FEATURED POST

Trial by Fire - Did Texas execute an innocent man?

Image
The fire moved quickly through the house, a one-story wood-frame structure in a working-class neighborhood of Corsicana, in northeast Texas. Flames spread along the walls, bursting through doorways, blistering paint and tiles and furniture. Smoke pressed against the ceiling, then banked downward, seeping into each room and through crevices in the windows, staining the morning sky.
Buffie Barbee, who was eleven years old and lived two houses down, was playing in her back yard when she smelled the smoke. She ran inside and told her mother, Diane, and they hurried up the street; that’s when they saw the smoldering house and Cameron Todd Willingham standing on the front porch, wearing only a pair of jeans, his chest blackened with soot, his hair and eyelids singed. He was screaming, “My babies are burning up!” His children—Karmon and Kameron, who were one-year-old twin girls, and two-year-old Amber—were trapped inside.
Willingham told the Barbees to call the Fire Department, and while Dia…

As judge considers Arkansas' executions plan, doctor shares concerns about state's drugs

Midazolam
A doctor who specializes in anesthesiology expressed concerns in federal court Monday over the three-drug mixture with which Arkansas plans to execute seven men next week.

The testimony kicked off a three-day hearing scheduled by U.S. District Court Judge Kristine G. Baker after she was asked to halt the executions of seven inmates set to die over 11 days beginning April 17.

The men’s lawyers requested an injunction on the grounds that the compressed schedule violates their Eighth Amendment rights to be free from cruel and unusual punishment, the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette previously reported.

Dr. Joel B. Zivit, an associate professor at Emory University who specializes in anesthesiology and critical care medicine, appeared via video as an expert for the plaintiffs. Zivit, who said he witnessed an execution in Georgia, spent much of the morning answering questions posed by federal public defender Julie Vandiver about Arkansas’ lethal injection protocol.

Zivit first told the courtroom he has no comment or knowledge on how to improve lethal injections. 

The physician said he has concerns about the drugs Arkansas plans to use, how those drugs are handled and mixed, how they will then be administered to the inmates and if those drugs will cause an excessively painful death.

Under the state Department of Corrections protocol, three drugs — midazolam, vecuronium bromide and potassium chloride — will be given intravenously.

Zivit said the first drug, midazolam, is generally used as a calming agent and to create amnesia in a patient, but it in no way blocks pain.

The second drug, vecuronium bromide, is often used to paralyze muscle movement while patients undergo surgery, he said. Hospitals use an apparatus to ensure the patient can breathe. Without it, the person will suffocate, Zivit said. “It’s like being held underwater."

Vandiver asked the doctor if he would ever give a patient midazolam followed by a dose of vecuronium bromide during a procedure. He responded that he would, but only in a rare circumstance, and “if a patient survived, I would apologize later."

The third drug, potassium chloride, can affect the way a heart muscle contracts, Zivit said. Potassium, when it’s injected, is “quite painful” because the element destroys the vein while it passes along its length, he said.

Zivit added that he has concerns about how the drugs will be given to each inmate, based on his study of autopsy reports of other people who have been put to death through similar methods. He said he has been administering anesthesia for 25 years and it’s “not a simple thing to do.”

There is no such thing as training to put an IV in someone who will be executed, Zivit said. Doctors and medical professionals are trained to deal with patients who are “volunteers” to the treatment they are undergoing, he said, which is not the case in executions.

Zivit said when he studied an autopsy of Oklahoma inmate Clayton Lockett, the man had puncture wounds on his “arms, legs, neck, chest” where professionals had tried, and failed, to insert an IV.

The state objected several times during Zivit’s testimony to the doctor speaking about anything other than the general use and effects of the three drugs. Baker recognized the state’s objections but allowed the doctor's testimony to continue.

Source: Arkansas Online, Emma Pettit, April 10, 2017

⚑ | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.


Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!

Most Viewed (Last 7 Days)

Nevada law says chief medical officer must advise on executions despite ethical clash

Russian who joined ISIS in Iraq sentenced to hanging

20 Minutes to Death: Record of the Last Execution in France

Ohio executes Gary Otte

Iran: Prisoners Hanged in Public While Crowd Watched

Trial by Fire - Did Texas execute an innocent man?

Poorly executed - Indiana inmate challenges state's lethal cocktail change

Arkansas death-row inmate tries to drop appeal blocking execution; request denied

Nevada inmate asks how he should mentally prepare for execution

"I cannot execute convicted murderers," Tanzania's president declares