FEATURED POST

Trial by Fire - Did Texas execute an innocent man?

Image
The fire moved quickly through the house, a one-story wood-frame structure in a working-class neighborhood of Corsicana, in northeast Texas. Flames spread along the walls, bursting through doorways, blistering paint and tiles and furniture. Smoke pressed against the ceiling, then banked downward, seeping into each room and through crevices in the windows, staining the morning sky.
Buffie Barbee, who was eleven years old and lived two houses down, was playing in her back yard when she smelled the smoke. She ran inside and told her mother, Diane, and they hurried up the street; that’s when they saw the smoldering house and Cameron Todd Willingham standing on the front porch, wearing only a pair of jeans, his chest blackened with soot, his hair and eyelids singed. He was screaming, “My babies are burning up!” His children—Karmon and Kameron, who were one-year-old twin girls, and two-year-old Amber—were trapped inside.
Willingham told the Barbees to call the Fire Department, and while Dia…

Federal judge may allow Alabama to execute inmate using new 1-drug method

'Use of a single dose of midazolam has apparently never been tried elsewhere.'
'Use of a single dose of midazolam has apparently never been tried elsewhere.'
A federal judge may allow Alabama to change its lethal injection method for the Dec. 8 execution of Alabama death row inmate Ronald Bert Smith.

U.S. District Court Judge Keith Watkins, in an order issued Wednesday, tells Smith's attorneys to submit in writing, on or before noon on Nov. 16 why he should not order Alabama to execute Smith using "a large initial dose of midazolam, followed by continuous infusion" of that drug.

Smith is among a group of Alabama death row inmates who have been challenging Alabama's 3-drug lethal injection protocol for executions. Alabama, along with other states, have developed different drug combinations after drug manufacturers started refusing to supply execution drugs the states had been using.

When death row inmates file lawsuits challenging a state's method of execution as cruel and unusual punishment, they must offer suggestions to the court of alternate methods of execution. Among the suggestions by Alabama inmates have been firing squad and hanging - both options Watkins dismissed because they are not set out in Alabama law. One lawmaker, however, last week said he will introduce a bill to make firing squads an option.

Efforts to reach Smith's attorney were unsuccessful prior to publication of this story. A spokeswoman for the Alabama Attorney General's office said that office would not comment.

Earlier in the litigation Alabama offered death row inmate Christopher Brooks the opportunity to be executed by a 1 large dose of midazolam, Watkins noted in his order. That drug - a sedative - is the 1st drug administered in the state's 3-drug protocol.

Brooks refused and on Jan. 21 became the 1st inmate executed in more than 2 years, using the state's new 3-drug lethal injection method.

After his execution, a witness in the viewing room testified one of Brooks' eyes opened after the consciousness assessment and remained open until the curtain was closed in the viewing room, according to the judge's order.

"The eye episode has become a central component of the Eighth Amendment (cruel and unusual punishment) claim in the current complaint of Mr. Smith, in the motion to dismiss, and in the response to it - particularly in Mr. Smith's objection to midazolam as a sedative in the 3-drug protocol," the judge states. "Mr. Smith argues that midazolam will inadequately anesthetize him, thereby causing severe pain upon the infusion of the 2nd and 3rd drugs in the protocol, rocuronium bromide and potassium chloride, respectively."

"It is undisputed that potassium chloride causes severe pain to a conscious person," Watkins states.

Attorneys for 8 Alabama death row inmates have discussed other methods of executions in recent court filings in their lawsuits that claim the state's current lethal injection method is painful and would violate the constitutional protection against cruel and unusual punishment. The Alabama Attorney General's Office in July sought to have all seven lawsuits dismissed.

While they feared midazolam wouldn't sedate them enough for the next 2 drugs, the inmates argued that 1 large dose of midazolam would be enough to kill them anyway.

Watkins writes that he ultimately dismissed the notion of a one-drug protocol in Brooks' case as "fraught with peril" arising out of a number of unanswered concerns.

Use of a single dose of midazolam to execute an inmate has apparently never been tried elsewhere. But legal arguments in the inmates' lawsuits have cited expert testimony that a single large and continuous dose of midazolam could be used to cause death.

Pittman said the Tommy Arthur case prompted him to introduce the bill.

But it's time to reconsider it, according to Watkins. "Changes in the posture of the case dictate that the court explore the midazolam option pled and urged by Mr. Smith and presently offered by defendants (Alabama Attorney General's Office)," Watkins states.

Watkins writes that: Alabama's "offer" for one mega dose of midazolam is not contingent on Smith executing a consent as was the case with Brooks; "a year of reflection on the issue brings it to the forefront"; and that a 1-drug midazolam protocol exists.

"Because Mr. Smith has pled it and offered the option as viable, readily implemented and available, defendants (Alabama) have accepted the offer," Watkins writes in his order.

All the parties agree that midazolam is available, it is feasible, it is readily implementable, and it is not risky with regard to unnecessary pain and suffering, Watkins writes in his order.

Watkins also ordered the Alabama Attorney General's Office on or before Monday to submit to him its plan for administering 1 large dose of midazolam, along with a copy of its 3-drug protocol for comparison.

Smith, who has been on death row since Oct. 6, 1995, was convicted in Madison County in the November 1994 slaying of Circle C convenience store clerk Casey Wilson during a robbery. A judge overrode a jury recommendation for life without parole and imposed the death penalty.

Source: al.com, November 11, 2016

⚑ | Report an error, an omission; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; send a submission; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.


Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!

Most Viewed (Last 7 Days)

Nevada law says chief medical officer must advise on executions despite ethical clash

Russian who joined ISIS in Iraq sentenced to hanging

20 Minutes to Death: Record of the Last Execution in France

Ohio executes Gary Otte

Iran: Prisoners Hanged in Public While Crowd Watched

Trial by Fire - Did Texas execute an innocent man?

Poorly executed - Indiana inmate challenges state's lethal cocktail change

Arkansas death-row inmate tries to drop appeal blocking execution; request denied

Nevada inmate asks how he should mentally prepare for execution

"I cannot execute convicted murderers," Tanzania's president declares