Skip to main content

Alabama | Proposed bill would require unanimous jury decision to impose death sentence

House Bill 14 would require a unanimous vote by jurors to impose a death sentence in capital murder cases in the state of Alabama. The bill is sponsored by State Representative Chris England of Tuscaloosa County.

"When I started practicing almost every state imposed the death penalty. Now we are down to 27," said Richard S. Jaffe, a local criminal defense lawyer. "That is very significant in what's going on with the national trend which is many, many, many fewer death verdicts and fewer states even allowing the death penalty. That's the trend."

In 3 states, a death sentence can be handed down without a unanimous jury decision.

At least 10 jurors are needed to sentence someone to death in Alabama. In Missouri and Indiana, judges determine the sentence, which could be death, even if a jury isn't unanimous in their decision.

"It's kind of hard, I think, to argue with those other 20-something states that require a unanimous verdict because we are talking about eliminating a life, putting someone to death rather than allowing them to die in prison," said Jaffe. "A lot of people think that it's more expensive to house someone for their life even if sentenced at a young age but the fact of the matter is it's 5 times more expensive to seek the death penalty and 45% of death verdicts are overturned on appeal anyway. It's really not fair to the victims' families for our sentencing structure to be the way it is."

He added, to sentence a person to life in prison without parole, there have to be at least seven jurors in favor.

"Anything in between gets very messy," said Jaffe.

Criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor, Leslie Schiffman Moore, explained a unanimous verdict is required to convict a person of capital murder. She believed it should be the same for a death sentence.

"It's the most serious decision a jury has to make putting somebody to death, putting another human being to death regardless of what they've done, and they have done something horrible to get to that point obviously," she said.

The bill also has some retroactive measures. It allows for people who've been sentenced to death without a unanimous verdict to be resentenced.

Before 2017, juries provided non-binding advisory verdicts in capital murder cases. The judge was able to make the final decision, which could be something different than the jury advisory. Judges were required to give the advisory verdict consideration.

Inmates who had a judge hand down a sentence not matching the jury advisory could also be resentenced under this bill.

Those with a non-unanimous sentence or with a sentence from a judge different than the jury advisory could petition to be resentenced by filing a form with the Administrative Office of Courts if HB 14 passed into law.

"I think we're heading toward the point where the United States Supreme Court is going to require a unanimous verdict for death, a unanimous recommendation for death from a jury. I think we are getting ahead of the game on this by changing the law before we are told to change the law by the federal government or before we end up with a bunch of appeals based on a new opinion by the United States Supreme Court, " said Moore. "[A non-unanimous jury] makes people think that we want to impose the death penalty, or make the death penalty more easy to impose when we're not in line with the rest of the country."

Jaffe said there is a weight put on jurors who are tasked with deciding life or death.

"They are weighing decisions to basically play God and step into that role and decide whether someone lives or dies, especially since we just don't know all the time what really happened in many of these cases," said Jaffe.

According to the bill, if a jury is unable to reach a verdict during the sentencing phase, a mistrial is declared. The mistrial does not impact the conviction. Another sentencing hearing will be conducted for a different jury. After one or more mistrials, the right to have a verdict from a jury can be waived and the judge can decide the sentence without a recommendation from a jury.

Changes to the state's execution process have been ongoing. In November, Gov. Kay Ivey ordered a review of the state's execution process after failed executions.

In January, the Alabama Supreme Court abolished the previous one-day time frame to carry out a death sentence. The governor will now set the window of time for the execution.

The Court also eliminated an automatic "plain error review". That review allowed the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals to automatically review death penalty cases for a clear error at trial even though the defense lawyer did not object.

A spokesperson with the Alabama Department of Corrections said the review is nearing completion.

Source: ABC News, Staff, February 24, 2023

_____________________________________________________________________




_____________________________________________________________________


FOLLOW US ON:


TELEGRAM


TWITTER







HELP US KEEP THIS BLOG UP & RUNNING!



"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted."


— Oscar Wilde

Most viewed (Last 7 days)

Florida executes Michael Tanzi

Florida on Tuesday executed a death row inmate described by one local detective as a "fledgling serial killer" for the murder of a beloved Miami Herald employee. Florida executed Michael Tanzi on Tuesday, 25 years after the murder of beloved Miami Herald employee Janet Acosta, who was attacked in broad daylight on her lunch break in 2000.   Michael Tanzi, 48, was executed by lethal injection at the Florida State Prison in Raiford and pronounced dead at 6:12 p.m. ET. 

South Carolina | Man who ambushed off-duty cop to face firing squad in second execution of its kind

Mikal Mahdi, 48, who was found guilty of killing an off-duty police officer and a convenience store worker, is the second inmate scheduled to executed by South Carolina's new firing squad A murderer who ambushed and shot an off duty police officer eight times before burning his body in a killing spree is set to become the second person to die by firing squad. South Carolina's highest court has rejected the last major appeal from Mikal Mahdi, 41, who is to be put to death with three bullets to the heart at 6pm on April 11 at the Broad River Correctional Institution in Columbia. Mahdi's lawyers said his original lawyers put on a shallow case trying to spare his life that didn't call on relatives, teachers or people who knew him and ignored the impact of weeks spent in solitary confinement in prison as a teen.

