|Arkansas' death chamber|
Some executions get far more attention than others, and this unprecedented spate of killings has already garnered headlines around the country. Some stories point to concerns about the psychological impact on those required by duty to be part of the process, including execution teams, correctional officers, and state-mandated witnesses.
Reporting on these stories can also leave a mark, says Bruce Shapiro, executive director of the Dart Center for Journalism and Trauma and the author of Legal Lynching: The Death Penalty and America’s Future. “No two reporters are going to react the same,” says Shapiro. “On the whole, as a tribe, reporters are pretty resilient. But there is no doubt that witnessing death, whether at the hands of a person or the hands of the state, can take a toll.”
“I’m sure there’ll be a lot of, ‘Let’s sit around and drink and talk about this’ after each one,” says David Bailey, managing editor of the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette. “It’s a draining story to cover, not just for the reporters on the scene but the editors as well.” Bailey edited coverage of a pair of executions on the city desk at the Baton Rouge Advocate in the 1980s. “You don’t sleep well after that,” he says.
For coverage of next month’s executions, Bailey says there will be a pool report from within the chamber, but he doesn’t know yet if the Democrat-Gazette will be in it. (Hometown reporters get preference from the state Department of Corrections, followed by the Associated Press, which has a policy of covering every execution. The AP was unavailable for comment.) While several Democrat-Gazette staffers have covered executions before, it’s been a long time since anyone witnessed an execution in Arkansas; the state hasn’t performed one in 12 years. Now, the paper is gearing up to tell the stories of eight executions in about as many days, and the unique circumstances surrounding them.
Ziva Branstetter, the editor in chief of Tulsa, Oklahoma’s investigative journalism nonprofit The Frontier, says the “number one thing” news managers should avoid is pushing anyone into this coverage. “Don’t make them feel less-than as a journalist if they don’t want to do it. It has to be completely voluntary,” she says.
Branstetter, who recently announced plans to join The Center for Investigative Reporting as a senior editor, was a Pulitzer Prize finalist for her 2014 coverage of the botched execution of Oklahoma death-row inmate Clayton Lockett. During his execution, Lockett suffered an exploded vein after his lethal injection cocktail was administered. The problem drug in Lockett’s case was midazolam, the sedative that’s set to expire in Arkansas. Lockett’s flawed execution spurred the midazolam shortage behind Arkansas’s rush to execute next month.
Branstetter covered her first execution in 1990, as a 26-year-old reporter at the Tulsa World. Her editors were assigning the execution of Charles Troy Coleman, the first Oklahoma inmate to be executed in 24 years. “I was the third person they came to, and the first one who said yes,” she says. “It sounds so freaking callous, but I wanted to be in on the biggest story. And I felt I had a responsibility as a reporter to witness it.” She had covered death before, reporting on tornadoes, and didn’t think this would be much different. “I thought, I can do this, no big deal.”
Branstetter was among the pool reporters permitted to witness the execution. At the time, she felt ready for the challenge of witnessing Coleman’s death. In hindsight, she says she wasn’t.
“It was what the offender said at the moment of death,” she says. “He said, ‘Tell everyone I love them. I have a peace and quiet heart.’ It just got to me.”
Branstetter found herself crying while giving her pool report after the execution, surrounded by reporters from other outlets who noticed and swarmed her for their own interviews. They demanded to know why she was crying and pressed for her personal views on the death penalty. “I was mortified,” she says. “I thought I was going to get in trouble back at the office, but they were super nice about it.”
She had nightmares and trouble sleeping for a while after that, but didn’t shy away the next time a similar assignment came around; she has witnessed three executions since then. In 2015, as editor-in-chief of The Frontier, her newsroom became one of several regional news outlets to partner with the Marshall Project on The Next To Die, a database that tracks upcoming executions.
Before she covered Coleman’s death, Branstetter had been prepped by a more experienced reporter—one of the most important things a seasoned colleague can do for a reporter witnessing their first execution, she says.
“Make it very clear exactly what they’re going to see,” says Branstetter. “Walk them through it. Tell them, ‘You’re going to get in a van. They’ll take you down to this holding area. Sit you down in these chairs. You’ll hear the other inmates banging on bars. That’s a sign of respect for the inmate. If there’s not much banging, there’s not much respect.’”
She’d also make a point of alerting the reporter that they may encounter the inmate’s own family in the witness area. “That’s just something else, seeing someone’s sister or grandmother watching them die. You have to be ready to put a wall up emotionally.”
Source: Columbia Journalism Review, Tasneem Raja, March 31, 2017. Tasneem Raja writes for national magazines and journals, with a focus on culture and technology.
⚑ | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!