Texas Should Not Have Executed Robert Pruett

Update: Robert Pruett was executed by lethal injection on Thursday.
Robert Pruett is scheduled to be executed by the State of Texas Thursday. He has never had a chance to live outside a prison as an adult. Taking his life is a senseless wrong that shows how badly the justice system fails juveniles.
Mr. Pruett was 15 years old when he last saw the outside world, after being arrested as an accomplice to a murder committed by his own father. Now 38, having been convicted of a murder while incarcerated, he will be put to death. At a time when the Supreme Court has begun to recognize excessive punishments for juveniles as unjust, Mr. Pruett’s case shows how young lives can be destroyed by a justice system that refuses to give second chances.
Mr. Pruett’s father, Sam Pruett, spent much of Mr. Pruett’s early childhood in prison. Mr. Pruett and his three siblings were raised in various trailer parks by his mother, who he has said used drugs heavily and often struggled to feed the children. Wh…

51 % Of California Voters Want To Abolish The Death Penalty

Nebraska: Gathering signatures against the death penalty repeal
Nebraska: Gathering signatures against the death penalty repeal
California and Nebraska will decide next week whether they will keep the death penalty and both measures would have national implications on the debate over capital punishment. Polls show voters are conflicted.

Ballot measures addressing the death penalty in California and Nebraska could lead to a dramatic change in the national debate over capital punishment. But polls show voters in both states are split on whether to keep the death penalty.

51% of voters in California are in favor of abolishing the state's death penalty and replace it with life without parole, a move that would clear out the largest death row in the United States, according to a new poll released on Thursday.

Abolishing the death penalty in California would have the overnight effect of removing more than a quarter of inmates from death row in the United States.

45 % of the respondents said they would vote to keep the death penalty, and the remainder said they were undecided. The survey was conducted by Field Poll (a nonpartisan pollster) and UC Berkeley's Institute of Governmental Studies.

Another poll released this week, this one done by the Los Angeles Times, had only 44 % of respondents say they would vote to repeal the death penalty, compared to 45 % who said they would keep it. Another 10 % said they were still undecided.

California houses more than 700 inmates on its death row, more than any other state. Nonetheless, the state carries out few executions - the state has not executed anyone in a decade, and has only executed 13 people since the death penalty was brought back in the 70s.

But voters in California aren't only being asked whether to remove their state's death penalty, they are also being asked if they should speed it up.

A competing proposition would make a few changes in an effort to speed up the state's execution process - it would limit the number of appeals death row inmates are allowed, and allow for less oversight over how execution methods are decided.

Polls show voters are confused by the initiative that would speed up the process. This week's Los Angeles Times poll found about 20 % of respondents still didn't know how to vote on the issue.

Both of this week's Field and the Los Angeles Times polls show less than a majority are in favor of changing the appeals process, although they both found very different margins: 48 % in the former and 35 % in the latter.

If both propositions somehow pass, whichever one receives the most vote governs the state's death penalty.

Meanwhile, polling in Nebraska is much more limited.

Last year, Nebraska's unicameral legislature overrode their governor's veto and abolished the death penalty. But, with significant fundraising provided by Gov. Pete Ricketts, supporters of the death penalty gathered enough signatures to give the voters the ultimate say on whether to keep the death penalty.

Nebraska houses just 10 death row inmates, and the state has only executed 3 men in the modern era. In an attempt to show how the state could carry out the death penalty, Gov. Ricketts' department of corrections spent $26,000 on illegal execution drugs from a supplier in India. The drugs were not allowed into the United States, and despite their requests, Nebraska has been unable to get a refund.

So practically speaking, the impact of Nebraska's death penalty is much less than California's. But Nebraska matters as a symbol.

When Nebraska's nonpartisan legislature abolished the death penalty, the anti-death penalty movement held it up as an example that, even in conservatives states, the death penalty is unpopular. If voters decide to bring the death penalty back, it hurts that narrative.

The death penalty is generally supported in Nebraska, although the polling on this specific initiative has been thin.

Back in August, the group aiming to bring back the death penalty sponsored a survey that found 58 % of those who responded said they would vote to bring back the death penalty. 30 % said they would vote to leave the death penalty abolished, and 11 % said they were undecided.

The poll has important caveats though - it was conducted in early August, before ads on the issue had begun to pick up (and the anti-death penalty side has greatly outspent the pro side), and the survey did not use the official ballot language that includes the fact that the death penalty would be replaced by life without parole.

Finally, another conservative state - Oklahoma - also is asking its voters about the death penalty. But there, the practical impact appears to be minimal. It's more about sending a message.

Over the past several years, Oklahoma has garnered national attention for its repeated botched execution attempts, which eventually earned a grand jury investigation led by the state's own attorney general. That investigation found the state was "careless, cavalier, and in some circumstances dismissive of established" execution procedures.

After their numerous mistakes, Oklahoma won't be permitted to carry out executions any time soon. But, with Oklahoma's petition, supporters of the death penalty can show that they believe the death penalty is still constitutional.

Under the referendum, the legislature would be able to designate any method of execution not specifically prohibited by the US Constitution, and it would declare that the death penalty "shall not be deemed to be or constitute the infliction of cruel or unusual punishment under Oklahoma's Constitution," although Oklahoma's courts given no indication that they actually desire to do so.

Source: BuzzFeedNews, November 4, 2016

⚑ | Report an error, an omission; suggest a story or a new angle to an existing story; send a submission; recommend a resource; contact the webmaster, contact us: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com.

Opposed to Capital Punishment? Help us keep this blog up and running! DONATE!

Most Viewed (Last 7 Days)

New Hampshire: Death penalty repeal may be back on the table

Texas: Montgomery County DA asks governor to stay Anthony Shore's execution

Texas court halts execution to review claims that co-defendant lied at trial

Alabama executes Torrey Twane McNabb

The Execution Dock in London was used for more than 400 years to execute pirates, smugglers & mutineers

Hours before execution, Tourniquet Killer granted 90-day stay at DA's request

Texas Should Not Have Executed Robert Pruett

Ohio parole board rejects Alva Campbell's mercy request

Papua New Guinea: Death row inmates denied full protection of the law

More drug dealers to be shot dead: Indonesia's National Narcotics Agency chief