FEATURED POST

Capital Punishment in the United States Explained

Image
In our Explainer series, Fair Punishment Project lawyers help unpackage some of the most complicated issues in the criminal justice system. We break down the problems behind the headlines - like bail, civil asset forfeiture, or the Brady doctrine - so that everyone can understand them. Wherever possible, we try to utilize the stories of those affected by the criminal justice system to show how these laws and principles should work, and how they often fail. We will update our Explainers monthly to keep them current. Read our updated explainer here.
To beat the clock on the expiration of its lethal injection drug supply, this past April, Arkansas tried to execute 8 men over 1 days. The stories told in frantic legal filings and clemency petitions revealed a deeply disturbing picture. Ledell Lee may have had an intellectual disability that rendered him constitutionally ineligible for the death penalty, but he had a spate of bad lawyers who failed to timely present evidence of this claim -…

Indonesia vows more executions this year

Indonesia's attorney-general M Prasetyo
Indonesia's attorney-general M Prasetyo
It would be wise if the government listens to those criticizing the death penalty, says a moral theologian.

A new round of executions will take place this year when a legal row over appeals is resolved, according to Indonesia's attorney-general.

Muhammad Prasetyo said Indonesia is still fully committed to carrying out executions in line with President Joko Widodo's hardline anti-drug policy.

The president says executions of drug traffickers, a policy that has drawn international condemnation, are necessary to combat rampant drug abuse in Indonesia.

Franciscan Father Peter C. Aman, a moral theology lecturer at the Driyarkara School of Philosophy in Jakarta said it would be wise if the government listens to those criticizing the death penalty.

"It presumes the death penalty can reduce the number of crimes particularly related to drugs. That is nonsense," he said.

The last round of executions took place in July last year when 4 people were shot by firing squad in a clearing on the island of Nusa Kambangan.

10 others facing execution were given a last minute reprieve.

Since then, the country's Constitutional Court ruled to lift time restrictions on convicts filing clemency appeals to the president, a move analysts believe has delayed a further round of executions taking place.

Rules had stipulated that convicts had to file a last-ditched appeal to the president within a year of a final court ruling being handed down.

However, in Indonesia, the Constitutional Court holds sway on clemency rules.

Prasetyo said at the weekend that his office has appealed to the Supreme Court to overturn the ruling, which would remove any legal obstacles preventing more executions taking place.

Rights activists immediately condemned the attorney- general's comments.

Supriyadi Widodo Eddyono, executive director of the Institute for Criminal Justice Reform, accused Prasetyo of trying to run roughshod over the Constitutional Court.

"The Constitutional Court's ruling is clear enough. Why ask the Supreme Court for a decision?

"It seems he is desperately trying to seek a solution to execute death row inmates," Eddyono said.

Yati Andriyani, coordinator of the Commission for the Disappeared and Victims of Violence, urged the government not to pursue another round of executions.

"The government must first evaluate the whole process of previous executions. Were death row inmates' rights fulfilled?" Andriyani alleged there were flaws in the legal system and malpractices by investigators.

"In some cases, the convicts' right to have adequate legal assistance was ignored. Also, torture was still used by law enforcement officers in their efforts to get confessions from alleged criminals."

Source: La Croix International, Katharina R. Lestari, March 1, 2017


Amnesty International warns new AFP protocols could see more death sentences handed down



A decision by the Federal Government on information-sharing protocols between the Australian Federal Police (AFP) and foreign authorities could allow a repeat of the Bali 9 drug smuggling case, according to Amnesty International.

Last year, a parliamentary committee recommended the AFP "obtain guarantees" from foreign prosecutors that they would not pursue the death penalty before providing information relating to information on crimes such as drug trafficking.

The Government has now released its response, and argued there are difficulties in ensuring such promises are binding.

"An undertaking from a prosecutor not to seek to apply the death penalty may not be reliable where a court can still impose the death penalty," the Government's response stated.

"Generally speaking, the Government does not consider it appropriate to seek, or rely on, an undertaking from a prosecutor.

"In the instances where assurances have been provided to Australia, they have usually occurred at ministerial level."

The Government said fighting serious drug crimes remained a high priority.

"The Government's ability to detect, deter and prevent drug crimes would be impeded if Australia could not cooperate with states in the region that retain the death penalty."

In 2015, the AFP defended its decision to inform Indonesian authorities about the Bali 9 drug syndicate, with Commissioner Andrew Colvin saying officers did not have enough evidence to arrest the Australians before they left for Indonesia.

2 of the smugglers, Andrew Chan and Myuran Sukumaran, were executed in 2015.

Amnesty International raised concern with the Government's decision not to follow the recommendations, in an effort to avoid a repeat of that case.

"This is unfortunate, particularly as Australia has made a number of positive commitments in response to the inquiry," organisation spokesman Guy Ragen said.

"The Government's announcement that Australia is going to have a strategy to guide its advocacy against capital punishment in our region and around the world is strongly welcomed."

The Government did accept a number of recommendations in the report, including that "high risk" cases be directed to the Minister for a decision and that Australia continue its advocacy and opposition to the death penalty around the world.

Source: abc.net.au, March 1, 2017

⚑ | Report an error, an omission, a typo; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; submit a piece, a comment; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.


Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!

Most Viewed (Last 30 Days)

Harris County leads Texas in life without parole sentences as death penalty recedes

Idaho County commissioners take stand against death penalty

Texas: Reginald Blanton executed

30-year-old Chinese inmate bids farewell to daughter, wife and mother before execution

USA: Executions, Death Sentences Up Slightly in 2017

Indonesian death penalty laws to be softened to allow reformed prisoners to avoid execution

Death penalty cases of 2017 featured botched executions, claims of innocence, 'flawed' evidence

Virginia Governor commutes death sentence of killer found mentally incompetent to be executed

Texas man with scheduled execution uses letters from fellow death row inmates to argue for reprieve

New book features Kansas man who executed Nazi war criminals