Skip to main content

Statement on the situation of human rights in Belarus: UN High Commissioner for Human Rights

STATEMENT DELIVERED BY: United Nations Deputy High Commissioner for Human Rights, Nada Al-Nashif

AT: Interactive Dialogue on the situation of human rights in Belarus, 54th session of the Human Rights Council

LOCATION: Geneva, Palais des Nations, Room XX

Mr. President

Excellencies

Dear Colleagues,

I welcome the opportunity to address the Council and provide an update on the human rights situation in Belarus, in accordance with Resolution 52/29.

Three years from the contested Presidential elections of August 2020, the human rights situation in Belarus remains grave, showing no signs of improvement. On the contrary, we are witnessing the further shrinking of civic space and continuing lack of respect for fundamental freedoms, evidenced by a campaign of violence and repression against individuals who oppose the Government, or who are perceived to be doing so, expressing critical or independent views. Systematic impunity continues to allow those who are responsible for gross human rights violations to evade accountability for their actions.

The documentation of OHCHR reveals an ongoing and distressing pattern of arbitrary arrests and prosecutions on trumped-up charges, the targeting of various segments of society, including government critics, human rights defenders, journalists, academics, trade unionists, religious figures, members of minorities, lawyers, and others who seek to exercise their fundamental rights.

As of this month, September 2023, the Belarus authorities' crackdown on those critical or perceived to be critical of the Government has resulted in over 3,750 individuals being convicted in criminal trials characterized by severe and disproportionate prison sentences, with little regard for due process or indeed, the right to a fair trial. Notably, pursuant to amendments to the criminal code made in 2022, trials in absentia are now possible and have been conducted against prominent political opponents and individuals currently residing outside Belarus. Inside Belarus, 1,500 individuals are currently detained on charges that our Office believes to be politically motivated.

I am deeply concerned about the conditions of detention, in particular for those charged or convicted on politically motivated charges. Detainees, both men and women, are subjected to torture and ill-treatment, including beatings, overcrowding, sleep deprivation, denial of access to medical care, repeated solitary confinement and unsafe or exploitative compulsory labour. In addition, some detainees were subjected to severe psychological violence, including death threats, rape threats, sexually abusive comments, insults, and other forms of abuse.

High-profile opposition figures and human rights defenders serving sentences face broad restrictions in contacting their family or lawyers, with some of them held fully incommunicado for months, their families lacking official information about their whereabouts or conditions. Of particular concern is the increasing difficulty for detainees to access legal assistance. Over 100 lawyers have been disbarred since 2020, with some being detained, even prosecuted for fulfilling their professional duties. Over 200 lawyers have chosen to leave the profession, while many others have fled the country due to fear of arrest.

We are deeply troubled by the reported deaths in detention, including cases of suicide. I remind the Government of its special responsibility for the safety and health of all persons in its custody, and call for thorough investigation of each and every such death – whatever the cause - to clearly establish the facts and circumstances, to ensure the appropriate accountability and to enable measures to be put in place to avoid recurrence.

Since our last update, the authorities have further tightened their already far-reaching control over civic space. Again, as of this month, the Government's so-called "extremists" list includes almost 3,300 individuals. The authorities are increasingly employing the label “extremism” to stifle dissent, loosely classifying activities described as disseminating false information, insulting officials, discrediting institutions, organizing mass riots, calling for sanctions and inciting social hatred as also constituting “extremist” acts subject to criminal penalty. The particular situation, once again, of journalists is alarming, with more than 670 arrests recorded by the Belarusian Association of Journalists since 2020.

The crackdown on civil society organizations continues, with as many as 900 NGOs being dissolved and 492 organizations forced to shut down to avoid criminal prosecution. Similarly, new restrictions on political party registration raise concerns as they effectively exclude opposition parties, including from participation in the upcoming parliamentary elections scheduled for February 2024.

I am deeply concerned by recent legislative proposals that, if adopted, would pose significant threats to communities and individuals, exposing them to discrimination and harassment. One such troubling draft aims to unduly regulate religious groups, imposing restrictions on their activities and religious education based, once again, on vague terms such as "extremism", "terrorism," or incompatibility with "the ideology of the Belarusian state." Another discriminatory proposal seeks to arbitrarily restrict freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and association of members of the LGBT community, under the guise of prohibiting so-called “propaganda”. This proposal also aims to penalize a so-called “child free lifestyle”, in violation of personal freedom and reproductive choice of individuals.

