FEATURED POST

A Most American Terrorist: The Making of Dylann Roof

Image
“What are you?” a member of the Mother Emanuel AME Church in Charleston asked at the trial of the white man who killed eight of her fellow black parishioners and their pastor. “What kind of subhuman miscreant could commit such evil?... What happened to you, Dylann?”
Rachel Kaadzi Ghansah spent months in South Carolina searching for an answer to those questions—speaking with Roof’s mother, father, friends, former teachers, and victims’ family members, all in an effort to unlock what went into creating one of the coldest killers of our time.
Sitting beside the church, drinking from a bottle of Smirnoff Ice, he thought he had to go in and shoot them.
They were a small prayer group—a rising-star preacher, an elderly minister, eight women, one young man, and a little girl. But to him, they were a problem. He believed that, as black Americans, they were raping “our women and are taking over our country.” So he took out his Glock handgun and calmly, while their eyes were closed in prayer, ope…

Bahrain appeals court upholds death sentence for police killers

Bahrain
The Terror Crime Prosecution Chief Advocate General Ahmed Al Hammadi said the High Court of Appeals today upheld death and lifetime sentences pronounced by a lower court against defendants for killing 3 officers.

The defendants were found guilty of placing an explosive device to target police forces in the Northern Area on March 3, 2014, that killed first-lieutenant Tariq Mohammed Al Shehi and policemen Mohammed Raslan and Ammar Abdou Ali Mohammed.

The court ruled the execution of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th suspects and a life in jail term for the 1st suspect and the 5th to the 10th suspects.

The court also revoked the citizenship of the 1st 8 suspects, and ordered all suspects to re-pay collectively for the damage incurred from the incident.

The suspects had lured the police forces to the location of the blast through rioting that necessitated the intervention of the public order servicemen.

The suspects detonated the device as the police force arrived, resulting in the death of three officers and the injuries of 13 others.

Investigations carried out by the public prosecution indicated that the first and second suspects had formed a terror group as part of the so-called Saraya Al Ashtar terrorist organisation.

They succeeded in recruiting the other suspects who had experience in making and using explosives and in acts of rioting with the purpose of forming groups that undertake terror attacks against policemen, destruction of vital security installations to undermine public order and to prevent the authorities from carrying out their work.

The suspects made several explosive packages and held several meetings during which they prepared their criminal plot to achieve the goals and purposes of the group.

As part of their terror plot, they agreed to use a funeral procession and laid explosives attached to remote detonation devices in different locations where in they knew the forces would gather to maintain public order. They lured the forces to the locations of the explosives with the purpose of causing the biggest number of causalities among them.

The suspects during the previous night placed 3 explosives on the road and tasked the 4th suspect to detonate the 1st which killed the 3 policemen. They assigned other members of the group who are still at large to detonate the 2nd and 3rd under the supervision of the 3rd suspect while the 5th suspect would photograph the location and the rest of suspects would monitor the situation. On March 3, 2014, they faked the rioting to lure the police forces to the location. The 4th suspect followed the police arrival from the top of a building and as soon as the servicemen arrived he detonated the explosive using a mobile phone.

The suspects could not detonate the 2 other explosives as the 2nd package was affected by the 1st blast and since none of the policemen has approached the location of the 3rd explosive.

The prosecution referred the 8 suspects, 3 in absentia, to the 4th High Criminal Court.

The case was deliberated during the sessions of the Criminal Court which listened to their defence arguments. The court enabled them to present all aspects of their defence arguments.

The court listened to the Public Prosecution's argument in conclusion of which it demanded the maximum penalty be meted out on the suspects. The court issued its sentence after it found the suspects guilty.

The court relied in its verdict on the firm evidence presented by the Public Prosecution that the suspects had committed the crimes ascribed to them, including reliance on witnesses' testimonies, seized materials and tools used in making the explosives found in possession of the suspects, including evidence of communications found in the phone of 1 of the suspects on the day of the incident.

The court also relied on technical reports including traces of human cells of one of the suspect on the explosives placed on the location of the crime.

Under Bahrain's law, the case can be taken to the Cassation Court for the ultimate ruling.

Source: Bahrain News Agency, May 31, 2016

- Report an error, an omission: deathpenaltynews@gmail.com - Follow us on Facebook and Twitter

Most Viewed (Last 7 Days)

Marcellus Williams faces execution in Missouri despite doubts about conviction

Georgia executes Emmanuel Hammond

Vietnam upholds death sentences against shipping execs in major corruption case

As Sammantha Allen Heads for Death Row, Will Arizona Execute a Woman Again?

Damien Echols says he suffered brain injuries on death row, his wife calls for end to executions

France condemns Iran execution of juvenile offender Alireza Tajiki

Florida set to conduct its first execution in a year and a half

Missouri governor stays execution of Marcellus Williams after attorneys say DNA evidence exonerates him

Most American Indian tribes opt out of federal death penalty

Malaysia postpones execution of Filipino on death row