Afghanistan | Four men publicly executed by Taliban with relatives of victims shooting them 'six or seven times' at sport stadium

Four men have been publicly executed by the Taliban, with relatives of their victims shooting them several times in front of spectators at a sport stadium. Two men were shot around six to seven times by a male relative of the victims in front of spectators in Qala-i-Naw, the centre of Afghanistan's Badghis province, witnesses told an AFP journalist in the city.  The men had been 'sentenced to retaliatory punishment' for shooting other men, after their cases were 'examined very precisely and repeatedly', the statement said.  'The families of the victims were offered amnesty and peace but they refused.'

South Carolina executes Mikal Mahdi

Mikal Mahdi, 42, was executed for the 2004 murder of 56-year-old James Myers A man facing the death penalty for committing two murders was executed by firing squad on Friday, the second such execution in the US state of South Carolina this year. Mikal Mahdi, 42, was executed for the 2004 murder of 56-year-old James Myers, an off-duty police officer, and the murder of a convenience store employee three days earlier. According to a statement from the prison, "the execution was performed by a three-person firing squad at 6:01 pm (2201 GMT)," with Mahdi pronounced dead four minutes later.

USA | Why the firing squad may be making a comeback

South Carolina plans to execute Mikal Mahdi on Friday for the murder of a police officer, draping a hood over his head and firing three bullets into his heart. The choice to die by firing squad – rather than lethal injection or the electric chair – was Mahdi’s own, his attorney said last month: “Faced with barbaric and inhumane choices, Mikal Mahdi has chosen the lesser of three evils.” If it proceeds, Mahdi’s execution would be the latest in a recent string of events that have put the spotlight on the firing squad as a handful of US death penalty states explore alternatives to lethal injection, by far the nation’s dominant execution method.

I spent 16 years in solitary in South Carolina. This is what it did to me. | Opinion

South Carolinian Randy Poindexter writes about the effects 16 years of solitary confinement had on him ahead of South Carolina’s planned execution of Mikal Mahdi , who spent months in solitary as a young man. For 16 years, I lived in a concrete cell. Twenty-three hours a day, every day, for more than 3,000 days, South Carolina kept me in solitary confinement. I was a young man before I was sent to solitary — angry, untreated and unwell. I made mistakes. But I wasn’t sentenced to madness. That’s what solitary did to me. My mental health worsened with each passing day. At first, paranoia and depression set in. Then, hallucinations and self-mutilation. I talked to people who weren’t there. I cut myself to feel something besides despair. I could do nothing as four of my friends and fellow prisoners took their own lives rather than endure another day of torturous isolation.

Louisiana | Lawyers of Jessie Hoffman speak about their final moments before execution

As Louisiana prepared its first execution in 15 years, a team of lawyers from Loyola Law were working to save Jessie Hoffman’s life. “I was a young lawyer three years out of law school, and Jessie was almost finished with his appeals at that time, and my boss told me we needed to file something for Jessie because he’s in danger of being executed,” Kappel said. Kappel and her boss came up with a civil lawsuit to file that said since they wouldn’t give him a protocol for his execution, he was being deprived of due process, and the lawsuit was in the legal process for the next 10 years.

Lethal Injection, Electric Chair, or Firing Squad? An Inhumane Decision for Death Row Prisoners

South Carolina resumed executions with the firing squad killing of Brad Sigmon last month. Mikal Madhi’s execution date is days away. The curtain shrieked as it was yanked open to reveal a 67-year-old man tied to a chair. His arms were pulled uncomfortably behind his back. The red bull’s-eye target on his chest rose and fell as he desperately attempted to still his breathing. The man, Brad Sigmon, smiled at his attorney, Bo King, seated in the front row before guards placed a black bag over his head. King said Sigmon appeared to be trying his best to put on a brave face for those who had come to bear witness.

Execution date set for prisoner transferred to Oklahoma to face death penalty

An inmate who was transferred to Oklahoma last month to face the death penalty now has an execution date. George John Hanson, also known as John Fitzgerald Hanson, is scheduled to die on June 12 for the 1999 murder of 77-year-old Mary Bowles.  The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals on Tuesday set the execution date. The state’s Pardon and Parole Board has a tentative date of May 7 for Hanson’s clemency hearing, executive director Tom Bates said.

Arizona | The cruelty of isolation: There’s nothing ‘humane’ about how we treat the condemned

On March 19, I served as a witness to the execution of a man named Aaron Gunches, Arizona’s first since 2022. During his time on death row, he begged for death and was ultimately granted what is likely more appropriately described as an emotionless state-assisted suicide. This experience has profoundly impacted me, leading to deep reflection on the nature of death, humanity, and the role we play in our final moments. When someone is in the end stages of life, we talk about hospice care, comfort, care, easing suffering and humane death. We strive for a “good death” — a peaceful transition. I’ve seen good ones, and I’ve seen bad, unplanned ones.