The recent expansion of the application of the death penalty to include the ill-defined crime of "terrorism" and "high treason by government officials or members of the armed forces" is similarly alarming and distressing, running flatly counter to the worldwide movement away from the death penalty. I note with deep concern that dozens of activists and human rights defenders have been charged with "terrorism", and may therefore run the risk of capital sentences for conduct that is entirely protected under international human rights law. Once again, I urge an immediate moratorium on the imposition of the death penalty, as a first step towards its eventual abolition.

Against this grim background, the situation in Belarus has forced at least an estimated 300,000 persons to leave the country since May 2020 and the repression is increasingly extending beyond the borders of Belarus, targeting those who have already left. Regrettably, many have been added to the Government's "extremists" list, as I outlined, while their relatives and friends remaining in Belarus face tremendous pressure and, at times, direct retaliation from the authorities.

In this context, amendments to the Citizenship Law, effective since July of this year, are deeply concerning. They provide the authorities with the power to revoke the citizenship of individuals residing abroad who have been convicted – including in absentia – of "extremism" or and I quote "causing serious harm to the interests of Belarus." Additionally, Belarusians are required to inform the authorities about their residences abroad, leading to heightened surveillance of those in exile as well as their families remaining at home. These amendments risk inflicting statelessness and provide broad space for abuse and misuse; they should be repealed. Of further concern, on 4 September, a Presidential Decree was issued ordering Belarusian diplomatic missions abroad to stop the issuance and renewal of passports for Belarusians in those countries.

Mr. President,

Our Office deeply regrets the Government’s ongoing lack of cooperation. We call on the Government to engage constructively with our Office and other human rights mechanisms. Urgent actions are needed, including the prompt release of detainees and prisoners charged on politically motivated grounds. Human rights violations, including the systematic repression of civil society, independent media, and opposition groups, must end. Belarus should take immediate steps to uphold human rights and protect all individuals within its borders.

I call for prompt, effective, thorough, independent, impartial and transparent investigations into past human rights violations, ensuring appropriate remedies and holding those responsible to account. In light of the prevailing impunity in the country, Member States should actively support other forms of accountability, notably through national proceedings based on established principles of extraterritorial and universal jurisdiction, consistent with international law.

I would express our acknowledgment and gratitude to the many victims, the survivors, the members of civil society who have shared their often deeply painful experiences, in cooperation with our Office. I am especially grateful to our experts Karinna Moskalenko, Susan Bazilli, and Monika Platek for their invaluable advice to the Office in the discharge of this mandate, and for the continued support provided by the Council’s Special Rapporteur on Belarus. A detailed report with recommendations will be presented at the next Council session.

Thank you, Mr. President.

Source: ohchr.org, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, September 22, 2023


_____________________________________________________________________

Home  |  Twitter/X  |  Facebook  |  Telegram  | Contact us






"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."

— Oscar Wilde

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Florida executes Michael Tanzi

Florida on Tuesday executed a death row inmate described by one local detective as a "fledgling serial killer" for the murder of a beloved Miami Herald employee. Florida executed Michael Tanzi on Tuesday, 25 years after the murder of beloved Miami Herald employee Janet Acosta, who was attacked in broad daylight on her lunch break in 2000.   Michael Tanzi, 48, was executed by lethal injection at the Florida State Prison in Raiford and pronounced dead at 6:12 p.m. ET. 

South Carolina executes Mikal Mahdi

Mikal Mahdi, 42, was executed for the 2004 murder of 56-year-old James Myers A man facing the death penalty for committing two murders was executed by firing squad on Friday, the second such execution in the US state of South Carolina this year. Mikal Mahdi, 42, was executed for the 2004 murder of 56-year-old James Myers, an off-duty police officer, and the murder of a convenience store employee three days earlier. According to a statement from the prison, "the execution was performed by a three-person firing squad at 6:01 pm (2201 GMT)," with Mahdi pronounced dead four minutes later.

Afghanistan | Four men publicly executed by Taliban with relatives of victims shooting them 'six or seven times' at sport stadium

Four men have been publicly executed by the Taliban, with relatives of their victims shooting them several times in front of spectators at a sport stadium. Two men were shot around six to seven times by a male relative of the victims in front of spectators in Qala-i-Naw, the centre of Afghanistan's Badghis province, witnesses told an AFP journalist in the city.  The men had been 'sentenced to retaliatory punishment' for shooting other men, after their cases were 'examined very precisely and repeatedly', the statement said.  'The families of the victims were offered amnesty and peace but they refused.'

