulled uncomfortably behind his back. The red bull’s-eye target on his chest rose and fell as he desperately attempted to still his breathing. The man, Brad Sigmon, smiled at his attorney, Bo King, seated in the front row before guards placed a black bag over his head. King said Sigmon appeared to be trying his best to put on a brave face for those who had come to bear witness.

Arizona | The cruelty of isolation: There’s nothing ‘humane’ about how we treat the condemned

On March 19, I served as a witness to the execution of a man named Aaron Gunches, Arizona’s first since 2022. During his time on death row, he begged for death and was ultimately granted what is likely more appropriately described as an emotionless state-assisted suicide. This experience has profoundly impacted me, leading to deep reflection on the nature of death, humanity, and the role we play in our final moments. When someone is in the end stages of life, we talk about hospice care, comfort, care, easing suffering and humane death. We strive for a “good death” — a peaceful transition. I’ve seen good ones, and I’ve seen bad, unplanned ones.

Execution date set for prisoner transferred to Oklahoma to face death penalty

An inmate who was transferred to Oklahoma last month to face the death penalty now has an execution date. George John Hanson, also known as John Fitzgerald Hanson, is scheduled to die on June 12 for the 1999 murder of 77-year-old Mary Bowles. The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals on Tuesday set the execution date. The state’s Pardon and Parole Board has a tentative date of May 7 for Hanson’s clemency hearing, executive director Tom Bates said.

Death Penalty News

Search This Blog