OKLAHOMA CITY, OK – On Tuesday, May 5 at 1:30 p.m., a federal district court will hear Glossip, et al., v. Gross, in which attorneys will argue whether the state of Oklahoma provided an incomplete execution protocol on February 13. At that time, state officials announced that it would use the same three drug cocktail that was used five years ago in the two botched executions in Oklahoma.
Judge Stephen P. Friot will preside over the hearing at the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, William J. Holloway, Jr. United States Courthouse, 200 NW 4th Street, Courtroom 401, in Oklahoma City.
The
new protocol retains the use of midazolam in a three-drug protocol, which has contributed to a number of problematic executions across the country, including the execution of
[Clayton] Lockett.
Attorneys representing Oklahoma death row prisoners contend that “the protocol lacks the details about execution personnel training necessary to assess whether the revised protocol addresses the issues that led to the use of an unauthorized drug in the execution of
Charles Warner (January 15, 2015), which was almost repeated before
Richard Glossip’s execution (September 30, 2015) was halted at the last minute.
The state disclosed in October 2015 that the
wrong drug was used in Warner’s execution, in contravention of the state’s lethal injection protocol.
A November 2015 poll by
The Oklahoman showed that over half of Oklahomans support the state’s moratorium on carrying out executions.
In March 2016, a bipartisan group of prominent Oklahomans formed the
Oklahoma Death Penalty Review Commission. According to
The City Sentinel, the Commission was to conduct “the first-ever independent, objective and thorough review of the state’s entire capital punishment system.” The City Sentinel also endorsed a continued moratorium on executions until the Commission concludes its study.
The death row prisoners’ previous litigation challenging Oklahoma’s lethal injection protocol was administratively closed in 2015 pursuant to a
Joint Stipulation between the prisoners and the state.
At the hearing on May 5, attorneys for the prisoners will argue that the state’s “
Notice of Protocol,” does not comply with the 2015 Joint Stipulation.
Among the concerns, attorneys will argue that Oklahoma Department of Corrections has not provided specific protocols and training for staff carrying out executions, denying prisoners “a full and fair opportunity to address all constitutional issues.” (
Reply Brief, p. 9)
As the
Reply Brief notes, death row prisoners “should not be subject to execution by surprise.” (p. 9). Prisoners will further argue the Department of Corrections has not provided satisfactory notice that it can comply with the express terms of the execution protocol to ensure humane and constitutional executions in the future.
To attend the hearing, check the court
website for the most current information about COVID-19.
⚑ | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us:
deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.
Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!
"One is absolutely sickened, not by the crimes that the wicked have committed,
but by the punishments that the good have inflicted." -- Oscar Wilde
Comments
Post a Comment
Constructive and informative comments are welcome. Please note that offensive and pro-death penalty comments will not be published.