USA | Why the firing squad may be making a comeback

South Carolina plans to execute Mikal Mahdi on Friday for the murder of a police officer, draping a hood over his head and firing three bullets into his heart. The choice to die by firing squad – rather than lethal injection or the electric chair – was Mahdi’s own, his attorney said last month: “Faced with barbaric and inhumane choices, Mikal Mahdi has chosen the lesser of three evils.” If it proceeds, Mahdi’s execution would be the latest in a recent string of events that have put the spotlight on the firing squad as a handful of US death penalty states explore alternatives to lethal injection, by far the nation’s dominant execution method.

I spent 16 years in solitary in South Carolina. This is what it did to me. | Opinion

South Carolinian Randy Poindexter writes about the effects 16 years of solitary confinement had on him ahead of South Carolina’s planned execution of Mikal Mahdi , who spent months in solitary as a young man. For 16 years, I lived in a concrete cell. Twenty-three hours a day, every day, for more than 3,000 days, South Carolina kept me in solitary confinement. I was a young man before I was sent to solitary — angry, untreated and unwell. I made mistakes. But I wasn’t sentenced to madness. That’s what solitary did to me. My mental health worsened with each passing day. At first, paranoia and depression set in. Then, hallucinations and self-mutilation. I talked to people who weren’t there. I cut myself to feel something besides despair. I could do nothing as four of my friends and fellow prisoners took their own lives rather than endure another day of torturous isolation.

South Carolina | Man who ambushed off-duty cop to face firing squad in second execution of its kind

Mikal Mahdi, 48, who was found guilty of killing an off-duty police officer and a convenience store worker, is the second inmate scheduled to executed by South Carolina's new firing squad A murderer who ambushed and shot an off duty police officer eight times before burning his body in a killing spree is set to become the second person to die by firing squad. South Carolina's highest court has rejected the last major appeal from Mikal Mahdi, 41, who is to be put to death with three bullets to the heart at 6pm on April 11 at the Broad River Correctional Institution in Columbia. Mahdi's lawyers said his original lawyers put on a shallow case trying to spare his life that didn't call on relatives, teachers or people who knew him and ignored the impact of weeks spent in solitary confinement in prison as a teen.

Louisiana | Lawyers of Jessie Hoffman speak about their final moments before execution

As Louisiana prepared its first execution in 15 years, a team of lawyers from Loyola Law were working to save Jessie Hoffman’s life. “I was a young lawyer three years out of law school, and Jessie was almost finished with his appeals at that time, and my boss told me we needed to file something for Jessie because he’s in danger of being executed,” Kappel said. Kappel and her boss came up with a civil lawsuit to file that said since they wouldn’t give him a protocol for his execution, he was being deprived of due process, and the lawsuit was in the legal process for the next 10 years.

Lethal Injection, Electric Chair, or Firing Squad? An Inhumane Decision for Death Row Prisoners

South Carolina resumed executions with the firing squad killing of Brad Sigmon last month. Mikal Madhi’s execution date is days away. The curtain shrieked as it was yanked open to reveal a 67-year-old man tied to a chair. His arms were pulled uncomfortably behind his back. The red bull’s-eye target on his chest rose and fell as he desperately attempted to still his breathing. The man, Brad Sigmon, smiled at his attorney, Bo King, seated in the front row before guards placed a black bag over his head. King said Sigmon appeared to be trying his best to put on a brave face for those who had come to bear witness.

Execution date set for prisoner transferred to Oklahoma to face death penalty

An inmate who was transferred to Oklahoma last month to face the death penalty now has an execution date. George John Hanson, also known as John Fitzgerald Hanson, is scheduled to die on June 12 for the 1999 murder of 77-year-old Mary Bowles.  The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals on Tuesday set the execution date. The state’s Pardon and Parole Board has a tentative date of May 7 for Hanson’s clemency hearing, executive director Tom Bates said.

Arizona | The cruelty of isolation: There’s nothing ‘humane’ about how we treat the condemned

On March 19, I served as a witness to the execution of a man named Aaron Gunches, Arizona’s first since 2022. During his time on death row, he begged for death and was ultimately granted what is likely more appropriately described as an emotionless state-assisted suicide. This experience has profoundly impacted me, leading to deep reflection on the nature of death, humanity, and the role we play in our final moments. When someone is in the end stages of life, we talk about hospice care, comfort, care, easing suffering and humane death. We strive for a “good death” — a peaceful transition. I’ve seen good ones, and I’ve seen bad, unplanned ones.